62 richest people as wealthy as poorest half of world's population

Windmill knight

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
I thought this was big news today and worth some discussion. It's simply outrageous, and insane that some people may think that they are entitled to as much as billiones of people just because they are who they are or because 'they worked really hard' - as if they were the only ones! This is what a dystopia truly looks like. No need to wait for future scenarios - it's already here! Like right out of 'The Hunger Games' or 'Elisyum'. But of course those movies got inspiration from reality.

http://www.sott.net/article/310524-Obscene-inequality-62-richest-people-as-wealthy-as-poorest-half-of-worlds-population-according-to-Oxfam-report

Obscene inequality: 62 richest people as wealthy as poorest half of world's population, according to Oxfam report

Growing inequality means that the world's wealthiest 62 people own as much as the poorest half of the planet's population - some 3.6 billion people - according to a new report from Oxfam.

The richest 1% - around 73 million out of the world's 7.3 billion people - now own as much as everyone else put together, said the report, published ahead of the annual World Economic Forum of global political and business leaders in Swiss ski resort Davos.

Oxfam said urgent action was needed to tackle the "inequality crisis" and called on world leaders - including Prime Minister David Cameron - to take action to crack down on tax-dodging by the rich, which denies governments in the developing world billions of pounds a year which could be used on health, education and anti-poverty measures.

Mr Cameron promised in a speech in Davos three years ago to get tough on avoidance, warning corporate tax-dodgers to "wake up and smell the coffee".

But Oxfam said that promised measures to increase transparency in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, such as the Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands, have not yet been implemented. While the UK has made good on Mr Cameron's promise to introduce public registers of companies' owners, only one overseas territory - Montserrat - has followed suit.

The report found that the gap between rich and poor had widened "dramatically" over the past 12 months. As recently as 2010, the combined wealth of the 388 richest people was needed to equal that of the poorest half of the world, but that number has since plummeted to 80 last year and 62 now.

The total wealth of the poorest half of the world fell by a trillion US dollars (£694bn) since 2010 even though the actual number of people in this group rose by 400 million, said the report, An Economy for the 1%. Meanwhile, the wealth of the super-rich 62 rose by more than half a trillion dollars over the same period to 1.76 trillion (£1.22 trillion). This equates to an average of around £20 billion for each of the 62, who include just nine women.

Although the number of people living in extreme poverty halved between 1990 and 2010 globally, the average annual income of the poorest 10% has increased by less than three dollars (£2.08) a year over the past 25 years.

Oxfam said action on tax should form part of a three-pronged approach, alongside increased investment in public services and action to boost the income of the lowest paid - with priority given to ending the era of tax havens. Allowing governments to collect tax owed is "vital" to meeting the new international development goal of eliminating extreme poverty by 2030, the charity said.

Oxfam GB chief executive Mark Goldring said: "It is simply unacceptable that the poorest half of the world population owns no more than a small group of the global super-rich - so few, you could fit them all on a single coach.

"World leaders' concern about the escalating inequality crisis has so far not translated into concrete action to ensure that those at the bottom get their fair share of economic growth. In a world where one in nine people go to bed hungry every night we cannot afford to carry on giving the richest an ever bigger slice of the cake.

"Tackling the veil of secrecy surrounding the UK's network of tax havens would be a big step towards ending extreme inequality. Three years after he made his promise to make tax dodgers 'wake up and smell the coffee', it is time for David Cameron to deliver."

Globally, the super-rich are estimated to have a total of 7.6 trillion dollars (£5.3trn) stashed in offshore accounts, depriving governments around the world of 190 billion dollars (£132bn) in tax revenues each year, said the report.

As much as 30% of all African financial wealth is believed to be held offshore, costing 14 billion dollars (£9.7bn) in lost tax revenue each year - enough to save four million children's lives a year through improved healthcare and employ enough teachers to get every African child into school - said Oxfam.

Nine out of ten WEF corporate partners have a presence in at least one tax haven and it is estimated that tax dodging by multinational corporations costs developing countries at least 100 billion dollars (£69bn) a year, said Oxfam. Corporate investment in tax havens increased almost quadrupled between 2000 and 2014.

Mr Goldring said: "Ending extreme poverty requires world leaders to tackle the growing gap between the richest and the rest which has trapped hundreds of millions of people in a life of poverty, hunger and sickness.

