FWIW, here is the "mask":
...
NISP, including SOLIS and GONG, produces many data products, including H-Alpha images, magnetograms, helioseismology data and synoptic maps.
nso.edu
Regarding the cover story for GONG, i.e. solar oscillations or oscillations of the Sun's surface, they were first discovered using Doppler effect during 1960, with a period of more or less 5 min, and in a simple model of oscillating or vibrating sphere or ball are attributed to sound waves or/and so called gravity waves [R.Kippenhahn, "Discovering the Secrets of the Sun", Ch 10
Oscillations of the Sun, 1994].
More encompassing explanation of the phenomenon can most probably be related to Faraday waves or cymatics.
After a few historical examples, he explains how Michal Faraday discovered that if you vibrate water, you get patterns or ripples on the surface. And if you add vertical walls to the container where the water is located, these ripples or patterns are reflected, giving standing wave patterns which are now called Faraday waves. The science of Faraday Wave phenomena, is also popularly known as cymatics.
Simple vibrating sphere model, from the same book as above plot, introduces also the term "degree of oscillations" which is apparently relevant for the Sun:
and the next page
The relevance is explained further in the book, and can be summarized with next two plots.
Real measurements of solar surface oscillations.
In the discussion after these plots, an interesting passage.
Back to the session where GONG was asked about.
Q: What, precisely, is the GONG project doing?
A: Magnetic frequency. Measurements for possible future use.
What exactly is the "magnetic frequency" the C's referred to?
Does that mean we're dealing with magnetic waves as in magnetohydrodynamic waves as usually assumed when considering the Sun's interior?
Or it has to do more with electromagnetic waves AKA light, which are then related to unstable gravity waves as discussed further down the line during that session?
Q: Today, the exchange was as follows: Ark wrote: C's once said that EM was an expression of gravitational energy. I said: they said that light is an energy expression of gravity, that EM was the same as gravity, or, more precisely, intertwined. And, this would incline me to believe that the total spectrum of EM is the 'stuff' of the 'balloon,' that is the balance to the 'non-balloon,' of gravity, being that which emerges out of non-being, and that the various separations of EM into waves such as light, radio, and other frequencies are energy expressions. In other words, EM IS the unstable gravity wave, so to speak. Was this correct?
A: Close.
Q: Is ethereal existence the 'non-balloon.'
A: Closer.
Q: And EM is intertwined. That is, EM is 'being' and ethereal existence is non-being?
A: No. EM is being and ethereal existence is thinking...
Q: Absolute non-being is the origin of gravity. It emerges out of the absoluteness of non-being, and what emerges out of gravity is EM?
A: Where did you get this "absoluteness of non-being?"
Q: Well, non-being that is so 'non' that is is NON!
A: That is ALL, maybe?
Q: I guess so.
A: Is non really nano?
Q: I don't know. Is that a clue?
A: ?
Q: Well, then I said: If the varieties of waves of the EM spectrum are unstable gravity waves, then they could be added together which could arrive at some total factor of electromagnetism, which then, if reversed, would express the existence of gravity?
A: On the right track, or "rail" as in "railgun."
Or are we talking about magneto-gravitics, as discussed right next in that session?
Q: Well, I can't go any further with that because I know nothing about railguns, not even what they are. Now, let me read this text:
"I have recently come into possession of a paper on magneto-gravitics and field resonance systems, presented by A.C. Holt from NASA Johnson Space Center to the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics' 16th Joint Propulsion Conference, June 30-July 2, 1980. Holt presents a project using an already existing system known as the Coherent Field and Energy Resonance System (CoFERS) [probably located at Los Alamos Labs' High Magnetic Field Research Laboratory]. CoFERS utilizes a toroidal-shaped energy guide with megagauss magnetic field sources located along radius vectors equally spaced around the toroid. CoFERS is shaped like a thick flying disc. Holt goes on to say: "By converying an object's normal space-time energy pattern to an energy pattern which differs substantially from the normal pattern, the gravitational forces acting on the object are changed. The object's new pattern interacts with the surrounding space-time and virtual energy patterns, such that the interactive forces are substantially altered. The alteration of the characteristics of the continuous field of force results in the apparent motion of the object *through space-time*." [...]
