Haiku
Jedi Master
Got a good-sized sunspot 4420, directly facing us for the next three days, bad news if it goes off, Haiku ...
Big sunspot ...
Big sunspot ...
Sol (Sun) and its phenomena
- Thread starter mabar
- Start date
The twenty-eighth and the twenty-ninth, as expected
Seestar (Official ZWO Group) | Sunspots 4419 and 4420 have 'beta-gamma-delta' magnetic fields that harbor energy for X-class solar flares | Facebook
Sunspots 4419 and 4420 have 'beta-gamma-delta' magnetic fields that harbor energy for X-class solar flares. AR4419 has already produced two X2.5-class solar flares on April 24. The two X-flares were...
www.facebook.com
Monday, Apr. 27, 2026
A POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS SUNSPOT: Don't be surprised if there's another X-flare today. Active sunspot 4420 is directly facing Earth, and it is potentially dangerous. David Wilson photographed the behemoth from his backyard solar observatory in Inverness, Scotland.
"A movie of this sunspot shows a lot of dynamics," says Wilson. "One of the interior spots is rotating clockwise and another is rotating counter-clockwise."
In addition to the turmoil, the sunspot has a 'beta-gamma-delta' magnetic field. This means it is unstable with latent energy for X-class solar flares. Earth will be in the strike zone for the next 3-4 days. Solar flare alerts: SMS Text
Dr. Tamitha Skov's latest insight into what may develop from the current Solar activity
Big Flares with Eruption Eye Candy & A PanSTARRS Photobomb
Space Weather Spotlight 26 April 2026
6.1 Earthquake coming into the Japan Region. Sunday 4/26
Apr 26, 2026 Big Island Video News
HAWAIʻI VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK - On April 23rd, episode 45 high lava fountains lasted for 8 and a half hours. After the episode was over, a strong glow and flames could be seen at the vents for days.
Dr. Ryan French on Substack
A POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS SUNSPOT: Don't be surprised if there's another X-flare today. Active sunspot 4420 is directly facing Earth, and it is potentially dangerous. David Wilson photographed the behemoth from his backyard solar observatory in Inverness, Scotland.
"A movie of this sunspot shows a lot of dynamics," says Wilson. "One of the interior spots is rotating clockwise and another is rotating counter-clockwise."
In addition to the turmoil, the sunspot has a 'beta-gamma-delta' magnetic field. This means it is unstable with latent energy for X-class solar flares. Earth will be in the strike zone for the next 3-4 days. Solar flare alerts: SMS Text
Dr. Tamitha Skov's latest insight into what may develop from the current Solar activity
Big Flares with Eruption Eye Candy & A PanSTARRS Photobomb
6.1 Earthquake coming into the Japan Region. Sunday 4/26
HAWAIʻI VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK - On April 23rd, episode 45 high lava fountains lasted for 8 and a half hours. After the episode was over, a strong glow and flames could be seen at the vents for days.
Dr. Ryan French on Substack
Rounding up
Overall, it’s been a quiet two months on the Sun, with the exception of the two major solar flares earlier this week. But this is undoubtedly a good thing, as strong solar activity during the Artemis II mission could have caused real complications for the crew and spacecraft operations. Moving forward, this newsletter will keep you up-to-date with happenings on the Sun – including solar flares, eclipses, space weather, and more!
So after the comet zoomed out, no more X flares on the sun for the time being. The bug zapper did his job, though.
An interesting observation of how most of the activity comes from the North, which hasn't been the norm for the entire current cycle.
Comet PANSTARRS approached from Northwest.
Up to a point, it's useful to see the details. But we've got to be able to zoom out, way out.
Activity in the North vs South in regards to coronal mass ejections, could be a clue as to where the galactic current is coming from.
There's not only plasma discharge comet theory, but also "surge in the heliogap field", a concept introduced by the Cs to explain Earth Changes and coronal mass ejections in the 1994 and 2024 sessions. Essentially, a clue for a galactic current coming into the solar system:
May 18th 2024
July 22, 1994:
Let's keep the above in mind as we witness coronal mass ejections.
An interesting observation of how most of the activity comes from the North, which hasn't been the norm for the entire current cycle.
Not all of them, of course, there was comet MAPS earlier this year:
Comet PANSTARRS approached from Northwest.
Up to a point, it's useful to see the details. But we've got to be able to zoom out, way out.
Activity in the North vs South in regards to coronal mass ejections, could be a clue as to where the galactic current is coming from.
There's not only plasma discharge comet theory, but also "surge in the heliogap field", a concept introduced by the Cs to explain Earth Changes and coronal mass ejections in the 1994 and 2024 sessions. Essentially, a clue for a galactic current coming into the solar system:
May 18th 2024
July 22, 1994:
Let's keep the above in mind as we witness coronal mass ejections.
From what you posted from the 2024 session, does it therefore mean that the Sun could quite quickly be recharged by incoming surge from the galactic current regardless of how many comets discharge the solar capacitor? In other words, just because the sun has now been discharged, it could quickly gather charge potential again. Or am I misunderstanding it?
I would say, open.
