A family brawl at Disneyland (Video: bad language)

[Ca.]

That must have been quite some feast for 4D STS!

I think that's relevant to show the follw up to that query:

A: Perhaps you should try one question at a time.

Q: (L) Why do blacks commit more crimes than whites?

A: That is too broad spectrum a concept to be answered simply. Please try to break down the question into several parts so that the answers can adequately explain.

Q: (L) Can you suggest a way for me to break it down; it is a difficult subject?

A: Normally this is not the procedure, however, one suggestion may be, for example, to ask, first of all, what is it that causes individuals to commit crimes; secondly, is there any connection between one's race and national origin or physical state of being and one's proclivity to commit crimes, etc. In other words, this is a broad spectrum subject. In order for it to be answered adequately, it must be broken down into many consecutive questions.

Q: (L) What is it that causes individuals to commit crimes?

A: Well, now you see, that too, has many answers. We will choose one and then let you contemplate. One answer is, of course, as we mentioned previously, the alteration of blood, body and brain chemistry through the use of ultra- high frequency sound waves. Of course, as you can well imagine, one effect that this may have would be what you would refer to as anti-social behavior. Do you not see this?

Q: (L) I do. Okay, is there anything about a person of a particular race or body type which makes them more susceptible to this manipulation than another race or person?

A: Well now, that brings into question the physical differences between races, including the obvious body chemistry differences, a subject that has not been adequately explored on the third density level of existence. For example, it is very obvious the different "races" as it is called, are human beings that have different chemical make-up in their bodies. Would you not say this?

Q: (L) I would say that might be probable.

A: Now, if one takes this one step further, perhaps if one race has a brain chemistry make-up or blood chemistry make-up that can alter the emotions in such a way so as to commit what is called anti-social behavior, at least in social environment to which you are accustomed, then this, perhaps, would explain why there may be a higher percentage of crimes committed by persons of a particular race as opposed to persons of a different particular race.

Q: (L) Are there any specific chemicals that we could isolate or name that would be involved with this condition?

A: Tumoxifene.

Q: (L) And, what is that?

A: A hormone secreted by the pituitary gland. You'll find this particular hormone to be in high concentrations in persons of what is referred to as the Negro race.

Q: (L) And why does this hormone make a person susceptible to these ultra-high frequency sound waves, so that they exhibit anti-social behavior?

A: That's actually a question that skips over some necessary ingredients, however the best way to answer that is that when this hormone is in high abundance, then one's aggressive nature is heightened, since it already exists in higher levels within individuals of the Negro race, it does not require much alteration to increase it to what would be referred to as the danger level. Therefore, aggressive or anti-social behavior can be more easily facilitated in those of the Negro race, and those of other races.

Q: (L) Is it possible, or does it happen, that people of the other races, white, Hispanic, or oriental, to have individuals born into those races, who, by some fluke, have higher levels of this hormone?

A: Are you asking: "Do some individuals of other races besides the Negro race have high levels of that hormone?" Well, obviously each individual situation is different. It is averages that make up the important composition.

Q: (L) So, this is what we could call, in a general sense, the "Crime Hormone?"

A: It is certainly one of them, anyway. Although, aggressive behavior does not necessarily translate into criminal behavior.

Q: (L) True. What is it in the blacks that tends to make aggressive behavior translate into crime?

A: That question is not answerable when put in that way. Please reverse and ask a more basic foundational question.

Q: (L) Well individuals such as members of the Celtic background are historically and evidentially quite aggressive, yet they do not as frequently, in fact less frequently, commit crimes as a result of their aggression. Why is this?

A: Well, there is more than one answer, of course. Everyone's chemical nature or make-up is oriented toward their native environments. Of course, if one thinks of the Negro race as having lived for many thousands, in fact millions, of years in the general climate and environmental situation they are native to, then perhaps it could be said that a greater level of Tumoxifene would be needed for survival in that environment. Now, when removed from that environment to an entirely different environment whereby such chemical balance is not correct for the new environment, then increased amounts of this chemical may produce aggressive behavior of one or two particular types. Whereas other races or cultures, when exposed to any stimuli which causes increases or changes in various brain chemistry, this may cause aggressive behavior of a different sort which can be channeled into more acceptable pursuits within the given society.

