Near-Earth objects and close calls

Asteroid 2024 YR4 had a 3% chance of colliding with Earth; now the odds have since risen to 4.3%, according to data from the James Webb space telescope.
If it crashes into the moon, it could send meteor shower towards Earth.

Giant asteroid could crash into moon in 2032, firing debris towards Earth​

Researchers say satellites may be at risk and impact could create a spectacular meteor shower in the skies

Oliver Holmes
Mon 23 Jun 2025 13.03 EDT


If a giant asteroid smashes into the moon in 2032 it could send lunar debris hurtling towards Earth, researchers have said, posing a risk to satellites but also creating a rare and spectacularly vivid meteor shower visible in the skies.

Asteroid 2024 YR4 triggered a planetary defence response earlier this year after telescope observations revealed the “city killer” had a 3% chance of colliding with Earth.

Later observations found the likelihood of the asteroid, estimated at about 53-67 metres (174-220ft) wide, hitting the Earth was negligibly low at 0.0017% – although the moon would still be under threat.

The odds of the space rock hitting Earth’s nearest neighbour have since risen to 4.3%, according to data from the James Webb space telescope.

A study released this month by researchers from Canadian universities, which has not been peer reviewed, has mapped out how the asteroid’s impact on the moon may shear off rocks that could head for Earth.

Researchers simulated how the impact could create a roughly 1km-diameter crater in the moon’s surface and launch millions of kilograms of debris out of the moon’s orbit and towards Earth, where it would arrive days later.


“If 2024 YR4 strikes the moon in 2032, it will (statistically speaking) be the largest impact in approximately 5,000 years,” the report said. “The resulting meteor shower at Earth could be eye-catching.”

While many of the millimetre- to centimetre-sized lunar rocks would burn up in Earth’s atmosphere and present no threat to humans, some material could be captured in Earth’s orbit, presenting a hazard to satellites, spacecraft and astronauts.

The study’s lead author, Dr Paul Wiegert of the University of Western Ontario, told Agence France-Presse that the impact on the moon’s surface would be “comparable to a large nuclear explosion in terms of the amount of energy released”.

“A centimetre-sized rock travelling at tens of thousands of metres per second is a lot like a bullet,” he added.

The findings showed that “planetary defence considerations” should be extended to cover threats to areas far away from near-Earth space, the study said.

Nasa and other national space agencies have long tracked asteroids and comets that could threaten the planet – and are working on ways to deal with a possible collision – but the moon is of secondary concern.

Joy and jubilation as Nasa crashes spacecraft into an asteroid in 'planetary defence test' – video

1:02

Joy and jubilation as Nasa crashes spacecraft into an asteroid in 'planetary defence test' – video
In 2022, Nasa conducted a test to divert an asteroid when it smashed its Double Asteroid Redirection Test (Dart) spacecraft into one named Dimorphos, successfully altering its orbit trajectory. The mission was seen as a test run for future celestial bodies that may be on a course for Earth.

Asteroid 2024 YR4, which orbits the sun, is now too far away to be properly observed and is not expected to be visible again until 2028, when researchers can reassess its size and trajectory.

Despite earlier concerns that an impact with the moon might alter its orbit around Earth, Nasa ruled out that scenario in April when it reassessed its size.

Agence France-Presse contributed to this report
 
Inbound object a possible origin from outside solar system. Much larger than Oumuamua or Borisov.

For only the 3rd time in history, astronomers might have just identified an interstellar object hurtling through our solar system. The newly discovered space rock, currently named A11pl3Z, could be as large as 12 miles (20 km) in diameter. And it’s soaring toward the sun on a trajectory that suggests it originated outside our solar system.
1751469943159.png
 
In this SOTT article: Meteor fireball seen flying across the skies over Sweden and Finland on July 1


It appears to me as if in the 6th second it makes a turn to the right and then to the left. It is probably just an illusion of sorts, but would it be possible to experience a straight move as curved or the other way around?

Regarding straight and curved, there was the following about what might happen when 4th and 3rd density begin to merge.

Session 4 November 1995
A: OK, time for us to teach patience. We are going to illuminate you! Why do you suppose there are roads around Dulce NM where people have become confused when traveling on them? Because the 4th density vibrational frequency emanating from the nearby base more and more frequently resonates on surface.

Q: (L) OK, continue.

A: Then going to 4th density: road seems straight as seen in 4th density, when curved in 3rd.


