The Puzzle part III

Gateway

Padawan Learner
This is the third piece of a thread to a point fleeting named as "The Puzzle." So you may want to see part I, and part II here linked. The thread is somewhat dynamic, i.e. it has a variable core though all its topics own intrinsic connection, so that each part has been posted originally under a distinct label. Yet it is a usual thread with forumers' thoughts but also it lists diverse questions that even lacking uniqueness still they aspire, meekly, to unveil a little of the existential mosaic. So for sure facets of some of these questions were touched in this forum either before or since then.

session December 5 said:
Q: (L) What distinguishes one realm from another?
A: Assumptions.
[...]
Q: (L) Okay, is this wave that is coming our direction going to give us an experience that is going to change our assumptions?
A: Catch 22: One half is that you have to change your assumptions in order to experience the wave in a positive way.
session July 12 said:
A: You would not have been able to receive [the truth]. When you ask a question with strong prejudice, we cannot violate your will to believe.
session July 23 said:
Q: (L) So, prejudice on the part of anyone in the room as to what the answer should or should not be, or could or could not be, can, in effect, create an answer?
A: It can divert the energy flow as we mentioned earlier when you asked about your own experience. If you recall, we cautioned you repeatedly not to involve prejudice either in your questions or in your expected responses. This was an effort on our part to help you to gain valuable information and to help you to learn how to gather valuable information, thus leading to an extensive expansion of your own knowledge base. Again we also cautioned you not to perceive our efforts as scolding, but as assistance.
[...]
Q: (L) Where else can prejudice enter in?
A: [...] And your own reflections, your own perusal of your own thought centers can and will produce any and all possible answers.
On occasion these 3rd part enquiry on hand turned out somewhat focused and perhaps this had made a bit of objectivity let go, but still the expectation is that these particulars don't prevent the truth in any case. Though here is a humble personal assumption: "Asking is a primary and fundamental step in the quest for knowledge. Dubiety is a vital part of the engine necessary to keep a being free, whereas absolute certainty may build a deep darkness around the soul."


  • The list III:

session June 11 said:
Q: (L) Well, what about the fact that for example the Cathars were supposed to be vegetarian? Cathars were the ones that were the Perfect. They were vegetarian and they didn't eat meat.
A: They didn't succeed in surviving either!
[...]
Q: (Ailen) Yeah, but I was thinking that there might be some kind of difference in their essence or genes in the sense that some of them make a choice...
A: Not really. The only evidence for "soul potential" is the realization that the body is just a machine and needs optimal fuel.
session April said:
(L) Are you saying that the people who can't do the ketogenic diet that they...
(Galatea) They can't evolve, or they can do it another way?
A: It is helpful to evolving and FRV [Frequency resonance vibration] for those who require it. For some, it is required that they follow an adjacent plan. There is a great range of individual types. As you may have noticed, the ketogenic path is very difficult and a challenge even for the people it is right for. Some others have a bit more leeway and less struggle. And in answer to your next question, indeed there is something like karma involved.
Q: (L) So are you suggesting that those of us who need the ketogenic diet have karma to pay off? That we're being tortured? [laughter] We were gluttons in past lives or something?
A: Close enough! But aren't you glad that a path is available?
Q: (L) Well, that leads to the question: You also once said that the development of the soul is married to the genetics. Is there something involved with that in this?
A: Yes.
session November 11 said:
Q: (L) The next question in the list is: You indicated that we should study the legend of Orion, and I looked it up in several sources, and basically the legend is of the perfect man, who fell in love with a woman, and her jealous father caused him to be blinded. The only cure was to gaze at the light, the goddess Aurora, to regain his sight. Can you tell us how this relates to the idea that Orion was the indiginous home of humans?
A: It is up to you to look for answers.
session Date: July 16th 2009 said:
Q: (DD) Is there a time on Mondays to do the dance, like sunrise or sunset?
A: Better as sun sets. In fact you can employ a little sungazing.
Q: (L) So you do your sungazing, get yourself charged up, and then you start your dance. Is that it?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Is it a good idea to do breathing exercises beforehand?
A: Absolutely!
session October said:
A: [...] beings on the third level of density can draw [energy] from beings on the second level of density, though this type of drawing is not as necessary but is done. This is why human beings existing on the third level frequently cause pain and suffering to those of the animal kingdom who exist on the second level of density because you are drawing negative soul energy as beings who primarily serve self, as you do, from those on the second level, and on the first, and so on.

a1. It is claimed that human beings can live feeding only on sunlight. In fact some adepts of yoga, like Prahlad Jani, Ram Bahadur Bomjon, and others have occasionally exhibited such prowess like only barely drinking water or even nothing of it for long periods. Also is learned from Ayurveda that sunlight is a chief source of prana, which, is said, the vital energy that can solely sustain a human. Moreover there are allegations of ascetics and holy men living for decades without any eating, and of even Paracelsus partaking of such practice for years (see also Yogananda's Autobiography of a Yogi). Yet there are reports of injurious results to some practisers. So, the sungazing methods of William Bates do improve eyesight? Do work as purported the Jasmuheen's sungazing methods and breathing exercises? Considering a 3D person are there practices, and supportive elements if so, for health living by way of sunlight and breathing instead of conventional food? If so, which are?

b1. When feeding on beings from 2nd density, as usually a souled man does on earth, he in addition to the drawing of negative energy to serve self, is he also strengthening his STS status?

c1. In the winter of 2011, at the town Le Roy in US, about 20 women got a mysterious sickness some of them severely. A symptom, for example, was their bodies jerking uncontrollably like with some freaky hiccups and tics. Some of the infected women had none physical contact each other and the doctors diagnosed the disease as a case of mass hysteria. Similar cases occurred before in another parts of the world and again in 2013 at Danvers, Massachusetts. What did produce those effects in these women? What was the cause?

session April said:
(L) Are you saying that the people who can't do the ketogenic diet that they...
(Galatea) They can't evolve, or they can do it another way?
A: It is helpful to evolving and FRV for those who require it. For some, it is required that they follow an adjacent plan. There is a great range of individual types. As you may have noticed, the ketogenic path is very difficult and a challenge even for the people it is right for. Some others have a bit more leeway and less struggle. And in answer to your next question, indeed there is something like karma involved.
Q: (L) So are you suggesting that those of us who need the ketogenic diet have karma to pay off? That we're being tortured? [laughter] We were gluttons in past lives or something?
A: Close enough! But aren't you glad that a path is available?
Q: (L) Well, that leads to the question: You also once said that the development of the soul is married to the genetics. Is there something involved with that in this?
A: Yes.
session June 7 said:
Q: The next thing is the dietary restrictions. Many cultures eat rabbits and pigs, in specific, those of Aryan extraction. The rabbit was sacred to Athena, and the Celts at a LOT of pork. Yet, here these items are restricted from the diet of the Jews. Is there any relation between the diet as outlined here, and the Aryan genetic tendencies to conquest and domination?
A: Trichinosis used to be nonexistent in Aryan types... But, mixing of genetic factors eliminated this.
Q: So, the Jews were susceptible to trichonosis, and the Aryans were not?
A: Originally.
d1. Hence there are OP's, not OP's, and genetic subdivisions if understood correctly from the above quotes. So regarding that there is more than one type of human, does exist a distinct range of health LDL cholesterol respective to some of these kinds? If so what is usually that measure (mg/dl) to each type of person considering it in a health condition? Furthermore C's have stated that in general one in two subjects is an OP, but still regarding these quotes, what is the percentage of OP's among the Semitic Jews?

