Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

Uh-oh! This is not good! 😨

Putin's general calls for massive mobilisation as he declares 'WW3 has already started'

From Veteran's Today:

Whether the conflict will remain between the two countries or will result in a localized international war, like the one in Ukraine, depends on the role of the USA and NATO countries.


Let's keep in mind the role the "peace" President played in all this. :mad:

Veteran's today is a pointless website that peddles nonsense and hysteria, and has been doing so for many years.

A Vladimir Putin general claimed today that World War 3 has already started following Israel’s strikes on Iranian soil on Thursday night. Maj-Gen Apti Alaudinov, 51, urged the Kremlin to carry out mass mobilisation of up to one million fresh troops.

This "general" is a) not a general b) not Putin's "general" and c) not a serious person.
 
Ok I just ordered 2 more 5 gallon "Jerry Cans" for the garden shed, thanks @Joe

I don't know about you all, but this feels like this war is going to go on, perhaps for years. I have been having deja vu since February waxing and waning. Usually that is a signal to me that some event by our controllers is in the works. A few weeks ago, I had a dream that I lived in a house on stilts and felt very vulnerable. Mossad was after me and knew where I lived. I kept trying to find a gun but could not find one. Instead I was protected by a swarm of bees and some kind of slimy substance (slimy in a positive way).

Anyways, I would feel bad for the Donald if were actually humble enough to realize that he is in a impossible position. The position being, defy Mossad=certain death; go ahead supporting Israel in this conflict=economic strife and populist anger from a population who is tired of conflicts.

In this video below, Bibi sure is looking a bit desperate. Perhaps the attack on Iran is another "gross miscalculation" made by our controllers.


This is an interview of an intellectual in Iran named Prof Marandi seen at the end of the other video. He calls out the Zionists and their genocide in Gaza, states Iran is prepared for war, and around the 17 min mark, talks about how the disruption in oil in the Middle East could have devastating effects on the US economy:

 
Now that Israel and Iran are fighting, what's happening with the Palestinians? Is Israel accelerating the genocide while the missiles are flying? Or has Iran sufficiently diverted Israel's attention to give Palestinians some relief? šŸ¤”
Same as before. Internet was cut off in Gaza for 3 days, since right before Israel launched its first wave of strikes against Iran, but the little footage that has emerged from Gaza is bad. It shows some 300 people to have been massacred, and around 2,000 more injured, as they queue for food thrown to them by the Israeli- and US-run 'aid workers'. Given Israel's tight control of information from Gaza, the death toll could well be much higher than that.

Al Jazeera’s Tareq Abu Azzoum, reporting from Deir el-Balah, said Palestinians are starting to see GHF distribution hubs as ā€œexecution sites,ā€ considering the repeated attacks there. But people in Gaza ā€œhave run out of options, and they are forced to travel to these dangerous humanitarian spaces to get aidā€.
 
I haven't slept well, anyway! But glad to be with you all, keeping our heads amidst chaos and uncertainty.
I didn't sleep well either, but I dreamed that I was observing a very important meeting in Moscow—Putin, Lavrov, Zakharova were there, discussing the recent escalation seriously. I was afraid that their building would get hit by a missile, so I quickly examined the defense mechanisms around the area. Then, sensing a lot of tension in the air, I suddenly started worrying about my own safety—I didn't want to be labeled as a spy!
 
June 12, 2025 - IAEA Censures Iran

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog, voted to censure Iran for failing to comply with its nuclear non-proliferation obligations. This decision, made on June 12, 2025, marks the first such censure in nearly 20 years and was backed by 19 out of the 35 member countries on the IAEA board, with Russia, China, and Burkina Faso opposing the resolution, and 11 others abstaining or not voting.

The
resolution was introduced by the U.S., U.K., France, and Germany, following an IAEA report that criticized Iran for its lack of cooperation, particularly regarding uranium traces found at undeclared sites. The report also raised concerns about Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% purity, which is close to weapons-grade levels.


