shijing
The Living Force
I have been working on this topic since the Nostratic question was answered, and I wanted to write it up into a thread as a way to show thanks and give something back, especially in light of the fact that many of the questions forum members posted didn’t end up getting a reply. The purpose of this thread is to use the Cassiopaean transcripts to focus on Kantekkian history and culture, trying to infer as much as possible from what we have at hand. Since I am a historical linguist, I am going to do this primarily through the lens of language, although input from other fields would be very welcome. I also include information on other racial groups below in an attempt to learn more about the Kantekkians by way of contrast in a broader context. I apologize for not including individual session dates, which would have been quite daunting – they can be included in the future if need be.
It should be noted that the terms ‘Aryans’ and ‘Celts’ are used somewhat interchangeably throughout the transcripts. ‘Aryan’ seems to be used in the older sense of ‘Indo-European’, whereas ‘Celt’ may be broadly seen as indicating western Europeans, although the term properly refers to a specific Indo-European subgroup. In general, ‘Aryan’ is used as the most inclusive label, although the two are distinguished at one point:
‘Caucasian’ is designated as a subgroup of ‘Aryan’ as well, being generally synonymous with ‘European’:
Aryans are also distinguished from the original Atlanteans who were extant at the evacuation of Kantek:
Pre-Earth History
About the Merkabah:
So Kantek is the original home of the Aryans, who destroyed their planet with psychic energy. The Aryans were transferred to Earth via either the ‘Mother Stone’ or with the help of the Lizards. At least some of them had been in direct and regular contact with the C’s on Kantek.
Culture
There is not much about original Kantekkian culture. One enigmatic excerpt is the following:
Then there is this:
Physiology
There is this about ‘Nordic’ genes:
However, this is said in the course of a conversation about the Nordic Covenant:
Then there is this, which leads into a discussion about iron:
Transition to Earth and Atlantean period
So hundreds of millions of Kantekkians were dropped in the Caucasus and surrounding region, in what was probably part of Atlantis. They proceeded to take over the northern part of Atlantis, and apparently had a nuclear war with one of the other groups, the Paranthas.
It was also during the time of Atlantis that the Kantekkians/Aryans began to develop a subterranean civilization:
Post-Atlantean history
Mythology
Pre-Kantekkian Races
The following figure provides a general picture of the major hypothetical language superphyla, some of which are accepted by mainstream academia and others of which are quite controversial:
Map 1: Language phyla of the world (Greenberg) (http://starling.rinet.ru/maps/maps20.php?lan=en)
Africans
The African group, which is located in sub-Saharan Africa, is represented primarily by Nilo-Saharan and Niger-Kordofanian. The third and southernmost group, Khoisan, is notable for their small stature and click languages (popularized in the movie The Gods Must Be Crazy). The following information exists in the transcripts:
So ‘black people’ (which I understand to specifically denote sub-Saharan Africans) are the product of hybridization between a Nordic genetic template and Neanderthal. They are said to have had a history at the top of the pyramid in a hierarchical society, were apparently quite cruel, and are working off the karma for that cruelty in the current era. There was one other question about a specific African ethnic group, the Nubians, who originate in northern Sudan (note: 'Nubian' here may have also been used as a more general term for sub-Saharan African):
The East Indian aborigines are part of a large group of Australoid people connected by the C’s with other peoples in the Pacific with a similar phenotype, related to the Paranthas of Atlantis (see below). What is unclear from the above is what the other component of the genetic mixing was (presumably African of some sort). It is also interesting that their origin is said to be the Cauc[as]us range, which is also the general area where the Kantekkians were originally transferred after their rescue from Kantek.
Australoids
Australoid is a broad cover term for people in the southwestern Pacific area who have dark skin, frizzy hair, broad noses, and other features. They include native Australians, natives of Papua New Guinea, Melanesians, and the Negritos of places like the Philippines, Andaman islands, and southern India (where they were probably more numerous in prehistory). The two language phyla in Map 1 above which correspond to this group are Indo-Pacific and Australian. The closest mention to this group in the transcripts is the following:
So while it is said that the third race of Atlanteans, the Paranthas, were destroyed in a cataclysm, their closest of kin appear to be the modern day Australoids.