e1. There are scientific validations on homeopathy and kind of on significant part of the work of Hulda Clark, like for example the researches by the scientist Benveniste and others as described in "The Field" by L. MacTaggart (e.g. see p. 222). But on Clark's claims her invention called Syncrometer supports much of her researches and that when tuned properly it can detect a vast gamut of substances and pathogens. Yet there is much [link=http://web.archive.org/web/20010720184009/www.uoguelph.ca/~kkolas/#syncrometer]scepticism[/link] about her appliance since, is alleged, few individuals or nobody beyond her staff was able of using it. So, does work such her device as purposed?

f1. Osho was a famous guru of "new" techniques of meditation and teachings which were considered to have much in common with the concepts advocated by Gurdjieff and Reich. His center of practices in Pune (India) also was said to be at first assembled under the same molds of the French community of Gurdjieff, and counting annually 200,000 world visitors to date. Yet he also was a controversial person: convicted in US and deported, and as an open backer of the capitalism he was widely named with epitomes of negative connotation such as the "rolls-royce guru". How much of his teaching is accurate? What were the forces and orientation compelling him and his guidance? He claimed to have been deadly sickened by US agents while living in US; was he really a fatal victim of a US scheme?

g1. Is true that a number of men before birth have gills? In parallel to this subject there is a scientific theory notably put forward by Alister Hardy, and then famously by Elaine Morgan and David Attenborough, which states that human primates migrated to and from water ages ago. In spite of some criticism still remain the theory's propositions whence comes up that with less gravity, like within water, would be solved the postural troubles of an erect man and childbirth issues, that human babies are able to swim skillfully before they can even walk, man has a flexible spinal column (whereas all these characteristics don't happen with apes), that dolphin and human share many chromosomal similarities, and so forth. Is there any earthly humanoid species nowadays on Earth which lives as aquatic beings? Homo sapiens, i.e. modern humans, had any aquatic ancestral hominoid?

session September 30 said:
Q: (L) The sun is not the source of the periodicity of “dyings”, is that correct?
A: Sometimes. Many causes.
session October said:
A: The water vapor canopy was a natural element of the particular composition of your atmosphere at that particular measure point in space/time.
Q: (L) Was the gravity level the same as what it is now?
A: It was somewhat different. But not perceptible to you. That difference is part of the explanation of why that vapor canopy remained suspended.
Q: (L) Did that condition prior to the flood of Noah, the altered gravitational state as well as the water vapor canopy, was that condition more conducive to extended life spans than the conditions that exist on the planet now?
A: Not only those things but all the other conditions that existed on the planet at that particular point in space/time were more conducive to longer life spans. And, by the way, Noah is a symbolic message rather than an historical event.
h1. Hence from the above quotes may be inferred that that canopy did prevent larger damage from the sun on living beings, and earth at that time didn't present the same level of contamination as today. So, the present solar radiation does poison vital materials of the earth having as result deleterious substances accumulated in most of the living beings' bodies thusly promoting mental issues, aging, and death? In the absence of this solar poisoning and resulting contaminated substances, how much a human being could live?

session March 15 said:
Q: Okay. In the natural state, where do electrons come from?
A: Aether boundary with material continuum.
[...]
A: Gravity center of planet is also “window” to all other density levels and dimensional planes of existence, which is why electrically charged atoms “ground” in order to pass on to other planes through gravity binder.
[...]
A: Electrical energy is merely “tapped,” collected, trapped, then channeled.
[...]
A: .... Electrons are “free” energy.
[...]
Q: You say they [electrons] are tapped. Where are they tapped from? What is the source of these free electrons?
A: All materials. All matter. All aether.
i1. That which is called gravity by scientists is actually a consequence of the presence of one or more etheric vortexes?

j1. It seems that in an atom the electron and the 7th density proton exist under a harmonic balance. So, how is that? That is, what does prevent an electron from plummeting into a proton at the atom's core? Is the etheric vortex that keeps an electron into quantum orbit?

session October 5 said:
Q: (L) Who built the great pyramid?
A: Atlanteans.
[...]
Q: (L) Why was it built? What purpose was it used for?
A: Capture cosmic energy.
session October said:
Q: (L) Would the great pyramid in Egypt still work if someone knew how to use it?
A: It still works today even though it isn’t being artificially used. It was also a preservative chamber. If you were to walk inside the confines of the great pyramid and then leave the body, your body would retain its structure for quite some time. This ability has contributed to the preservation of the actual structure.
session March 17 said:
Q: (T) It [Star of David] describes a physics that transcends the densities.
A: So is pentagon.
[...]
A: You as Atlanteans knew this, and lived by it in many ways. For example, the pyramid recharges by capturing exactly half the energy points, thus allowing a positive imbalance buildup to be captured, then expended.
k1. It was verified the existence of ultrasound waves and an electromagnetic beam of 28 kHz irradiating to the zenith from the top of the Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun. The majority of pyramids (Egypt, Central America, and others) has showed to be beaming those same wave cycles. Natural hills or mountains don't produce such beams. So there is physical evidence that the pyramids are like devices disposing energy (which reminds Tesla's projects). Yet the Bosnian pyramid beam increases intensity of its electromagnetic force as it goes up to the sky. According to physics the intensity of any electromagnetic field decreases as it goes distant (by the inverse square) from its source. Hence, if current physics is correct, the energy source has to be something in the sky and actually the beam is coming into the pyramid. So, for allowing a pyramid to capture cosmic energy, is enough correct proportions and sky orientation? A pyramid without outer walls, that is, built only as an edge structure also does capture energy? Since organic matter is long preserved, also a living person when dwelling within a pyramidal room has its vitality improved?

session October 20 said:
Q: When did the Aryans invade India?
A: 8243 years ago.
session October 23 said:
Q: (L) Who built Stonehenge?
A: Druids.
Q: (L) Who were the Druids?
A: Early Aryan group.

l1. 19th century Godfrey Higgins reasoned that Druids built Stonehenge, that Jews and Druids emigrated from India, and the Hindu deity Brahma and the Semite Abraham refer to the same figure. With respect to these two last assertions are them accurate?

session November 2 said:

Q: (L) What happened to Lemuria?
A: Submerged close to time you refer to as Fall of Eden, approximately.
[...]
Q: (L) Does this mean that the Edenic state existed for about 300.000 years before the “Fall?”
A: Yes.