Documents released by Iran show that IAEA chief Grossi has been completely coordinated with Israel and has been carrying out Israel's orders. Iran recently managed to obtain a wealth of secret documents from the Israeli regime.
 
Same as before. Internet was cut off in Gaza for 3 days, since right before Israel launched its first wave of strikes against Iran, but the little footage that has emerged from Gaza is bad. It shows some 300 people to have been massacred, and around 2,000 more injured, as they queue for food thrown to them by the Israeli- and US-run 'aid workers'. Given Israel's tight control of information from Gaza, the death toll could well be much higher than that.
Yes, they will take advantage of the fact that we are all watching Iran's attacks on Israel to massacre and massacre Palestinians, without anyone seeing anything, without anyone saying anything, like the Nazis, which is what they are. And who knows, perhaps one of the objectives of this attack on Iran is to finish off the Palestinians in Gaza. I fear the worst.
 
I feel like, if Iran wanted, it could destroy Israel in a very short time. But what would happen then? There’s the high likelihood of being the target of a devastating attack by the US-led coalition, which would almost certainly bring the current Islamic government down since this is also desired by a significant portion of the Iranian citizens. The predominantly Sunni realm of Islam would be glad for the destruction of not only Israel but also of the current Iranian regime. But would this be a happy and justified result?

I’m not sure but I think one of the reasons for the Iranian regime to play somewhat dirty tricks in its conflict with Israel within the Palestinian context is to both ensure its survival and also raise its rank in the Islamic world.

Many, if not most, Sunni religious scholars believe and claim that Shia is a false and pervert, even demonic, way of practicing Islam. But then the Palestinian conflict might be a most interesting litmus paper in terms of the contentious relationship between the Sunni and Shia main branches of Islam.

Most of the Sunni Islamic nations or governments don’t appear to be willing to unite for counteracting the demonic Israeli oppression of the Palestinians. Iran, by comparison, is almost the ā€œprofessionalā€ Islamic force that counteracts Israel in this sense. I don’t know but doubt that the Palestinian resistance groups could maintain their fight without the direct and indirect Iranian help.

A lot of Sunni opinion leaders claim that Iran doesn’t really oppose Israel but, on the contrary, is as evil as Israel, that it joyfully benefits from the Israel’s tyranny, thereby spreading Shia and oppressing Sunnis under the guise of opposing Israel. They might be justified to some extent in this criticism but then, I think, one must also question how virtuous or how truthful the Sunni-majority Islamic world is in view of their great general silence, even approval, in the face of the long-standing Israeli-US tyranny against the Palestinians.

Based on historical discourse, and also with the benefit of being the overwhelming majority, the Sunni Islamic view seems to be significantly justified in its fierce criticism of Shia Islam, but then the Palestinian litmus test indicates otherwise, I believe. Or, maybe, it provides an interesting balance in the debate of ā€œvalidityā€ between the Sunni and Shiite Islamic views. We know that there are many deep falsities in the widely-accepted views of the history of Islam in its entirety as is the case, more or less, with some other religions. I don’t intend to defend Islam or a specific branch of it, I try to understand various aspects of Iran’s position regarding Palestine, Israel, the Sunni Islamic world, etc. Based on this, I also try to find clues with regard to how the basic schism between Sunni and Shia Islam developed. This thread is probably not ideal place for the history aspect of the matter but I wanted to share some of my thoughts about why the Iranian regime often acts ā€œweirdā€, to say the least, in its so-called fight against Israel’s evilness. There really seems to be some genuine intent but also many dark or suspicious deeds. I don’t doubt that the regime has been involved in significant corruptions (very interesting things were also said by the C’s in this regard, which I consider to be true most probably) but, still, Iran’s opposition to Israel doesn’t seem to be fake altogether. There’s almost the sense of a predestined mission in this regard, despite the high level of corruption. Even if the Iranian regime is capable of destroying Israel when it wants to, it also has to consider what would happen thereafter. I think it both wants to ensure its survival after a possible ā€œEnd of Israelā€, and it also wants to ensure more (even absolute?) legitimacy as the central base of Shia in the Islamic world, the overwhelming majority of which is Sunni with a mostly unfavorable view of Shia.
 
