2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

They 'let' him win. Which was not exactly the case, but they did find a way to make use of his presidency to advance the agenda. Anyway, some thoughtful analysis in this discussion. Jones outlook seems to have matured. He also takes on some responsibility for what happened on Jan. 6th.
Don't know if I'd use thoughtful analysis and Alex Jones in the same breath.
When Q first came onto the scene, Jones was singing its praises and even claimed to be in contact with the source. Jones is a grifter who makes wild claims and doesn't take accountability for completely changing his story (just like Q).
 
Don't know if I'd use thoughtful analysis and Alex Jones in the same breath.
When Q first came onto the scene, Jones was singing its praises and even claimed to be in contact with the source. Jones is a grifter who makes wild claims and doesn't take accountability for completely changing his story (just like Q).
To my knowledge, he wasn't a Q person from the start. I used to watch his shows a few years ago and he has always had a negative outlook on Q. I thought it was because he was taking attention away from his show as another conspiratorial platform.

If he was a ever a Q praiser, he wasn't one very long.
 
To my knowledge, he wasn't a Q person from the start. I used to watch his shows a few years ago and he has always had a negative outlook on Q. I thought it was because he was taking attention away from his show as another conspiratorial platform.

If he was a ever a Q praiser, he wasn't one very long.
Yeah exactly, he was losing viewers to the new Q movement so he tried to corral his people back by saying that Q was a legitimate source and that he was in contact with the Q team. He even brought on "one of the guys behind Q" for a phone interview. I don't really listen to Jones so don't know how long he was Q-grifting but I did see that in the early days.
 
bjorn said:
A war with China is not on the agenda.

Another way of saying “war”, when you strip the word of its patriotic and justifying connotations, is “Human Sacrifice”, so if you tweak the above (along with some word-play on the word "with"), you get the following:

“An American lead Human Sacrifice (in tandem) with China is not on the agenda.”

“Insurrectionist Forces” seems to be what’s on the menu this time around, and both empires have their “enemies at the gates” to go to “War” with. The US has the Christians, Pro-Trumpers, and Republicans in their sights (although how this will pan out is still uncertain), while China has Taiwan, Tibet, and Xinjiang in theirs.

And that, at least, IS on the agenda, or that’s how it looks to me from where I am standing.

Robin
 
So... No uprising or false flag today? Interesting. Thought something would happen, based on the crappy flyers. Did I miss it?
Perhaps the people who might have rose in earnest today took a lesson from the way Jan 6th got played and decided, “F**k this. I’m not getting blamed for whatever those infiltrating antifa motherf**ers decide to do - all the while dressed as us and carrying our flags - intending to sow destruction to be hung on us in the media! I’m not being the next poster boy for their lies.”

Nothing better than having your enemies plan you a party, and you don’t show up. Best way to make the left look stupid? Leave them to run the show all by themselves. Like the Hell’s Angels ran Altamont.🤣 Then all they have are their bad actors. All of whom belong to their side. Eventually it’s gonna occur to someone to say, “Hey, where are all the actual Trump Nation folks at, anyway? There’s 75 million of them. If none of them are here, well that makes me nervous.” :rotfl:
You get the gist!
 

Fortress Washington Occupied and Militarized​






What’s going on in the nation’s capital is unprecedented.

Around 25,000 troops, unknown numbers of secret service agents, other federal security forces, and local police turned the city into a blockaded armed camp ahead of illegitimate transition of power on January 20.

The nation’s capital resembles occupied Baghdad’s Green Zone that’s half-way around the world from Washington DC.

Seven-foot-high non-scalable barricades topped with razor wire surround the Capitol and various federal buildings.

Thousands of heavily armed National Guard troops and other security forces — with orders to use lethal force against alleged threats — guard the city’s perimeter and virtually everything important inside.

Bridges into the city and National Mall will be closed ahead of Wednesday’s transition of power.

At checkpoints, IDs of occupants in cars, no other modes of transport, or on foot entering or leaving the city are checked.

The Military Times reported that “National Guard troops from (virtually all US (states) continue to pour into DC for…security.”