Q: (L) Is there anything that can be done chemically to alter this aggression or crime hormone to reduce it or to convert its effects into other behavior?

A: That's an extremely complicated question because any tampering with chemistry of the brain is similar to what you would describe in cliché as shooting in the dark at this point in your development, because you do not understand all of the intricacies involved. Therefore, it is very difficult also to positively answer that question when put in that form.

Q: (L) Is there any form that question could be put into where it could be answered more simply?

A: That is up to the one asking the questions to determine. Obviously the answer is yes, but if you are asking how to formulate the question, we cannot do that for you because that is part of your learning process. If we now are reduced to asking or rather telling, how to ask questions, this is rather like leading you by the hand, is it not?

Q: (L) Yes. Is there a simple, practical action that could be taken to assist members of the black race in reducing this aggressive behavior?

A: Well, again, you keep asking nearly impossible questions because, you must realize that this is not a simple black and white issue, no pun intended. What it is is trying to answer an extremely difficult question with very simple answers and this will not work because there are so many different directions involved here. There is just an impossible number of difficulties involved in trying to deal with this. Apparently you don't see that it is not something where one can simply formulate an injection, for example, and line up all the members of the black race for this injection. Can you imagine the extreme difficulty in even trying to contemplate such a thing? And, all of the resistance that would be received from every imaginable corner of your society at even the mere suggestion of such a thought? Obviously this is a problem that will only be taken care of at a later time, as you measure time, when the shift from 3rd density to 4th density takes place. There really is no point in trying to climb backwards up the side of a mountain with nothing but your slippery bare feet and hands to work with. That is what you would be trying to do if you tried to answer such a problem so simply.

 

[Matthew]

Thank you so much for quoting that and for adding emphasis to the key points c.a. When I re-read it earlier and realised how inadequate my memory of this session was it was quite the slap in the face. Life is hard enough as it is so I do not envy those who have to deal with such a propensity towards quick anger and aggression. Their lessons must be hard earnt.

 

[Ca.]

I think it's very understandable. And I when saw the tweets being posted on social media and the source ABC (Deep State) news, we can see it's just another way of dividing the Masses.

And like you said, it does create a feeding for the 4DSTS, on many levels beyond our imagination.

So it's actually good that you shared this, and we can correct its nature. I am sure others would have a better take on the motive.

 

[Laura]

What interests me most NOW about the above session is the information the Cs gave that matches so well with our recent research on genetics and Intelligent Design. As they said, each type was engineered for a specific environment and to be supremely successful in that environment. All types of humans - races, if you will - are geniuses in their own way. And that was brought out in the David Reich book.

However, one issue we have at present is racial mixing. What effect might that have on engineered propensities. Obviously one would be that any mixed race person has the potential to be equally successful in more than one environment; that is, they could inherit the genius of more than one race. On the other hand, they could inherit the negatives of more than one race.

I think I've seen this in action in some things I've been noting recently. There are a lot of African American thinkers who are as brilliant as any white European thinker ever was, and maybe even better, in the European cultural milieu. And there are mixed race white looking people that are psychopaths with possibly the hair trigger thinking/reactions of an African forebear; not a good combination, I think.

The Cs said that Africans and Native Americans were more "in tune" with the frequency of this planet and if so, that would be a beneficial effect of some racial mixing.

Except for recent immigrants, I think there are almost NO Americans of several generations presence, that are NOT mixed race. Doing genealogy has sure taught me that there was a LOT of intermingling going on especially in the earlier days of colonization. It was only when some of the 1% got the idea that their serfs/indentured servants/slaves, might want to abandon working for peanuts or nothing that they began to pass laws about intermarriage and ownership of land and such. This was somewhat later in the "American Experiment." And notice that it is only the 1% that owned slaves. The other 99% of white Americans did not and were, essentially, a lot more egalitarian in their lifestyles and were just as victimized as the Africans and Native Americans.

In reading censuses, again and again I come across mixed families or white families with free black families living with them, so they must have been related in some way. Many of them were doing all kinds of things to fly under the radar and many of them were moving to new territories where slavery was not allowed. When Georgia was first made a state, slavery was outlawed there.

I've also read dozens of wills where the testator stipulated that their slaves were to be freed at their death and provided with land and a start in life even if it had to be done extra-legally. And, of course, Quakers were totally against slavery from the very start.

At the same time, I've encountered free Black individuals who, themselves, owned slaves!! That was pretty shocking, but it was actually rather common. And some of them were quite wealthy. Slavery just wasn't perceived in the same way then as it is today by the majority of people though there were always advanced persons with developed consciences who knew it was wrong and said so. That was even true in ancient history when everybody and anybody was subject to being a slave of some other group that conquered them in war.

Anyway, I think a little mixing up can be very beneficial OR very detrimental; it just depends on the mixing up of the genes. It seems likely to me that the family in question certainly has some caucasian genetics and for all we know, that might be the trigger for "out of control" episodes.

On the other hand, in today's world, the kinds of stresses people are put under, that family could have been ANY family, white or black or brown or yellow or anywhere in between.

 

[Matthew]

I think it's very understandable. And I when saw the tweets being posted on social media and the source ABC (Deep State) news, we can see it's just another way of dividing the Masses.

And like you said, it does create a feeding for the 4DSTS, on many levels beyond our imagination.

So it's actually good that you shared this, and we can correct its nature. I am sure others would have a better take on the motive.

Indeed; those who already have firm convictions e.g. with regard to black people will just use this to reinforce their preexisting prejudices whether pro or con. We cannot know if this incident was due to STS manipulation but they certainly would have had a good feast from it. Just think of the intense emotions generated there, not only from the family but from all those onlookers. Horrible. Then, of course, there are all those who will see it posted online, potentially millions of people. That is going to elicit an emotional reaction out of a lot of people so it will be quite a feast for STS.

Thinking more about the failure of my memory it occurs to me that it is even worse in my case than just this one misremembering. To explain: many years ago life made it quite apparent to me that my memory was distinctly unreliable. There was something I remembered so clearly and with such certainty that I would have staked my life on my memory being correct. Then I was given clear evidence that my memory was wrong on that occasion. It was rather chastening as you might imagine. That experience made me consciously aware of my own fallibility where memory is concerned and I began to notice these memory errors more and more. It taught me to not trust my own memory implicitly and to seek further corroboration. However, in time I realise now that I became complacent. My inner voice smugly told me that I was aware of memory fallibility and that I had a handle on it. Clearly not! I misremembered that session badly. I suppose it is a reminder to me of how prone our inner voice is to tell us how wonderful and speshul we are and for us to overestimate our own capabilities. Also, that I am not on top of who I am as I like to think I am. Oh well, the C's do say that learning is fun!

This conversation prompted me to re-read the most recent session which is no bad thing.

A: .... STS uses many tricks and traps to suck people into negative dynamics so that they become food.

I know this but it doesn't hurt to be reminded!

 

[genero81]

My only question: How many people (family or not) does the guy in the pink shirt need to maul before security escorts him off the premises?

 

[Matthew]

My only question: How many people (family or not) does the guy in the pink shirt need to maul before security escorts him off the premises?

That point was made and debated at length on the other forum. The consensus was that the security there are instructed to let these things blow over before stepping in so as not to damage the illusion of a family-friendly Disney environment One poster had a friend who worked there as 'Peter Pan' but was sacked after he took his hat off and jumped into a pool to save a little girl who had fallen in. Apparently, Peter Pan never takes his hat off so that was grounds for dismissal .

 

[genero81]

I think the "illusion" had already been smashed. If I was head of security, some people would be fired for that performance. I mean, what exactly are they being paid to do?

 

[Matthew]

I think the "illusion" had already been smashed. If I was head of security, some people would be fired for that performance. I mean, what exactly are they being paid to do?