"It is no longer good enough for the richest to pretend that their wealth benefits the rest of us when the facts show that the recent explosion in the wealth of the super-rich has come at the expense of the poorest."

Comment: The idea that the concentration of wealth in the right hands would create more wealth that would trickle down to the masses is a scam designed to make us accept the huge unfairness of the unbridled capitalistic system we live under.

It is said that behind closed doors the elite often refer to the population as 'useless eaters'. But in a world in which one in nine does not eat properly, and 1% 'eat' as much as the rest, who really are the useless eaters?
 
Yes, it is a dire situation that 99% find ourselves in. "Useless eaters"

It is clear, as described in the Wave series, that our days are numbered and the frightening thing is that number is swiftly approaching 0. Now I am ever the optimist, but the facts are pointing us to the time when all of this will come to a head. All we can do is to be aware of this and all that it implies, stay strong and be true to ourselves. It is clear to the 1%, the 99% have no value except as slaves. Boy, talk about wishful thinking.

I hope to be holding down a patch of grass, patiently waiting for the final act to play.
 
The situation is beyond crazy. Millions, if not billions, condemned for the financial gains of a small few. The level of unbalance is just crazy.
 
Globally, the super-rich are estimated to have a total of 7.6 trillion dollars (£5.3trn) stashed in offshore accounts, depriving governments around the world of 190 billion dollars (£132bn) in tax revenues each year, said the report.

Checking _http://www.nationaldebtclocks.org/ the global dept currently stands at $59 trillion - so I'm thinking the imbalance is actually bigger than is stated in practical terms.
I've always wondered who the money was 'owed' too when it came to national debts. If it's the same super rich people, then technically they have robbed the 99% of all their assets and we are already slaves with only a thin facade (of national debt) keeping the illusion in place.

I've also always wondered about UFO's and 4D STS trying to get people emotionally invested in illusions (in order to steal energy) - bidding for a persons soul. Given the 99% outnumber the 1% then it really is another example of a STS pyramid - using lies, illusions and emotional manipulation in order to harvest energy (at our level that's money).

When you realize you have nothing (or in Work terms are 'nothing' more than a machine) it is both devastating (the devastation is the realization that you time, money, energy and/or emotions have been invested in a lie) and liberating.
Knowing this world (and 4D STS) are stacked against you - you can collapse in self pity (and continue to feed the system) or study it and try and find ways of Being that don't feed the beast.

So a question - is there a list of names, businesses and perhaps contact or asset information available on these people?
Shining a spotlight on the imbalance seems like an important thing to do fwiw.
 
I think the *perception* is that when such inequality becomes blatant, revolution happens.

To be honest, I don't know if that's the case at all. Certainly we have seen revolutions in the past, seen empires fall, economies collapse...however how much of that is actually engineered by the PTB?

Is it possible that all this posturing about inequality is the PTB setting us up for an artificial collapse, at which point we're all going to *think* we're better off, when really nothing has changed?
 
It'd be a cool question to ask the C's what percentage of these folks are psychopaths, and then as a follow up, what various personality disorders they suffer from and the numbers for each. My first question when I heard about this story was wondering how many of them were psychos.
 
Puck said:
It'd be a cool question to ask the C's what percentage of these folks are psychopaths, and then as a follow up, what various personality disorders they suffer from and the numbers for each. My first question when I heard about this story was wondering how many of them were psychos.

Don't know if all psychos, but there has to be something psychologically wrong with wanting to have such vast fortunes that it would be physically impossible to spend it all in a life time. And on top of that, to think that you deserve it.

Sadly, one of those 62 peeps is probably the recently captured drug lord Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán. They guy wanted to have Sean Penn and Kate del Castillo (a Mexican actress) make a movie of his life (narcissistic much?), which was apparently one reason why they caught him.

I bring him up because as part of the info he was providing these two actors, he videotaped an interview, which I watched recently; and I was amazed at how much he comes across as a cardboard character. Here is a criminal mastermind, one of the richest men in the world, and he shows no insights whatsoever, either of himself, what he does or the world. And I don't think that's just because he came from a poor family and presumably did not have much education; you can be uneducated and still have realizations and wonder about different aspects of life. But no, he just is and fulfills his evil duties without much of a concern or thought. Almost as if he were a puppet for something else... :whistle: So I wonder how many at the top would have similar shallow puppet profiles, in spite of their delusions of grandure.

Here's the 'interview':

 
Puck said:
It'd be a cool question to ask the C's what percentage of these folks are psychopaths, and then as a follow up, what various personality disorders they suffer from and the numbers for each. My first question when I heard about this story was wondering how many of them were psychos.

Maybe we can answer that one ourselves? :)

So, logically, what behaviour (beyond psychopathy) could be a strong enough drive to acquire that much wealth (beyond what is needed to live well) and keep it from the rest of the world?

Perspective needs to be included here - we're not talking about average dreams of wanting a million dollars (which aren't usually strong enough to come to fruition).
A trillion is a million million. So it's a million times bigger than the average dream.

It requires single minded dedication - the sort of drive that makes you want to leap out of bed in the morning.
It's like being a world class athlete at acquiring and keeping money, it's not average.

The level of evil involved here is, would you be able to grab all the money in the world if it meant billions suffering, going hungry, cold and dying because of your actions (directly or indirectly)?
From what we know about the psychological aspects of disease, I think anyone who has a conscience wouldn't last long even if they where indoctrinated into such a system.
 
RedFox said:
Puck said:
It'd be a cool question to ask the C's what percentage of these folks are psychopaths, and then as a follow up, what various personality disorders they suffer from and the numbers for each. My first question when I heard about this story was wondering how many of them were psychos.

Maybe we can answer that one ourselves? :)

So, logically, what behaviour (beyond psychopathy) could be a strong enough drive to acquire that much wealth (beyond what is needed to live well) and keep it from the rest of the world?

Perspective needs to be included here - we're not talking about average dreams of wanting a million dollars (which aren't usually strong enough to come to fruition).
A trillion is a million million. So it's a million times bigger than the average dream.

It requires single minded dedication - the sort of drive that makes you want to leap out of bed in the morning.
It's like being a world class athlete at acquiring and keeping money, it's not average.

The level of evil involved here is, would you be able to grab all the money in the world if it meant billions suffering, going hungry, cold and dying because of your actions (directly or indirectly)?
From what we know about the psychological aspects of disease, I think anyone who has a conscience wouldn't last long even if they where indoctrinated into such a system.

Exactly what I was thinking. You have to be a vile human being to have more money then you know what to do with while 805 million people continue to struggle with hunger every day, and 25,000 people die every day of hunger or hunger-related causes, amongst other sufferings of poverty stricken people... If it's not psychopathy, there's defiantly something VERY wrong with these human beings.

It's disheartening.
 
Self entitlement, feelings of being special, power, being worshipped, having all your whims attended to... All these could account for it.

I wouldn't say billionaires are single mindedly dedicated necessarily... I think luck plays a huge role. Take Mark Zuckerberg, he got lucky. He had a viable product that essentially won him the lottery. I wouldn't say he is anymore dedicated than a small business owner. After awhile, chances are, just the mere fact of having money begets you more money with minimal effort. For example, I imagine good old Mark hiring all sorts of professionals to make his money multiply. Again, he's afforded this luxury because he can

A) Afford to hire said team of professionals
B) Has enough money to play with so as to profit from the financial markets.

You can say the same about most billionaires. Whatever guilt they feel, they would simply undo by doing some philanthropic work. They probably think they are big contributors to humanity and these further feeds the justification for the obscene accumulation of wealth. They also probably like the fact they can shape government policy and thus exercise power over whole nations.

They are probably caught in a cycle they can't escape.
 
I don't know if it's that simple. I'd be willing to bet there's at least one or two humans with functioning consciences in that group. Not all wealth at that level is acquired, it's even likely that there's some billionaires who inherited their funds or are managing old-money.

Granted, anyone who seeks that much money and power likely has something off in their minds. So while we can conjecture based off of what we know we've got no way to actually ID specific numbers or disorders. :lkj:
 
Puck said:
I don't know if it's that simple. I'd be willing to bet there's at least one or two humans with functioning consciences in that group. Not all wealth at that level is acquired, it's even likely that there's some billionaires who inherited their funds or are managing old-money.

Granted, anyone who seeks that much money and power likely has something off in their minds. So while we can conjecture based off of what we know we've got no way to actually ID specific numbers or disorders. :lkj:

A lot of billionares inherit their money. A whole bunch of British billionares fall into such a group + even some American ones, e.g. the Koch Brothers, those who own Walmart (Walton family) and European ones (e.g. Liliane Bettencourt owner of L'oreal) etc. Yeah, there are probably ones with conscience amongst the top group but I imagine they all pretty much sing to the same tune.

