I'm thinking that he agreed to this war probably because either outcome fits him: Either Iran falls apart and the US will get Iranian oil or Israel gets destroyed or severely weakened - so the people who he knows tried to assassinate him will be unable to go on any more conquests. Plus, the negative impact on China's energy supply either way.
If they have plans to assassinate Trump, surely they must already have someone close to him, no matter how weakened Israel is. It would not be very objective to think in general about the weakening of the country (Israel) only, when they have spread like the virus they are to sustain their survival and even more importantly, their goals at the global level. They are not so foolish as to concentrate all their power in one place.
Surely part of the plan to see Israelis burning Patagonia and other places in the world to create settlements, is part of that, because the side of the "Good Guys" will not bomb them to such an extent that they can never be reproduced again.
I have also thought about that possibility, a weakened Israel that allows Trump more maneuver time but it would be very naive to think like that when we don't even know if Trump would still be the president at that moment, something that no one seems to be taking into account by just focusing on "Trump's evil" when we already have enough example with the Obama experiment, his color did not bring peace either but brought false illusion to people and easy acceptance.
Assassinating Trump would help even more to maintain that rhetoric of "national security" and it will depend on the psychopath they have as president at that moment.
Limited and linearly I can think of only two things, the USA retreats for a moderate time where it returns to its cave to recover and the same for Israel, focusing only on smaller-scale wars, smaller-scale attacks because if they do nothing, Russia and China and other countries will have more time to grow in every sense and obviously that should prevent it until they are back to optimal to continue with something worse.
That is, only in the "best" of cases as long as Iran is not struck down prematurely and is left with the stuck nuclear bomb.
A 4.3‑magnitude earthquake strikes the Jirash area, south of Fars Province in Iran, at a depth of 10 km.
Western and Israeli defense experts have expressed concern that this might be a nuclear test conducted by the Iranian regime.
This is, I think, the second time that earthquakes have been registered on the part of Iran that are associated with nuclear tests. And the first time was precisely before the war began.
It's a curious "coincidence" that it happened in these two countries... the earth is sending signals! (laughs).
Damn AI, it has ruined journalistic video evidence for us, as well as cat videos. I won't forgive that.
Yes, it's the flag that looks really off and is just a bit too obvious.
The videos in AI always have imperfections that must be corrected that are achieved by repeating the generation of the same video until the desired is obtained or that at least can be corrected by lowering the quality of the video in subsequent editing to something close to real videos such as applying blurs and distortions that make it difficult to observe the predetermined imperceptions of the AI.
The AI is still very clumsy in maintaining the geometry of objects in an exact way.
An eye trained in creating 3D elements and video editing
could find those details much better because it knows very well the level of fluids of an animation and video quality as well as the type of effect and filter to cover imperfections.
I have noticed that Grok, since it makes a synthesis of the information collected from the internet, and based on that, according to the "greater weight" that the news gets and that users keep the opinion matrix as "true" of something false, Grok will keep the information as true. That is already a reason not to trust Grok to identify that it is false and that it is not.
In those cases, it is better to go to the primary source that are publishing those videos, most of them have their watermark to precisely avoid bad information and search for it in their file banks, especially now that they are videos and images that are being controlled and reduces their massification generating the right publication funnel to be able to detect them.
This union of the grilles and the candle holder is not consistent and conveniently a drastic zoom is made so as not to observe it in time but that grille rarely merges with another.
Regarding the movement effect, it follows the same rocking pattern that goes unnoticed by the continuous zoom application, but it does not seem to vary at any time and that rocking usually appears to me in my AI videos.
Additionally, I have not found this video in the main archive of the accounts I follow, it does not appear and has been deleted from other accounts where people comment that it is fake.
There is no continuity of the elements in an area where apparently the buildings are made in the same way. The windows change in size considerably.
Another problem with AI, maintaining continuity with cars and shadows. That car looks strange and there are missing shadows on that tree compared to the others.
At least the Iranian accounts that I follow on X, have not echoed this news. With such an extraordinary shot, they haven't published it.
It is a matter of paying close attention to the homogeneity of the elements in the video.
newrepublic.com
www.ibtimes.co.uk
www.ynetnews.com
