Session 1 November 2025

More info from the Cs on those armbands as to their purpose or significance plus whether they are the source of the cathedral window rosette depictions would be an interesting line of inquiry.
Rossette depictions are examples of "frequency resonance vibration" in art:


There's a beautiful presentation by Rupert Sheldrake that makes the case of "frequency resonance vibration" as underlying morphogenetic fields.

He presents his research on vibratory patterns in water using concepts of analog computers which model processes by creating processes, which are actually easier to understand than digital computing where you need to be a computer expert.

Sheldrake explains how analog computing is better for true phenomena and processes involving waves. He modelled waves because he thinks that that is the underlying processes in morphogenesis in biology, chemistry molecules, crystals, etc. in what he calls morphogenetic fields.

They're basically vibratory fields of activity, wavelike and rhythmic. And the way to understand better patterns of vibration is through analog model systems.

After a few historical examples, he explains how Michal Faraday discovered that if you vibrate water, you get patterns or ripples on the surface. And if you add vertical walls to the container where the water is located, these ripples or patterns are reflected, giving standing wave patterns which are now called Faraday waves. The science of Faraday Wave phenomena, is also popularly known as cymatics.

Nowadays, you can study Faraday waves with a CymaScope developed by John Stuart Reid and available here. Other than water science, the CymaScope can be used to study blood, brain wave patterns, geology, music, etc.

It contains a coil that vibrates up and down, and there's a container where a small amount of fluid can be poured in. You can adjust the frequency and amplitude of the CymaScope, and these are some of the patterns obtained depending on the frequency and amplitude. It illustrates symmetry patterns and resonant frequencies:

brave_screenshot_www.youtube.com.png



Symmetrical patterns that you obtain from vibrating water, have distinct analogs in biological forms, like flowers, turtle shells, pollen grains, etc. You can find these patterns in art as well:

brave_screenshot_www.youtube.com (1).png

brave_screenshot_www.youtube.com (2).png

brave_screenshot_www.youtube.com (3).png

Paris_Cathédrale_Notre-Dame_Innen_Nördliche_Rosette_4.jpg



Sheldrake thinks morphogenetic fields are actually vibratory patterns, that the underlying morphogenetic process must depend on waves, wave patterns of some kind, possibly acoustic waves but more likely electrical wave patterns, within cell membranes. He thinks that body rhythms, like brainwaves, are best modeled by vibrating models such as the Cymascope.

Here's an example I obtained from the CymaScope website:

The CymaScope Pro instrument can make visible much of the electrical activity of the brain via recorded electroencephalograph signals. The frequency of such signals ranges from as low as 0.1Hz for the Delta range, and up to 40Hz for the Gamma range. The CymaScope bandwidth begins at 3Hz, which covers part of the Delta range, and can image all frequencies in the Theta range, Alpha range, Beta range and Gamma range.

new-web-site.jpg



If I had the time and energy, I could come up with a few experiments using the CymaScopePro.... :whistle:

And here are examples of analog liquid computers that they used in the 20th century, of which there are a few models in existence, the only thing that will keep working in case of an EMP catastrophe:

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/epdf/10.1098/rstb.2018.0372

en.wikipedia.org

Phillips Machine - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Here's Sheldrake's full presentation:
 
I've often wondered what the response would be from Egyptian Antiquities if they were told the Pyramids were actually just a bunch of big batteries? 😂😂😂 Still it would be nice to know how they actually worked. They probably wouldn't be too enthusiastic about a change to their narrative.

Here's a very interesting couple of papers that might describe how they work - apparently as functional resonant devices. I'm no physicist, so it's all above my paygrade and I can't verify, but it looks like a good theory:

 
Last edited:
Rossette depictions are examples of "frequency resonance vibration" in art:

Reading your post about the morphogenetic field reminded me of the representation of the chakras.

According to Wikipedia:

Sahasrara, according to the traditions of Tantrism, refers to the sahasrara chakra (in Sanskrit: सहस्रार चक्र, IAST: sahasrāra cakra, in English: 'the thousand-petaled lotus') or crown chakra[1][2] and is located at the crown of the head.[3

Ayyavali_Sahasrara.PNG



So maybe those bracelets improve the connection with the information field or something similar.

IMG_20251115_183722.png

In the center there is a small triangle drawn as in the representation of the crown chakra
 
Q: (A) Has it already come through the Oort Cloud and is now getting farther and farther away?