Q: (J) It seems straight when seen in 4th, but it's actually curved in 3rd? (SV) In other words, accidents! (J) It changes configuration from 3rd to 4th! (T) When people drive those roads out there, as the fourth density seeps out through, and is seeping out farther and farther, they become confused because they're moving between 3rd and 4th. As the road curves in 3rd, and the car, which is in 3rd, should be curving with the road, the driver sees the road as straight, and drives off the road, because he's confused by what he sees.

A: Exactly.

Q: (J) It's all about perception! (T) Now, we're back to perception of reality!

A: In 4th, you see full circle from any vantage point.

Q: (L) We talked about that before. (T) So the road looks straight, because you're seeing it from all angles, therefore, instead of it being curved on one, you're seeing it every way, so the road is now straight. But, it's not really straight in 3rd, and you drive off the road. (L) OK, continue on with what you were saying...

A: The entire New Mexico region is on verge of moving to 4th density permanently!

Q: (L) OK...

A: Because of the bases.

Q: (L) So, in other words, the rumors of the bases being moved, being filtered down from other densities, through some of the distorted channels, is in essence, somewhat correct... (J) Because they need to have the base in third density! (L) Only, they're not moving them to Paris, Washington or Buenos Aires, they're moving to 4th density.

A: Close but the bases are already there, pity the host regions. Why do you think there is so much activity seen there!

Q: (L) Does this mean that when that whole region goes to 4th density, that it's going to, for all intents and purposes, disappear from 3rd?

A: No.

Q: (T) OK, answer your earlier question, then. Why is there so much UFO activity there? Tell me.

A: Bleed through.

Q: (L) So they're flying around in 4th density... (T)...and they're showing up here in 3rd because...

A: Wait 'til shift is complete.

Q: (L) Do you mean the shift of New Mexico? Or the total shift? (T) I think they're making the sarcastic statement: "Wait till shift is complete... We ain't seen nuthin yet!!" We're just beginning to.

A: Yes.

Q: (T) Now, this opens up some questions. First question. You made the statement "But the bases are in 4th density." What happens when the 3rd density base, which is vibrating itself into 4th density, runs into the 4th density base that's already there?

A: Merge.

Q: (T) They become one base?

A: They already are.

Q: (T) What do you mean by "They will merge?"

A: To same density.
If a fireball moved in 4th Density, how might it be perceived from 3rd Density, if there was a bleed through?
 
thorbiorn:
If a fireball moved in 4th Density, how might it be perceived from 3rd Density, if there was a bleed through?

One thing to consider might be the time factor. What we see as one or two of these a day in different locales might all be more or less simultaneous in 4D? The old saying might apply: "time is what keeps everything from happening at once." Also, the number that get filmed and reported is only a fraction of likely occurrences planet wide.
 
Inbound object a possible origin from outside solar system. Much larger than Oumuamua or Borisov.
It was also reported in the dedicated thread :
 
Meteor-like object observed from the Marmara and Black Sea regions of Turkey on July 6th.

gokyuzunde-gizemli-cisim-bircok-sehirde-goruldu-3232382.webp

According to various Turkish news outlets, a mysterious object was observed in the sky from various cities on the Black Sea shore of Turkey from Sakarya to Ordu on the night of July 6th at about 21:40 (local time).

[youtube]

[youtube]

It could also be a kind of missile but I believe a meteor is more likely?

Later, some news sites claimed that the object was learned to be a flare fired from a ship, but this doesn't sound realistic.

I'm not sure why the pictures above are much brighter and more clear than the images in the videos. Maybe the pictures were digitally enhanced.
 
Strange light in the sky seen over large swathes of the Middle East. From Turkey to Syria and Iraq
Grok says:
This strange light likely stems from Iran's suborbital test of the Qased satellite rocket on July 23, 2025. The launch's exhaust plume was visible across Turkey, Syria, and Iraq, appearing as a diffuse glow in the night sky. Not a meteor or UFO—confirmed by Newsweek and Iranian media.

Grok is probably referring to this article: Iran's rocket launch raises alarm

This comes almost exactly 2 months after that Lunar standstill spirals that were allegedly caused by Musk´s rocket.
 
Strange light in the sky seen over large swathes of the Middle East. From Turkey to Syria and Iraq
The portal located in the ME that has been discussed with the C's over the years comes to mind... Doesn't look exactly like when some kind of space rocket is fired, like the famous spiral one over Norway years back. Maybe it is man-made space related, but what can you trust out of gov't nowadays to actually give you a straight answer, let alone any answer unless it is forced upon them.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom