Session 1 November 2025

More info from the Cs on those armbands as to their purpose or significance plus whether they are the source of the cathedral window rosette depictions would be an interesting line of inquiry.
Rossette depictions are examples of "frequency resonance vibration" in art:


There's a beautiful presentation by Rupert Sheldrake that makes the case of "frequency resonance vibration" as underlying morphogenetic fields.

He presents his research on vibratory patterns in water using concepts of analog computers which model processes by creating processes, which are actually easier to understand than digital computing where you need to be a computer expert.

Sheldrake explains how analog computing is better for true phenomena and processes involving waves. He modelled waves because he thinks that that is the underlying processes in morphogenesis in biology, chemistry molecules, crystals, etc. in what he calls morphogenetic fields.

They're basically vibratory fields of activity, wavelike and rhythmic. And the way to understand better patterns of vibration is through analog model systems.

After a few historical examples, he explains how Michal Faraday discovered that if you vibrate water, you get patterns or ripples on the surface. And if you add vertical walls to the container where the water is located, these ripples or patterns are reflected, giving standing wave patterns which are now called Faraday waves. The science of Faraday Wave phenomena, is also popularly known as cymatics.

Nowadays, you can study Faraday waves with a CymaScope developed by John Stuart Reid and available here. Other than water science, the CymaScope can be used to study blood, brain wave patterns, geology, music, etc.

It contains a coil that vibrates up and down, and there's a container where a small amount of fluid can be poured in. You can adjust the frequency and amplitude of the CymaScope, and these are some of the patterns obtained depending on the frequency and amplitude. It illustrates symmetry patterns and resonant frequencies:

brave_screenshot_www.youtube.com.png



Symmetrical patterns that you obtain from vibrating water, have distinct analogs in biological forms, like flowers, turtle shells, pollen grains, etc. You can find these patterns in art as well:

brave_screenshot_www.youtube.com (1).png

brave_screenshot_www.youtube.com (2).png

brave_screenshot_www.youtube.com (3).png

Paris_Cathédrale_Notre-Dame_Innen_Nördliche_Rosette_4.jpg



Sheldrake thinks morphogenetic fields are actually vibratory patterns, that the underlying morphogenetic process must depend on waves, wave patterns of some kind, possibly acoustic waves but more likely electrical wave patterns, within cell membranes. He thinks that body rhythms, like brainwaves, are best modeled by vibrating models such as the Cymascope.

Here's an example I obtained from the CymaScope website:

The CymaScope Pro instrument can make visible much of the electrical activity of the brain via recorded electroencephalograph signals. The frequency of such signals ranges from as low as 0.1Hz for the Delta range, and up to 40Hz for the Gamma range. The CymaScope bandwidth begins at 3Hz, which covers part of the Delta range, and can image all frequencies in the Theta range, Alpha range, Beta range and Gamma range.

new-web-site.jpg



If I had the time and energy, I could come up with a few experiments using the CymaScopePro.... :whistle:

And here are examples of analog liquid computers that they used in the 20th century, of which there are a few models in existence, the only thing that will keep working in case of an EMP catastrophe:

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/epdf/10.1098/rstb.2018.0372

en.wikipedia.org

Phillips Machine - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Here's Sheldrake's full presentation:
 
I've often wondered what the response would be from Egyptian Antiquities if they were told the Pyramids were actually just a bunch of big batteries? 😂😂😂 Still it would be nice to know how they actually worked. They probably wouldn't be too enthusiastic about a change to their narrative.

Here's a very interesting couple of papers that might describe how they work - apparently as functional resonant devices. I'm no physicist, so it's all above my paygrade and I can't verify, but it looks like a good theory:

 
Last edited:
Rossette depictions are examples of "frequency resonance vibration" in art:

Reading your post about the morphogenetic field reminded me of the representation of the chakras.

According to Wikipedia:

Sahasrara, according to the traditions of Tantrism, refers to the sahasrara chakra (in Sanskrit: सहस्रार चक्र, IAST: sahasrāra cakra, in English: 'the thousand-petaled lotus') or crown chakra[1][2] and is located at the crown of the head.[3

Ayyavali_Sahasrara.PNG



So maybe those bracelets improve the connection with the information field or something similar.

IMG_20251115_183722.png

In the center there is a small triangle drawn as in the representation of the crown chakra
 
Q: (A) Has it already come through the Oort Cloud and is now getting farther and farther away?

A: No.

Q:
(L) They said it had already passed through on its way IN.

A:
Yes.

Now we understand that it last close passage on it way in was during the maunder minimum. So maybe it will again be visible on it way out and in a second close passage to the solar system before getting farther and farther away as Ark said.
The Oort Cloud is very far away - starting at around 2000 AU, whereas Pluto is at 39 AU.

The C's said previously that the closest approach of the brown dwarf was close to the orbit of Pluto and in the current session they confirmed that this happened during the Maunder Minimum.

The brown dwarf has been on its way out for about 350 years now, but it will take many hundreds or even thousands of years more to reach the Oort Cloud again. Which is what the C's confirmed in the above quote, that it has not reached the Oort Cloud on its way out yet.

The next time it comes close to the inner solar system will be only in around 26-27 million years, according to the C's.

Calculations indicate that the brown dwarf is currently around 270-300 AU from the Sun in the Scattered Disc region of the Kuiper Belt, or already beyond it.