What disorder they have is not really of much consequence, it's what they do that is (run the world to the ground!).
 
luke wilson said:
Puck said:
I don't know if it's that simple. I'd be willing to bet there's at least one or two humans with functioning consciences in that group. Not all wealth at that level is acquired, it's even likely that there's some billionaires who inherited their funds or are managing old-money.

Granted, anyone who seeks that much money and power likely has something off in their minds. So while we can conjecture based off of what we know we've got no way to actually ID specific numbers or disorders. :lkj:

A lot of billionares inherit their money. A whole bunch of British billionares fall into such a group + even some American ones, e.g. the Koch Brothers, those who own Walmart (Walton family) and European ones (e.g. Liliane Bettencourt owner of L'oreal) etc. Yeah, there are probably ones with conscience amongst the top group but I imagine they all pretty much sing to the same tune.

What disorder they have is not really of much consequence, it's what they do that is (run the world to the ground!).

I've had a little exposure to the 'elite club' (not those 62 people though :)) here and I think we should rather see this in light of ponerology and how it affects those people. Namely, people in these circles are 1) subject to ponerization/corruption and 2) there is a selection process for leadership/influence that favors the ruthlessly ambitious, i.e. psychopaths.

For example, from what I've seen, there are very strict social codes in these circles: there are always some events, balls, dinners etc. that you need to attend, then there are codes for cloths, behavior and even special dances that are not taught outside those groups. Many of these 'codes' are rather pathological, for example heavy drinking seems to be part of the equation, and it's a lot about appearances/superficial charm etc.

So if you are born into these circles, it's extremely difficult to break free - you basically have the option of playing along or cut all ties to your family (and loose everything of course). What makes it extra-difficult is that your whole upbringing/socialization is so different from ordinary people that you will have a hard time integrating into 'normal society' once you are kicked out by 'the club'.

What happens to those people in these circles who are either 'too decent'/not ambitious enough or just lack the intellectual capacity to become a 'mover and shaker' is that they become those guys sitting in their mansions/castles and maybe breed horses, farm whine or polish their oldtimer collection while attending social 'in-club' events. Those ruthless and ambitious enough (either through corruption/ponerization or because they are psychopaths) on the other hand will 'swarm out' to get top-positions in management, consulting, media, politics, the arts world and/or create evil foundations etc. and will use these positions of course to protect their interests. Then of course there are always 'newcomers' to the club, who I think 'selected themselves' by huge amounts of ambition and ruthlessness (like 'El Chapo'?), but even they must play along and can get crushed by 'the club' if they don't.

So I think that definitely not all super-rich people are psychopaths, some are even quite decent. The problem is rather the selection and corruption process when it comes to wielding actual power and influence that is described in PP that also works within the 'oligarchy club' - OSIT.


BTW, there is an interesting documentary that gives a glimpse into the world of the super-rich in the US called 'The One Percent':

 
luc said:
BTW, there is an interesting documentary that gives a glimpse into the world of the super-rich in the US called 'The One Percent':

That documentary, if i recall, is an excellent and quite blatant example of how growing up wealthy can distort your being and leave you almost helpless. I think suicide and heavy drug use and therapy were mentioned often.

That said, it's often written on the face's of some of the wealthy - having little exposure to reality what they consider acceptable in appearance can differ quite greatly. I guess an easy example would be pumping your lips full of toxic filler, once everybody in your group has it done, it's the 'norm', yet many people in the street would actually reel back in horror. And i guess in some ways this extreme also applies similarly to certain areas of the working class; in that only associating with their own they create their own distorted memes.

In fact this could be a superficial example of how distortion can infect nearly everyone, especially when it's dressed up as 'aspirational'. Any behaviour can be made acceptable these days so long as someone successful is doing it, which prepares the way for more dupes and pathologicals which support this division of wealth and the structure becomes concretized.

You could say that those born into wealth have a responsibility just as much as we do to see themselves and make appropriate change, and that they have money at their disposal maybe even more so.

So i guess that's distortion at a 'working level' but with regards to those scheming and hoarding at the very top, it seems only a being with no concept of reality, or an empty hole greater than reality can fill, would be so greedy.
 
Back
Top Bottom