How do humans change the cycle for 1D and 2D?

You’re a troll, @bozadi. This thread has 14 pages and the majority of them are you just arguing with people, not listening to their feedback and not doing what is asked. At this point, I’m pretty sure you have some sort of character disorder.

I won’t be participating in this thread any more, or bringing any more metaphysical topics up as discussion threads. It’s like friends going to the park for a picnic and some psycho coming over and sitting next to us with a Bluetooth speaker playing death metal at full volume and refusing to turn it down.
Now, this is why I said the following:

Sometimes, in some certain discussions, I doubt that I'm in the Cassiopaean forum.
 
It's just that I'm yet to see things from our sources which obviously show that I'm wrong in my claim(s).
This is not to say that "I was never wrong". In the history of my participation in this forum, there were many cases I had to admit that I was wrong in some of my views or claims. What I meant in the above quote refers to those assertions of mine which became a hot topic in this specific thread.
 
Session 21 March 2015 said:
Q: (L) So, what is it that makes somebody weak?

A: Mostly ego.

Session 26 October 2015 said:
(Ennio) Getting back to knowledge and communication... Is there any particular area of knowledge that people should be focusing on?

A: Self knowledge and ones own weaknesses.

I know that the subject matters like those we've been discussing in this thread are not as important compared to "working on ourselves". And I think what is meant by "work on self" is explained in the above quotes in a nutshell.

During the recent hot discussions or arguments in this thread, there were most certainly ego-based problems, some of which is caused by my own ego. But I believe mine is not the only ego that has been causing problems. The reason I say these is not solely to claim or prove that "others are also guilty". I hope this to be an opportunity, another small step, to watch, analyze, and heal ego, both for me and others.
 
Last edited:
session-3-february-2001 said:
Q: (L) What was Frank upset about?

A: Ego.

Q: (L) Yes. It didn't show itself so clearly except when he was under hypnosis, and then his ego was just simply repellant. (J) Yes. (L) The whole attitude was that he was all-knowing and the rest of the world was just basically dirt.

A: No. Afraid.

Q: (T) Afraid of what?

A: Not being. Ego.

Q: (L) His ego was afraid of not being?

A: Yes.

Although the C's seems to talk specifically abut "Frank" in the above excerpt, I suppose that it might not be wrong to make a general inference like "Ego is afraid of not being". And I think what the C's call "ego" is almost synonymous with "STS". Then we might conclude that STS beings are "afraid of not being". But, ironically, increasing their STS polarity is exactly what gets them closer and closer to non-existence.

Our ego, that is, our fear of "not being", is probably a very big part of what the C's mean when they "Stop thinking 3D". We live in, and significantly identify with, physical bodies, have so many and so deep "desires and fears" about our physical life on earth. And what is called ego, or false self, most probably feeds on these endless earthly desires and fears.

The information offered in the Ra & Cassiopaean cosmology and in some others show the real nature of being, what we really are, and thus provides a significant catalyst for diminishing and, hopefully, getting gradually rid of our ego or false self, or materially based desires and fears, or STS nature (although I know that some part of our STS nature is very normal, not extremely problematic for 3D).
 
During the recent hot discussions or arguments in this thread, there were most certainly ego-based problems, some of which is caused by my own ego. But I believe mine is not the only ego that has been causing problems. The reason I say these is not solely to claim or prove that "others are also guilty". I hope this to be an opportunity, another small step, to watch, analyze, and heal ego, both for me and others.
This is called "deflecting". Saying that you have a problem, but look over there, they also have a problem. That's not Working on oneself. That's deflecting people's eyes to someone else in order to have people focus on someone else.

The information offered in the Ra & Cassiopaean cosmology and in some others show the real nature of being, what we really are, and thus provides a significant catalyst for diminishing and, hopefully, getting gradually rid of our ego or false self, or materially based desires and fears, or STS nature (although I know that some part of our STS nature is very normal, not extremely problematic for 3D).
One cannot do this if they are constantly deflecting and defending their own misconceptions. Maybe it would be a good idea for you to concentrate on the Work on yourself instead of disrupting threads and letting your ego run amok.
 
Thank for your feedback, Nienna.

This is called "deflecting". Saying that you have a problem, but look over there, they also have a problem. That's not Working on oneself. That's deflecting people's eyes to someone else in order to have people focus on someone else.
Right, I said "I have a problem, but look over there, they also have a problem". However, this is not what I wish the people here to keep their focus on.

One cannot do this if they are constantly deflecting and defending their own misconceptions. Maybe it would be a good idea for you to concentrate on the Work on yourself instead of disrupting threads and letting your ego run amok.
Can you please specifically mention my most obvious misconceptions as you see them, because that's what I've been trying to discuss. It has never been my intention to distort or consciously misinterpret the Ra-Cassiopaean cosmology. I've been trying to support my ideas with references to that cosmology.
 