I doubt Disney are too pleased about this being posted all round the internet. However, it might do them some good to realise that their current security protocols are inadequate. I'm surprised we don't see more videos like this to be honest. Several people commented in the other forum to that effect from their own experience of going there. They pointed out that it is really expensive so everyone is pressured to really enjoy it and make the most of their money by having just the best time. It reminds me of how the mass of people react to Christmas with it being so commercialised. It is here, in the UK, at least. Everyone has to be on their best behaviour. It's a pressure cooker waiting to go off. We know, too, that crowds are easily manipulated by STS so they can feed on the intense emotions generated. All it takes is a little nudge to one or two people to lose their cool and then crowd dynamics take over. I tend to avoid large congregations of people unless I am really on top form. I know myself well enough to know that unless I am in a really good state I just find them too much so you won't have to worry about bumping into me at Disneyland!

 

[Matthew]

Great post, Laura, thank you. You make so many wonderful observations it is a lot to digest!

What interests me most NOW about the above session is the information the Cs gave that matches so well with our recent research on genetics and Intelligent Design. As they said, each type was engineered for a specific environment and to be supremely successful in that environment. All types of humans - races, if you will - are geniuses in their own way. And that was brought out in the David Reich book.

However, one issue we have at present is racial mixing. What effect might that have on engineered propensities. Obviously one would be that any mixed race person has the potential to be equally successful in more than one environment; that is, they could inherit the genius of more than one race. On the other hand, they could inherit the negatives of more than one race.

I think I've seen this in action in some things I've been noting recently. There are a lot of African American thinkers who are as brilliant as any white European thinker ever was, and maybe even better, in the European cultural milieu. And there are mixed race white looking people that are psychopaths with possibly the hair trigger thinking/reactions of an African forebear; not a good combination, I think.

The Cs said that Africans and Native Americans were more "in tune" with the frequency of this planet and if so, that would be a beneficial effect of some racial mixing.

I find this a really helpful perspective. It is easy to forget the bigger picture, thank you.

Except for recent immigrants, I think there are almost NO Americans of several generations presence, that are NOT mixed race.

Wow, I had no idea! This is very different from the mental conception I have of the US. Is this common knowledge?

Doing genealogy has sure taught me that there was a LOT of intermingling going on especially in the earlier days of colonization. It was only when some of the 1% got the idea that their serfs/indentured servants/slaves, might want to abandon working for peanuts or nothing that they began to pass laws about intermarriage and ownership of land and such. This was somewhat later in the "American Experiment." And notice that it is only the 1% that owned slaves. The other 99% of white Americans did not and were, essentially, a lot more egalitarian in their lifestyles and were just as victimized as the Africans and Native Americans.

In reading censuses, again and again I come across mixed families or white families with free black families living with them, so they must have been related in some way. Many of them were doing all kinds of things to fly under the radar and many of them were moving to new territories where slavery was not allowed. When Georgia was first made a state, slavery was outlawed there.

I've also read dozens of wills where the testator stipulated that their slaves were to be freed at their death and provided with land and a start in life even if it had to be done extra-legally. And, of course, Quakers were totally against slavery from the very start.

At the same time, I've encountered free Black individuals who, themselves, owned slaves!! That was pretty shocking, but it was actually rather common. And some of them were quite wealthy. Slavery just wasn't perceived in the same way then as it is today by the majority of people though there were always advanced persons with developed consciences who knew it was wrong and said so. That was even true in ancient history when everybody and anybody was subject to being a slave of some other group that conquered them in war.

Again, this is a very different perspective on US slavery than the one I have been fed. I had no idea it was just the 1% who had slaves for a start! It seems to me, looking from the outside, that nowadays white Americans are supposed to feel guilty for what their forebears did to black people but given what you say I wonder if this is just a case of the 1% shifting the blame so that the 99% don't realise who is really to blame. Divide and conquer, indeed! Can't have the chattel realising that they have a common enemy. They might rise up against the 1% Best to have them fight amongst themselves.

