anart
A Disturbance in the Force
oguz said:hi norma, you can find this in many sources. search "neuschwabenland" on google.
for earthquake, cassiopaeans cite this as "california falling into ocean".
Actually, the C's said:
941126 said:Q: (L) Well, let's not denigrate literal translations or at least
attempts to get things into literal terms. I like realistic art
work. I am a realist in my art preferences. I want trees to
look like trees and people to have only two arms and legs.
Therefore, I also like some literalness in my prognostications.
A: Some is okay, but, beware or else "California falls into the
ocean" will always be interpreted as California falling into the
ocean.
Q: [General uproar] (F) Wait a minute, what was the
question? (L) I just said I liked literalness in my prophecies.
(F) Oh, I know what they are saying. People believe that
California is just going to go splat and that Phoenix is going to
be on the seacoast, never mind that it's at 1800 feet elevation,
it's just going to drop down to sea level, or the sea level is
going to rise, but it's not going to affect Virginia Beach even
though that's at sea level. I mean... somehow Phoenix is just
going to drop down and none of the buildings are going to be
damaged, even though its going to fall 1800 feet... (T) Slowly.
It's going to settle. (F) Slowly? It would have to be so slowly
it's unbelievable how slowly it would have to be. (T) It's been
settling for the last five million years, we've got a ways to go in
the next year and a half! (F) Right! That's my point. (T) In
other words, when people like Scallion and Sun Bear and
others say California is going to fall into the ocean, they are
not saying that the whole state, right along the border is going
to fall into the ocean, they are using the term California to
indicate that the ocean ledge along the fault line has a
probability of breaking off and sinking on the water side,
because it is a major fracture. We understand that that is not
literal. Are you telling us that there is more involved here as
far as the way we are hearing what these predictions say?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Are we understanding what you are saying?
A: Some.
Q: (T) So, when we talk about California falling into the
ocean, we are not talking about the whole state literally falling
into the ocean?
A: In any case, even if it does, how long will it take to do this?
Q: (LM) It could take three minutes or three hundred years.
(T) Yes. That is "open" as you would say.
A: Yes. But most of your prophets think it is not open.
Q: (J) Yeah, because they think they have the only line on it.
(T) Okay. So they are thinking in the terms that one minute
California will be there and a minute and a half later it will be
all gone. Is this what you are saying?
A: Or similar.
Q: (T) So, when we are talking: "California will fall into the
ocean, which is just the analogy we are using, we are talking
about, as far as earth changes, is the possibility that several
seismic events along the fault line, which no one really knows
the extent of...
A: Or it all may be symbolic of something else.
Q: (L) Such as? (J) All the fruitcakes in California are all
going to go off the deep end together. (L) Symbolic of what?
A: Up to you to examine and learn.