A: No.

Q:
(L) They said it had already passed through on its way IN.

A:
Yes.

Now we understand that it last close passage on it way in was during the maunder minimum. So maybe it will again be visible on it way out and in a second close passage to the solar system before getting farther and farther away as Ark said.
The Oort Cloud is very far away - starting at around 2000 AU, whereas Pluto is at 39 AU.

The C's said previously that the closest approach of the brown dwarf was close to the orbit of Pluto and in the current session they confirmed that this happened during the Maunder Minimum.

The brown dwarf has been on its way out for about 350 years now, but it will take many hundreds or even thousands of years more to reach the Oort Cloud again. Which is what the C's confirmed in the above quote, that it has not reached the Oort Cloud on its way out yet.

The next time it comes close to the inner solar system will be only in around 26-27 million years, according to the C's.

Calculations indicate that the brown dwarf is currently around 270-300 AU from the Sun in the Scattered Disc region of the Kuiper Belt, or already beyond it.

Its current location in Libra on the ecliptic plane is close to the direction of the galactic orbit of the Sun (it moves towards Hercules). This means that the companion probably already passed the heliopause as well, which is around 110-180 AU away in that direction and stretches at least 350 AU behind the Sun's movement around the galaxy.
 
So the twin sun was closest to us around 1700, or 325 year ago. If take average speed of 3I/ATLAS, 210000 km/h, and calculate how far was it 325 years ago, we get around 4000 AU. Inner Oort cloud (or Hills cloud) is believed to begin at 2000-5000 AU from Sun. Of course, this is an oversimplified calculation, but 3I/ATLAS can be our "local" rock thrown at us by the twin sun, not an interstellar object.
 
The Oort Cloud is very far away - starting at around 2000 AU, whereas Pluto is at 39 AU.
I remember something about Pluto's orbit being highly irregular and not like the other planets. It seems 39 AU is an average, but Pluto can range between 49.3 AU to 30 AU. Pluto even crosses paths with the orbit of Neptune, but due to something called "Orbital Resonance", is never going to colide with it.

I did wonder whether the Sun's dark companion interacted with any of the outer planets, (or even the inner planets). I suppose it must have done to cause something like the Maunder Minimum?

It seems there's a lot we don't know about our Solar System's electromagnetic "engine". Pluto seems such an odd little planet.... and it has been 'collecting moons' as well, just like the other outer gas giants. Apparently it now has 5 moons.

From here:

Orbit and Rotation​

Pluto's orbit around the Sun is unusual compared to the planets: it's both elliptical and tilted. Pluto's 248-year-long, oval-shaped orbit can take it as far as 49.3 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun, and as close as 30 AU. (One AU is the mean distance between Earth and the Sun: about 93 million miles or 150 million kilometers.) But on average, Pluto is 3.7 billion miles (5.9 billion kilometers) away from the Sun, or 39 AU.

From 1979 to 1999, Pluto was near perihelion, when it is closest to the Sun. During this time, Pluto was actually closer to the Sun than Neptune.

One day on Pluto takes about 153 hours. Its axis of rotation is tilted 57 degrees with respect to the plane of its orbit around the Sun, so it spins almost on its side. Pluto also exhibits a retrograde rotation; spinning from east to west like Venus and Uranus.

And an AI "overview":

AI Overview



CONFUSED : Pluto comes in the way of Neptune...... OR ...

Pluto's orbit is distinct from the other planets because it is highly elliptical (oval-shaped) and tilted at a significant angle to the solar system's plane. This makes its orbit eccentric, causing it to cross Neptune's orbital path for about 20 years at a time. However, Pluto and Neptune will not collide due to an orbital resonance; for every two orbits Pluto completes, Neptune completes three, which prevents them from ever occupying the same space at the same time.

Key differences in Pluto's orbit
  • Inclination: Pluto's orbit is tilted at about 17 degrees relative to the ecliptic, the plane in which the other planets orbit. This is the highest inclination of any planet in the solar system.
  • Eccentricity: Unlike the other planets' more circular orbits, Pluto's is highly eccentric, meaning it is more oval-shaped.
  • Orbital path: Due to its eccentricity, Pluto's distance from the Sun varies significantly, and for about 20 years of its 248-year orbit, it is closer to the Sun than Neptune is.
  • Orbital Resonance: Pluto is in a 2:3 mean-motion resonance with Neptune. This means that Pluto's orbit takes about 1.5 times longer than Neptune's. This orbital relationship keeps them from ever colliding, despite their paths crossing.
 
It seems Napoleon himself long believed he was sterile. Was he truly sterile? (And then Napoleon II and other children attributed to Napoleon are not his children.)
Is infertility one of the markers of "underground" members? Do they deliberately send "sterile" men/women to the surface so that they cannot leave their DNA (genetic line) and continue the family line?
Napoleon being sterile might be a rumor coming from Josephine.
Apparently Napoleon himself had many mistresses that he got pregnant (i didn't look deeply into it, though), which might indicate that either Josephine herself was sterile, or she didn't actually want to have a child with Napoleon so she was just gaslighting him into giving up.

Plus, why would "undergrounders" be intentionally made sterile? I imagine creating children, thus, prolonging the bloodline, would be one of the goals of putting these people here.

Think about it - an entire bloodline of people at your disposal! People you can pick at any point in time, make them do whatever you want, and affect the course of history.
People you specifically prepared to function as empty vessels for you and your kind to enter them at will, so you can live a life of pleasure and luxury!

Well the jury is out on Sir Francis Bacon. Was he a force for good (STO) or an agent, whether witting or unwitting, for STS forces. You tell me.
This is an STS reality. Everyone here is an STS agent, willingly or not!
There is no coming here as STO and remaining STO unless you do something that is useful for the system. This is a farm, and if one does not benefit the farm, you are out, one way or another.

Plus, the farm needs to occasionally allow some creativity and goodness, new ideas, or even rebellion, so it doesn't stagnate and dry out. STS need to allow STO to come in, and entrap them. Sir Francis Bacon might have been exactly that.

The more I look at that 'Tree', it really looks like some kind of central staff or rod with plasma filaments emanating from it.
Or... a Tesla Coil. :whistle:
 
Last edited:
Plus, why would "undergrounders" be intentionally made sterile? I imagine creating children, thus, prolonging the bloodline, would be one of the goals of putting these people here.
We can only guess why this is being done.
Firstly, you're right, DNA can trace your entire family tree. If you have the appropriate technology (4D STS does). DNA is a chronicle of past generations, a huge data set that, if it falls into the wrong hands, could provide a "hacker" with a lot of valuable information. I even read somewhere (I'm not 100% sure it's true) that DNA can trace you from the moment of birth; everything is recorded there, like a video archive. Every moment and day of your life. You can trace the path of Napoleon (any underground activist), where he was born and raised, at which underground base he trained. If he left descendants (children, grandchildren), you can go back and trace his path through DNA. The more descendants, the easier it is to trace. Given that various 4D STS factions exist and compete for influence, they may also be fighting each other's underground agents. It's like intelligence and counterintelligence in our earthly world.
Secondly, we don't know, but certain "rules of the game on planet Earth" may exist among the various 4D STS factions. For example, one group cannot seize all power on Earth by force, as this would violate the free will of most people. You also cannot directly interfere too much in the lives of ordinary people; you cannot send a million underground agents to the aboveground world; you cannot usurp power and establish a dynasty of rulers (for example) by force. This was the case in the past, but not now.
You can act "covertly" and send small groups of underground agents from time to time, without attracting too much attention and operating "behind the scenes." Thirdly, perhaps the underground workers themselves (and their "masters") are afraid that some important genetic lines will enter the above-ground world, and ordinary people (and their descendants from mixed marriages) will receive them and become stronger and more knowledgeable about 4D STS.
There may also be a certain genetic incompatibility between the underground workers and people on the surface.
So, there are many reasons, and we lack the information to draw 100% conclusions about the underground workers.

Yes, I also forgot about the "observers" or QUORUM, who apparently monitor the rules of the "game" on Earth.

People you specifically prepared to function as empty vessels for you and your kind to enter them at will, so you can live a life of pleasure and luxury!
I'm not entirely sure who this refers to: the underground workers or their "masters" from 4D STS. It seems to me that the underground workers are simply "useful idiots," so to speak. The "underground" workers' task is to advance the plans of the "4D masters" on the Earth's surface and prepare the "infrastructure" (as well as ordinary people) for the arrival of the 4D masters. Once Earth transitions to 4D, the STS masters will return with new bodies. These new bodies are the very same "improved" hybrid form of humans and aliens.
 
