Candace Owens: From TPUSA Conservative Activist to Powerful Voice for Truth
- Thread starter wodasi
- Start date
Watched it. Great stuff on many levels.
One thing I find so important and educational in that whole drama that has unfolded since they decided to take Kirk out is: getting a lesson everyday on how to spot lies, liars and/or “Agents“ (of one form or the other) and how they might be able to manipulate not only ordinary people but yourself too, if you are not careful.
And IMO the brightest shining light out there for spotting something like that is currently Candace. She is cutting through manipulations and lies just beautifully.
You can learn how to detect lies and manipulations no matter what the motive might be. Some Agents are probably doing it on purpose and knowingly so.
For example, in the above I would bet that there was at least one deliberate manipulator, which I would bet was the first person who spoke, with the name of “Harrison“ something. And notice how tactically careful Candace is handling the guy and even expose him while still staying respectful.
There are two additional people I would by now possibly also put in that category, namely, the “Valhalla“ YouTube guy and the other “Tactical“ something YouTube guy that also appeared recently on a TPUSA podcast.
The other interesting thing to note (besides the ways your own thinking could be derailed if you are not careful) is to see how likely good people out there can be lured into unfavorable directions too, like you can see in the above, when you hear how Candace explains how Ian Carroll was told things by that Valhalla guy (or rather manipulated?).
Phill4
The Living Force
Hope you are x2 speeding it. Lol
The "we" is:
ValhallaVFT (Nate)
Paramount tactical (Gary) and
jesseOnFire (Jesse)
they have a groupchat together
And keeping in mind that Gary exposed himself that Andrew Kolvet was the person at TPUSA feeding him (possibly Alex Jones too) the false alabi
Candace's live on X has her full response it is worth the watch.
EDIT:spacing
I watched part of this exchange on X, as I happened to be on X and it suggested this exchange and there were 30+K listeners at that time. It was pretty descent exchange most of the time. Harrison from Infowars pushed little harder on ' Fort Huachuca doesn't matter' narrative and Candace had a pretty balanced in response. Other pitched in to help candace and Ian Caroll tried to balance in between.
One person brought on the topic of whom to trust when there is no clear evidence. That person wants to trust the 'public' personality rather than private personality like Mitch. Candace expressed her view that, he won't give too much weightage because some body public personality. As a whole, it is decent exchange yesterday.
One person brought on the topic of whom to trust when there is no clear evidence. That person wants to trust the 'public' personality rather than private personality like Mitch. Candace expressed her view that, he won't give too much weightage because some body public personality. As a whole, it is decent exchange yesterday.
Initially, every body gave benefit of doubt to Harrison Smith. Actually today's X discussions devolved into exchange of dirty words.
Actually, infowars guys are looking like this now.
Another point I was made aware of in that latest X discussion with Candace is that according to Candace (whom I tend to trust) Mitch was never in his life convicted on/of anything.
This stands in extreme contrast to how for example that Valhalla YouTube guy made things look like in his “expose“ on Mitch of which I saw large portions: I think at no point during what I saw there I heard that Valhalla guy say even just one iota about “that little fact“. That is another point that strongly suggests to me that that Valhalla guy deliberately tried to manipulate the audience.
What I‘m wondering though is how that Valhalla guy could have claimed that Mitch was in prison “for some of what he did“ when there was never a conviction? Did Valhalla lie about that “too“, or what is going on there?
This stands in extreme contrast to how for example that Valhalla YouTube guy made things look like in his “expose“ on Mitch of which I saw large portions: I think at no point during what I saw there I heard that Valhalla guy say even just one iota about “that little fact“. That is another point that strongly suggests to me that that Valhalla guy deliberately tried to manipulate the audience.
What I‘m wondering though is how that Valhalla guy could have claimed that Mitch was in prison “for some of what he did“ when there was never a conviction? Did Valhalla lie about that “too“, or what is going on there?
Phill4
The Living Force
Valhalla also said he didnt speak and didnt want to speak with Mitch, i haven't seen anyone point it out.
Not only that, ( i was giving Nate the benefit of the doubt) Nate was trashing Mitch publicly as we all already know, but then Candace revealed that Nate and Gary DID in fact speak, and they were very nice to him behind the scenes.