session March 11 said:
Q: (T) Now wait a minute. I am losing the whole train here. What were we before the “Fall?”
A: 3rd density STO.
m1. So, Was Lemuria a 3D STO civilization? It is told that during ages huge seismic and volcanic activities hit Lemuria making it to submerse. Is this accurate? Regarding the beginning and end of the ancient Lemurian civilization when did it exist? At their most how many Lemurians did inhabit earth? What was the destiny, what did happen to the Lemurian people?

n1. Literary mention of an ancient continent called Pan in the Pacific Ocean exists even before R. Shaver's accounts thereon is claimed that Mu, Pan, and Lemuria refer to a same location (or planet in some instances). Was there a continent called Pan pictured in some books as the first place of humans on earth? Pan, Mu and Lemuria were concomitant denominations of a same place?

session July 19 said:
Q: Are there such things as ‘DEROS,’ as described in this underground bases book?
A: Detrimental Robots.
Q: Are DEROS part of the underground city/bases scenario?
A: Yup.
o1. Deros, Teros ("moral" kinsmen of deros), and righteous Norse aliens into the role of cosmic rulers interwoven oddly with their lust and a capitalist society are part of the Shaver's tales in which all resembles typical if not on occasion just dull fiction. Yet today deros or "derolike" persons sound like flooding not only mysterious caverns but also the streets of numerous cities of the mundane world. So yes, his writings appear to involve some explicitness likewise disquieting concealment as seen in "The time machine" by Wells. So what were the sources coming through the "stories" of Shaver? In his narratives, purported to be true, how much are they accurate? In what ways at this time, let's assume, lizards or STS Orions do connect to the underground Deros?

p1. Plongeon authored claims of a "Naacal" mother language, but other and earlier descriptions tell of an ancient primeval language called "Panic" (from Pan, the continent), which looks like a mix of Hebrew, Algonquin, Chinese, Greek and Latin. After a while these preceding claims also Shaver purported his "Pan alphabet" as originated from the cosmic "Mantong" then argued as having elements of German, ancient Egyptian, Chinese, Japanese and so a "mother tongue" from which all earthly language have sprung. Was Panic or the Mantong a Lemurian language?

q1. It's said that the remaining parts from the Atlantic portion of Lemuria, after it sunken, gave origin to Atlantis. Is this accurate? James Churchward, who to a large extent described the "Mu continent," did really gain access to ancient tablets that described Mu? What was the age of such tablets? The tablets he claimed to be a source from the Naacal culture, settlers of the Mu civilization. Is this accurate?

session October 7 said:
Q: (L) Where else did the Atlanteans go?
A: Americas. Inca. Aztec. Maya. Hopi Tribe. Pima tribe.
session November 2 said:
Q: (L) What is the origin of the Sanskrit language?
A: Atlantis.
r1. The Naacals (see previous question), as argued earlier by Augustus Le Plongeon (in turn said inspired by the archaeologist Brasseur de Bourbourg): "were at first a kind of Mayan missionaries and later called as Nagas in Burma, Asia." In fact the Naga people was once known as "Nakas" and of them there was an ancient group said to be snake worshipers of Tamil language, which is a Dravidian tongue, that is to say a pre-Aryan race and lacking relation to Sanskrit. Yet today "Nagas" represents an umbrella term for some Asian ethnic groups, and is unclear their origin since are many tribes which consist of 36 languages making hard to compare these to an ancient Naacal language (as claimed by Churchward). On the other hand is interesting that "Nagas," in the Indian subcontinent, also designate mythical entities which have reptilian features and are objects of great veneration. Then disregarding the scarcity of data still seems incongruent to infer that "Naacals" would be a mere Atlantean offshoot, besides such assumption might be mixing up places and times from distinct events. So, the ancient "Naacals" of Plongeon did exist? If that is the case, were they human? When and where the events concerning these settlers did take place? What was their relation to the 4D lizards if so?

s1. Brasil Island was discovered, visited, and described by many sailors during the period of the known history. Yet today it is not visible and considered just a legend. Myths say the island was inhabited by "gods" and that from times to times it emerges from the bottom of the ocean. Is this "island" still there in the bottom of the ocean? What kind of beings are in charge of this "place" and what is their purpose over there?

t1. At Giza is suspected for hieroglyphs thereabouts that existed two sphinxes. Thus is conjectured that one was destroyed or this still remains buried under the sand. Was there another sphinx around there? In relation to the known sphinx where is or was such other sphinx?

session February 25 said:
Q: (BP) Were the Mayans an STS civilization?
A: No.
Q: (BP) Why did they engage in human sacrifice and so forth?
A: They did not.
[...]
(TM) Wasn’t there another group... the Toltecs, were they the ones who engaged in human sacrifice?
A: At some point.
u1. Reports from the Spanish conquerors, as well as many archeological pictures and sculptures, "apparently" show human sacrifices as common rituals by Mesoamerican peoples. Were those sacrificial images planted for misinformation or inducing a nasty tendency? Which Mesoamerican peoples did practice human sacrifices? "Quetzalcoatl" for archeology is at times described as a reptilian being called the "Feathered Snake", a major deity of the Mesoamerican peoples who created and ruled the fifth cycle of humanity. Yet in old occultism Quetzalcoatl is portrayed as a virtuous outsider "white" man, who for while educated the natives to put an end to any bloody sacrifices and instead to make offerings of flowers and seeds. He was thus also a provisional instructor that taught to bring to a halt any violence. And more recently while in Amazon, Brazil, the writer Pinchbeck alleged to have channeled Quetzalcoatl. Who was or is Quetzalcoatl?

v1. Who and from where were the beings and factions apparently fighting each other in the skies of Nuremberg (Germany) on 1561? What were the main reasons for the battle? Who did win that war? Also it is reported a UFO battle, known as The Battle of the Clouds," on July 28th, 1874 at Saw Mill Run, Pennsylvania, which even caused a fatal flood around. In the annotations of Jessup's book the latter is described as a battle between a Lemurian and Muanian mother ships that used to stay parked in deep water. Was the crew of those ships descendent or kindred of Lemuria or Mu natives? Still on Jessup book an ancient global "Great War" is mentioned often and whence the contenders are called "Lemurians" or "Little Men" for those on earth, and the other side as the S-Men who "broke it all up" (as written) on earth applying a cosmic desvastation. In this latter description "Lemurians" and "Little Men" does refer to the same faction and kind of individuals? When this colossal war did happen?

w1. In Paquime, north Mexico, there are the ruins called Amarumuru portals which is said to be from where Norse people used to appear. What was the purpose of this place? Who were those Norse figures?

x1. Beneath the Ocean at southwest India bordering Maldive Islands and Laccadive Islands, along the last centuries hundreds of official reports were made either on luminous edification or moving objects under or rising from the water. Also Charles Fort pointed out that in many details, yet in spite of all those observations the mystery remains. Who did build these supposed submersed constructions? How long those structures are there and who, if so, lives there now?

