Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[Ricardo]

Mr. Stew Peters @ X , does a (imo) good summation of the whole CK murder and subsequent shenanigans. (2:55 mins) Quote "(...)How do these people look me in the eye and say these things, surely they can´t believe these things that they´re saying, no of course not , but they are not like us. They´ll do anything for they have to have it , they lust after it , they love the money , they clamor for the power (...),. That is how you end up with the safe and most effective people (...) " . He doesn´t mention exterior people or psycho´s , and neither the control but mostly hidden structure but otherwise on point.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2003965910667927570

 

[Ricardo]

Mr. Stew Peters @ X , does a (imo) good summation of the whole CK murder and subsequent shenanigans. (2:55 mins) Quote "(...)How do these people look me in the eye and say these things, surely they can´t believe these things that they´re saying, no of course not , but they are not like us. They´ll do anything for they have to have it , they lust after it , they love the money , they clamor for the power (...),. That is how you end up with the safe and most effective people (...) " . He doesn´t mention exterior people or psycho´s , and neither the control but mostly hidden structure but otherwise on point.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2003965910667927570

Timed out to edit and correct, a minor correction on the quote , should say "(...)safe and effective people (...)" , a remark on the vax moran apologists .

 

[Cosmos]

Haven't watched it myself yet, but it seems Ian Carroll now also is seriously considering the exploding Mic theory, and with him and his reach, now probably a lot more people. As said, I think Ian Carroll belongs to the best out there with big reach. The video Title states, "Is The Exploding Mic Theory Seeming More Legit? - Clip":

Watched it now. Holy Moly! Ian Carroll and others through the research he shared there are now getting extremely close to what the C‘s have said are the exact things that killed Kirk on that day. And it is very convincing too: Exploding microphone. There is little doubt in my mind and it sounds like Ian thinks so too: that this very much looks like what happened.

The interesting thing is that the guy I will share below and is at the basis of the video above (by the name of Jon Bray) basically presents a full fletched theory backed up by pretty hard evidence he created/amassed himself (despite being just on the internet).

The other interesting thing to note is that Ian says that the guy doing the interview sits on more pretty interesting evidence that he will present soon about that theory and what happened to the body of Kirk.

Also interesting is the fact that the pictures Candace received from the car Kirk was dragged into shows what looks like black shreds of some kind laying all around inside the car and that Jon Bray was actually the person that alerted Candace to those shreds (which he thinks are pieces of the destroyed microphone).

Further interesting note therefore is that Candace is probably also considering similar ideas and that one of her best friends (Ian Carroll) will probably make it more likely that Candace will soon start to highlight the exploding mic theory more too.

Here are the original two videos which Ian Carroll discussed/used above:

And here is the X account of the star (Jon Bray) who is thus championing that exploding mic theory with darn good evidence to back it up:

https://x.com/jonaaronbray?s=20

 

[Cosmos]

And from the above as well:

On Oktober 11, one month after the Kirk assassination, a small company in the US exploded to pieces killing 16 people, in which exactly the type of shaped charges were produced. Possibly exactly where parts of the exploded microphone on Kirk were produced.

 

[Voyageur]

On Oktober 11, one month after the Kirk assassination, a small company in the US exploded to pieces killing 16 people, in which exactly the type of shaped charges were produced. Possibly exactly where parts of the exploded microphone on Kirk were produced.

This seems to be the event as reported by the BBC:

16 killed in Tennessee explosives factory blast are identified

A shaken sheriff said that a teacher, a neighbour and one of his best friends were among the victims who died in the blast.

www.bbc.com

Carroll noted that Baron (and he said he knows details) is coming out with an 'explosives' show' on this, perhaps next week.

 

[Cosmos]

Watched it now. Holy Moly! Ian Carroll and others through the research he shared there are now getting extremely close to what the C‘s have said are the exact things that killed Kirk on that day. And it is very convincing too: Exploding microphone. There is little doubt in my mind and it sounds like Ian thinks so too: that this very much looks like what happened.

The interesting thing is that the guy I will share below and is at the basis of the video above (by the name of Jon Bray) basically presents a full fletched theory backed up by pretty hard evidence he created/amassed himself (despite being just on the internet).

The other interesting thing to note is that Ian says that the guy doing the interview sits on more pretty interesting evidence that he will present soon about that theory and what happened to the body of Kirk.

Also interesting is the fact that the pictures Candace received from the car Kirk was dragged into shows what looks like black shreds of some kind laying all around inside the car and that Jon Bray was actually the person that alerted Candace to those shreds (which he thinks are pieces of the destroyed microphone).

Further interesting note therefore is that Candace is probably also considering similar ideas and that one of her best friends (Ian Carroll) will probably make it more likely that Candace will soon start to highlight the exploding mic theory more too.

Here are the original two videos which Ian Carroll discussed/used above:

And here is the X account of the star (Jon Bray) who is thus championing that exploding mic theory with darn good evidence to back it up:

https://x.com/jonaaronbray?s=20

IMO the theory of Jon Bray does not only very closely match what the C's have said, but it also explains pretty much all the "anomalies" of the event and even why and how they planned it, what went wrong and why they needed to adapt the initial script/plan on the fly as fast as they could to cover up what went wrong, thereby making even more mistakes that are easy to see through.

 

[Niall]

The interesting thing is that the guy I will share below and is at the basis of the video above (by the name of Jon Bray) basically presents a full fletched theory backed up by pretty hard evidence he created/amassed himself (despite being just on the internet).

Great analysis. However, he may be wrong about the projectile that hit Kirk's neck being unintended shrapnel damage, rather than the exit wound of the projectile fired by the shaped charge. On the other hand, his theory seems 'neater': the mic was 'supposed to' damage the chest in a similar fashion to what might be expected from a rifle firing a 30.06 caliber bullet. But when everyone saw an exit wound on Kirk's neck, the conspirators had a much more difficult time making the case that that was the entry wound of a high-powered rifle.