Nate also demanded in his first coverage of Mitch, that Candace let him interview him amd that HE Nate should take care of those leads, leading me to believe he wanted to sabotage her leads.
Valhalla also didn't cover the lies from the ex wives ( for someone as interested in the baby mamas as he was )
Notice also the leading questions from Harrison and his dishonest ambush to get Candace to make an accusatory statement and then crying on X.
It,s good to see the eathquake she is causing is revealing these "independent" are effectively operatives for the world to see.
Jimmy Dore : 11mn24
The evidence suggests that there is currently a coordinated, paid astroturf campaign targeting Candace Owens, likely driven by political action committees using “clipping sites” that pay influencers per view to push specific narratives and keywords. Jimmy’s guest Ryan Matta explains how these bounty systems work, describing how influencers receive payouts for posting aligned content across platforms like Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube, all designed to make coordinated messaging look organic.
The evidence suggests that there is currently a coordinated, paid astroturf campaign targeting Candace Owens, likely driven by political action committees using “clipping sites” that pay influencers per view to push specific narratives and keywords. Jimmy’s guest Ryan Matta explains how these bounty systems work, describing how influencers receive payouts for posting aligned content across platforms like Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube, all designed to make coordinated messaging look organic.
It looks Candace may be facing some serious criticism ( from normal 'non critical' observers) for this investigation for the first time since the CK's assassination. It is nothing of her fault, but the fickleness of the 'non critical' observers and dangers involved in this type of activity. This is related to Fort Huachuca.
When the topic of Fort Huachuca came, she realized there was LOT of heat on her. Later she went to meet Erika and people were nervous about it. But, whatever reason it is, Candace dropped bomb with Mitch's interview. But there were no photos or proofs. How does one even prove that type of things. Metadata can be easily manipulatable. The Alibi's provided by accused fell flat ( Senator, Erika indirectly), naturally . After ignoring attempts to be contacted by her, Cobat Phillips provided some pictures and video's. Candace asked for metadata, he provided. Candace cleared him with this tweet. Many are still not convinced of it, but major players in the game are sort of accepted Cabot's proof.
Though every body, knows it is 'open source' investigation in which some leads may not be true. But the paid attackers won't keep quite. It looks there are some cracks in the 'open source' investigators. Some video's related to it, though they are supportive of her.
There is a danger of these paid attackers going after her flesh like army of hyenas. Ultimately it is about the 'minds of people', not whom they are following currently. Candace mentioned that she had explosive topic coming next week. It was not clear whether this is related to CK topic or something else. we will see how it goes.
When the topic of Fort Huachuca came, she realized there was LOT of heat on her. Later she went to meet Erika and people were nervous about it. But, whatever reason it is, Candace dropped bomb with Mitch's interview. But there were no photos or proofs. How does one even prove that type of things. Metadata can be easily manipulatable. The Alibi's provided by accused fell flat ( Senator, Erika indirectly), naturally . After ignoring attempts to be contacted by her, Cobat Phillips provided some pictures and video's. Candace asked for metadata, he provided. Candace cleared him with this tweet. Many are still not convinced of it, but major players in the game are sort of accepted Cabot's proof.
Though every body, knows it is 'open source' investigation in which some leads may not be true. But the paid attackers won't keep quite. It looks there are some cracks in the 'open source' investigators. Some video's related to it, though they are supportive of her.
There is a danger of these paid attackers going after her flesh like army of hyenas. Ultimately it is about the 'minds of people', not whom they are following currently. Candace mentioned that she had explosive topic coming next week. It was not clear whether this is related to CK topic or something else. we will see how it goes.
Carroll posted this yesterday, a review of the the goings on in the last week - the big X show. There's like a 3-way video discussions going on (Candace and Coach), and of course, Fort Huachuca and Mitch factor. Nothing has set off the attacks more than when Fort Huachuca was first brought up. Moreover, as soon as the shape charge mic came up, things were lit up.
Carroll does not trust Mitch per se (in his opinion), but he does not know or fault Candace as she keeps going as it needs to all be turned over, and she has more information than most others.
Carroll does not trust Mitch per se (in his opinion), but he does not know or fault Candace as she keeps going as it needs to all be turned over, and she has more information than most others.