y1. John Keel lists reports on crewmen engaged apparently in rustic repairs of their spaceships as well as requesting water and other mundane items for fixing the ships, and even UFO's carrying ropes attached to hanging anchors which at times were recovered by human observers. The "aliens" "played" similar scenes like these at several periods of history. So, do these sightings refer to accidental cases of disconnected events? Or behind of them was there a plan intended to show a facade of them ("aliens") like having 3D physicality as is hinted by Keel?

z1. Around the medial of 2015 was photographed some spots emitting intense lights within a crater of Ceres. Scientists made the assumption that these were caused by sunlight reflected in ice over there. The problem is that such lights were no observed before that time and thus far only one crater of a number of others in the dwarf planet displays the lights. Is the scientists' assumption correct?

a2. Who was or what does represent Ahura-Mazda the supreme god of the Zoroastrians, symbolized by a winged disc, and whose son is told battled "the great dragon of the sky"? Moreover, the story of Garuda seen in the Hindu epics, and who battled the reptilian Nagas, has some relation to Ahura-Mazda's son?

session March 4 said:
Q: (L) In the annotated copy of the Morris K. Jessup book, there were three people annotating: Mr.A., Mr. B., and one known as Jemi. One of the references was to the sighting made by Kenneth Arnold. In reference to that sighting, Mr.B wrote: “Don’t worry, Jemi, those were LM ships not S men. They are an improved type and were on a training flight. That is why their leader interconnected their force fields, to teach them level tele-control without inducing a fear block.” Now, what is an LM ship?
A: Light matter.
Q: (L) What is an “S man?”
A: Secret order member.
b2. The dialogues by the annotators of Jessup's book hint talks among individuals that seemed human spacecrafts' crewmembers or at least knowledgeable on these ships, that the commentators had lived long somewhere in earth and too they had gypsy propinquity. Furthermore there are many notes on Mu and some hints on Californian subsurfaces, was this latter an earthly dwelling of them? Were the annotators members of the Thor’s Pantheum? Are S-M's, 4D reptilians? Anyway is also alluded that some L-M's live in Mu (in subterraneous remnants?), that these appear to be hostile to man at times, they have short stature and use to abduct people. Yet there is clear mention of L-M's in conflict with S-M's. So, are the L-M's ... Grays?

c2. Jessup book's comments freely allude entities called Lemurians or Muanians who came from space and then settled on earth. So both Jessup book and Shaver's accounts explore the existence of Muanians or Lemurians living in concealed terrestrial locations up to this time. Are the two writings referring to the same entities? There is some kinship between the legendary ancient Lemurians and the current ones?

session August 28 said:
Q: Next question. Somebody sent me some information recently about something called “Roswell Rods.” Can you tell me what these “Rods” are?
A: Do you mean the life forms?
Q: Well, that IS what some of the folks are trying to call them!
A: 4th Density Life Forms.
Q: That’s pretty interesting.
(A) Is it a being with a soul?
A: Sort of.
Q: (A) Intelligent?
A: Relative to others.
Q: In terms of what we know about relative intelligence, could you give us an example of something in our density that relates here?
A: Birds.
d2. The comparison of solar systems with atoms and molecules is not something new. Furthermore adding wild speculation and "fiction", galaxies has been cogitated as part of colossal organic structures which in turn belongs to a larger sentient entity. So in this sense some UFO sightings, such as the called "rods," coming in and out of the upper earthly atmosphere were proposed as entities of low complexity like huge cosmic protozoans. Has veracity any of these conjectures?

e2. What do represent the Jotuns pictured in the Norse mythology as a race of frost-giants and enemies of the gods? Who were or are they?

f2. Along a dirt road between northeastern Oklahoma and southwestern Missouri since at least the 19th century have been witnessed some luminous orbs of diverse colors bouncing and bobbing usually between 10:00 p.m. and passing midnight. Called as "The Spooklight," under any weather the orbs appear most often as an orange color and sizes from a basketball to larger. Persons that try to come near to them make them shy away, while on the contrary they seem not to disturb animals. Yet a 2014 academic study concluded that The Spooklights were just cars' headlights beamed from some highway or other. What are the Spooklights?
Jessup book said:
The terrifying thing about Fireballs is that When Human & Fireball face each other, the one recognizes a Panicked intelligence in the other AND is thus terrified in reciprocal emotions.
A Fireball is either L-M or S-M WHO, LIKE THAT process that Burned the Ancient ARKS HAS TOO HAD A MALFUNCTION ACCIDENT. OR CAUSED. OF ONE OR ALL OF HIS "INDUCED" FIELDS & thus burns.
g2. The above quote copies a comment as done by the annotators when Jessup's book explores the subject of close encounters with fireball-like orbs. The comment on "ancient Arks" mostly refer to a kind of abandoned mother-ships for some reason. Is a orb or fireball-like every so often a passing or marooned entity from some forsaken spaceship? If so where is its destination?

Have fun! :)
 
I'm kind of curious what your aim is with throwing all of these questions out on the forum. Some of them are interesting but it looks like a lot of them could only realistically be answered by the Cassiopaeans, and then you'd either have to "take it or leave it." What would you do with the knowledge?

Usually when you have a burning desire to find stuff out, there is a certain line of force behind what you're asking so that you can solve one mystery and go on to the next one. This really seems all over the map to me. It could appear, from others perspective, that you're just looking for a bunch of cool factoids to make into conversation pieces...