Session 27 September 2025

(Joe) Well, but you would've thought that if it was some kind of explosive, it would very quickly cause bleeding on his shirt or whatever bleed through, right? But it was very quick.

(L) If it sent a projectile, let's see, it was on the right side and his left carotid artery. So if it was here and it sent something up explosively, it could have gone just, I mean, not very deep...

(Joe) The wound we saw on him in the video, was that an exit wound?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Is this a more advanced version of what the Israelis did in Lebanon last year?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So was it effectively a bullet within the microphone case?

A: Not a "bullet" exactly.

Q: (Joe) Okay. Some kind of projectile.

Q: (L) A projectile?

A: Yes

 

[JEEP]

On the other hand, his theory seems 'neater': the mic was 'supposed to' damage the chest in a similar fashion to what might be expected from a rifle firing a 30.06 caliber bullet. But when everyone saw an exit wound on Kirk's neck, the conspirators had a much more difficult time making the case that that was the entry wound of a high-powered rifle.

It's my understanding now that the aim was to cause a chest wound that would mimic a 30.06 caliber bullet from a rifle shot from a distance, but the projectile caused an exit wound in the neck. So, did the projectile travel through the body to the neck area and was there also a chest wound that caused all the shirt/pendant/body reactions that Jon Bray explains? I know there were people who asserted that they saw Charlie get hit in the chest, but due to the directed charge, no chest hole in the shirt or gushing blood there either? If there was indeed a chest wound, wouldn't there be at least some blood coming through the shirt in that area?

I know that info regarding his surgery, the autopsy, and everything else has either been contradictory, pure fiction, or nonexistent. Was he actually cremated? So many puzzling elements which, of course, serves to prove that a planned assassination took place that didn't quite go off as expected.

 

[herondancer]

So many puzzling elements which, of course, serves to prove that a planned assassination took place that didn't quite go off as expected.

Indeed. One of my favorite parts of Bray's theory is that the neck wound wasn't expected. He thinks the operation was constructed so as to be able to pass it off as a rifle shot to the chest. The anomalous visible neck wound is the reason for all the shuck and jive about 'steel neck bones' and other nonsense that had to be explained away. They were making it up on the fly.

He also advances a reason for the immediate re-landscaping of the area. He theorizes that the type of explosive material most likely used in the mic is extremely toxic, doesn't break down in the environment and would have been all over the speaking area. Impossible to clean up, along with any stray plastic bits. So the only answer was to bury it. Ditto the pendant chain. It would have been covered in that same toxic material. Why hasn't it been tested, he asks, just as a matter of course to determine what type of 'gun powder' was on it? So whatever Erika was holding up for the cameras, he thinks it's a fake.

edit: added link to slang term

 

[Joe]

in which exactly the type of shaped charges were produced. Possibly exactly where parts of the exploded microphone on Kirk were produced.

The explosives plant in question made explosives for the US military, including shaped charges (which is not unusual) but there's no public information about them making "exactly the type of shaped charge" that was used on Kirk or any modified wireless mics etc. If they did, that kind of information would be kept secret as part of a military contract.

 

[Niall]

I know this has been well covered before, but I don't recall seeing it from this particular angle/footage.

The moment Kirk was 'hit' is the second of these two (consecutive) frames:

Besides the bulge at the back of his t-shirt, note the expansion of both the front and side of his neck, pushing his hairline upwards.

 

[Joe]

Besides the bulge at the back of his t-shirt, note the expansion of both the front and side of his neck, pushing his hairline upwards.

That was visible in the first videos of the event, and was noted here I think. I remember noting it anyway. With the Jon guy fleshing things out, it was probably an effect of the smaller initial stand-off charge, moving both the shirt and his fascia.

 

[Joe]

Dan Flood appears to have a habit of making that arm movement. Maybe just a habit?

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000657148280181146

 

[Joe]

However, he may be wrong about the projectile that hit Kirk's neck being unintended shrapnel damage, rather than the exit wound of the projectile fired by the shaped charge. On the other hand, his theory seems 'neater': the mic was 'supposed to' damage the chest in a similar fashion to what might be expected from a rifle firing a 30.06 caliber bullet. But when everyone saw an exit wound on Kirk's neck, the conspirators had a much more difficult time making the case that that was the entry wound of a high-powered rifle.

His idea has a few problems with it, IMO. He said that that a shaped charge as designed would have had a very similar impact effect to a .306. But at the same time he said that a .306 impact would be much more violent than the hole we saw in Charlie's neck. Fair enough, the wound wasn't a .306. But then why did we not see immediate and major trauma to his chest if the shaped charge hit there? Why no blood on his shirt etc? The idea that the magnetic clasp "accidentally" penetrated his neck seems a bit implausible to me, but I suppose possible.

Also, if the plan was to use the shaped charge in the mic on the right of his shirt, hitting him in that area of the chest, the chances of him surviving probably would not have been negligible. Seems more likely to me that the shaped charge was designed to penetrate his chest in a diagonal (right to left) trajectory and exited his neck. That still doesn't explain why there is no .306-like impact on his chest, unless this Jon guy is wrong about that, which is understandable given that there probably aren't many examples of such a device hitting a person that one can examine.

Now that we're down in the weeds on this, it's all still a bit obscure as to what precisely happened.

 

[Jones]

Since Jon Bray makes the case that the blast wave itself could have killed Charlie at that close proximity by sudden increases in intracranial and intrathoracic pressure then it may not be necessary to have an entry wound. What if the projectile that caused the exit wound was a piece of Charlie's rib or something like that?