A sobering analysis from Col. Macgregor

AI summary of the video:

Israel’s Dream – The World’s Nightmare: Analyzing the Current Geopolitical Crisis​

The ongoing conflict involving Israel and Iran is escalating, with significant implications for global politics and security. Colonel Douglas Macgregor discusses the potential consequences of this conflict, the role of the U.S., and the broader geopolitical landscape.

The Current Situation​

Macgregor argues that the actions and rhetoric from the Israeli government have led to a false sense of security among its supporters, particularly in the United States. He likens the current situation to a modern-day Pearl Harbor, suggesting that while Israel may celebrate initial victories, the long-term consequences could be disastrous.

Miscalculations and False Security​

The Colonel emphasizes that Israel's confidence may be misplaced, as the Iranian response could escalate significantly. He notes that the Iranians are currently using older missile technology to draw out Israel's defenses, potentially setting the stage for a more devastating counterattack with advanced weaponry.

Global Reactions and Alliances​

Macgregor points out that the conflict is likely to unify other nations around Iran, particularly those in Moscow and Beijing. He suggests that these countries may view the situation as a warning, fearing they could be next if they do not support Iran. This shift could lead to a more complex geopolitical landscape, with nations forming alliances based on mutual interests against perceived threats from Israel and its allies.

The Role of the United States​

The Colonel expresses concern over the U.S. government's unwavering support for Israel, questioning how this aligns with American interests. He highlights the bipartisan support for Israel among U.S. lawmakers, suggesting that this could lead to increased tensions domestically and internationally.

The Risk of Escalation​

Macgregor warns of the potential for the conflict to escalate into a broader war, involving not just regional players but also global powers. He raises the specter of nuclear weapons being used as desperation grows, particularly if Israel feels threatened. The implications of such an escalation could be catastrophic, not only for the Middle East but for global security.

Domestic Concerns​

The Colonel also addresses the potential for domestic unrest in the U.S., citing concerns about sleeper cells and the possibility of attacks on American soil. He warns that the influx of undocumented individuals during previous administrations could pose a security risk, especially in the context of rising tensions abroad.

The Media Landscape​

Macgregor critiques the current media environment, suggesting that both mainstream and alternative media often propagate similar narratives, limiting the diversity of perspectives available to the public. He calls for more independent voices to challenge the dominant narratives and provide a more nuanced understanding of the situation.
 
@Joe - :headbash: It's never a good idea to do late night posting and not accurately weigh the info catching one's attention especially when a deep down fear that the current situation will escalate to beyond dire levels is triggered. WWIII has been bandied about for some time now as the many military confrontations proliferate and intensify particularly between Ukraine and Russia. Now Iran and Israel has literally exploded with not only US involvement, but apparently NATO as well. Add that the Cs have said certified insane people are operating.

Can't help but think about the "Sampson" option and that not 10 million, but 30 million illegals in the US is the latest figure being attested to and yeah, "cells"! Signs of billionaire funded insurrection/color revolution/civil war amazingly time coordinated with the Army parade/Trump's birthday and the blow up in the Middle East also contributes to a feeling of great unease. Worse, will the attack on Iran ultimately result in the price of oil skyrocketing to further tank economies here and elsewhere. A recipe for extreme chaos playing out as one presumes is part and parcel of the overall plan by the Deep State and associates.

Since we're under the impression that alien disclosure is also part of the plan at some point, how bad will it all get till then - to the very brink of WWIII? It's been noted that nuclear explosions negatively affect even 4D, so it would seem that threat will be kept under control. Maybe that applies to the Samson option, too.

I apologize for not using adequate discernment - too easy to get carried away with such volatile events. Where's Alfred Newman when you need him . . .

Thanks for the implied reminder to keep it real!
 
Last edited:
Another very interesting interview with Alex Krainer.
Alex Krainer believes that's Israel's attack on Iran was a massive miscalculation, one that will ultimately backfire and potentially lead to the end of Israel as a world power as America's hegemony over the Middle East collapses spectacularly. Alex explains that when it comes to this brewing war, along with the conflict in Ukraine, all roads lead to City of London as the architect of death and destruction to generate profits for the psychopathic banker class that truly pull the levers of power.