Having said all of that, I am kind of a fan of the more "far out" questions in the sessions because they tend to lead to interesting and very thought provoking places. I will try and give you some tips on some of your more interesting questions that I think are somewhat within the realm of answerability.
Gateway said:
b1. When feeding on beings from 2nd density, as usually a souled man does on earth, he in addition to the drawing of negative energy to serve self, is he also strengthening his STS status?
Research the Law of Three.
Gateway said:
h1. Hence from the above quotes may be inferred that that canopy did prevent larger damage from the sun on living beings, and earth at that time didn't present the same level of contamination as today. So, the present solar radiation does poison vital materials of the earth having as result deleterious substances accumulated in most of the living beings' bodies thusly promoting mental issues, aging, and death? In the absence of this solar poisoning and resulting contaminated substances, how much a human being could live?
Well, in the transcripts the water vapor canopy collapse is linked to the Flood of Noah story, which the Bible plagiarized from far older sources. Perhaps some of the other stories in the OT were quasi-accurate as well. Perhaps the Bible's mention of people being to able live for about 900 years has some literal basis in fact.
Gateway said:
o1. Deros, Teros ("moral" kinsmen of deros), and righteous Norse aliens into the role of cosmic rulers interwoven oddly with their lust and a capitalist society are part of the Shaver's tales in which all resembles typical if not on occasion just dull fiction. Yet today deros or "derolike" persons sound like flooding not only mysterious caverns but also the streets of numerous cities of the mundane world. So yes, his writings appear to involve some explicitness likewise disquieting concealment as seen in "The time machine" by Wells. So what were the sources coming through the "stories" of Shaver? In his narratives, purported to be true, how much are they accurate? In what ways at this time, let's assume, lizards or STS Orions do connect to the underground Deros?
It seems the remnants of various civilizations, the "Illuminati" of a particular time period, end up running off to underground cities when the Earth Changes start getting bad. In addition, aliens are widely reported to use these underground cities to carry out their various nefarious activities surreptitiously. Deros are probably tools of the Lizards just like most of humanity and in their thrall. This is probably all ties in with "The Nation of the Third Eye" mentioned in the transcripts.
Gateway said:
u1. Reports from the Spanish conquerors, as well as many archeological pictures and sculptures, "apparently" show human sacrifices as common rituals by Mesoamerican peoples. Were those sacrificial images planted for misinformation or inducing a nasty tendency? Which Mesoamerican peoples did practice human sacrifices? "Quetzalcoatl" for archeology is at times described as a reptilian being called the "Feathered Snake", a major deity of the Mesoamerican peoples who created and ruled the fifth cycle of humanity. Yet in old occultism Quetzalcoatl is portrayed as a virtuous outsider "white" man, who for while educated the natives to put an end to any bloody sacrifices and instead to make offerings of flowers and seeds. He was thus also a provisional instructor that taught to bring to a halt any violence. And more recently while in Amazon, Brazil, the writer Pinchbeck alleged to have channeled Quetzalcoatl. Who was or is Quetzalcoatl?
I think this addresses it.
session990828 said:
Q: I have this book, this Marcia Schafer thing: "Confessions of an Intergalactic Anthropologist," and its a bunch of channelled stuff; one thing she says: "the snake is associated with the sign of wisdom and higher learning, and is often regarded quite highly in mystical circles." She had an interaction with a rattlesnake, for which she felt sympathy, and she also has sympathetic
interactions with Lizzies. I would like to have a comment on the idea of the snake as a "sign of wisdom and higher learning." Does this, in fact, represent what the snake symbolizes?
A: Snake is/was reported in context of the viewpoint of the observer.
Q: Are you saying that when the observer's viewpoint is that the snake is a symbol of higher learning, maybe...
A: Maybe the observer was just "blown away" by the experience.
Q: Clarify, please.
A: If you were living in the desert, or jungle, about 7,000 years ago, as you measure time, would you not be impressed if these Reptoid "dudes" came down from the heavens in silvery objects and demonstrated techno-wonders from thousands of years in the future, and taught you calculus, geometry and astrophysics to boot?!?
Q: Is that, in fact, what happened?
A: Yup.
Gateway said:
y1. John Keel lists reports on crewmen engaged apparently in rustic repairs of their spaceships as well as requesting water and other mundane items for fixing the ships, and even UFO's carrying ropes attached to hanging anchors which at times were recovered by human observers. The "aliens" "played" similar scenes like these at several periods of history. So, do these sightings refer to accidental cases of disconnected events? Or behind of them was there a plan intended to show a facade of them ("aliens") like having 3D physicality as is hinted by Keel?
I think Keel answers that pretty convincingly. Aliens have to create as much confusion and disinformation around their presence as possible to keep humans chasing phantoms so we don't wise up to their real agenda.
Gateway said:
z1. Around the medial of 2015 was photographed some spots emitting intense lights within a crater of Ceres. Scientists made the assumption that these were caused by sunlight reflected in ice over there. The problem is that such lights were no observed before that time and thus far only one crater of a number of others in the dwarf planet displays the lights. Is the scientists' assumption correct?
I doubt it. Research Electric Universe theory.
Gateway said:
a2. Who was or what does represent Ahura-Mazda the supreme god of the Zoroastrians, symbolized by a winged disc, and whose son is told battled "the great dragon of the sky"? Moreover, the story of Garuda seen in the Hindu epics, and who battled the reptilian Nagas, has some relation to Ahura-Mazda's son?
These are likely highly mythicized accounts of various power struggles occurring in 4D at the time. The accounts that have survived are probably so far removed from the original event that very little of the original essence remains.
Gateway said:
c2. Jessup book's comments freely allude entities called Lemurians or Muanians who came from space and then settled on earth. So both Jessup book and Shaver's accounts explore the existence of Muanians or Lemurians living in concealed terrestrial locations up to this time. Are the two writings referring to the same entities? There is some kinship between the legendary ancient Lemurians and the current ones?
Sounds like "The Nation of the Third Eye" again.
Gateway said:
d2. The comparison of solar systems with atoms and molecules is not something new. Furthermore adding wild speculation and "fiction", galaxies has been cogitated as part of colossal organic structures which in turn belongs to a larger sentient entity. So in this sense some UFO sightings, such as the called "rods," coming in and out of the upper earthly atmosphere were proposed as entities of low complexity like huge cosmic protozoans. Has veracity any of these conjectures?
Yes, research Gurdjieff/Mouravieff, specifically the "Ray of Creation" and "Cosmoses" then research Information Theory, and then "The Origin of Life: The 5th Option."
Gateway said:
e2. What do represent the Jotuns pictured in the Norse mythology as a race of frost-giants and enemies of the gods? Who were or are they?
Research forum for "Nephilim".
Gateway said:
f2. Along a dirt road between northeastern Oklahoma and southwestern Missouri since at least the 19th century have been witnessed some luminous orbs of diverse colors bouncing and bobbing usually between 10:00 p.m. and passing midnight. Called as "The Spooklight," under any weather the orbs appear most often as an orange color and sizes from a basketball to larger. Persons that try to come near to them make them shy away, while on the contrary they seem not to disturb animals. Yet a 2014 academic study concluded that The Spooklights were just cars' headlights beamed from some highway or other. What are the Spooklights?
Probably 4D bleedthrough. Research transcripts for "Marfa lights."
 
Très intéressants messages... Merci pour le partage...

Very interesting messages ... Thanks for sharing ...
 
Neil said:
I'm kind of curious what your aim is with throwing all of these questions out on the forum. Some of them are interesting but it looks like a lot of them could only realistically be answered by the Cassiopaeans, and then you'd either have to "take it or leave it." What would you do with the knowledge?

Usually when you have a burning desire to find stuff out, there is a certain line of force behind what you're asking so that you can solve one mystery and go on to the next one. This really seems all over the map to me. It could appear, from others perspective, that you're just looking for a bunch of cool factoids to make into conversation pieces...

Having said all of that, I am kind of a fan of the more "far out" questions in the sessions because they tend to lead to interesting and very thought provoking places. I will try and give you some tips on some of your more interesting questions that I think are somewhat within the realm of answerability.
Salute Neil! thanks for your sugestions and comments. So, let's see. Well looks like your personal questions are already answered in the first lines of this thread. But let me then to rephrase some anyway:

Neil said:
"a lot of them could only realistically be answered by the Cassiopaeans.
Maybe you are right, maybe not. Anyway is really great when the C's help us, yet learning through other ways is also fun!

