I understood as he was opposing against an Israel attack, the events took place on the same Thursday that Trump announced -via Levitt-that he would take two weeks off or less to make a decision. In fact, DJ Vance was in favor to bomb Iran with not "little weak bombing rounds". According to the video, to which implications seem accurate to me, Zionists and Technocrats are in cahoots.Since JD Vance was opposed to the US attack, this does seem to suggest that the Zionists and Technocrats are not exactly working together.
I'm not sure about that, yet.There is no sign that Trump is aware of the Technocrat plan for a digital slavery system yet, so I wonder if it was really just Musk acting erratically that caused this apparent split.
Maybe they can be shipped back to the Us , and make use of the reported fema camps built there. (as prisons)
I hear Ukraine has a lot of empty homes vacated from their residents being sent to the front line. Ukraine is in need of new canon fodder :)Maybe they can be shipped back to the Us , and make use of the reported fema camps built there. (as prisons)
It would be interesting if you could provide a source for your information. Is it reality or just click bait Ah! I see the name Turner...The Turner Net Work Channel....Hal Turner is reporting the Iranian President just resigned. I cannot see reported anywhere else yet, but if true, it probably means Iran will be substantially responding to Trump and will not be taking the path of de-escalation. I.e. Time to throw down with Israel and the US. FLASH: PRESIDENT OF IRAN RESIGNS ! ! ! !
Hal Turner's website. That should be an internal link to halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news-selections/world-news/flash-president-of-iran-resigns which I assume the forum pulled up the meta tag as a link automatically (I just pasted the link, pasted the text this time). Hal does not do a good job of vetting his stuff, so he is not exactly reliable (thus the comment on not getting verification elsewhere). But he does have contacts and at times does in fact get things ahead of times a good amount of time. His vetting sucks though and he puts up obvious fake info sometimes.It would be interesting if you could provide a source for your information. Is it reality or just click bait Ah! I see the name Turner...The Turner Net Work Channel....
JD Vance has been certainly contradictory in his stance on attacking Iran. What he said publicly in that video a while back ("If you punch Iran, you punch hard and that leads to peace") contradicts what is reported in Israel about his and Trump's phone conversation with Netanyahu just a day or two ago:I understood as he was opposing against an Israel attack, the events took place on the same Thursday that Trump announced -via Levitt-that he would take two weeks off or less to make a decision. In fact, DJ Vance was in favor to bomb Iran with not "little weak bombing rounds". According to the video, to which implications seem accurate to me, Zionists and Technocrats are in cahoots.
The two sources familiar with the matter say Israel has communicated its concerns to Trump administration officials on Thursday in what they described as a tense phone call. [...]
During the call, Vice President JD Vance pushed back, saying the United States shouldn’t be directly involved and suggesting that the Israelis were going to drag the country into war, say the sources.
I am sure he said 19 missiles.He relates in early in the morning Jordanian time, in the air he counted 90 missiles heading toward Israel.
I noticed JD's expression while Trump was doing his 'victory speech' about the three targets. He looked unhappy - to me it felt like disapproval, discomfort, deep concern. Did not feel to me that he was aligned with what was being said or just the situation in general.If Zionists and Technocrats were truly in cahoots. JD Vance would be pushing for what the Zionists want, instead of doing the opposite.
Nop, Trump-"Israel official,s including Netanyahu" phone call-according to the article- was the same day Trump announced the two weeks decision - via Levitt - on Thursday, June 19th. ...The article, on the other hand, was published on Saturday June 21st. (Updated to today)JD Vance has been certainly contradictory in his stance on attacking Iran. What he said publicly in that video a while back ("If you punch Iran, you punch hard and that leads to peace") contradicts what is reported in Israel about his and Trump's phone conversation with Netanyahu just a day or two ago:
US is already directly in a war, the "punch hard", in my opinion was not hard enough in the damage sense, it is hard enough in the implications and/or repercussions of their (US) decision.Vice President JD Vance pushed back, saying the United States shouldn’t be directly involved and suggesting that the Israelis were going to drag the country into war
00:58 GMT Yemen’s Houthi official Mohamed al-Farah has announced that the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites is “not the end of the war, but the beginning,” warning, “The time of hit and run is gone.”
The group had earlier threatened to target US ships if Washington joined Israel’s campaign.