Imminent Alien Disclosure?

[Liliea]

I think this info fits into this context because it repeats the methodology they are using with respect to the ‘UFO measuring’ phenomenon and how governments, in this case the French government, cover them up.

Plane been making strange zigzags in the skies over the Pyrénées-Orientales​

On Thursday, January 9, some residents in the area of Perpignan and the Roussillon plain between France and Catalonia, captured on video a “luminous ball” that crossed the sky for almost a minute,

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

Following this, aircraft have been seen mapping the area with methodical precision in night flight, which has raised many questions, reportedly with a very specific mission: to conduct thermographic studies to identify thermal losses of public buildings.
These low altitude “sweep” overflights allow very high resolution photos to be taken and precise topographic and geographic data to be collected.

The Akapparatus was flying low altitude, sometimes less than 400 meters.
An aircraft used to map territories
This aircraft is a Piper PA-31-350. It left Beziers (Herault) at 19h and made strange back and forth in the sky until 23:30. TheAkapparatus then returned to its starting point.
Registered F-HODB, thearaircraft belongs to the company PixAir Survey. The latter has been conducting mapping and monitoring missions in France and worldwide for about ten years. It is based in Boos (Seine-Maritime), near Rouen.
In 2022, our colleagues at 76Actualidad had already evoked one of these operations in Le Havre (Seine-Maritime).

Other overflights could take place
The mission carried out this Monday consisted in photographing the part of the department of thatya: the south of the Roussillon plain and the Vermeille coast. Communes such as Corneilla-del-Vercol, Axis, Saint-André, Argeles-sur-Mer, Collioure, Port-Vendres or still Cerberus were overflown.
Ddafter Le Petit Port-Vendrais, “ other similar flights could still take place in the next few days ”.

Pourquoi un avion a fait d'étranges zigzags dans le ciel des Pyrénées-Orientales ?
Pourquoi un avion a-t-il fait de mystérieux allers-retours dans le ciel du Havre et de son agglo ?

 

[Valeera]

I would like to gather video materials from whistleblowers who have been popping up like mushrooms lately. The current that is pushing the truth to the surface is strong. Whether someone is consciously letting them do this to carry out a fake invasion or something similar is hard to say at this moment from my perspective. Here is a list of what I wanted to post here and hear your opinion on:

Luis Elizondo:

David Grush:

Jacob Barber:

This show of Steven Greer's contains 3 whistleblowers.

Battle For Disclosure (2024) (Hardcoded Subtitle).mp4

drive.google.com

Here is Bob Lazar's appearance on Joe Rogan's show.

Steven Greer's opinion on the topic of UFOs recently across the United States.

Is Steven Greer mentioned in any transcripts and why does he always think that all kinds of extraterrestrials are good for humans? At first, I thought he was inserted to spread disinformation and stir the pot, but maybe he just truly believes all of this.

If this has been discussed anywhere on the forum, please transfer me there :) Thank you!

​

 

[Niall]

I would like to gather video materials from whistleblowers who have been popping up like mushrooms lately. The current that is pushing the truth to the surface is strong. Whether someone is consciously letting them do this to carry out a fake invasion or something similar is hard to say at this moment from my perspective. Here is a list of what I wanted to post here and hear your opinion on:

Hello, I know it's a big ask but if you read through this thread of 96 pages, you'll see it contains discussions of all those whistleblowers, including Greer. And, because it is somewhat unique - at least in terms of its 'intensity', and the publicity it received - there's another thread here on the 'New Jersey drones'. And no, I don't think Greer is specifically named in any of the transcripts. That may just simply be because, to us, he's so transparently wrong on so much of the topic that we've never felt the need to ask about him.

 

[Niall]

A Republican congressman, Tim Burchett again, casually discussing the presence of alien bases underwater - and their having come here from light years away - with recently-hired One America News anchor, Matt Gaetz.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1882261986831978911

Does this count as 'disclosure'?!

 

[Joe]

Does this count as 'disclosure'?!

At this point it's pretty clear that disclosure is a process of drip feeding information into the public sphere in order to slowly, very slowly, acclimatize the population to the 'reality' of some kind of NHI. So no one event or statement can ever be called "disclosure".

We should also remember that most of this information is NOT reaching the average person, except indirectly, perhaps even by something akin to the "collective unconscious".