You asked why these questions were "thrown" (like you put) in the forum? You want to know why are we searching for knowledge? The main answer can be because there is a natural tendency in our soul for searching for knowledge, understand our history, and so learning and then increasing our light. Please see also that is not the intention here to mystify anything or dodge your question, so having that said, keep still in mind under a second plane why this thread was named "the puzzle"!

If I understood correctly seems that you notice that the enquiry here may looks like an attempt of making little conversations. No! not one bit was this case or the purpose (as already denoted before). Indeed such thing even couldn't be afforded by this forumer at all as you can see by the time taken to reply you. By the way sorry for taking so long. See, these questions were targeted as a STO work and hopefully for significant consequences. Yet if this goal sometimes failed and, for example, someone found out any "factoid" in these questions then would be interesting, to all of us possibly, to see that reasoned in reported facts and reliable references for backing such assertion.

So as said before, these question lists aim to assembly a little of the human puzzle and thus optimistically making essential light. Besides, perhaps if that question that looks like a "little fact" but rather was contemplated with humbleness and more deepness, then maybe it could bring either new pieces to solve the puzzle or a new can of worms; who knows? But wait, you yourself already said something like that last phrasing, right?

Neil said:
Gateway said:
b1. When feeding on beings from 2nd density, as usually a souled man does on earth, he in addition to the drawing of negative energy to serve self, is he also strengthening his STS status?
Research the Law of Three.
That above is a little obscure comment by you, no? Could you enlighten us in more details of how the "The Law of Three" (yeah, most of us likely know it) does answer that question? Or even better: if you have such might you share your clues or answer for that question with an objective yes or no, and then followed by an explanation? Probably most of the forum would like to know that as well. Furthermore many of the comments from you look like of conjectural character and so maybe a first start given the extent and deepness of some of the questions; that is, seems that there is still a lot to be considered and dug in about the questions.

Neil said:
Gateway said:
d2. The comparison of solar systems with atoms and molecules is not something new. Furthermore adding wild speculation and "fiction", galaxies has been cogitated as part of colossal organic structures which in turn belongs to a larger sentient entity. So in this sense some UFO sightings, such as the called "rods," coming in and out of the upper earthly atmosphere were proposed as entities of low complexity like huge cosmic protozoans. Has veracity any of these conjectures?
Yes, research Gurdjieff/Mouravieff, specifically the "Ray of Creation" and "Cosmoses" then research Information Theory, and then "The Origin of Life: The 5th Option."

Hum...interesting. Message taken and quite appreciated. See you in class. ;)

PERLOU said:
Merci pou votre travail...

Merci pou votre travail...
Perlou est vraiment charmant quand vous commentez en français. Meilleurs voeux. :D
 
Gateway said:
Neil said:
Gateway said:
b1. When feeding on beings from 2nd density, as usually a souled man does on earth, he in addition to the drawing of negative energy to serve self, is he also strengthening his STS status?
Research the Law of Three.
That above is a little obscure comment by you, no? Could you enlighten us in more details of how the "The Law of Three" (yeah, most of us likely know it) does answer that question? Or even better: if you have such might you share your clues or answer for that question with an objective yes or no, and then followed by an explanation? Probably most of the forum would like to know that as well. Furthermore many of the comments from you look like of conjectural character and so maybe a first start given the extent and deepness of some of the questions; that is, seems that there is still a lot to be considered and dug in about the questions.

I think Neil was probably just trying to point out that it's not a black and white situation. There are probably a lot of other factors to consider, and each case needs to be taken individually in its own context.

This session might help to give some perspective (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,24722.msg285390.html):

Q: (L) And that's what you meant by not only a doorway, but also a barrier because the person who is on the wrong diet and has schizophrenia is barred from being able to be a bridge between the worlds. They kind of get lost. They're barred from having a normal life, and they're also barred from coming back from their delusions or whatever they're seeing even if they're not delusions. Maybe they’re seeing, but they're unable to help or do anything.

Okay. Now, you made a remark about the diet that is normal for the human being. And I know {name redacted} and a lot of people - not just {name redacted}, but a lot of people - have a problem with a diet that requires you to consume the flesh of other creatures. And I know that we've read what Lierre Keith has written about it, and it's a very moving statement about life and earth and so on and so forth. But I'd like to know if there's something a little more esoteric that we could understand about this? I mean, I don't understand why and how a person can achieve spiritual growth, which is what you seem to be implying throughout all of this stuff that we've been learning, from eating meat. How many other groups have taken a vegetarian pathway and said that this is... I mean, aside from the fact that we now know that agriculture and vegetables and the owning of the land is pure STS destruction... What about fruit? Well of course they didn't have fruit then. Like everybody, I'm having a little problem with this. So can you help me out here?

A: You know the saying: Only through the shedding of blood is there remission of sins?

Q: (L) Yes.

A: And what about: Take eat, this is my body?

Q: (L) Yes.

A: And: Take, drink, this is my blood?

Q: (L) Yes. (Burma) So it sounds like they're saying that there's a hidden thing in the whole resurrection or salvation by the blood thing. That agriculture is evil and we could return by going on an animal-based diet?

A: No not exactly. When humankind "fell" into gross matter, a way was needed to return. This way simply is a manifestation of the natural laws. Consciousness must "eat" also. This is a natural function of the life giving nature of the environment in balance. The Earth is the Great Mother who gives her body, literally, in the form of creatures with a certain level of consciousness for the sustenance of her children of the cosmos. This is the original meaning of those sayings.

Q: (L) So, eating flesh also means eating consciousness which accumulates, I'm assuming is what is being implied here, or what feeds our consciousness so that it grows in step with our bodies? Is that close?

A: Close enough.

Q: (Ailen) And when you eat veggies you're basically eating a much lower level of consciousness. (L) Not only that, but in a sense you're rejecting the gift and you're not feeding consciousness. And that means that all eating of meat should be a sacrament.

A: Yes
 
Neil said:
Gateway said:
f2. Along a dirt road between northeastern Oklahoma and southwestern Missouri since at least the 19th century have been witnessed some luminous orbs of diverse colors bouncing and bobbing usually between 10:00 p.m. and passing midnight. Called as "The Spooklight," under any weather the orbs appear most often as an orange color and sizes from a basketball to larger. Persons that try to come near to them make them shy away, while on the contrary they seem not to disturb animals. Yet a 2014 academic study concluded that The Spooklights were just cars' headlights beamed from some highway or other. What are the Spooklights?
Probably 4D bleedthrough. Research transcripts for "Marfa lights."

