2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

[bjorb]

Finally some honest campaigning done for the democrats.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1296520446192619524

 

[aragorn]

From the little I’ve seen, the Democrat’s campaign is so bad it’s hard to believe it’s not comedy! They are using the same people (Obamas, Clintons), the same rhetoric (psychopathic projection: blame others for doing what you’ve done), the absolutely horrible props and entertainers. Those gray eminences who are scripting and planning this are completely out of touch with reality. Maybe they are suffering from dementia, or loss of brain cells from all the evil things they’ve done. Imagine what a bunch of young, smart and innovative people could produce instead of this garbage that looks like it’s straight from the 80’s.

 

[Ca.]

the absolutely horrible props and entertainers.

So true as Hollywood's far left are running out ammo against Trump, (when they bring in the carpetbagger's and the likes).

Julia Louis-Dreyfus Dunks on Donald Trump, Mike Pence on DNC Night 4

"Joe Biden goes to church so regularly that he doesn’t need tear gas and heavily armed troops to get there," she said

variety.com

Snip: Aug 20, 2020 6:22pm PT
In praising Vice Presidential nominee Kamala Harris, Louis-Dreyfus said she cannot wait to see her debate “our current Vice President, Mika Peince.” She continued to play up not being able to pronounce Mike Pence (“Some kind of weird foreign name,” she said. “That’s what people are saying, strongly.”), a dig at those who have not pronounced Harris’ first name correctly, as Pence did at a recent campaign stop.

She also took a shot at Trump, saying, “Joe Biden goes to church so regularly that he doesn’t need tear gas and heavily armed troops to get there.”

In encouraging people to text VOTE to 30330 for information on voting in their community, she said that it was easy to remember the number because “that’s the year Donald Trump will finally release his tax returns.”

“If we all vote, there’s nothing Facebook, Fox News, and Vladimir Putin can do to stop us,” she continued.

She then went on to talk about the first time she met Democratic Presidential nominee Joe Biden when he was Vice President and she was starring on the HBO political comedy “Veep.” After that meeting, she was asked to be on the cover of Amtrak’s “Arrive” magazine “which no one reads, even though it’s free.”

In encouraging people to text VOTE to 30330 for information on voting in their community, she said that it was easy to remember the number because “that’s the year Donald Trump will finally release his tax returns.”

Biden accepts nomination, says he’s fighting for the ‘heart and soul of America’
Aug. 20, 2020 | 9:10 PM

https://twitter.com/x/status/1296672617794080771

https://twitter.com/x/status/1296674959738187776

 

[Ca.]

Rated for R for a mature audience.

DNC 2020 - Day 3 Highlights

•Aug 20, 2020 John Ward
By an impossible miracle of hilarity, Day 3 of the Democratic National Convention continued the decreasing trend in quality.
Down absurdly in ratings compared to 2016 - when their candidate lost - not even an all-star cast could lift the weird virtual zoom meeting to a level even liberals could enjoy. Key moments included Elizabeth Warren, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Vice Presidential candidate Kamala Harris.
DAY 1 HIGHLIGHTS: https://youtu.be/lN21hKt8ha4 DAY 2 HIGHLIGHTS: https://youtu.be/AF-R61ppKZI

 

[Ennio]

From the little I’ve seen, the Democrat’s campaign is so bad it’s hard to believe it’s not comedy! They are using the same people (Obamas, Clintons), the same rhetoric (psychopathic projection: blame others for doing what you’ve done), the absolutely horrible props and entertainers. Those gray eminences who are scripting and planning this are completely out of touch with reality. Maybe they are suffering from dementia, or loss of brain cells from all the evil things they’ve done. Imagine what a bunch of young, smart and innovative people could produce instead of this garbage that looks like it’s straight from the 80’s.

Or maybe all the smart and innovative people out there have an inkling as to how utterly corrupt and wrong-headed the Dems are that they don't want any part of it and are choosing to opt out. That or some of that pool of talent has already been so co-opted and ideology-possessed that they're working behind the scenes already. The Dems quite simply select for corruption-potential, sociopathic tendencies, etc.

And speaking of talent, apparently Tulsi Gabbard wasn't even allowed to speak at the convention - which, according to some, breaks with the tradition of giving time to anyone who won delegate seats during the debates, which Gabbard did.