Army General Daniel Hokanson, head of the National Guard Bureau, is commanding what’s going on.

Deployment of troops was authorized for up to 30 days for transition of power preparations, what’s planned for January 20 and its aftermath.

The Washington Post, located in the city on K Street NW, said it’s “closed off like never before,” adding:

“(T)he Secret Service has launched a massive security operation.”

“Vehicle traffic in much of the city will be prohibited or limited to residents and businesses only.”

“Metro is shuttering stations in the city’s core and near the Mall.”

“Street closures will continue through Thursday, and are subject to change at the discretion of the Secret Service.”

Mayor Muriel E. Bowser noted the unprecedented interruption of daily life for city residents and businesses while all of the above continues.

Saying “we are in unchartered waters” greatly over-dramatizes preparations for alleged threats that are highly unlikely to happen unless one or more state-sponsored false flags are planned to further vilify Trump and his supporters.

No reported intelligence or other information suggests a serious enough or any threat to warrant over-the-top preparations — notably 25,000 National Guard troops from all states.

No explanation was given for what’s going on at enormous taxpayer expense — other than non-specific remarks.

The best FBI director Christopher Wray would offer was saying the following:

“We are seeing an extensive amount of concerning online chatter — that’s the best way I would describe it — about a number of events surrounding the inauguration” with no further elaboration.

His remark suggested no organized or other planned threat(s) to inauguration day events — likely because there are none expected.

According to one observer who walked around the perimeter of barricades twice this week, it’s nearly impossible for any unauthorized vehicle or person to get anywhere near close to where inaugural ceremonies will be conducted.

At Secret Service discretion, closures, barriers, and other preparations are subject to change.

A Final Comment

On Friday, Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser’s remark was an Orwellian shot across the bow for what may be coming ahead nationwide, saying:

“(O)ur entire country is going to have to deal with how our intelligence apparatus, security apparatus at every level deal with a very real and present threat to our nation (sic).”

Her remark indicates a new abnormal for the city that perhaps is coming to the US nationwide.

The only “threat to our nation” is state-sponsored.

A free and open society appears on the chopping block for elimination — totalitarian rule enforced by police state harshness appears coming to replace it.View attachment 41801
 

Attachments

  • 1610974583348.png
    1610974583348.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 11

FBI vetting National Guard troops in DC over insider attack concerns​



The FBI is vetting every National Guard member stationed in the nation’s capital for Inauguration Day after concerns of a possible attack from within the ranks.

The vetting process, spurned by worries from defense officials, was confirmed by Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy in an interview with The Associated Press.

”We’re continually going through the process, and taking second, third looks at every one of the individuals assigned to this operation,” McCarthy said.

“The question is, is that all of them? Are there others? We need to be conscious of it and we need to put all of the mechanisms in place to thoroughly vet these men and women who would support any operations like this.”

Officials told the AP the FBI began screening the National Guard troops upon their arrival to Washington, D.C. over a week ago.

McCarthy said that so far no threats have been detected.

The screening of all 25,000 Guard troops is expected to be completed by Wednesday, when President-elect Joe Biden is inaugurated.

In addition to the review, which involves running names of troops through FBI-maintained watchlists, McCarthy said guard members are receiving training to detect potential insider threats.
 
It might be interesting to attempt to evaluate Trump in terms of Zionism. As per Laurent Guyenot's book "From Yahweh to Zion," since WWII no president in line with the Zionists failed to get re-elected, with LBJ the only exception (I believe) since the Vietnam War rendered him so unpopular. Trump's Middle East policy would seem to fall on the Zionist side of things -- particularly given his son in law's involvement -- and yet this too failed to get him in office for a second term. Or am I missing something relative to the Zionists? Did Trump fail on their terms? If not, why did the Zionist faction of the Deep State fail Trump?

Here's what I wrote on this previously re: Kushner/Trump's negotiations with Israel, UAE, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia (later followed by another nation, I think). These new alliances form a formidable front against Iran, of course, so it's hard to call these "peace negotiations."

 
Back
Top Bottom