I wish I could find the statement from Ra that talks about the depolarising effects in 4D when STS asks for something from STO, because sometimes choose to STO decline they lose some polarity -percentage, because they didn’t serve others, likewise STS lose some polarity because they couldn’t serve themself, then both have to go off and ‘regroup’ to in other areas to regain the polarity lost. I just don’t have the time (or willingness) to keep on looking for it.

This would mean though that polarity would be lost but not being or knowledge.

There doesn’t seem to be anything more I can add, just going around in circles at this point.
 
I wish I could find the statement from Ra that talks about the depolarising effects in 4D when STS asks for something from STO, because sometimes choose to STO decline they lose some polarity -percentage, because they didn’t serve others, likewise STS lose some polarity because they couldn’t serve themself, then both have to go off and ‘regroup’ to in other areas to regain the polarity lost. I just don’t have the time (or willingness) to keep on looking for it.

This would mean though that polarity would be lost but not being or knowledge.

There doesn’t seem to be anything more I can add, just going around in circles at this point.
I think the C's said something like that, maybe not only for 4D but in general, in the context of degaussing (demagnetizing), IRC.
 
I wish I could find the statement from Ra that talks about the depolarising effects in 4D when STS asks for something from STO, because sometimes choose to STO decline they lose some polarity -percentage, because they didn’t serve others, likewise STS lose some polarity because they couldn’t serve themself, then both have to go off and ‘regroup’ to in other areas to regain the polarity lost. I just don’t have the time (or willingness) to keep on looking for it.

This would mean though that polarity would be lost but not being or knowledge.

There doesn’t seem to be anything more I can add, just going around in circles at this point.

Session 25
February 16, 1981

QUESTIONER: You have spoken of an Orion Confederation and of a battle fought between the Confederation and the Orion Confederation.
Is it possible to convey some concept of how that battle is fought?

RA: I am Ra. Imagine, if you will, your mind. Imagine it in total unity with the other minds in your society. In that case, you have a single mind, and what is a weak electrical charge in your physical illusion now becomes an immensely powerful machine through which thoughts can be projected as objects.
In that struggle, the Orion group attacks the Confederation armed with light. The result is a stalemate, as you would call it, for both energies are somewhat depleted by the struggle and must regroup; the negative is depleted by its inability to manipulate, the positive is depleted by its inability to accept what is given.

QUESTIONER: Could you expand on what you mean by "inability to accept what is given"?

RA: I am Ra. At the level of time/space where this takes place in the form of what you might call "thought warfare," the most tolerant and loving energy would be to love those who wished to manipulate, to the point that those entities would be surrounded and enveloped, transformed by the positive energies.
However, as this is a battle between equals, the Confederation is aware that on equal footing, it cannot allow itself to be manipulated into remaining purely positive, for then, although pure, it would have no significance, having been placed under the control of the so-called powers of darkness, as you might say.
For that reason, those fighting in this thought warfare must be on the defensive, rather than willing to accept, in order to maintain their usefulness in service to others. Consequently, they cannot fully accept what the Orion Confederation wishes to give, which is slavery, and thus a certain polarity is lost due to this friction, and both factions, if you will, must regroup. This has not been beneficial to either side. The only useful consequence has been a balance of the energies available to this planet, such that those energies have less need to be balanced in this space/time, thus reducing the chances of planetary annihilation.
 
Session 25
February 16, 1981

QUESTIONER: You have spoken of an Orion Confederation and of a battle fought between the Confederation and the Orion Confederation.
Is it possible to convey some concept of how that battle is fought?

RA: I am Ra. Imagine, if you will, your mind. Imagine it in total unity with the other minds in your society. In that case, you have a single mind, and what is a weak electrical charge in your physical illusion now becomes an immensely powerful machine through which thoughts can be projected as objects.
In that struggle, the Orion group attacks the Confederation armed with light. The result is a stalemate, as you would call it, for both energies are somewhat depleted by the struggle and must regroup; the negative is depleted by its inability to manipulate, the positive is depleted by its inability to accept what is given.

QUESTIONER: Could you expand on what you mean by "inability to accept what is given"?

RA: I am Ra. At the level of time/space where this takes place in the form of what you might call "thought warfare," the most tolerant and loving energy would be to love those who wished to manipulate, to the point that those entities would be surrounded and enveloped, transformed by the positive energies.
However, as this is a battle between equals, the Confederation is aware that on equal footing, it cannot allow itself to be manipulated into remaining purely positive, for then, although pure, it would have no significance, having been placed under the control of the so-called powers of darkness, as you might say.
For that reason, those fighting in this thought warfare must be on the defensive, rather than willing to accept, in order to maintain their usefulness in service to others. Consequently, they cannot fully accept what the Orion Confederation wishes to give, which is slavery, and thus a certain polarity is lost due to this friction, and both factions, if you will, must regroup. This has not been beneficial to either side. The only useful consequence has been a balance of the energies available to this planet, such that those energies have less need to be balanced in this space/time, thus reducing the chances of planetary annihilation.
That’s the one. Thank you Wandering Star.
As we can see this has nothing to do with knowledge but a preservation of chosen polarity. Therefore knowledge and polarity aren’t congruent and can be independent of each other, meaning to be- 100% STO does not equate to union with The One.
 
