Q: (Chu) Do we want to ask the main motive?
(Joe) Yeah. Are we correct in assuming that getting rid of Charlie Kirk wasn't the primary motive because of the way that it was done, that it could have been taken out any other more...?
A: Not primarily no.
Q: (L) Was the primary motivation the effect on the psyche of the American people or global people or whatever?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) One of the effects it seems - it's hard to know for sure, but by anecdotal reports - is that a lot of people have turned back to or rekindled their relationship with Christianity at the church. Was that an intended effect?
A: That is a 4D part.
Q: (L) So 4th density STS want people to get all religious and looshy?
A: Mostly. But be aware that there are also some people that turn to religion and do not become part of the feeding mechanism.
Q: (L) So they're just good Christians and doing the right thing. Because let's face it: Christianity and religions in many respects have a beneficial effect on society if it's done right, right?
A: Yes. But it is so seldom done right.
Q: (L) Okay. So those are a minority.
(Joe) In the last session they said... I think I asked if the program change that was planned to be the assassination of Trump that didn't happen, if they had another one planned, another program change plan? In the last session they said, "upcoming". Was the Charlie Kirk assassination that?
A: Yes
Q: (L) I forgot about that.
(Joe) And also in the last session they said that extra protection had been activated or something for people furthering knowledge. So are we to assume that Charlie Kirk wasn't among those furthering knowledge because he wasn't protected?
A: He might have done so much more and that is part of the motivation for selecting him as a target.
Q: (L) So, well, I guess you know what they just told us a while ago that knowledge protects and they were giving us information that could be protective, and Charlie didn't have that kind of view of the world yet. He was only just really starting, I think, to wake up to what was really going on. I mean, he was a really beautiful, beautiful young man and he was sincere and he was honest and he was principled, which came out from his refusal to be bought out and told what to say and who to have on his show and so forth. And that in and of itself, I think, couldn't be tolerated by those forces. So...
(Joe) For example, Benjamin Netanyahu, was he aware of the plot to kill Charlie?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) He's read in on these things. And people's instinct was to call him up for it.
(Joe) Yeah, but is there a positive element to this in the sense that a lot of people are becoming more curious?
A: Ultimately, yes indeed!!
Q: (Niall) They've said in the past that a Batman movie that was released in 2012-ish, which had references to the Sandy Hook shooting in the movie, even though it came out beforehand, was an instance of the Cosmic Mind sending many clues ahead of time. With the Charlie Kirk shooting, there's a 1998 Hollywood movie called Snake Eyes that has loads of similarities with the Kirk assassination. Was this another instance of that?
A: Yes there are many such instances.
Q: (Joe) Is Erica Kirk legitimate?
A: A bit shady. Notice her current behavior.
Q: (Joe) Right, but she wasn't part of that or aware of the plot to kill Charlie?
A: No
Q: (L) I mean, are all of y'all kind of keeping an eye on Twitter where they show her repeatedly in different situations? I mean, not just the rally after the death of Charlie, but taking over the whole TPUSA and... I mean, if you're not aware of it, the question is not for you, but my question to all of you is: Can any of you imagine yourself in her situation acting as she is acting? I mean, really try to put yourself in her shoes. Anybody? I guess not. So, I couldn't imagine it.
(Andromeda) No, not at all.
(L) I mean, she's got two little babies and...
(Andromeda) And she's already up puttin' on a show.
(Chu) It goes against her whole spiel about being a quiet wife and all that.
(Joe) Is Kash Patel aware of the truth about Charlie's assassination?
A: Kash is not in the loop.
Q: (Niall) This is what you said earlier.
(L) Did you say that?
(Niall) He said something like that several days ago. He was joking that, oh, here's Kash finding out what the FBI was told, but he's learning like the rest of us what the FBI said.
(Joe) He's on camera going, "Sorry, I can't tell you any of that because they won't let me. They won't give me information." Aren't you the director? "Yeah. I'm kind of new. There's people who've been here for a long time and they kind of run the show and I'm just a noob." [laughter]
(L) Yeah. He got in there and found out that just being the director was... if you don't have the other outside connections, you're never going to get inside. I am sure everybody has seen that happen in the corporate environment or any kind of job where somebody new comes along.
(Niall) Is the governor of Utah in the loop on this issue?
A: Partly.
Q: (L) I guess that's why they did it in that state.
(Niall) It's like Stepford Wives, that area, at least from what Candace is finding. The whole place is like the Latterday Saints, it's the university, it's the CIA. It's this engineering company that everyone either works for or knows someone who works for.
(Joe) It's an old boys club.
(Andromeda) Creepy.
(Joe) So the device that was the manipulated mic on Charlie's shirt, it contained a small amount of explosives like C4?
A: Yes