Predictions and Prophecies

[candasiri]

Oh dear: Brandon sees what happens to Gaza. Seems very plausible. Very Sad.

 

[Puma]

Prediction on social media​

Donald Trump has made statements suggesting or mentioning the idea of canceling the 2026 midterm elections (November), although the White House has insisted that these are jokes or sarcastic comments, not a formal plan.

Referring to Ukraine and its suspension of elections during the war, Trump commented in September 2025: "So you're saying that during wartime you can't have elections... in three and a half years, you mean if we're at war with somebody, there won't be any more elections? Oh, that's okay."

He reiterated the idea during a speech to House Republicans in early January, saying, "I'm not going to say cancel the election; they should cancel them"

In an interview with Reuters on January 15, 2026, Trump said, "When you think of it, we shouldn't even have an election," expressing frustration with polls showing risks for Republicans in the midterm elections.

So people are getting an idea of what might come next, given recent events with ICE raids. It even seems that someone or some people (like George Soros or the Democrats) want to light the fuse of civil war in the US.

In a nutshell, this is what people think will happen.​

Trump is preparing for a state-level civil conflict that will allow him to deploy the army in Minneapolis and cancel the November elections, which all polls say he will lose by a landslide.​

It has undoubtedly been an explosive start to the year, as mentioned by Joni Patry, who also told us about an event in August that would have repercussions towards the end of the year. According to Patry, this event is related to mortal danger for leaders. It should be noted that the downfall of leaders can also be political.

Now, legally, the president does not have the authority to suspend or cancel elections, even in the event of war, without a constitutional amendment or a law passed by Congress, which is extremely unlikely and would be unconstitutional in most scenarios, but with Trump, anything can happen.

In an interview with the NYT, Trump said, "Yes, there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. That's the only thing that can stop me (...). I don't need international law. I'm not looking to hurt people."

"My own morality" and "I'm not looking to hurt people" remind me of the events that led Julius Caesar to seize power.​

Julius Caesar was appointed dictator—initially on a temporary basis and then for life in 44 BC—to stabilize the Roman Republic after a bloody civil war that he himself provoked by crossing the Rubicon. The Senate granted him this centralized power to restore order, reform the corrupt government, and control the political crisis. Grok​

Trump referred to himself as a "dictator" in a recent speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos. He said, "I am a dictator... and sometimes you need one." This reminds me of Terri Serafío's prediction that Trump would give himself another title.

Will Trump be forced to cancel the November elections? Will history repeat itself?​

 

[Herbal witch]

Prediction on social media​

Donald Trump has made statements suggesting or mentioning the idea of canceling the 2026 midterm elections (November), although the White House has insisted that these are jokes or sarcastic comments, not a formal plan.

Referring to Ukraine and its suspension of elections during the war, Trump commented in September 2025: "So you're saying that during wartime you can't have elections... in three and a half years, you mean if we're at war with somebody, there won't be any more elections? Oh, that's okay."

He reiterated the idea during a speech to House Republicans in early January, saying, "I'm not going to say cancel the election; they should cancel them"

In an interview with Reuters on January 15, 2026, Trump said, "When you think of it, we shouldn't even have an election," expressing frustration with polls showing risks for Republicans in the midterm elections.

So people are getting an idea of what might come next, given recent events with ICE raids. It even seems that someone or some people (like George Soros or the Democrats) want to light the fuse of civil war in the US.

Will Trump be forced to cancel the November elections? Will history repeat itself?​

Very interesting. However, really dangerous from the standpoint of what people actually want. The people elect the president, not the president choosing to stay or whatever. In a normal situation, those who choose to stay and forego all traditions or protocols are usually "dictators" as he points out. Having said that, not all "dictators" are alike. He may choose to compare his situation to Caesar, but Caesar really wanted to get rid of all the corruption and make a better future for his people. Did Caesar gain monetarily from being a "dictator"? Trump may be sincere to "Make American Great Again" but at which cost? Let's be honest, he will gain monetarily. His son in law has a seat at his great Peace Council to rebuild Gaza....
Trump can gain to have a lot of "freebees" if he continues: particularly with his peace program with other countries. He wants to rebuild Gaza. Who will benefit? Him? Ben? Qatar? Others? You can bet they will ask for something in return to rebuild out of their own money. Don't forget there is huge liquid gold underneath Gaza. Who will get there first????
This brings me to Carnage now. If he cancels all elections, what would happen to the country? This is the wrong man for the job. All he cares about is his pocket book. He is the sort of dictator that no one wants as he has showed again and again. He is already running the country into the ground (started by playboy T.) and he is not finished yet. We are heading for a very serious recession, worse than the 30s. I can actually compare our situation with that of Venezuela. It is that serious. What is his game? Are there other nefarious reasons for him to go ahead and making it worse? I hope the reasons will be found out soon. And don't get me started with his carbon credits and net zero agenda!!!! He is as corrupt and authoritarian as those countries he visited recently. He tells us he is an European; so why is he ruling a country he despises??????
If this Minister is ever elected with a Majority Government, we will be destroyed with no chance of recuperation!