So the twin sun was closest to us around 1700, or 325 year ago.
The closest approach was most likely around 1680, which is the middle of Maunder Minimum. It also looks like the brown dwarf was observed in 1678 by Hevelius in exactly the spot where it should have been back then.

If take average speed of 3I/ATLAS, 210000 km/h, and calculate how far was it 325 years ago, we get around 4000 AU.
3I/Atlas is much faster than the solar system escape speed (60,000 km/h). All the planets and the brown dwarf are way below that or they would not stay in an orbit around the Sun.

The orbital parameters of the brown dwarf, which the C's gave, indicate a maximum speed of about 6 km/s (20,000 km/h) at its closest approach and about 2 km/s (7000 km/h) currently.
 
Or... a Tesla Coil. :whistle:

Or a (portable) Wardenclyffe Tower. :-)

I've often wondered what the response would be from Egyptian Antiquities if they were told the Pyramids were actually just a bunch of big batteries? 😂😂😂 Still it would be nice to know how they actually worked. They probably wouldn't be too enthusiastic about a change to their narrative.

They might say, " 𓀐𓂸 ! 𓌜 𓀡 𓁀 ! 𓆨 ! " Just a guess.

I joked to myself yesterday: what if they did actually dig to the bottom of the 'money pit' on Oak Island, and all they found was a fancy stick. " 𓀐𓂸 𓇗 ! "
 
Was Bacon a schizoid? The simple answer is that it is impossible really to know.

I'm not an expert on Bacon, but here is what Lobaczewski says about schizoids:

Every macroscopic social evil has its genesis in the mind of some individual who suffered from a characteropathy which caused him to elaborate a pathological ideology. The schizoid declaration is the first phase of this process. The schizoid person, thanks to his oversimplified and overly complicated thinking, creates a system of ideas which normal people would consider contradictory or absurd. However, this very content, with its gaps and contradictions, becomes attractive to hysterics and other characteropaths, who later elaborate it into a full-fledged pathocratic ideology.

The schizoid person is the one who creates the original ideological content, the ‘declaration’ which later becomes the basis for the pathocratic system. His thinking is characterized by a hypertrophy of the associative faculty, which causes him to link facts in a manner incomprehensible to normal people. The result is a worldview which is both oversimplified and overly complicated, containing contradictions and gaps which normal people would find unacceptable.

And the schizoid declaration:

We frequently find expressions of their characteristic attitudes in their statements and writings: “Human nature is so bad that order in human society can only be maintained by a strong power created by highly qualified individuals in the name of some higher idea.” Let us call this typical expression the “schizoid declaration".
 
I was looking in Manly P. Hall's Secret Teachings to see what he wrote about the pine cone. A few entries = pineal gland, Cyclops, third eye, etc. The usual. But there was one entry that spoke about the pineal gland of reptiles.

P. 250 (p.225 in my book)
Electricity was commonly symbolized by the serpent because of its motion. Electricity passing between the poles of a spark gap is serpentine in its motion. Force projected through atmosphere was called The Great Snake. Being symbolic of universal force, the serpent was emblematic of both good and evil. Force can tear down as rapidly as it can build up. The serpent with its tail in its mouth is the symbol of eternity, for in this position the body of the reptile has neither beginning nor end. The head and tail represent the positive and negative poles of the cosmic life circuit. The initiates of the Mysteries were often referred to as serpents, and their wisdom was considered analogous to the divinely inspired power of the snake. There is no doubt that the title "Winged Serpents" (the Seraphim?) was given to one of the invisible hierarchies that labored with the earth during its early formation.

There is a legend that in the beginning of the world winged serpents reigned upon the earth. These were probably the demigods which antedate the historical civilization of every nation.
The symbolic relationship between the sun and the serpent found literal witness in the fact that life remains in the snake until sunset, even though it be cut into a dozen parts. The Hopi Indians consider the serpent to be in close communication with the Earth Spirit. Therefore, at the time of their annual snake dance they send their prayers to the Earth Spirit by first specially sanctifying large numbers of these reptiles and then liberating them to return to the earth with the prayers of the tribe.