Asians
I take the term ‘Oriental’ in the transcripts to be equivalent to East Asian, and especially Southeast Asian (including the southern Chinese and the Asians to their west and throughout the Southeast Asian peninsula and into the Pacific – for northeast Asians, see below). The language phylum that corresponds most directly with this group is Austric. The transcripts have this to say:
So East Asians are descendants of the original Lemurians, and are presently located to the northwest of where the C’s indicate Lemuria itself used to be located. There is also a brief exchange about a more specific group, the Tibetans:
Native Americans
There are two language phyla which correspond to the term ‘Native American’ which is used in the transcripts. The most obvious one is Amerind, which is located throughout the southern half of North America and all of South America. The other is Dene-Caucasian, which is a super-phylum on par with Nostratic, and extends to the south of Nostratic from Europe, across Eurasia, to North America.
Map 2: The Dene-Caucasian phylum (http://starling.rinet.ru/maps/maps5.php?lan=en)
It can be seen comparing map 2 with map 1 above that Dene-Caucasian was likely spoken more extensively to the north, but it was overrun by Eurasiatic (a Nostratic subgroup), possibly as a result of the speakers of the latter being in a position to take advantage of the land freed up by retreating glaciers after the last ice age (compare map 4 below):
Map 3: Ice sheet coverage during the last ice age (_http://geography.howstuffworks.com/terms-and-associations/ice-age1.htm)
Based on recent work by Vitalij Shevoroshkin, it is starting to look like Amerind and Dene-Caucasian may have a closer relationship with each other than was previously realized, but it is still too early to say for sure. The following can be found in the transcripts regarding the Native Americans:
The following seems to address more recent prehistory:
Finally, the Mayans in particular have been asked about on more than one occasion:
Although it is stated that the Mayans were taken by the Lizards to ‘Lizzieland’, it either wasn’t a permanent trip or otherwise it didn’t include all of the Mayans, since they exist today in Cenral America (as stated above).
Kantekkians
Finally, the Kantekkians have been associated with Nostratic, which in the map 1 above includes Dravidian, Kartvelian, and Eurasiatic (which itself includes Indo-European, Uralic, Altaic, and the Paleosiberian languages Gilyak (Nivkh), Ainu, Chukchi-Kamchatkan, Eskimo-Aleut):
Map 4: The Eurasiatic branch of Nostratic (http://starling.rinet.ru/maps/maps8.php?lan=en)
Afroasiatic (which includes Semitic) is considered to be a sister of Nostratic:
Map 5: The Afroasiatic family (http://starling.rinet.ru/maps/maps2.php?lan=en)
Here’s what the C’s have to say about Nostratic:
So the C’s basically say that Kantekkians spoke pre-Nostratic, and that what can be reconstructed as Nostratic using data from the languages of Earth is essentially a heavily creolized form of the language that includes a significant component from the languages being spoken on Earth (probably in Atlantis) at the time. A tentative hypothesis would be that the language phylum Nostratic was most-heavily influenced by was Dene-Caucasian, which includes languages spoken primarily by people with a north Asian phenotype (but also Caucasian in Europe and Amerind in North America).
So it looks like what happened is this: The Kantekkians were transferred to the area in and around the Caucasus when first brought to Earth, and it is still in that area that you find the greatest concentration of their original phenotype (light-haired, light-skinned, blue-eyed). They proceeded to conquer all of what we know today as Europe, and at the same time spread eastward. They entered what is now Asia and intermixed with the ethnic group that was already there (speakers of Dene-Caucasian, and probably related to the group known today as the Native Americans); they also entered India, intermixing with an Australoid group related to the earlier Paranthas.
Indo-European
Of all the Nostratic subgroups, the one asked about most frequently in the transcripts is Indo-European. When Indo-European (Aryan) languages are asked about, Germanic is given as the most conservative subgroup:
Celtic is normally considered a separate Indo-European subgroup from Germanic, so if the above is not in error, one possible interpretation is that the conservative group being indicated is the one which includes both of these groups as well as Italic (a recent computational phylogeny groups them in this way: [Celtic [Germanic-Italic]].
Map 6: Indo-European subgroups (http://starling.rinet.ru/maps/maps30.php?lan=en)
As a sidenote, Sanskrit, another Indo-European language, is also discussed:
This would make sense technically since the Kantekkians were one of the three primary races which comprised the Atlantean civilization.
I am not sure what criteria were used here, or why Sanskrit was chosen – it is not the oldest written language. It is still used in restricted contexts, so perhaps it is meant that it is the oldest spoken language with an unbroken tradition.