'I was not invited': Tulsi Gabbard says DNC did not ask her to participate 'in any way' -- Sott.net

Democratic Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard confirmed Thursday that she had not been invited to participate in her own party's convention. The former presidential candidate — who endorsed former Vice President Joe Biden when she formally dropped out of...

www.sott.net

 

[SlipNet]

And speaking of talent, apparently Tulsi Gabbard wasn't even allowed to speak at the convention - which, according to some, breaks with the tradition of giving time to anyone who won delegate seats during the debates, which Gabbard did.

And Tulsi knows exactly why she wasn't invited to speak. How anyone can on the Dem's side come out in support for Biden is just absurd at this point though. Trump, for all his faults, is a shoe-in for me at this point, but then I'm not American, so my hand isn't exactly on the political pulse, perhaps some of our U.S members can say for sure how things are over there. We've got a self serving buffoon in charge in the U.K, I just hope Trump has a decent enough voter base to clinch this one come November.

 

[Pearce]

And Tulsi knows exactly why she wasn't invited to speak. How anyone can on the Dem's side come out in support for Biden is just absurd at this point though. Trump, for all his faults, is a shoe-in for me at this point, but then I'm not American, so my hand isn't exactly on the political pulse, perhaps some of our U.S members can say for sure how things are over there. We've got a self serving buffoon in charge in the U.K, I just hope Trump has a decent enough voter base to clinch this one come November.

I guess my thinking is that all of it is by design: Trump getting (s)elected, the left losing their mind, Russiagate to divide and distract while they shored up the last several years all the positions they wanted themselves to be in for the dismantling of America and the rest of the world. "They" being the real globalists, "Masters of the Universe" etc.

In what I've seen, hands being tied or not, Trump was placed there exactly for his ability to bring into light what was before hidden. In other words it's his effect, not his cause. They need people to lose all faith in the structure of our society because none of it is useful for them anymore, especially the elections. This whole thing is driving people right into rooting for Trump when it seems like that is exactly what is wanted.

Anyone who honestly believes in or is willing to vote for Biden or anyone on the left is beyond an idiot, a true fool, and a large majority of people from all sides are now flocking to Trump because it seems like the obvious thing to do. That looks an awful lot like putting the dog at one end of the field, barking and acting rabid, to drive the sheep in the opposite direction, to "safety."

Well, I don't buy it, and increasingly feel that, save for any big disaster or Continuity of Government preventing an election at all, electing anyone from this roll call, including and especially Trump, will turn out to be a huge mistake; the last Trump card on humanity. I just don't trust in someone else to make life "better" or "more safe" anymore because it really is perfect taken as a whole, and it's our job to take back control and responsibility for ourselves and those we love.

I know that last sentence is overly simplistic and bereft of any detail of what fulfilling or enacting those ideas may actually entail, and I definitely don't know what the answers to our predicament are, but I'm not doom and gloom because I do have a lot of faith and trust in the Universal Mind, as well as in the ability of goodness to prevail.

I just...don't trust politicians

 

[Color]

Joker for Trump :)

https://twitter.com/x/status/1297588675333591040

SOTT covered when this creature spoke for the Women's March, back in 2017, now she's popping out again at the DNC non the less, must be a winner:

DNC Features Convicted Murderer Who Squeezed Victim’s Testicles with Pliers

At the Democrat National Convention (DNC) this week, a convicted murderer and kidnapper implicated in a gruesome 1985 torture and killing case was featured as a “criminal justice reform advocate.”

Donna Hylton, a 55-year-old Jamaican-American who was abused and molested as a child, was given a short slot in a DNC video montage where supporters of Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden recited the Preamble of the Constitution.
Toward the end of the montage, Biden delivers the closing words of the Preamble.

Thread:
So incredibly honored and humble to have been asked to participate in the Preamble of the Constitution for the DNC tonight.
With deep thought, I accepted this opportunity to represent the millions of Americans who have been left out and shut out. pic.twitter.com/087pZVIrLv
— Donna Hylton (@DonnaHylton) August 18, 2020

Hylton was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison after she participated with six other people in the brutal kidnapping, torture, and murder of Long Island, New York, real estate broker Thomas Vigliarolo, 62-years-old, in 1985.

The New York Times, in 1985, reported that Hylton and six others had kidnapped Vigliarolo and held him for a $435,000 ransom for about two weeks before murdering him. His body was found locked inside a trunk in an apartment in Manhattan.

The Washington Post reported on the case in 2018, noting Hylton’s links to the Women’s March:

In 1985, a Long Island real estate broker, Thomas Vigliarolo, was brutally killed. Seven people were arrested on charges of kidnapping and second-degree murder. One was Donna Hylton, 20, who was sentenced to 25 years to life for her participation in the crime, during which the 62-year-old victim was starved, burned and beaten over the course of more than two weeks. His body was later put in a footlocker to decompose.

Many of the details of the case were revealed in a July 1995 report from Psychology Today. During the group’s torture of Vigliarolo, they squeezed his testicles with pliers, shoved a metal rod into his anus, and would beat him periodically.

Psychology Today reported:

Vigliarole believed the three girls were prostitutes who were going to have sex with him. Instead, they picked him up on March 8 in Elmhurst, Queens, at Maria’s home, and drugged him to make him drowsy. Then they drove him to Selma’s apartment in Harlem. The apartment had already been prepared for an extended torture session: The closet door had been cut, a pot put in it for use as a toilet, the windows boarded.
For the next 15 to 20 days (police aren’t sure just when Vigliarole died), the man was starved, burned, beaten, and tortured. (Even 10 years later, Spurling could recall Rita’s chilling response when they questioned her about shoving a three-foot metal bar up Vigliarole’s rear: “He was a homo anyway.” How did she know? “When I stuck the bar up his rectum he wiggled.”)
…
[New York City Detective William] Spurling himself interviewed Donna: “I couldn’t believe this girl who was so intelligent and nice-looking could be so unemotional about what she was telling me she and her friends had done. They’d squeezed the victim’s testicles with a pair of pliers, beat him, burned him. Actually, I thought the judge’s sentence was lenient. Once a jailbird, always a jailbird.”

Biden’s running mate, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) has been derided by the progressive wing of the party for her background as attorney general of California. In the 2019 Democrat presidential primary, Harris seemingly embraced Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) plan to provide voting rights to sitting inmates, including violent murderers, rapists, sex offenders, and terrorists.

“People who are in — convicted, in prison, like the Boston Marathon bomber, on death row, people who are convicted of sexual assault, they should be able to vote,” CNN’s Don Lemon asked Harris at a town hall event.

“I think we should have that conversation,” Harris said.

DNC Features Convicted Killer Who Squeezed Victim's Testicles with Pliers

At the DNC a convicted murderer implicated in a gruesome 1985 torture and killing case was featured as a "criminal justice reform advocate."

www.breitbart.com

 

[seek10]

Historically, India's name never used to play any role in US elections. The situation was so bad that, Before Indian general elections in 2014, then Congress government couldn't get it to release its body-searched Indian diplomat for a month. Worse, there were reports that Indian diplomats who were trying to figure out whom to reach, was sent to the secretary of NY senator.

US tried India as a 'Contain China' policy using its historical differences. They couldn't do much either during spineless Manmohan Singh ( 2005-2014) days or later. Though Modi went around the world( after 2014 election), hugging their leaders ( for his 'Make in India' campaign and others), wooing the Non-resident Indians in rock star receptions, called Obama for its Republican parade and so on, its impact on US politics is minimal to non-existent. Even after Trump's election in 2016, Modi's multiple visits to the US, Meliana Trump's multiple visits to India, it is business as usual.

But, something has changed after Modi's 2019 reelection, Trump started showing some interest. Initially, Trump's name was not in the September 2019 Modi's speech in Austin. But later Trump's name was added to the gathering and Modi promoted him parading Trump with hands raised around the stadium. Media speculated many things - billions of military contracts, wooing predominantly democratic party inclined American-Indians, and so on. But not much materialized in military contracts though. Modi reciprocated the gesture by calling Trump to India and his home state in 2020. Despite all this showcase, both make decisions like nationalistic leaders sometimes conflicting each other. I wondered what has changed. Does Trump sees some value in using Modi's playbook in the handling Left. But, that is for another post.

Kamala Harris's selection for the VP position seems to have changed this attitude. She is half-Indian and half-Black. According to the analysis, her impact on the small 2.6 million Indian community vary. Some say it will attract the Indian community, but others say "Most Indians live in democratic states like NY, NJ, CA, so change is minimal" and her advocacy of Indian related issues is non-existent. But interestingly, the Trump campaign team released a video to attract the Indian community. Probably, this is related to attract Indians in swing states like Texas, Florida however small it is.

'America loves India': Trump campaign releases commercial for Indian-Americans

As the US Presidential elections are coming closer, Donald Trump, who is re-running for the post in November is reaching out to all communities, even the Indian-American community. Aiming to gain confidence of the Indian-American community, which is nearly 2 million in the US, Trump's campaign...

www.wionews.com

https://twitter.com/x/status/1297267137736781824

Whether one calls it silly foreign influence (like in 'Russian interference') or not is to be seen.

 

[Color]

Best piece I've read so far:

Send in the Clowns for the Circus Is in Town
by Edward Curtin

Send in the Clowns for the Circus Is in Town

Edward Curtin Don’t bother, they’re here, already performing in the center ring under the big top owned and operated by The Umbrella People. Trump, Biden, Pence, Harris, and their clownish sidekick…

off-guardian.org

Don’t bother, they’re here, already performing in the center ring under the big top owned and operated by The Umbrella People.

Trump, Biden, Pence, Harris, and their clownish sidekicks, Pompeo, Michelle Obama, et al., are performing daily under the umbrella’s shadowy protection. For The Umbrella People run a three-ring circus, and although their clowns pop out of separate tiny cars and, acting like enemies, squirt each other with water hoses to the audience’s delight, raucous laughter, and serious attentiveness, they are all part of the same show, working for the same bosses.

Sadly, many people think this circus is the real world and that the clowns are not allied pimps serving the interests of their masters, but are real enemies.

The Umbrella People are the moguls who own the showtime studios – some call them the secret government, the deep-state, or the power elite. They run a protection racket, so I like to use a term that emphasizes their method of making sure the sunlight of truth never gets to those huddled under their umbrella.

They produce and direct the daily circus that is the American Spectacle, the movie that is meant to entertain and distract the audience from the side show that continues outside the big top, the place where millions of vulnerable people are abused and killed. And although the sideshow is the real main event, few pay attention since their eyes are fixed on the center ring were the spotlight directs their focus.

The French writer Guy Debord called this The Society of the Spectacle.

For many months now, all eyes have been directed to the Covid-19 propaganda show with Fauci and Gates, and their mainstream corporate media mouthpieces, striking thunderbolts in the storm to scare the unknowing audience into submission so the transformation of the Great Global Reset, led by the World Economic Forum and the International Monetary Fund, can proceed smoothly.

Now hearts are aflutter with excitement to see the war-loving Joe Biden boldly coming forth like Lazarus from the grave to announce his choice of a masked vice-presidential running mate who will echo his pronouncements.

And the star of the big top, the softly coiffured reality television emcee Trump, around whom the spectacle swirls, elicits outraged responses as he plays the part of the comical bad guy.

Punch and Judy indeed.

All the while the corporate mainstream media warn of grim viral milestones, election warnings, storms ahead! The world as you know it is coming to an end, they remind us daily.

The latter meme contains a hint of truth since not just the world as we know it may be coming to an end, but the world itself, including human life, as the clowns initiate a nuclear holocaust while everyone is being entertained.

Meanwhile, as the circus rolls along, far away and out of mind, shit happens:

With more than 400 military bases equipped with nuclear weapons surrounding China, the United States military continues its encirclement of China and China enters a “state of siege.”

The US conducts military exercises with the Ronald Reagan Carrier Strike Group in the contested South China Sea. These US “maritime Air defense operation” close to the Chinese mainland are a part of significantly increased US military exercises in the area.

The US Defense Secretary Esper announces that the US is withdrawing troops from Germany but moving them closer to the Russian border to serve as a more effective deterrent against Russia.

Russia says it will regard any ballistic missile aimed at its territory as a nuclear attack and will respond in kind with nuclear weapons.

Although the US is formally not at war with any African country, a new report reveals that the United States has special forces operating in 22 African countries with 29 bases and 6,000 troops, with a huge drone hub in Niger that cost 100 + million to build and is expected to have operating costs of more than $280 billion by 2024.

The US continues its assault on Syria, aside from direct military operations, by building up Kurdish proxies in northeastern Syria to protect the oil fields that they are stealing from the Syrian government, a plan hatched long ago. The US says their strategy is to deny ISIS a valuable revenue stream. The same ISIS they used to attack the Syrian government in a war of aggression.

A new document exposes the US plan to overthrow the socialist government of Nicaragua through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), a traditional US regime change and CIA front organization.

Meanwhile, in Belarus, a place most Americans can’t find on a map, there is another color “revolution” underway.

Continuing its war against Iran and Venezuela by other means, the Trump administration seizes Iranian tankers carrying fuel to Venezuela. “Something will happen with Venezuela. That’s all I can tell you. Something will be happening with Venezuela,” said Trump in a July interview with Noticias Telemundo.

And of course the Palestinians are left to suffer and die as Israel is supported in its despotic policies in the Middle East.

The list goes on and on as the US under Trump continues to wage war by multiple means around the world. But his followers see him as peaceful president because these wars are waged through sanctions, special operations, drones, third parties, etc.

But back in the center ring, the two presidential clown candidates keep the audience entertained, as they shoot water at each other. Trump, who now presides over all the events just listed, and Biden, who enthusiastically supported the American wars against Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, etc.

But then the followers of Obama/Biden also see their champions as peaceful leaders. This is even more absurd.

Don’t you like farce?

Besides being a rabid advocate for the invasion of Iraq in 2003 as a senator, Biden, as Vice-President under Obama for eight years, seconded and promoted all of Obama’s wars that were wrapped in “humanitarian” propaganda to evade international law and keep his liberal supporters quiet.

From Bush II, an outright cowboy war-wager who used America’s large military forces to invade Afghanistan and Iraq under false pretensions – i.e. lies, Obama and his sidekick Biden learned to arm and finance thousands of Islamic jihadists, run by the CIA and US special forces, to do the job in more circumspect ways.

They expanded and grew The United States Africa Command (US AFRICOM) throughout Africa. They agreed to a $1 trillion upgrade of US nuclear weapons (that continues under Trump). They disarmed their followers, who, in any case, wished to look the other way.

Out of sight and out of mind, Obama/Biden continued the “war on terror” with drones, private militias, color revolutions, etc. They waged war on six-seven – who knows how many – countries.

An exception to the more secretive wars was the Obama administration’s openly savage assault on Libya in 2011 under the lies of an imperial moral legitimacy. In order to save you, we will destroy you, which is what they did to Libya, a country still in ruins and chaos.

Their equally blood-thirsty Secretary of State Hillary Clinton let the cat out of the bag when she laughed and gleefully applauded the brutal murder of Libya’s leader Moammar Gaddafi with the words: “We came, we saw, he died.” Yippee!

After Libya was destroyed and so many killed in an illegal and immoral war financed with $2 billion dollars from the America treasury, Joseph Biden bragged that the US didn’t lose a single life and such a war was a “prescription for how to deal with the world as we go forward.”

Biden was Obama’s front man on Iraq, the war he voted for in 2003, and wrote an op ed article in 2006 calling for the breakup of the country into three parts, Shia, Sunni, and Kurdish.

When Obama launched 48 cruise missiles and more than ten thousand tons of bombs on Syria in 2016, killing over a hundred civilians, a third of them children, V.P. Biden stood proud and strong in support of the action.

When the US launched the bloody coup in Ukraine in 2014, Biden was of course in agreement.

But we are told that Trump and Biden are arch-enemies. One of them wants war and the other wants peace.

How many Americans will vote for these clowns this year? They are really front men for The Umbrella People, the money people who use the CIA and other undercover forces to carry out their organized crime activities.

As CS Lewis said in his preface to The Screwtape Letters:

The greatest evil is not now done in those sordid ‘dens of crime’ that Dickens loved to paint […] But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice.

In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump received 129 million votes out of 157 million registered American voters eager to believe that this system is not built on imperial war-making by both parties.

Perhaps that’s a generous assessment. Maybe many of those voters believe in the USA’s “manifest destiny” to rule the world and wage war in God’s name. I hope not. But if so, you can expect a big turnout on November 3, 2020.

In any case, it’s quite a circus, but these clowns aren’t funny. They are dangerous.

“But where are the clowns?
Quick, send in the clowns
Don’t bother they’re here”

Don’t you like farce?

 

[MikaelYosef]

If Trump wins re-election in November, the US will experience a wave of mass left-wing violence, rioting and looting much worse than what we've already experienced so far.

I've been thinking about this lately, and my post is hypothetical only. I'm not a US citizen or resident, but I have visited and have friends within the country. Trying to put myself in the shoes of a citizen I'm not sure there is any outcome that could be positive (from a citizen's perspective). It's pretty simple to say - if Trump wins and stays in power for 4 more years, there are going to be a lot of p*ssed off people <AND> if Trump loses, there are going to be a lot of p*ssed off people. So it seems like a lose-lose situation.

Thinking more about the emotional side of it and the reaction of either side waking up the next day following the result, and from there the potential outcomes.... For 4 years, one side has been 'in power' and the other side has been fighting it. To re-elect the sitting President where battle-lines have already been drawn between two sides, at worst it would reinforce those lines. I.e. in very simple terms: right now, the Right are in power, the Left are suppressed. To continue that for another 4 years would be depressing for the Left and the opposite for the Right, but 4 years would go on, although with a likely continuation of relatively authoritarian rule. Consider the flip side - if the sitting president were to be ousted, two polarized groups of people would suddenly shift oppositely in their perceived level of power and authority. The radical Left would gloat, the radical Right would seethe, and the middle would continue to be caught up in it. A possible ignition point for a powder keg of emotion and subsequent reaction.

This is my commentary from as neutral a position as possible. I think it's a lose-lose situation at best but it could also get a lot darker and spread beyond the USA. I can't see a possible way this will end well, humans are human.

 

[Deleted member 4737]

I've been thinking about this lately, and my post is hypothetical only. I'm not a US citizen or resident, but I have visited and have friends within the country. Trying to put myself in the shoes of a citizen I'm not sure there is any outcome that could be positive (from a citizen's perspective). It's pretty simple to say - if Trump wins and stays in power for 4 more years, there are going to be a lot of p*ssed off people <AND> if Trump loses, there are going to be a lot of p*ssed off people. So it seems like a lose-lose situation.

Thinking more about the emotional side of it and the reaction of either side waking up the next day following the result, and from there the potential outcomes.... For 4 years, one side has been 'in power' and the other side has been fighting it. To re-elect the sitting President where battle-lines have already been drawn between two sides, at worst it would reinforce those lines. I.e. in very simple terms: right now, the Right are in power, the Left are suppressed. To continue that for another 4 years would be depressing for the Left and the opposite for the Right, but 4 years would go on, although with a likely continuation of relatively authoritarian rule. Consider the flip side - if the sitting president were to be ousted, two polarized groups of people would suddenly shift oppositely in their perceived level of power and authority. The radical Left would gloat, the radical Right would seethe, and the middle would continue to be caught up in it. A possible ignition point for a powder keg of emotion and subsequent reaction.

This is my commentary from as neutral a position as possible. I think it's a lose-lose situation at best but it could also get a lot darker and spread beyond the USA. I can't see a possible way this will end well, humans are human.

I am in the US and I agree with this. I think we are screwed no matter who wins. HOW we are screwed will be based on who wins.

One thing many people here forget is that there are not really two political parties here. It's a scam to make us think we have a choice or say in things. "well I voted for X don't blame me!" "It's all the fault of X party we need to vote!"

The majority of these politicians are on the same side as they are paid off by the same people. Think about it though. If one did not have a party that offered us hope and a direction to point out fingers at, what then? Whom would American Democrat and Republican voters blame if they didn't have each other?

 

[Ennio]

How anyone can on the Dem's side come out in support for Biden is just absurd at this point though. Trump, for all his faults, is a shoe-in for me at this point, but then I'm not American, so my hand isn't exactly on the political pulse, perhaps some of our U.S members can say for sure how things are over there. We've got a self serving buffoon in charge in the U.K, I just hope Trump has a decent enough voter base to clinch this one come November.

The following article posits that the Dems now know that they cannot win legitimately against Trump and are anticipating a contested election (of their own making of course) with ready made "reasons" for why a Trump win could not have possibly been a fair one. And it gets even better, scarier, more absurd and more Machiavellian: Nancy Pelosi is hinting that if such a non-outcome to the election should occur, which the Dems now appear to be planning for according to the analysis below - then she, Pelosi, will take charge as President as part of the Continuity of Government system that's in place in case of emergencies or catastrophes. Now the Continuity of Government structure has been, even before 9/11, as 'Deep State' as it gets. See the following articles to get some idea:

• Dick Cheney's 'deep state' and "Continuity in Government" measures on 9/11
• Continuity of Government: The hidden government group linking JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra and 9/11?
• State of emergency and "continuity of government": What is the real reason the government is spying on Americans?

But back to the article about Pelosi's statements, there has been some buzz lately about a contested election and its clear now that the Dems are crazy enough, and desperate enough, to try something like this out. Also, they still have a large number of intelligence agency personnel and allies out of public view to try and pull something like this off. The article fleshes such a possible scenario out and it may just be one of several possible plans at this point, but it sure does give one some idea of where their heads are. Like everything else though, we wait and see.

On July 21st Nancy Pelosi appears to have explained a large part of the game plan, to MSNBC.

"Well, that's a loaded question there about coronavirus, what we do about it. But the fact is, whether he knows it yet or not, he will be leaving. Just because he might not want to move out of the White House doesn't mean we won't have an inauguration ceremony to inaugurate a duly-elected President of the United States and the - I just - you know, I'm second in line to the Presidency. Just last week I had my regular continuation of government briefing. This might interest you because I say to them, 'This is never going to happen. God-willing it never will.' But there is a process. It has nothing to do with the certain occupant of the White House doesn't feel like moving and has to be fumigated out of there because the presidency is the presidency. It's not geography or location."

Is there a Democrat plot to appoint Pelosi president? Not as far-fetched as it sounds -- Sott.net

A plan is underway to install Nancy Pelosi as president. It is not the only plan, but this plan will be worked towards its logical conclusion, whether or not its utility concludes prior to the election itself, now less than 90 days away. A series...

www.sott.net

 

[aragorn]

The following article posits that the Dems now know that they cannot win legitimately against Trump and are anticipating a contested election (of their own making of course) with ready made "reasons" for why a Trump win could not have possibly been a fair one. And it gets even better, scarier, more absurd and more Machiavellian: Nancy Pelosi is hinting that if such a non-outcome to the election should occur, which the Dems now appear to be planning for according to the analysis below - then she, Pelosi, will take charge as President as part of the Continuity of Government system that's in place in case of emergencies or catastrophes. Now the Continuity of Government structure has been, even before 9/11, as 'Deep State' as it gets. See the following articles to get some idea:

• Dick Cheney's 'deep state' and "Continuity in Government" measures on 9/11
• Continuity of Government: The hidden government group linking JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra and 9/11?
• State of emergency and "continuity of government": What is the real reason the government is spying on Americans?

But back to the article about Pelosi's statements, there has been some buzz lately about a contested election and its clear now that the Dems are crazy enough, and desperate enough, to try something like this out. Also, they still have a large number of intelligence agency personnel and allies out of public view to try and pull something like this off. The article fleshes such a possible scenario out and it may just be one of several possible plans at this point, but it sure does give one some idea of where their heads are. Like everything else though, we wait and see.

Is there a Democrat plot to appoint Pelosi president? Not as far-fetched as it sounds -- Sott.net

A plan is underway to install Nancy Pelosi as president. It is not the only plan, but this plan will be worked towards its logical conclusion, whether or not its utility concludes prior to the election itself, now less than 90 days away. A series...

www.sott.net

Wow, quite a read that article! And what's scary, the theory sounds completely plausible. I mean, c'mon man (sorry, couldn't resist), who the heck would vote for Biden and Harris? This became even clearer watching the two conventions. I didn't watch that much, but from what I saw, the Republicans did a terrific job with their line up of talkers. Even if the style is not exactly 'my cup of tea', I can see that putting normal working people on the stage, who have been through difficult times, to hear them talk about how they believe in Trump and how he has helped them, is a zillion times more appealing than spoiled celebrities and brain dead politicians virtue signaling.

So, with the prospect of a completely fair election, the game would be over already...Trump would win without a doubt. As the article says, the Dems must know this, and they've known this for a long time. Hence they've played their dirty games ever since Trump got elected. What I hadn't figured out yet was: since they know they're going to loose, they still act like they have 'something up their sleeve' – so, what's their plan?

Well, the plan laid out in this article could very well be it: they will mess up the election process so badly, that they can declare it null and void, and then they'll vote for a new president in the House (if I understood correctly). I wouldn't be surprised if they, if it comes to that situation, somehow manage to grant Killary the precidency (argh!). She's been acting very confident lately, and as James Wood pointed out on Twitter, all that plastic surgery and botoxing must mean 'she's running'.

Like the author of that article, I hope Trump has something up his sleeve, too.

 

[Glenn]

It reminds me of a line in Pirates of the Caribbean. "In a fair fight, I would beat you every time... Well that doesn't give me much incentive to fight fair then does it." (Paraphrasing)

We have heard overtures from Pelosi to not have Biden debate Trump, and her quote posted above about enacting some sort of continuance of government move if Trump wins.

It does seem that this covid scheme dovetails into this quite nicely. Get the population used to sweeping changes and bypassing laws, so that what is proposed here will be more easily accepted.