How do humans change the cycle for 1D and 2D?

You’re a troll, @bozadi. This thread has 14 pages and the majority of them are you just arguing with people, not listening to their feedback and not doing what is asked. At this point, I’m pretty sure you have some sort of character disorder.

I won’t be participating in this thread any more, or bringing any more metaphysical topics up as discussion threads. It’s like friends going to the park for a picnic and some psycho coming over and sitting next to us with a Bluetooth speaker playing death metal at full volume and refusing to turn it down.
Now, this is why I said the following:

Sometimes, in some certain discussions, I doubt that I'm in the Cassiopaean forum.
 
It's just that I'm yet to see things from our sources which obviously show that I'm wrong in my claim(s).
This is not to say that "I was never wrong". In the history of my participation in this forum, there were many cases I had to admit that I was wrong in some of my views or claims. What I meant in the above quote refers to those assertions of mine which became a hot topic in this specific thread.
 
Session 21 March 2015 said:
Q: (L) So, what is it that makes somebody weak?

A: Mostly ego.

Session 26 October 2015 said:
(Ennio) Getting back to knowledge and communication... Is there any particular area of knowledge that people should be focusing on?

A: Self knowledge and ones own weaknesses.

I know that the subject matters like those we've been discussing in this thread are not as important compared to "working on ourselves". And I think what is meant by "work on self" is explained in the above quotes in a nutshell.

During the recent hot discussions or arguments in this thread, there were most certainly ego-based problems, some of which is caused by my own ego. But I believe mine is not the only ego that has been causing problems. The reason I say these is not solely to claim or prove that "others are also guilty". I hope this to be an opportunity, another small step, to watch, analyze, and heal ego, both for me and others.
 
Last edited:
session-3-february-2001 said:
Q: (L) What was Frank upset about?

A: Ego.

Q: (L) Yes. It didn't show itself so clearly except when he was under hypnosis, and then his ego was just simply repellant. (J) Yes. (L) The whole attitude was that he was all-knowing and the rest of the world was just basically dirt.

A: No. Afraid.

Q: (T) Afraid of what?

A: Not being. Ego.

Q: (L) His ego was afraid of not being?

A: Yes.

Although the C's seems to talk specifically abut "Frank" in the above excerpt, I suppose that it might not be wrong to make a general inference like "Ego is afraid of not being". And I think what the C's call "ego" is almost synonymous with "STS". Then we might conclude that STS beings are "afraid of not being". But, ironically, increasing their STS polarity is exactly what gets them closer and closer to non-existence.

Our ego, that is, our fear of "not being", is probably a very big part of what the C's mean when they "Stop thinking 3D". We live in, and significantly identify with, physical bodies, have so many and so deep "desires and fears" about our physical life on earth. And what is called ego, or false self, most probably feeds on these endless earthly desires and fears.

The information offered in the Ra & Cassiopaean cosmology and in some others show the real nature of being, what we really are, and thus provides a significant catalyst for diminishing and, hopefully, getting gradually rid of our ego or false self, or materially based desires and fears, or STS nature (although I know that some part of our STS nature is very normal, not extremely problematic for 3D).
 
During the recent hot discussions or arguments in this thread, there were most certainly ego-based problems, some of which is caused by my own ego. But I believe mine is not the only ego that has been causing problems. The reason I say these is not solely to claim or prove that "others are also guilty". I hope this to be an opportunity, another small step, to watch, analyze, and heal ego, both for me and others.
This is called "deflecting". Saying that you have a problem, but look over there, they also have a problem. That's not Working on oneself. That's deflecting people's eyes to someone else in order to have people focus on someone else.

The information offered in the Ra & Cassiopaean cosmology and in some others show the real nature of being, what we really are, and thus provides a significant catalyst for diminishing and, hopefully, getting gradually rid of our ego or false self, or materially based desires and fears, or STS nature (although I know that some part of our STS nature is very normal, not extremely problematic for 3D).
One cannot do this if they are constantly deflecting and defending their own misconceptions. Maybe it would be a good idea for you to concentrate on the Work on yourself instead of disrupting threads and letting your ego run amok.
 
Thank for your feedback, Nienna.

This is called "deflecting". Saying that you have a problem, but look over there, they also have a problem. That's not Working on oneself. That's deflecting people's eyes to someone else in order to have people focus on someone else.
Right, I said "I have a problem, but look over there, they also have a problem". However, this is not what I wish the people here to keep their focus on.

One cannot do this if they are constantly deflecting and defending their own misconceptions. Maybe it would be a good idea for you to concentrate on the Work on yourself instead of disrupting threads and letting your ego run amok.
Can you please specifically mention my most obvious misconceptions as you see them, because that's what I've been trying to discuss. It has never been my intention to distort or consciously misinterpret the Ra-Cassiopaean cosmology. I've been trying to support my ideas with references to that cosmology.
 
I wish I could find the statement from Ra that talks about the depolarising effects in 4D when STS asks for something from STO, because sometimes choose to STO decline they lose some polarity -percentage, because they didn’t serve others, likewise STS lose some polarity because they couldn’t serve themself, then both have to go off and ‘regroup’ to in other areas to regain the polarity lost. I just don’t have the time (or willingness) to keep on looking for it.

This would mean though that polarity would be lost but not being or knowledge.

There doesn’t seem to be anything more I can add, just going around in circles at this point.
 
I wish I could find the statement from Ra that talks about the depolarising effects in 4D when STS asks for something from STO, because sometimes choose to STO decline they lose some polarity -percentage, because they didn’t serve others, likewise STS lose some polarity because they couldn’t serve themself, then both have to go off and ‘regroup’ to in other areas to regain the polarity lost. I just don’t have the time (or willingness) to keep on looking for it.

This would mean though that polarity would be lost but not being or knowledge.

There doesn’t seem to be anything more I can add, just going around in circles at this point.
I think the C's said something like that, maybe not only for 4D but in general, in the context of degaussing (demagnetizing), IRC.
 
Back
Top Bottom