Well observed, so objectively:
Session June said:
( J) What are the Marfa lights?
A: Window to this dimension leaves static.
[...]
A: Try getting up close to Marfa lights!
[...]
( T) What happens if you get close to them?
A: They appear at other location.
Q: (J) Does the EM from your body repel the light?
A: It is visual reality representation only.
Perhaps the next list's question may offer something else, but yes, indeed at first glance the spooklights seem very like the Marfa lights, they may be the same thing. See, according to some reports, the spooklights at times don't get "scared" with particular witnesses and actually they even seem to get close and follow that testifier or other. Spooky, no?

Approaching Infinity said:
This session might help to give some perspective (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,24722.msg285390.html):
Q: (L) And that's what you meant by not only a doorway, but also a barrier because the person who is on the wrong diet and has schizophrenia is barred from being able to be a bridge between the worlds. They kind of get lost. They're barred from having a normal life, and they're also barred from coming back from their delusions or whatever they're seeing even if they're not delusions. Maybe they’re seeing, but they're unable to help or do anything.

Okay. Now, you made a remark about the diet that is normal for the human being. And I know {name redacted} and a lot of people - not just {name redacted}, but a lot of people - have a problem with a diet that requires you to consume the flesh of other creatures. And I know that we've read what Lierre Keith has written about it, and it's a very moving statement about life and earth and so on and so forth. But I'd like to know if there's something a little more esoteric that we could understand about this? I mean, I don't understand why and how a person can achieve spiritual growth, which is what you seem to be implying throughout all of this stuff that we've been learning, from eating meat. How many other groups have taken a vegetarian pathway and said that this is... I mean, aside from the fact that we now know that agriculture and vegetables and the owning of the land is pure STS destruction... What about fruit? Well of course they didn't have fruit then. Like everybody, I'm having a little problem with this. So can you help me out here?

A: You know the saying: Only through the shedding of blood is there remission of sins?
Q: (L) Yes.
A: And what about: Take eat, this is my body?
Q: (L) Yes.
A: And: Take, drink, this is my blood?
Q: (L) Yes. (Burma) So it sounds like they're saying that there's a hidden thing in the whole resurrection or salvation by the blood thing. That agriculture is evil and we could return by going on an animal-based diet?
A: No not exactly. When humankind "fell" into gross matter, a way was needed to return. This way simply is a manifestation of the natural laws. Consciousness must "eat" also. This is a natural function of the life giving nature of the environment in balance. The Earth is the Great Mother who gives her body, literally, in the form of creatures with a certain level of consciousness for the sustenance of her children of the cosmos. This is the original meaning of those sayings.
Q: (L) So, eating flesh also means eating consciousness which accumulates, I'm assuming is what is being implied here, or what feeds our consciousness so that it grows in step with our bodies? Is that close?
A: Close enough.
Q: (Ailen) And when you eat veggies you're basically eating a much lower level of consciousness. (L) Not only that, but in a sense you're rejecting the gift and you're not feeding consciousness. And that means that all eating of meat should be a sacrament.
A: Yes

With the above quotes C's remind us of a deep and typical idiosyncrasy of the low densities and of particular weight upon the STS condition. Yet even deeper and straightforward still remains, as should be, that which was clarified before by C's:
session October said:
A: [...] beings on the third level of density can draw [energy] from beings on the second level of density, though this type of drawing is not as necessary but is done. This is why human beings existing on the third level frequently cause pain and suffering to those of the animal kingdom who exist on the second level of density because you are drawing negative soul energy as beings who primarily serve self, as you do, from those on the second level, and on the first, and so on.
 
Gateway said:
Perhaps the next list's question may offer something else, but yes, indeed at first glance the spooklights seem very like the Marfa lights, they may be the same thing. See, according to some reports, the spooklights at times don't get "scared" with particular witnesses and actually they even seem to get close and follow that testifier or other.
Well, having looked at these different phenomena over the years, and taking what the Cassiopaeans say about hyperdimensional phenomena into account, I think that most of these "spooky lights" are fundamentally the same thing. We could talk about the Phoenix lights, which was likely alien spacecraft of some sort, or crop circles, which some people claim are formed by glowing orbs, and say that while they are slightly different in origin and orientation, they are all some form of interdimensional energy transference. I think we definitely rule out bouncing headlights and swamp gas. It's hard to get any more specific than that.

Moving on to your question about feeding on 2D, I think you can make a valid argument that killing another being to sustain yourself is an STS activity, however take note about what the Cassiopaeans said about a way needed to be provided to get back. STS does not necessarily equal evil. Within that STS-ness is the potential to bring things back into balance. Things are not as simple as they seem. You don't get to STO by thinking about it and making affirmations or whatnot; you have to build a staircase. In order to advance on that staircase, some of the things that you do which may seem evil in one context might serve the greater good in another context. Thus we are back to the Law of Three. I think the comment about it not being necessary is spoken from an STO perspective. STO has other ways of sustaining itself, but we are not STO. Also, within the STS realm, there is a wide spectrum of attitudes towards the consumption of animals, with one extreme giving thanks to God or the Earth or whatever for the meat consumed, to people who just enjoy watching animals suffer and killing them for sport at the other. I think the character of the energy and the effect it has on the consumer differs greatly between these two scenarios, with the former perhaps allowing one to emulate a more STO way of doing things while remaining in an STS realm. Some people claim they can live off of sungazing and light and energy alone, but I've yet to be convinced that they actually accomplish anything; some who choose to adopt this lifestyle literally starve to death. Bottom line is if you don't eat, you starve, and you'll never move any closer to accomplishing your aim.
Gateway said:
Furthermore many of the comments from you look like of conjectural character and so maybe a first start given the extent and deepness of some of the questions; that is, seems that there is still a lot to be considered and dug in about the questions.
Well yes, they are of a conjectural character. Wandering out into these esoteric realms is like the shadows in the cave analogy. We have to ascertain the nature of an object by the shadow on the wall. This is not easy. I only provided answers to things I had a 75% confidence on, but a lot of the things you want to know live on the border between the unknown and the unknowable, like your questions about Lemuria. that was over 300,000 years ago. How much information do you think survives on it and how much is accessible to a non-elite human? Providing exact verifiable facts with rock solid citations and intricately detailed expositions as one might do in an academic paper is not really possible on a lot of these things in my opinion. Maybe you can get commentary from the Cassiopaeans since they are the only ones who aren't constrained by the limitations of this density and can see the actual object instead of the shadow on the wall, but how much weight do you give what the Cassiopaeans say as a verifiable fact? Perhaps sometimes we rely on them more than we should. Also keep in mind what they said about not leading by the hand.
Gateway said:
So as said before, these question lists aim to assembly a little of the human puzzle and thus optimistically making essential light. Besides, perhaps if that question that looks like a "little fact" but rather was contemplated with humbleness and more deepness, then maybe it could bring either new pieces to solve the puzzle or a new can of worms; who knows? But wait, you yourself already said something like that last phrasing, right?
Ok, you just seemed to have the opposite approach to how I would do it. I'll tell you a little story. Before I joined this forum, I was hearing things about nonphysical entities battling over human souls, and I had this idea that I might be some kind of reincarnated alien. My question at the time was, how could such a thing be possible? That one question led to many areas of research and smaller questions which needed to be answered in order to get back to the main question. Eventually, I was able to construct a conceptual framework to understand the main question, and moved on to deeper questions. I had curiosities, but I did not have a laundry list of questions that I expected answered at the very beginning in order to get to the big picture view. I pulled on one thread for awhile, and then another related thread for awhile, and maybe then a third, always keeping in mind the original question. I was just trying to figure out what your main question was. If you don't have one, it seems you're dividing your energy on a lot of tiny things and not really accomplishing anything instead of concentrating it and moving forward toward a particular aim. Maybe it's just me and my mind is wired differently than yours.
 