Its current location in Libra on the ecliptic plane is close to the direction of the galactic orbit of the Sun (it moves towards Hercules). This means that the companion probably already passed the heliopause as well, which is around 110-180 AU away in that direction and stretches at least 350 AU behind the Sun's movement around the galaxy.
 
So the twin sun was closest to us around 1700, or 325 year ago. If take average speed of 3I/ATLAS, 210000 km/h, and calculate how far was it 325 years ago, we get around 4000 AU. Inner Oort cloud (or Hills cloud) is believed to begin at 2000-5000 AU from Sun. Of course, this is an oversimplified calculation, but 3I/ATLAS can be our "local" rock thrown at us by the twin sun, not an interstellar object.
 
The Oort Cloud is very far away - starting at around 2000 AU, whereas Pluto is at 39 AU.
I remember something about Pluto's orbit being highly irregular and not like the other planets. It seems 39 AU is an average, but Pluto can range between 49.3 AU to 30 AU. Pluto even crosses paths with the orbit of Neptune, but due to something called "Orbital Resonance", is never going to colide with it.

I did wonder whether the Sun's dark companion interacted with any of the outer planets, (or even the inner planets). I suppose it must have done to cause something like the Maunder Minimum?

It seems there's a lot we don't know about our Solar System's electromagnetic "engine". Pluto seems such an odd little planet.... and it has been 'collecting moons' as well, just like the other outer gas giants. Apparently it now has 5 moons.

From here:

Orbit and Rotation​

Pluto's orbit around the Sun is unusual compared to the planets: it's both elliptical and tilted. Pluto's 248-year-long, oval-shaped orbit can take it as far as 49.3 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun, and as close as 30 AU. (One AU is the mean distance between Earth and the Sun: about 93 million miles or 150 million kilometers.) But on average, Pluto is 3.7 billion miles (5.9 billion kilometers) away from the Sun, or 39 AU.

From 1979 to 1999, Pluto was near perihelion, when it is closest to the Sun. During this time, Pluto was actually closer to the Sun than Neptune.

One day on Pluto takes about 153 hours. Its axis of rotation is tilted 57 degrees with respect to the plane of its orbit around the Sun, so it spins almost on its side. Pluto also exhibits a retrograde rotation; spinning from east to west like Venus and Uranus.

And an AI "overview":

AI Overview



CONFUSED : Pluto comes in the way of Neptune...... OR ...

Pluto's orbit is distinct from the other planets because it is highly elliptical (oval-shaped) and tilted at a significant angle to the solar system's plane. This makes its orbit eccentric, causing it to cross Neptune's orbital path for about 20 years at a time. However, Pluto and Neptune will not collide due to an orbital resonance; for every two orbits Pluto completes, Neptune completes three, which prevents them from ever occupying the same space at the same time.

Key differences in Pluto's orbit
  • Inclination: Pluto's orbit is tilted at about 17 degrees relative to the ecliptic, the plane in which the other planets orbit. This is the highest inclination of any planet in the solar system.
  • Eccentricity: Unlike the other planets' more circular orbits, Pluto's is highly eccentric, meaning it is more oval-shaped.
  • Orbital path: Due to its eccentricity, Pluto's distance from the Sun varies significantly, and for about 20 years of its 248-year orbit, it is closer to the Sun than Neptune is.
  • Orbital Resonance: Pluto is in a 2:3 mean-motion resonance with Neptune. This means that Pluto's orbit takes about 1.5 times longer than Neptune's. This orbital relationship keeps them from ever colliding, despite their paths crossing.
 
It seems Napoleon himself long believed he was sterile. Was he truly sterile? (And then Napoleon II and other children attributed to Napoleon are not his children.)
Is infertility one of the markers of "underground" members? Do they deliberately send "sterile" men/women to the surface so that they cannot leave their DNA (genetic line) and continue the family line?
Napoleon being sterile might be a rumor coming from Josephine.
Apparently Napoleon himself had many mistresses that he got pregnant (i didn't look deeply into it, though), which might indicate that either Josephine herself was sterile, or she didn't actually want to have a child with Napoleon so she was just gaslighting him into giving up.

Plus, why would "undergrounders" be intentionally made sterile? I imagine creating children, thus, prolonging the bloodline, would be one of the goals of putting these people here.

Think about it - an entire bloodline of people at your disposal! People you can pick at any point in time, make them do whatever you want, and affect the course of history.
People you specifically prepared to function as empty vessels for you and your kind to enter them at will, so you can live a life of pleasure and luxury!

Well the jury is out on Sir Francis Bacon. Was he a force for good (STO) or an agent, whether witting or unwitting, for STS forces. You tell me.
This is an STS reality. Everyone here is an STS agent, willingly or not!
There is no coming here as STO and remaining STO unless you do something that is useful for the system. This is a farm, and if one does not benefit the farm, you are out, one way or another.

Plus, the farm needs to occasionally allow some creativity and goodness, new ideas, or even rebellion, so it doesn't stagnate and dry out. STS need to allow STO to come in, and entrap them. Sir Francis Bacon might have been exactly that.

The more I look at that 'Tree', it really looks like some kind of central staff or rod with plasma filaments emanating from it.
Or... a Tesla Coil. :whistle:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom