2007: full scale GLOBAL WARMING campaign launched - THE HORRIBLE TRUTH

  • Thread starter Thread starter MattMarriott
  • Start date Start date
M

MattMarriott

Guest
Why did the satanic illuminati launch full scale the global warming campaign in late 2006? THE HORRIBLE TRUTH is very simple.

Decrease in consumption...

The combined action of these three main factors:

- the collapsing economy (-5 pct industrial output in 2006 in US and EU),
- the mass murder of elderly and other "unproductive" segments of the population in homes and hospitals (I estimated, derivated from other published data, these measures caused a population reduction of 1.7 pct in 2006);
- which were the main reasons for the drastic reduction of oil consumption (-8 pct gasoline consumption in 2006 in US and EU);

... NOT ENOUGH to compensate for decrease in global oil output

But that was NOT ENOUGH to compensate the second year of the post peak oil age (-6 pct global output in 2006).

Since the elasticity of demand is now close to the limits, any broadening of the gap would result in an explosion of oil prices. But since the population is now also reaching the limits of its financial capacity, this would lead to the implosion of the system.

Stage not yet finished, so illuminati trying to gain extra time, again and again

The illuminati now resort to global warming (which is real) only to try to postpone the last move required by their strategy, the final nuclear showdown. They use global warming to try to decrease oil consumption just enough to keep it in pace with the decreasing global oil output.

Because if that would not be the case then oil prices would explode.
And the illuminati would be forced to launch the full scale nuclear attack against Russia, since otherwise they know that soon their bodies would be dragged out into the streets.
 
How long have you been writing for the National Enquirer?

Oh, and you might want to re-check your data on that whole Peak Oil thing - wouldn't want you to be discredited or embarrassed by making outlandish statements or anything...

:rolleyes:
 
anart said:
How long have you been writing for the National Enquirer?
:rolleyes:
LOL!

I thought the National Enquirer took over the NY Times?
 
National Enquirer said:
Because if that would not be the case then oil prices would explode.
How terrible for the Illuminti owned oil companies that have been only running profits between 30% and 50% in the last few years while the rest of the world doesn't know where their money goes. I'm sure they would hate it if their insane profits would further increase. :lol:
 
Matt has a point. I was nearly sick when Johnny Howard, our local rep of the illuminati, had a Pauline conversion, but only a partial one, and bought into the Global Warming scenario. This man is on his last legs and lies don't faze him (he is a politician and a good one) but he is about to lose an election and could have kept up the GWB position. But he didn't. I am paranoid, and had to rein in the old noggin cos it was spinning scenarios 19 to the dozen! Why are they trying to rein in petrol company coal company profits? I am even paranoid enuff to encompass the idea that the illuminati aren't in control.......but I must take my meds!
 
You did not say which point Matt has. The National Enquirer type of point?
 
I don't think so. But they may be two "brothers", or at least in the same "brotherhood". :)
 
ark said:
or at least in the same "brotherhood".
they both use the same musical ranting language - fascinating. I wonder if Marriotfitzfungus or fungusfitzmarriott? sorry I couldn't resist.
 
Back
Top Bottom