We find out more about the Indo-Europeans in the context of questions about the Biblical Levites:
Semites
Besides the Indo-Europeans, the Semites are also asked about extensively (note that in the earlier transcripts, the Semites and the Jews are not kept distinct, although it becomes clear that they are two separate groups of people):
So if the Semites are considered ‘Aryan’, it implies that they are originally Kantekkian, meaning that the connection of Afroasiatic to Nostratic (mentioned above) is valid. It is also quite interesting that the Semites played ‘a significant role in the collapse of Atlantis’ and that ‘they were the reason for the destruction of the Jews of the “Abrahamic” line’. Aramaic, a Semitic language, is also asked about, confirming an Aryan connection:
The Egyptians are also asked about briefly:
Regarding the relationship between the ‘northern peoples’ and the Mediterranean peoples, the following excerpt focusing on the Hyperboreans is interesting:
Genetic Correlations
It is also informative to take a look at a human genetic map (Cavalli-Sforza) and compare it with what has already been discussed linguistically:
Figure 1: Genetic map of human populations (Cavalli-Sforza, from _http://www.friesian.com/trees.htm)
As has been noted by Cavalli-Sforza himself, there is a fairly strong correlation between genetic groups and language phyla. First, African populations stand apart from all other populations. The Asian group breaks into North Asian and a Southeast Asian groups -- in the latter, there is a division between Australoid and Southeast Asian populations, which are correlated above with Paranthan relatives and Lemurians, respectively. The North Asian clade breaks into Caucasoid on the one hand (correlated with conservative Kantekkian) and another group that in turn divides into NE Asian and American. It is the American group that is correlated here with pre-Kantekkian 'Atlanteans', and I suggest that the NE Asian clade represents a 'transition zone' between the Caucasoid Kantekkians and the Amerind Atlanteans where heavy contact took place between the two groups in what is now northern Asia.
More specific ethnic groups
Finally, the following is a list of other more specific groups which have been asked about in the transcripts, beginning with groups which have Kantekkian affinities:
Picts
Druids
Slavs
Scythians
Indian Aryans
Finns
Maltese
Notice that the Caucasus is mentioned in both the case of the Scythians and the Slavs, which makes sense if that is the original area where the Kantekkians were located.
The following groups are either non-Kantekkian or their affiliation is unsure:
Basques
Minoans (and Myceneans)
Sumerians
Etruscans
Jews
Gypsies
The Basques and Minoans are both listed as ‘Atlantean descendants’, which makes sense at least in the case of the Basques since their language is a subgroup of Dene-Caucasian. Note also that there seems to have been an extra amount of 4D STS genetic tweaking involved in the cases of both the Jews and the Gypsies.
Edit: Added more maps and genetic tree (with discussion)
It should be noted that the terms ‘Aryans’ and ‘Celts’ are used somewhat interchangeably throughout the transcripts. ‘Aryan’ seems to be used in the older sense of ‘Indo-European’, whereas ‘Celt’ may be broadly seen as indicating western Europeans, although the term properly refers to a specific Indo-European subgroup. In general, ‘Aryan’ is used as the most inclusive label, although the two are distinguished at one point:
‘Caucasian’ is designated as a subgroup of ‘Aryan’ as well, being generally synonymous with ‘European’:
Aryans are also distinguished from the original Atlanteans who were extant at the evacuation of Kantek:
Pre-Earth History
About the Merkabah:
So Kantek is the original home of the Aryans, who destroyed their planet with psychic energy. The Aryans were transferred to Earth via either the ‘Mother Stone’ or with the help of the Lizards. At least some of them had been in direct and regular contact with the C’s on Kantek.
Culture
There is not much about original Kantekkian culture. One enigmatic excerpt is the following:
Then there is this:
Physiology
There is this about ‘Nordic’ genes:
However, this is said in the course of a conversation about the Nordic Covenant:
Then there is this, which leads into a discussion about iron:
Transition to Earth and Atlantean period
So hundreds of millions of Kantekkians were dropped in the Caucasus and surrounding region, in what was probably part of Atlantis. They proceeded to take over the northern part of Atlantis, and apparently had a nuclear war with one of the other groups, the Paranthas.