Anyway, I think a little mixing up can be very beneficial OR very detrimental; it just depends on the mixing up of the genes. It seems likely to me that the family in question certainly has some caucasian genetics and for all we know, that might be the trigger for "out of control" episodes.

Indeed and also, I am reminded of a comment by the C's at one point where they said that it is auric alignment of the individual that counts. I am paraphrasing here but I have always taken that as a reminder that everyone is an individual and should be judged on that basis irrespective of whatever categories we might want to put them into, black, white, whatever. This is especially important to remember given that the social justice movement seems to be wanting to put everyone into group identities and diminish or eliminate the value of their unique individuality.

On the other hand, in today's world, the kinds of stresses people are put under, that family could have been ANY family, white or black or brown or yellow or anywhere in between.

Indeed, I have certainly seen lots of white people in the UK lose it and create a scene in public.

 

[theos]

I think that this could've been any family too but when I was told about this video yesterday by a family member I knew without even asking that they were black and I hadn't even watched the video until now. Granted, you can look at Youtube and find plenty of 'ghetto fight' and 'trailer park' fight videos but in my personal experience, most of the time when I hear about someone acting a fool in public they turn out to be black. My being black could make me more sensitive to such things but white people notice it too if Youtube video and news article comment sections are to be believed.

I don't believe that this type of behavior is something inherent in all blacks (although I do believe -- again through personal experience and observation-- that blacks, on the whole, are more aggressive than whites even if it doesn't always translate to more criminal behavior). Rather, I think it is more cultural with roots in the decimation of the black family, disciplinarian fathers being replaced by the welfare state, the glorification of violence through blaxploitation films and rap music which led to a rapid decline in the acceptance of pro-social values. Thomas Sowell writes a lot about how black families were much better off in the Jim Crow south than now as the rates of incarceration and unemployment were lower. Interestingly enough in Black Rednecks and White Liberals, he also writes about how certain aspects of black culture were also seen in whites from the British Isles in the colonial period. (Haven't read it yet but it's on my list along with They Were White and They Were Slaves about white slaves in early America.)

This behavior can't be blamed on poverty --this family could afford a Disney trip so they can't be that strapped financially -- though this type of behavior is seen primarily in lower-class, less educated blacks. I grew up poor but I've never seen this level of acting out in public before now.

That being said, I think that people are getting crazier in general, no matter what their race. It's all a part of the disintegration of society and now that everyone has a camera and a Twitter account we all get a front row seat.

 

[Arwenn]

I think that's relevant to show the follw up to that query:

Thanks for posting that c.a., I don't recall those parts of the session, so much for memory! There's nothing on the net about Tumoxifene other than reposts of the Cs session (& nothing on Google Scholar), either because there's no much known about it yet, or a select few people do know, & want that suppressed for their own nefarious eugenicky/greenbaumy purposes.

 

[Matthew]

Great post Odyssey; thank you so much for your perspective. This sort of behaviour is certainly not restricted to black people from my experience. I live in a smallish seaside town in the UK which is quite deprived and I have plenty of experience of lower class, badly educated and socialised white people to know that. I see some of them around town sometimes, shouting at their partner or screaming down their cellphone at someone, seemingly blissfully unaware of the scene they are making amongst complete strangers. I saw one woman scream a very rude word down her cellphone at someone recently. Then she saw me watching and said: "Oh sorry! Sorry!" The contrast between her nonchalant use of such an obscenity at quite some volume in a public place and then her embarrassment at being overheard meant that I couldn't help but smile.

 

[loreta]

They are pathetic, violent, no educated, ignorant, bad parents, bad husbands. What is sad are the little kids, that for them Disneyland is a feast, it is magical... life is hard for some little kids.

 

[Ca.]

They are pathetic, violent, no educated, ignorant, bad parents, bad husbands. What is sad are the little kids, that for them Disneyland is a feast, it is magical... life is hard for some little kids.

It's not that shallow. And remember, what C's said about Divided and conquer, and the Invasion!