 

[SOTTREADER]

Most of the good alien movies could be called a "first contact" sub-genre, and the aliens are portrayed as either good or inscrutable (but not explicitly bad). That started with The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951). Others: It Came from Outer Space, This Island Earth, Moon Pilot, 2001, Close Encounters, Escape to Witch Mountain, ET, Starman, Brother from Another Planet, Cocoon, Flight of the Navigator, Batteries Not Included, The Abyss, Contact, Coneheads, Third Rock from the Sun, Super 8, Paul, and more in recent years.

Two that have stood out to me recently:

Arrival - I'm sure everyone has seen this. If you haven't, you should!

Midnight special - not necessarily "invasion" more along the lines of first contact.

 

[SOTTREADER]

We should also remember that most of this information is NOT reaching the average person, except indirectly, perhaps even by something akin to the "collective unconscious".

Yup, none of this information is reaching the average person. Most ppl around me only remain concerned about day-to-day life, and pursuing things to improve their own individual lives and live as society says. Very few are concerned about any of these other stuff or care much about it.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Barber's full interview is up. I'm half way through, and it's much better watching it unedited like this. You get an idea of the limits of his knowledge - e.g. there are certain things he just doesn't know, or wasn't told, so he is left to come to his own conclusions on certain things. It's also an interesting look into the world of "non-official cover," front companies, etc.

His colleague Fred Baker's will go live tonight:

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Tim Alberino gives his Christian interpretation of Barber's claims. (He also interviewed Elizondo recently, sharing his views that the Grays are evil.)

He makes some good points, re: the emotion of the experience, pointing out the obvious: you cannot judge the intentions of another being based on the feelings they produce in you.

Now, in the full interview, Barber makes it clear that he doesn't even know if the craft was occupied. It may not have been. So here what I think the options might be in this case (broadly speaking - I can think of several more variations):

1) He encountered a negative entity that made him feel these emotions.
2) He encountered a positive entity that made him feel these emotions.
3) His proximity to the craft simply opened up his higher emotional center, and the emotions were a secondary effect not directly tied to the craft or its "pilots."

I lean towards option #1. He says repeatedly that the connection he felt is still with him, that he feels the NHI themselves want "disclosure," and that he and his team will facilitate this.

If that happens, I hope Trump will establish a UAP czar (the rumor in the UFO community is that this is a very real possibility), and that he puts someone like Grusch or Elizondo in charge. Barber sounds like he is being used by beings for purposes he does not fully understand. Guys like Grusch and Elizondo seem to have enough objectivity to be cautious about NHI intentions.

Alberino also throws out some interesting speculation on the Nordics: that they are "angels" of the bible (good and bad), or that they are a human antediluvian race that either survived underground or went off-planet. He shares stories he's heard from the villagers of the Andes mountains who describe Nordics arriving in flying saucers, healing the sick, and taking off. He points out that it can be difficult to tell whether an angel or Nordic is good or bad, thus the biblical advice to "test the spirits."

 

[Valeera]

Zdravo, znam da je to veliko pitanje, ali ako pročitate ovu temu od 96 stranica, vidjet ćete da sadrži rasprave o svim tim uzbunjivačima, uključujući Greer. I, budući da je donekle jedinstven - barem u smislu svog 'intenziteta' i publiciteta koji je dobio - ovdje postoji još jedna tema o 'dronovi iz New Jerseya'. I ne, mislim da Greer nije posebno imenovan ni u jednom transkriptu. To bi moglo biti jednostavno zato što, za nas, on toliko očito nije u pravu u vezi s tolikom temom da nikada nismo osjetili potrebu da pitamo o njemu.

Hello, I know it's a big ask but if you read through this thread of 96 pages, you'll see it contains discussions of all those whistleblowers, including Greer. And, because it is somewhat unique - at least in terms of its 'intensity', and the publicity it received - there's another thread here on the 'New Jersey drones'. And no, I don't think Greer is specifically named in any of the transcripts. That may just simply be because, to us, he's so transparently wrong on so much of the topic that we've never felt the need to ask about him.

I couldn't manage to read everything that evening when I decided to join; it's incredible how many topics are covered here, I didn't even suspect it :). Thank you so much for such a clear and precise statement.

 

[Windmill knight]

Barber sounds like he is being used by beings for purposes he does not fully understand. Guys like Grusch and Elizondo seem to have enough objectivity to be cautious about NHI intentions.