The great rapidity of motion manifested by lizards has caused them to be associated with Mercury, the Messenger of the Gods, whose winged feet traveled infinite distances almost instantaneously. A point which must not be overlooked in connection with reptiles in symbolism is clearly brought out by the eminent scholar, Dr. H. E. Santee, in his Anatomy of the Brain and Spinal Cord: "In reptiles there are two pineal bodies, an anterior and a posterior, of which the posterior remains undeveloped but the anterior forms a rudimentary, cyclopean eye. In the Hatteria, a New Zealand lizard, it projects through the parietal foramen and presents an imperfect lens and retina and, in its long stalk, nerve fibers."

I added a bit more, but this mention of two pineal bodies, one becoming a cyclopean eye, made me wonder what this was. My first search found this short article that was too scientific for me.

Pineal Eye in Reptiles:

In most reptiles (Lacerta, Calotes, Varanus, Anguis, etc.) and particularly in Sphenedon the roof of diencephalon is produced into a hollow median outgrowth, in front of epiphysis or pineal organ. The parietal organ or pineal eye is situated in the parietal foramen of the cranial roof just under the integument and covered in the young by a transparent scale.

The distal end of this becomes constricted off as a hollow sphere, while the remainder is converted into a nerve. The wall of the hollow sphere becomes divergently modified on opposite sides. The distal side gives rise to a lens-like thickening. The proximal side forms a membrane several layers in thickness-the retina. The whole is enclosed in a capsule of connective tissue. The nerve usually degenerates before the animal reaches maturity.

Sense Organs

The function of the reptilian pineal eye is still obscure. The skin over the top of the pineal eye in some reptiles becomes depigmented and takes the shape of cornea. The parietal organ is though eye-like in appearance, but it has no trace of any visual function. Histological evidences have not proved that this organ is a vestige of once functional median eye.

The main term for the 'pineal eye' is a parietal eye. It was discovered by Franz Leydig in 1872 through his work with lizards. It is currently believed the function of this eye plays an important role in thermoregulation and the circadian rhythm of ectotherms ("outside heat").

This eye is found on the tops of the heads of tuatara, most lizards, frogs, salamanders, some bony fish, sharks, and lampreys. Mammals don't have them but they once existed in the therapsids (279.5 MYA), the closest extinct relative. It's suggested that the mammals lost the eye because they became endothermic ("inside heat"). Birds, crocodilians, turtles and snakes also lack the eye however, crocodilian ancestors used to have one. Interestingly, Crocodiles (the closest living relatives to birds) appear to have lost their pineal organ altogether but apparently still show signs of melatonin rhythms.

Anolis_carolinensis_parietal_eye (rs).jpg


Frog_parietal_eye(rs).jpg



There's also this part from Hall on p.268 (p.242 in my copy). It feels supportive, in a yogic way, of Gaby's post about Rossette's and FRV above. Also, if the pine cone is a symbol of the pineal gland, then here the rose and lotus flower are as well. It's interesting that Hall says "or adjacent unknown center".

Of all symbolic flowers the [lotus] blossom of India and Egypt and the rose of the Rosicrucians are the most important. In their symbolism these two flowers are considered identical. The esoteric doctrines for which the Eastern lotus stands have been perpetuated in modern Europe under the form of the rose. The rose and the lotus are yonic emblems, signifying primarily the maternal creative mystery, while the Easter lily is considered to be phallic.

The Brahmin and Egyptian initiates, who undoubtedly understood the secret systems of spiritual culture whereby the latent centers of cosmic energy in man may be stimulated, employed the lotus blossoms to represent the spinning vortices of spiritual energy located at various points along the spinal column and called chakras, or whirling wheels, by the Hindus. Seven of these chakras are of prime importance and have their individual correspondences in the nerve ganglia and plexuses. According to the secret schools, the sacral ganglion is called the four-petaled lotus; the prostatic plexus, the six-petaled lotus; the epigastric plexus and navel, the ten-petaled lotus; the cardiac plexus, the twelve-petaled lotus; the pharyngeal plexus, the sixteen-petaled locus; the cavernous plexus, the two-petaled lotus; and the pineal gland or adjacent unknown center, the thousand-petaled locus. The color, size, and number of petals upon the lotus are the keys to its symbolic import. A hint concerning the unfoldment of spiritual understanding according to the secret science of the Mysteries is found in the story of Aaron's rod that budded, and also in Wagner's great opera, Tannhauser, where the budding staff of the Pope signifies the unfolding blossoms upon the sacred rod of the Mysteries—the spinal column.
 
Back
Top Bottom