"Since the gravitational forces acting on the propulsion system can be quickly altered to achieve the desired motion, the *spacecraft* can make right-angle turns at very-high velocities without adversely affecting the crew or system elements. The effective gravitational field the *spacecraft/ aircraft* experiences can be nearly simultaneously reoriented at a 90-degree angle, resulting in a smooth continuous motion as far as the occupants are concerned." [ ... ]
"The gravimagnetic system is perhaps best suited for use in and around ... a large mass such as the Earth."
"While the gravimagnetic system is likely to be the first field-dependent propulsion system developed, the field resonance system will **bring stellar and galactic travel out of the realm of science fiction**. The field resonance system artificially generates an energy pattern which precisely matches or resonates with a virtual pattern associated with a distent space-time point. According to the model, if a fundamental or precise resonance is established, (using hydromagnetic wave fine- tuning techniques), the spacecraft will be very strongly and equally repelled by surrounding virtual patterns. At the same time, through the virtual many-dimensional structure of space-time, a very strong attraction with the virtual pattern of a distant space-time point will exist. ...this combination of very strong forces will result in the translocation of the spacecraft from its initial position through the many-dimensional virtual structure to the distant space-time point. [ ... ]
"A space-time 'jump' already appears to be supported by astrophysical research."
Having read this text, my thought is that it is very similar to what I was talking about earlier today, and which was explicated by Karl von Eckertshausen in regards to the 'violin allegory.' That is, that a violin string tuned to a particular pitch, if plucked, will cause the identical string on another violin across the room tuned to the same pitch to sound also. However, it seems that what they are doing here is setting up a 'pitch' in this object which actually exists somewhere else. And, by creating this resonance, it 'becomes' or disappears from this point in space/time where its resonance is no longer appropriate, and reappears at the point in space/time where the 'tuned resonance' actually exists. It is both virtual and real. The question is: Is this text on the right track, and am I understanding it correctly?
A: Propulsion system for 3rd and 4th density Alien spacecraft.
Q: That is the propulsion system?
A: Very close, yes.
Q: Is my understanding close to correct?
A: Well, that is a clever anecdotal parallel as it matches conceptually, which is really the point, isn't it?
Seeing Laura's analogy with the violin strings, a thought, more like a speculation, formed in the mind that GONG was maybe measuring the magnetic frequency, whatever exactly "magnetic" meant, so to be able later to reproduce similar conditions in fusion research labs here on Earth.
What they didn't understand though, but maybe not anymore, was that it wasn't exactly fusion they were tapping into, but the hyperdimensional propulsion mechanism used by alien spacecrafts, as the C's indicated in above quoted part of the session.
(Another thought, in relation to that last passage-image from Kippenhahn's book, is that perhaps fusion as in termonuclear reactions assumed to power the Sun in the so called Standard Solar Model, is not the real thing that makes the Sun shine everyday.)
Another, even wilder speculation, is that by GONG-ing the Sun they got the empirical data for something that could lead to "breaking the veil of time" as indicated next in the session, while using this kind of propulsion system, which would be even more dangerous for the hyperdimensional control system.
Q: The point? Are you saying that the anecdote is more to the point than what this paper is saying?
A: In terms of consciousness, which is why everything exists ultimately, and with gravity as the "glue" that holds all on physical and ethereal planes together!
Q: Is the object to 'dematerialize' or is the object to transpose something that is material to some other point in space/time? I mean, when you collapse the gravity wave, is it necessarily that the object or person 'dematerializes' or 'disappears' from this point...
A: Break the veil of "time," and dematerialzation is no longer necessary, because one enters the realm of pure consciousness, where the illusion of physicality serves no longer, a purpose.
Q: Is it an issue for one to be able to retain internal coherence if one is no longer in a physical state?
A: Internal coherence can only be guaranteed in a purely non- physical "state." And this state is really only a state of mind, anyway!!
Q: If one were to travel in this manner, would it not be a temptation to not return to the physical reality?
A: If one goes bowling, is it a temptation to not return to the parking lot?
Q: I guess if your only choice was the parking lot, I guess you would want to stay, but if going to the parking lot meant getting in your car and going home, then no. Now, glue. The thing is that one has to 'unglue' oneself? Is that the point?
A: No.
Q: Well, if gravity is what holds material and ethereal existence together, and you are going from material into ethereal states...
A: By your definition, you would be unglued, since you perceive the physical, and thus are not completely stuck.
Q: So, you still have the ability to perceive the physical reality and the physical world when you are traveling this way, therefore you are not completely 'stuck.' However, we have talked about people who do get completely 'stuck,' is this correct?
A: Close.