Here is an article concerning what happened during the war of 1917 and the elections:

Wartime Elections Act​

Article by John R. Englis
Last Edited May 7, 2021
The Wartime Elections Act of 1917 gave the vote to female relatives of Canadian soldiers serving overseas in the First World War. It also took the vote away from many Canadians who had immigrated from “enemy” countries. The Act was passed by Prime Minister Robert Borden’s Conservative government in an attempt to gain votes in the 1917 election. It ended up costing the Conservatives support among certain groups for years to come. The Act has a contentious legacy. It granted many women the right to vote, but it also legitimized in law many anti-immigrant sentiments.

Conscription​

Robert Borden’s Conservative government had introduced conscription in May 1917, to bolster Canadian fighting forces in the First World War. Conscription deeply divided the country; English Canadians were largely in favour, while French Canadians and others not of British descent were opposed. The Conservatives feared that opponents of conscription, including the opposition Liberal Party, would join forces to defeat the Conservatives in the upcoming general election in December.

Election Moves​

Borden made several political moves to strengthen his position ahead of the election. He convinced many pro-conscription Liberals and other opposition MPs to join the Conservatives in a Union government to push for conscription and steer the Canadian war effort.

Sir Robert Borden
Nova Scotia-born, Borden entered the provincial parliament in 1896, took command of the federal Conservative party in 1901, and was Canadian Prime Minister, 1911–20.
(courtesy William James Topley / Library and Archives Canada / PA-028129)
Borden also changed the rules about who could and could not vote in the coming election by introducing the Wartime Elections Act. The Act was designed to create legions of new voters who were likely to support the Unionists, and to disenfranchise voters who would likely be opposed to conscription.

On 20 September, after an angry debate, Parliament passed the Act. The new law disenfranchised Canadian citizens who had been born in “enemy” nations after March 1902; although it exempted those citizens who had a son, grandson or brother on active duty in the Canadian Expeditionary Force. Meanwhile, the Act granted the vote to the wives, mothers and sisters of serving soldiers; as well as to women serving in the military. ( See also Canadian Women and War.) This was the first time Canadian women were granted the right to vote in federal elections.

Most Canadians supported conscription and the war effort; they therefore also supported the Act.

Aftermath​

The Act undoubtedly increased support for Borden’s party. It was not ultimately a major factor in the 1917 election, though, which the Unionists won. However, for decades afterward, Conservative support in Quebec, and among some ethnic and immigrant groups, was badly damaged.

In the vote on 17 December 1917, some 500,000 Canadian women participated in a federal election for the first time. The Act was repealed at the end of the war; but by 1918, all women born in Canada over the age of 21 would permanently gain the right to vote in federal elections.

The legacy of the Wartime Elections Act is contentious. It granted many women the right to vote, but it also legitimized in law many anti-immigrant sentiments.

And here is the Election Canada Page explanation if an election must be postponed:

Postponing an election

Backgrounder ? Postponing an election

www.elections.ca

I chose only two segments. Those interested can read the rest.

Can an election be postponed?​

Section 59 of the Canada Elections Act allows for an election to be postponed.

If the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) certifies that it has become impracticable for Elections Canada to administer the provisions of the Actin one or more electoral districts because of "flood, fire or other disaster," the Governor in Council (the Governor General, acting on the advice of Cabinet) may postpone the election by a few days in the affected electoral districts, or withdraw the writ in those districts. When a writ is withdrawn in an electoral district, a new election in that district must be ordered within three months.

The CEO would certify that it has become impracticable to administer an election in one or more electoral districts only after having used up all possible adaptations under the Act. This has never happened before.

If an election were to be postponed, how would it work?​

Once the CEO determines that it is impracticable to administer an election:

• The CEO completes a certificate that attests to the impracticability of carrying out the election by reason of a flood, fire or other disaster and names the electoral district(s) affected by this certification.
• The certificate is then delivered to the minister responsible for the Canada Elections Act. Currently, this minister is the Honourable Dominic LeBlanc, President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada.
• Section 59 of the Canada Elections Act provides that the Governor in Council has the option to a) decline to postpone the election, b) postpone the election for up to seven days, or c) postpone the election until a new writ is issued for the affected electoral district(s), which should be no later than three months from the date the election is postponed.
• The Governor in Council may order the postponement of the election or withdrawal of the writ for any electoral district for which the CEO has certified that it is impracticable to carry out the election.
• Once the Governor in Council issues the order, the election is postponed in that electoral district. The general election continues in the rest of the country.
• If the Governor in Council orders the withdrawal of the writ under section 59 of the Act, the CEO must then issue a new writ for each of the affected electoral districts. The Governor in Council determines when the writ will be issued and the date of the new election day.
• The new writ must be issued within three months of the publication in the Canada Gazette of the notice of withdrawal of the writ, and election day must not fall more than 50 days after the issue of the writ.
• As with any new election, the election in the affected electoral district(s) lasts a minimum of 37 days, and candidates are subject to new spending limits.