Gateway said:
With the above quotes C's remind us of a deep and typical idiosyncrasy of the low densities and of particular weight upon the STS condition. Yet even deeper and straightforward still remains, as should be, that which was clarified before by C's:
session October said:
A: [...] beings on the third level of density can draw [energy] from beings on the second level of density, though this type of drawing is not as necessary but is done. This is why human beings existing on the third level frequently cause pain and suffering to those of the animal kingdom who exist on the second level of density because you are drawing negative soul energy as beings who primarily serve self, as you do, from those on the second level, and on the first, and so on.

When I read that, I don't get the impression that it's a black-and-white situation. After all, it's possible to give farm animals a very decent life, free from a lot of pain and suffering, and then kill them in a relatively painless and human manner. While it's still STS (we're STS beings, after all), it is significantly different from a situation where the animal is tortured for its whole life, then violently killed in a protracted and painful manner.

Many people enjoy killing animals, making them suffer and causing them pain. One example is psychopaths who torture animals for the fun of it. Another is sport hunting where it's just for the "thrill of the kill", not for food. But it's possible to respect animals, give them decent lives, be horrified by their mistreatment, and still eat them. So I don't think your interpretation of the transcript above is necessarily that 'straightforward'. There are still areas of grey. The Vegetarian Myth by Lierre Keith also gives some good perspective on the subject, if you're interested in checking it out.
 
Some supplemental notes regarding the above question "k1":
Session August said:
[..] Can the Rife technology be as effective as the antibiotic protocol now being discussed on the forum?
A: If adequately constructed machine were available. Tall order.
Session July said:
Q: (L) Okay. Transmarginal inhibition is when an organism is stressed or pushed to the point where they break. It's like they become blank slates, and then they can be easily reprogrammed. Is that what we're getting at here?
A: Yes. Now think of the superimportant bit of data we sought to get through to you some years ago regarding parasitic infestations preventing a "quantum leap in awareness."
[..]
A: The parasites act as receivers [of Waves of information].
[..]
A: Getting free of parasitic microorganisms is one of the first orders of business for transformation.
[..]
(L) Okay, how is the tinkering [preventing a "quantum leap in awareness"] done?
A: Most often via viruses.
So it is interesting to point out that big pharma (allopathy) hardly offers effective antiviral drugs, for the most it offers only preventive treatments, if any. Thereon and with respect to the question k1 a possible unfoldment to it which brings a connection between pyramids, pathogens, ELF, and Rife can be found in this link. So drawn from there here's a crude synopsis:

On the whole the article's author, Engineer Goran Samoukovic, claims a formalization derived from empirical researches related to the interaction between the earth's Geomagnetism and solar wind. From that activity results ELF (EM Extremely Low Frequency, that is 2 to 10 hertz) and from this as consequence is produced electric currents distributed into grids on earth that in turn feature fixed intensities related to the period of earth's rotation that he calls "harmonics."

Thereon, is said, those periodic electric currents affect all living beings on earth through the effect of resonance in water molecules within them. Some sectors of the cyclic period incorporate the "harmonics" 1,3,5,7,9,.. (e.g. harmonic "1" is right related to a 24 hours period) whereon mammals, so humans, resonate to "3," whereas pathogens to "5" and above. Therein is calculated that the human frequency is w=4.55 Hz. Yet any part of the human body affected by pathogens resonates in the frequency of the pathogen, that is, not the human frequency. That also means that an individual infested by a pathogen can't be resonant to a health natural frequency typical of a human. For example when exposed to ELF where the harmonic=1, or close to, is highly likely the appearance of cancer according to the article.
Samoukovic article said:
"Different organisms absorb EM energy at different frequencies." Cancer diseases work around 3 Hz; in 3.25 Hz work bacteria, viruses, autoimmune issues; in 4.5 Hz work human organism and gut bacteria; in 5.25 Hz again appear Bacteria, viruses, and autoimmune issues. All diseases and pathogens absorb low frequency (ELF) energy at precisely defined frequencies which are present in air around us. Normal and healthy human cells (eukaryotes) does not absorb this energy at identical frequencies.
Samoukovic also claims that in spite of some spots emitting harmful frequencies, most of the Bosnian pyramid complex looks like a healing center, or at least healing features are easily found there.

At last ahead are some quotes on scientific researches on EM affecting the human body hence connected to this subject (some clarification added in brackets). You also may want to check this very interesting thread, The Field, where there is more on Popp et al.
The Field book said:
Biophysicist Fritz-Albert Popp was shocked to learn that photo-repair [of body's cells] works most efficiently at 380 nanometers. [..] Each of the carcinogens reacted only to the light at a specific wavelength — 380 nanometers. In Popp's presentation as well as his paper, it assumed that a weak light of 380 nanometers was somehow, being produced in the body. But in Popp's research the healthiest body would have the lowest light [emission], so the most desirable state — the closest living things could get to nothingness. The healthiest [matter] has the lowest and most coherent intensity of light. Any disturbance in the [organic] system would increase the production of photons. Health was a state of perfect subatomic communication [in the body], and ill health was a state where communication breaks down. We are ill when our waves are out of synch.[..] The biophoton vibrations Popp had observed in the body caused molecules to vibrate and create their own signature frequency.

Then we have an extension of this research on EM with the work by French scientist Jacques Benveniste, which in particular is right related to homeopathy and, more than this, gives solid scientific support to it:
The Field book said:
If each molecule [in the body] has its own signature frequency, its receptor or molecule with the matching spectrum of features would tune into this frequency, much as your radio tunes into a specific station, even over vast distances, or one tuning fork causes another tuning fork to oscillate at the same frequency. They get in resonance — the vibration of one body is reinforced by the vibration of another body at or near its frequency. As these two molecules resonate on the same wavelength, they would then begin to resonate with the next molecules in the biochemical reaction, thus creating, in Benveniste's words, a 'cascade' of electromagnetic impulses travelling at the speed of light. This, rather than accidental collision, would better explain how you initiate a virtually instantaneous chain reaction in biochemistry. It also is a logical extension of the work of Fritz Popp. If photons in the body excite molecules along the entire spectrum of electromagnetic frequencies, it is logical that they would have their own signature frequency.
 
Back
Top Bottom