It was also during the time of Atlantis that the Kantekkians/Aryans began to develop a subterranean civilization:
Post-Atlantean history
Mythology
Pre-Kantekkian Races
The following figure provides a general picture of the major hypothetical language superphyla, some of which are accepted by mainstream academia and others of which are quite controversial:
Map 1: Language phyla of the world (Greenberg) (http://starling.rinet.ru/maps/maps20.php?lan=en)
Africans
The African group, which is located in sub-Saharan Africa, is represented primarily by Nilo-Saharan and Niger-Kordofanian. The third and southernmost group, Khoisan, is notable for their small stature and click languages (popularized in the movie The Gods Must Be Crazy). The following information exists in the transcripts:
So ‘black people’ (which I understand to specifically denote sub-Saharan Africans) are the product of hybridization between a Nordic genetic template and Neanderthal. They are said to have had a history at the top of the pyramid in a hierarchical society, were apparently quite cruel, and are working off the karma for that cruelty in the current era. There was one other question about a specific African ethnic group, the Nubians, who originate in northern Sudan (note: 'Nubian' here may have also been used as a more general term for sub-Saharan African):
The East Indian aborigines are part of a large group of Australoid people connected by the C’s with other peoples in the Pacific with a similar phenotype, related to the Paranthas of Atlantis (see below). What is unclear from the above is what the other component of the genetic mixing was (presumably African of some sort). It is also interesting that their origin is said to be the Cauc[as]us range, which is also the general area where the Kantekkians were originally transferred after their rescue from Kantek.
Australoids
Australoid is a broad cover term for people in the southwestern Pacific area who have dark skin, frizzy hair, broad noses, and other features. They include native Australians, natives of Papua New Guinea, Melanesians, and the Negritos of places like the Philippines, Andaman islands, and southern India (where they were probably more numerous in prehistory). The two language phyla in Map 1 above which correspond to this group are Indo-Pacific and Australian. The closest mention to this group in the transcripts is the following:
So while it is said that the third race of Atlanteans, the Paranthas, were destroyed in a cataclysm, their closest of kin appear to be the modern day Australoids.
Asians
I take the term ‘Oriental’ in the transcripts to be equivalent to East Asian, and especially Southeast Asian (including the southern Chinese and the Asians to their west and throughout the Southeast Asian peninsula and into the Pacific – for northeast Asians, see below). The language phylum that corresponds most directly with this group is Austric. The transcripts have this to say:
So East Asians are descendants of the original Lemurians, and are presently located to the northwest of where the C’s indicate Lemuria itself used to be located. There is also a brief exchange about a more specific group, the Tibetans:
Native Americans
There are two language phyla which correspond to the term ‘Native American’ which is used in the transcripts. The most obvious one is Amerind, which is located throughout the southern half of North America and all of South America. The other is Dene-Caucasian, which is a super-phylum on par with Nostratic, and extends to the south of Nostratic from Europe, across Eurasia, to North America.
Map 2: The Dene-Caucasian phylum (http://starling.rinet.ru/maps/maps5.php?lan=en)
It can be seen comparing map 2 with map 1 above that Dene-Caucasian was likely spoken more extensively to the north, but it was overrun by Eurasiatic (a Nostratic subgroup), possibly as a result of the speakers of the latter being in a position to take advantage of the land freed up by retreating glaciers after the last ice age (compare map 4 below):
Map 3: Ice sheet coverage during the last ice age (_http://geography.howstuffworks.com/terms-and-associations/ice-age1.htm)
Based on recent work by Vitalij Shevoroshkin, it is starting to look like Amerind and Dene-Caucasian may have a closer relationship with each other than was previously realized, but it is still too early to say for sure. The following can be found in the transcripts regarding the Native Americans:
The following seems to address more recent prehistory:
Finally, the Mayans in particular have been asked about on more than one occasion:
Although it is stated that the Mayans were taken by the Lizards to ‘Lizzieland’, it either wasn’t a permanent trip or otherwise it didn’t include all of the Mayans, since they exist today in Cenral America (as stated above).
Kantekkians
Finally, the Kantekkians have been associated with Nostratic, which in the map 1 above includes Dravidian, Kartvelian, and Eurasiatic (which itself includes Indo-European, Uralic, Altaic, and the Paleosiberian languages Gilyak (Nivkh), Ainu, Chukchi-Kamchatkan, Eskimo-Aleut):
Map 4: The Eurasiatic branch of Nostratic (http://starling.rinet.ru/maps/maps8.php?lan=en)
Afroasiatic (which includes Semitic) is considered to be a sister of Nostratic:
Map 5: The Afroasiatic family (http://starling.rinet.ru/maps/maps2.php?lan=en)
Here’s what the C’s have to say about Nostratic:
So the C’s basically say that Kantekkians spoke pre-Nostratic, and that what can be reconstructed as Nostratic using data from the languages of Earth is essentially a heavily creolized form of the language that includes a significant component from the languages being spoken on Earth (probably in Atlantis) at the time. A tentative hypothesis would be that the language phylum Nostratic was most-heavily influenced by was Dene-Caucasian, which includes languages spoken primarily by people with a north Asian phenotype (but also Caucasian in Europe and Amerind in North America).