In short, for our country, this would be extremely bad. Consequences would be felt for many generations into the future (if we have a future after all the land shifts we could experience.... who knows?)

 

[Puma]

"The past is prologue."​

W Shakespeare

Very interesting. However, really dangerous from the standpoint of what people actually want. The people elect the president, not the president choosing to stay or whatever

Yes, very dangerous. I asked Grok if comments on X regarding civil war had increased with the events in Minneapolis. (It would also be interesting to know if Clif High has any data analysis on this subject. I checked his social media accounts, but there is nothing there in the present)
​

Yes, the topic "civil war" is being widely discussed on X right now (January 25-26, 2026), although it does not appear as an official #1 trend in all global or U.S. feeds. There is a significant volume of recent posts mentioning it, especially in the context of political tensions in the United States related to Trump, ICE operations, shootings involving federal agents (such as the case of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis), accusations of government provocation, and extreme divisions between the left and right.
From real-time searches on X:​

There are dozens of posts in the last few hours (even minutes) where users talk about "civil war" as something imminent or already underway. Examples:

●Discussions about how political tribalism and politically motivated deaths (comparing with Ashli Babbitt) inevitably lead to civil war.
●Users saying "we’re underway of a civil war" or "Trump appears to be using ICE to provoke a civil war."
●Criticism of the Trump administration for ICE actions that "are losing the narrative war" and pushing the country toward chaos or tyranny.
●Some see parallels with historical events or predict left-wing or right-wing dictatorship.
●Posts in Spanish and English mixed, with references to corruption, ICE as "Nazis," or armed divisions.​

This has intensified since the Minneapolis incident (where ICE agents killed a legally armed civilian during a protest), and with statements by Trump that some interpret as provocative (such as his comments on "law and order," dictator for a day, or insinuations about elections). There is frustration on both sides: some see ICE as oppressors, others as patriots defending order.​

It is not a massive trend like a global viral event (for example, it does not dominate like #SuperBowl or something similar), but it is a recurring theme in right-wing, anti-Trump, and conspiracy circles on X. The volume has increased significantly in the last 24-48 hours, with posts accumulating hundreds or thousands of likes/reposts in related threads.​

I wondered if history would repeat itself. And I found something else interesting.

As we know, on January 26, 2026, Neptune will enter Aries and remain there until around 2038-2039 (with a brief final retrograde in 2038-2039 before moving on to Taurus) The American Civil War occurred precisely when Neptune was in Aries.

Some sources specify that Neptune entered Aries on April 13, 1861, while others mention that it was in February or March 1862. The fact is that at the outbreak or during most of the war (1861-1865), this event coincided with Neptune's transit through Aries.

This transition lasted approximately 14 years (1861–1875), covering not only the war, but also the subsequent Reconstruction, the abolition of slavery and profound social changes.

Many astrologers emphasize that Neptune in Aries implies the dissolution of borders or collective illusions that lead to armed conflicts over ideals, as well as impulsive actions, but also a spiritual awakening for those who learn the lesson.

The conjunction between Neptune and Saturn will occur on February 20, 2026, and according to astrologer Beatriz Leveratto , it will be an unprecedented event in modern times: "There is no record of an astrological event similar to the one that is going to happen. This conjunction is especially unique."

Also, the conjunction of Saturn and Neptune always dissolves boundaries and shatters idealism. The energy intensifies from January 2026 (when both are in Aries) until April-May 2026, when they gradually separate.

Here are some events that happened during such a conjunction:

April 25, 1846. This is when the war between Mexico and the United States began, and Mexico lost more than half of its territory. Remember the Alamo? The Battle of the Alamo (1836) spurred Texas' independence, which, after being annexed by the US in 1845, led to the US invasion.​

(Joe) In the US, there are certain states - notably Florida and Texas - which have been exemplary in their pushback against this Covid nonsense. They didn't lock down, they opened and returned to normal more quickly, etc. That's kind of strange in a sense because you wouldn't expect that to come from the US - or at least we wouldn't. My point is that right now and over the past year, Florida and Texas were good places to live given what people in most places in the Western world were subjected to. So my question is: What's the prognosis for places like Florida and Texas?

A: Suppression will be attempted...

Q: (L) Alright, I think we've covered what we had to cover, right?

(Joe) "Suppression will be attempted..."

(Andromeda) But not necessarily successful.

(Joe) Revolution?

A: Exactly. Remember the Alamo!!

July 16, 1917. Although the Russian Revolution had begun in February 1917, it was on this date that the July Days began, which would define the formation of what we knew as the USSR.

July 27, 1953, which is when the armistice was signed in the Korean War. Therefore, this is what defines the demilitarized zone.

November 9, 1989, which is when the Berlin Wall fell. And this was the most obvious sign that led to the collapse of the USSR.

The energy of Aries drives conquest, which is why we see figures like Trump talking about taking over Greenland, why areas are beginning to be disputed over resources, and why some countries are already prepared to advance on others for security reasons.

This conjunction not only changes political borders, it can also dissolve internal boundaries, and it is very possible that American citizens will be tested and reach a breaking point with the advance of authoritarianism in America.
​