 
I just read on Sky news headlines that the Israelis have now eliminated the head of Army intelligence and his deputy. His name is Mohammed Kazemi.
I couldn't find the post earlier in the thread though but think it was Joe. The Israelis seem to be taking out key figures which is a real concern . How many more can they get to
 
I feel like, if Iran wanted, it could destroy Israel in a very short time. But what would happen then? There’s the high likelihood of being the target of a devastating attack by the US-led coalition, which would almost certainly bring the current Islamic government down since this is also desired by a significant portion of the Iranian citizens. The predominantly Sunni realm of Islam would be glad for the destruction of not only Israel but also of the current Iranian regime. But would this be a happy and justified result?

I’m not sure but I think one of the reasons for the Iranian regime to play somewhat dirty tricks in its conflict with Israel within the Palestinian context is to both ensure its survival and also raise its rank in the Islamic world.

Many, if not most, Sunni religious scholars believe and claim that Shia is a false and pervert, even demonic, way of practicing Islam. But then the Palestinian conflict might be a most interesting litmus paper in terms of the contentious relationship between the Sunni and Shia main branches of Islam.

Most of the Sunni Islamic nations or governments don’t appear to be willing to unite for counteracting the demonic Israeli oppression of the Palestinians. Iran, by comparison, is almost the ā€œprofessionalā€ Islamic force that counteracts Israel in this sense. I don’t know but doubt that the Palestinian resistance groups could maintain their fight without the direct and indirect Iranian help.

A lot of Sunni opinion leaders claim that Iran doesn’t really oppose Israel but, on the contrary, is as evil as Israel, that it joyfully benefits from the Israel’s tyranny, thereby spreading Shia and oppressing Sunnis under the guise of opposing Israel. They might be justified to some extent in this criticism but then, I think, one must also question how virtuous or how truthful the Sunni-majority Islamic world is in view of their great general silence, even approval, in the face of the long-standing Israeli-US tyranny against the Palestinians.

Based on historical discourse, and also with the benefit of being the overwhelming majority, the Sunni Islamic view seems to be significantly justified in its fierce criticism of Shia Islam, but then the Palestinian litmus test indicates otherwise, I believe. Or, maybe, it provides an interesting balance in the debate of ā€œvalidityā€ between the Sunni and Shiite Islamic views. We know that there are many deep falsities in the widely-accepted views of the history of Islam in its entirety as is the case, more or less, with some other religions. I don’t intend to defend Islam or a specific branch of it, I try to understand various aspects of Iran’s position regarding Palestine, Israel, the Sunni Islamic world, etc. Based on this, I also try to find clues with regard to how the basic schism between Sunni and Shia Islam developed. This thread is probably not ideal place for the history aspect of the matter but I wanted to share some of my thoughts about why the Iranian regime often acts ā€œweirdā€, to say the least, in its so-called fight against Israel’s evilness. There really seems to be some genuine intent but also many dark or suspicious deeds. I don’t doubt that the regime has been involved in significant corruptions (very interesting things were also said by the C’s in this regard, which I consider to be true most probably) but, still, Iran’s opposition to Israel doesn’t seem to be fake altogether. There’s almost the sense of a predestined mission in this regard, despite the high level of corruption. Even if the Iranian regime is capable of destroying Israel when it wants to, it also has to consider what would happen thereafter. I think it both wants to ensure its survival after a possible ā€œEnd of Israelā€, and it also wants to ensure more (even absolute?) legitimacy as the central base of Shia in the Islamic world, the overwhelming majority of which is Sunni with a mostly unfavorable view of Shia.
Sunni Islam has proven itself to be completely useless for defending The Faithful - both materially and spiritually - from The Djinn. Only Shias resist STS domination. Sunnis embrace fake jihad, the version the Mossad, CIA and MI6 want them to embrace.
 
Back
Top Bottom