So it looks like what happened is this: The Kantekkians were transferred to the area in and around the Caucasus when first brought to Earth, and it is still in that area that you find the greatest concentration of their original phenotype (light-haired, light-skinned, blue-eyed). They proceeded to conquer all of what we know today as Europe, and at the same time spread eastward. They entered what is now Asia and intermixed with the ethnic group that was already there (speakers of Dene-Caucasian, and probably related to the group known today as the Native Americans); they also entered India, intermixing with an Australoid group related to the earlier Paranthas.
Indo-European
Of all the Nostratic subgroups, the one asked about most frequently in the transcripts is Indo-European. When Indo-European (Aryan) languages are asked about, Germanic is given as the most conservative subgroup:
Celtic is normally considered a separate Indo-European subgroup from Germanic, so if the above is not in error, one possible interpretation is that the conservative group being indicated is the one which includes both of these groups as well as Italic (a recent computational phylogeny groups them in this way: [Celtic [Germanic-Italic]].
Map 6: Indo-European subgroups (http://starling.rinet.ru/maps/maps30.php?lan=en)
As a sidenote, Sanskrit, another Indo-European language, is also discussed:
This would make sense technically since the Kantekkians were one of the three primary races which comprised the Atlantean civilization.
I am not sure what criteria were used here, or why Sanskrit was chosen – it is not the oldest written language. It is still used in restricted contexts, so perhaps it is meant that it is the oldest spoken language with an unbroken tradition.
We find out more about the Indo-Europeans in the context of questions about the Biblical Levites:
Semites
Besides the Indo-Europeans, the Semites are also asked about extensively (note that in the earlier transcripts, the Semites and the Jews are not kept distinct, although it becomes clear that they are two separate groups of people):
So if the Semites are considered ‘Aryan’, it implies that they are originally Kantekkian, meaning that the connection of Afroasiatic to Nostratic (mentioned above) is valid. It is also quite interesting that the Semites played ‘a significant role in the collapse of Atlantis’ and that ‘they were the reason for the destruction of the Jews of the “Abrahamic” line’. Aramaic, a Semitic language, is also asked about, confirming an Aryan connection:
The Egyptians are also asked about briefly:
Regarding the relationship between the ‘northern peoples’ and the Mediterranean peoples, the following excerpt focusing on the Hyperboreans is interesting:
Genetic Correlations
It is also informative to take a look at a human genetic map (Cavalli-Sforza) and compare it with what has already been discussed linguistically:
Figure 1: Genetic map of human populations (Cavalli-Sforza, from _http://www.friesian.com/trees.htm)
As has been noted by Cavalli-Sforza himself, there is a fairly strong correlation between genetic groups and language phyla. First, African populations stand apart from all other populations. The Asian group breaks into North Asian and a Southeast Asian groups -- in the latter, there is a division between Australoid and Southeast Asian populations, which are correlated above with Paranthan relatives and Lemurians, respectively. The North Asian clade breaks into Caucasoid on the one hand (correlated with conservative Kantekkian) and another group that in turn divides into NE Asian and American. It is the American group that is correlated here with pre-Kantekkian 'Atlanteans', and I suggest that the NE Asian clade represents a 'transition zone' between the Caucasoid Kantekkians and the Amerind Atlanteans where heavy contact took place between the two groups in what is now northern Asia.
More specific ethnic groups
Finally, the following is a list of other more specific groups which have been asked about in the transcripts, beginning with groups which have Kantekkian affinities:
Picts
Druids
Slavs
Scythians
Indian Aryans
Finns
Maltese
Notice that the Caucasus is mentioned in both the case of the Scythians and the Slavs, which makes sense if that is the original area where the Kantekkians were located.
The following groups are either non-Kantekkian or their affiliation is unsure:
Basques
Minoans (and Myceneans)
Sumerians
Etruscans
Jews
Gypsies
The Basques and Minoans are both listed as ‘Atlantean descendants’, which makes sense at least in the case of the Basques since their language is a subgroup of Dene-Caucasian. Note also that there seems to have been an extra amount of 4D STS genetic tweaking involved in the cases of both the Jews and the Gypsies.
Edit: Added more maps and genetic tree (with discussion)
. What if this sort of energy is back today.