Agreed. I listened to the extended interview and I believe Barber is sincere - that is, he believes what he is saying and as far as he knows, the facts he presents are correct. But clearly, he leans towards aliens being angelic and knows nothing of evil aliens. He even had praise for Greer and his CE-5 attempts to contact them! Also, he thinks that the military get such a bad rep that they don't deserve, that generally military types love their country and that's why they do what they do.

Btw, I've always thought Greer is mind-controlled or brainwashed for the role he's been playing. Who the mind-controller is, I don't know, but my bet is 4D STS. (I can't stand him).

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Agreed. I listened to the extended interview and I believe Barber is sincere - that is, he believes what he is saying and as far as he knows, the facts he presents are correct.

Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if practically all of the events he related were factually true. It's his interpretations I don't trust.

But clearly, he leans towards aliens being angelic and knows nothing of evil aliens. He even had praise for Greer and his CE-5 attempts to contact them!

Technically, I agreed with him on that. Some people rag on Greer because they think CE-5 doesn't work. For me, yes, of course it works. The beings just aren't what Greer thinks they are. He's basically a traitor to the human race, in my opinion.

Also, he thinks that the military get such a bad rep that they don't deserve, that generally military types love their country and that's why they do what they do.

I think that is generally true, so no disagreement from me there.

Btw, I've always thought Greer is mind-controlled or brainwashed for the role he's been playing. Who the mind-controller is, I don't know, but my bet is 4D STS. (I can't stand him).

Same here. He's actually done a lot of good work as part of the Disclosure Project. As an example: getting Donna Ware's testimony, without which Gary McKinnon would never have found those UFO pictures on NASA's computers. But his interpretations of the phenomenon are completely backwards. I can't stand him for that reason, either.

 

[Wandering Star]

Btw, I've always thought Greer is mind-controlled or brainwashed for the role he's been playing. Who the mind-controller is, I don't know, but my bet is 4D STS. (I can't stand him).

I would even go further.

It is already installed in his body.

 

[SasaM]

I would even go further.

It is already installed in his body.

That would be sort of illogical, IMO.

The probability of higherdimensional STS being, of who knows how many orders of magnitude larger intelligence than usual 3D person or an OP, leaving its natural environment and abilities therein to be confined in a limited lower density physical body is practically null. At least until that body has reached the 4D level when the usual limitations of our everyday world and reality would no longer apply.

Besides, what would be the purpose to install itself in the body of someone who's consciousness is rather easily controlled by mere simple thoughts, and face a potential degaussing because of possible backlash due to actions of that body in 3D environment?

 

[Ennio]

Some people rag on Greer because they think CE-5 doesn't work. For me, yes, of course it works. The beings just aren't what Greer thinks they are. He's basically a traitor to the human race, in my opinion.

Listened to a talk some time ago by an individual who accompanied Steven Greer on one of his CE-5 outings. According to this man who went, he did in fact "make contact" with a being that, he said, came into semi-close proximity after whatever protocols Greer instructed his group of contacters to do.

The speaker at the talk got very emotional at one point in the telling because apparently the being asked this guy, telepathically, to please not injure it. This, to the speaker's mind, was a sure sign that the being felt vulnerable in the presence of a potentially violent human, "came in peace," and was therefore benevolent - supporting Greer's contention (and overall message) that the ET's are "good", and whatever trauma's been experienced in an abduction scenario for instance, is merely misunderstood.

Now, is it possible that the being in question (if the story is even true!) was indeed well-intended? I suppose. After all, there is probably a small percentage of individuals or "experiencers" who have come in contact with STO ET's. But given the thrust of Greer's agenda, it just seems to me that this "kindly" being discussed in the talk could have just as easily been a shill and arranged to meet with the contacter - to further bolster the perception in the UFO community that all or most aliens were ok and harmless.

Having said that, I'm now wondering what overall percentage of ET-human close encounters have been/are (from an STO value system and perspective) of a positive orientation? There have to have been at least a few I think.

He's actually done a lot of good work as part of the Disclosure Project. As an example: getting Donna Ware's testimony, without which Gary McKinnon would never have found those UFO pictures on NASA's computers. But his interpretations of the phenomenon are completely backwards. I can't stand him for that reason, either.

Greer's getting dozens of credible witnesses to give public testimonies over the years was, and is, his big hook imo. His large following, and folks absorbing his interpretations - comes from his successful efforts to make the subject real to many for the first time; like a 'limited hangout'.