I wish I could find the statement from Ra that talks about the depolarising effects in 4D when STS asks for something from STO, because sometimes choose to STO decline they lose some polarity -percentage, because they didn’t serve others, likewise STS lose some polarity because they couldn’t serve themself, then both have to go off and ‘regroup’ to in other areas to regain the polarity lost. I just don’t have the time (or willingness) to keep on looking for it.

This would mean though that polarity would be lost but not being or knowledge.

There doesn’t seem to be anything more I can add, just going around in circles at this point.

There's this from the C's:



August 17, 2024.
(seek10) One quick question, Laura. Is it the good guys in the Quorum who intervened?

A: Not the right concept.

Q: (Niall) Yeah. Remember the Quorum thinks in terms of... it's not good or bad per se, it's what will work. And remember they were thinking of resistance and balance as well. If they were going to off Trump, when there's so much support for him, at least some among them realize that's a breach, that's going too far.

(L) It's like Ra said, you know? If they go against the free will of humanity, STS gets degaussed.

(Joe) There's blowback.

(L) Yeah, serious blowback.
November 23, 2024
(Joe) The resistance that the quorum wanted. In the last session, they said that there was going to be a program change and that it turned out it was going to be the assassination of Trump and that program change needed to happen. This needed to happen because there wasn't enough resistance from the people to achieve balance.

(L) In other words, did it galvanize people?

A: Close.

Q: (Joe) So can resistance mean...

(L) Like resistance to a disease?

(Joe) Well, yeah, in a certain sense. We think of resistance as people on the streets shouting, "Down with this sort of thing!"

(L) Down with your side, down with my side.

(Joe) Is resistance also even more so like you said, awake people being aware, and resistance like an internal resistance?

A: The imbalance was so severe that the STS side risked a severe violation of free will at a level that would have resulted in necessary degaussing from natural factors of balance.

Q: (L) So they were too dirty and devious.

A: Yes.

I thought I'd read somewhere that when STO and STS battle both can be degaussed but I can't find the reference so maybe I'm misremembering.
 
There's this from the C's:



August 17, 2024.

November 23, 2024


I thought I'd read somewhere that when STO and STS battle both can be degaussed but I can't find the reference so maybe I'm misremembering.
Wandering Star quoted the Ra session about degaussing that I was thinking of.
It looks like we’ve taken that concept and used it in many discussions though it’s not something that the C’s have directly said, though alluding to on multiple occasions.

Session 25
February 16, 1981

QUESTIONER: You have spoken of an Orion Confederation and of a battle fought between the Confederation and the Orion Confederation.
Is it possible to convey some concept of how that battle is fought?

RA: I am Ra. Imagine, if you will, your mind. Imagine it in total unity with the other minds in your society. In that case, you have a single mind, and what is a weak electrical charge in your physical illusion now becomes an immensely powerful machine through which thoughts can be projected as objects.
In that struggle, the Orion group attacks the Confederation armed with light. The result is a stalemate, as you would call it, for both energies are somewhat depleted by the struggle and must regroup; the negative is depleted by its inability to manipulate, the positive is depleted by its inability to accept what is given.

QUESTIONER: Could you expand on what you mean by "inability to accept what is given"?

RA: I am Ra. At the level of time/space where this takes place in the form of what you might call "thought warfare," the most tolerant and loving energy would be to love those who wished to manipulate, to the point that those entities would be surrounded and enveloped, transformed by the positive energies.
However, as this is a battle between equals, the Confederation is aware that on equal footing, it cannot allow itself to be manipulated into remaining purely positive, for then, although pure, it would have no significance, having been placed under the control of the so-called powers of darkness, as you might say.
For that reason, those fighting in this thought warfare must be on the defensive, rather than willing to accept, in order to maintain their usefulness in service to others. Consequently, they cannot fully accept what the Orion Confederation wishes to give, which is slavery, and thus a certain polarity is lost due to this friction, and both factions, if you will, must regroup. This has not been beneficial to either side. The only useful consequence has been a balance of the energies available to this planet, such that those energies have less need to be balanced in this space/time, thus reducing the chances of planetary annihilation.
 
Ah. I missed that, apologies! Aaand that was the one I was thinking of too.
:-)
Gets me thinking how that might apply to 3DSTS beings attempting to increase their polarisation towards STO or ones that already have an STO profile. Would we be degaussed by rejecting things like vaccines, digital ID, propaganda, mind control techniques, and so on? If so how do we increase our polarisation, by serving others more? Or is it even relevant when knowledge and awareness protects?
 
Back
Top Bottom