These are clues:
But then, Laurentien2 brought arcing without comets:
I was wondering if the weakening of the magnetic field can be, maybe, one of the cause for what is discussed in this session, the electro machining of the surface of the planet and if so, what other source (body) could potentially cause it.
cassiopaeatranscripts.org
: (L) So in other words, the powers that be that are running the show aren't really as smart as they think they are...
A: Exactly.
Q: (L) They never counted on their satellites getting fried.
(Pierre) And other electronic equipment through which they monitor...
Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search
A: Exactly.
Q: (L) They never counted on their satellites getting fried.
(Pierre) And other electronic equipment through which they monitor...
Which brings the galactic current as a possibility.
However, from this discussion:
The main trends in the current cycle seem to be the comet cluster, recent perihelion with Nemesis, inner core dynamics. The sun's activity doesn't seem to be a big player right now, except when discharged by comets. If anything, it's the magnetic field which seems weaker and weaker.
In the case of Halley's comet during the last passage, the uptick in solar activity happened before the perihelion.
In the case of Halley's comet during the last passage, the solar flares were ejected on the opposite side of the comet location, towards Earth and not the comet.
SasaM
Dagobah Resident
Well, according to Wikipedia and other internet sources, that passage happened in 1986, at the start or the time of the minimum of solar cycle 22 (link).
BTW, what was suggested about the cometary induced uptick in solar activity was only sort of a conjecture based on observing what happened just during this last comet's approach, so from statistical PoV the odds of being wrong are more or less the same as being on the right track.
In relation to Halley's comet, there is also this fun fact about SC 22:
It would be interesting to see time distribution of the flares and CMEs during Halley's comet last passage and what else was there in the skies during that time.
Could you please provide a source for your info, maybe there could also be some additional and more detailed information about solar activity at that time?
Thanks.
BTW, what was suggested about the cometary induced uptick in solar activity was only sort of a conjecture based on observing what happened just during this last comet's approach, so from statistical PoV the odds of being wrong are more or less the same as being on the right track.
Yep, as they say, every comet is different.
It would be interesting to see time distribution of the flares and CMEs during Halley's comet last passage and what else was there in the skies during that time.
Could you please provide a source for your info, maybe there could also be some additional and more detailed information about solar activity at that time?
Thanks.
I haven't found that there was anything else during that time in the skies. It all happened a few days before perihelion. Here are some articles:
A very intense geomagnetic storm, the largest observed in 26 years, was observed in early February 1986 having just been preceded by a series of six solar flares during the period 3–7 February. The storm and its antecedent flares are currently a subject of great interest because of the unusually large magnitude of the various geomagnetic effects that obtained. The fact that the flares were moderate to large in soft X-ray intensity, but much smaller than the largest that the Sun is capable of producing, coupled with the fact that these events occurred near the minimum of the current solar activity cycle, adds to the uniqueness of the overall episode.
This paper describes the special circumstances surrounding these events and offers an interpretation of the cause and effect relationships through a numerical simulation of the dynamical evolutionary processes that may have occurred in interplanetary space.
The solar flares of February 1986 and the ensuing intense geomagnetic storm - Solar Physics
A very intense geomagnetic storm, the largest observed in 26 years, was observed in early February 1986 having just been preceded by a series of six solar flares during the period 3–7 February. The storm and its antecedent flares are currently a subject of great interest because of the unusually...link.springer.com
SasaM
Dagobah Resident
Well, the Wikipedia says that Halley's comet's perihelion occured at February 8th 1986, which is not so much off in terms of that conjecture.Yep, as they say, every comet is different.
...
I haven't found that there was anything else during that time in the skies. It all happened a few days before perihelion. Here are some articles:
During minima of solar activity, solar magnetic field configuration is rather stable and presumably mainly of dipole character, with field lines smoothly running more or less parallel and relatively close to the solar surface especially in equatorial region.
If Halley's comet's e-m field was strong enough to affect the solar magnetic field lines from further away as it was approaching the Sun, it could have started to drag and pull them sufficiently before it reached perihelion timewise. If so, it would start to sort of wind the solar magnetic field lines around the Sun as it traveled, helped also with the rotation of the Sun. When that winding stretched the lines beyond the field capacity to sustain their integrity, they would break. The point of rupture, near the solar surface that might produce tangible solar flares and CMEs, would be more likely to occur at the root of such stretched winded lines relatively closer to the Sun than to the actual comet's 'grabbing' point, which for strong and long enough dragging and winding might as easily happen to be on the opposite side of the solar sphere than where the comet would actually be located, and also slightly before its perihelion when the comet would already be in Sun's vicinity.
But, as you said, every comet basically has its own story to tell, and these theoretical remarks might or might not apply in general to cometary interactions with solar magnetic field. They might be useful though in a sense of providing some color to, at least in my case, more or less invisible or transparent concept of cometary discharges of the solar capacitor. In that way we can attach some provisional hypothetical mental figure to the phenomenon, OSIT.
NASA says that perihelion occurred at February 9th 1986.
And like Laura said, it makes you wonder if some of these celestial objects are perhaps sometimes tools of higher forces. If that's true, then we cannot completely predict what will they do.
Trending content
-
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
