StrangeCaptain
Jedi Council Member
Are there going to be references to what they do eat and not just what they don't?
A silly question... But I am trying to bring up as to whether or not the transformation from animal to food is brought up or will we just leave that in the background? On the one hand, it seems to me delicate how to broach killing an animal to a child, and on the other, spending time in the past would seem to lack something if hunting were not mentioned.
Maybe seeing the father go out to hunt and then a conversation with him when he comes back in?
It seems clear from extant cultures with hunting/gathering ancestors that reverence was given to the animal hunted and that the gravity of death was not removed from the process. Perhaps this sense of reverence/respect can be transmitted in the book as the father explains what he has to do to hunt. There are modern people who learn primitive survival skills who say that the process of stalking animals with use of nature-made bows and spears causes one to have to know the animal intimately in order to hunt it at least partly because of the reduced proximity to the animal when the kill is made, and this necessarily precludes the distancing from death that we have in our food production today.
Think about it... Imagine all of the cute animal moments that we see on youtube. Some of these get posted to this forum. And don't get me wrong, I like them, too. Now imagine the hunter who spends days stalking a herd of deer to understand their daily lives and to choose one of them to kill. The hunter is seeing these moments himself as they happen. After he sees the ways these animals can have traits that humans can identify with, he still has to bring supper home.
We could even extrapolate that hunters thinking about the widest ramifications of life would select the kill to augment the quality of the herd. This would only benefit all in the future. Modern people studying survival skills have noticed that gathering herbs in reasonable amounts actually causes the amount of an herb in its natural habitat to increase. The plants become hardier and more numerous through some culling. Ancient hunter/gatherers could not have failed to make the same observations.
Bottom line: If the transition from the animal to our plate is explained at all, then I think respect for life should be transmitted in the story. This could be done by some kind of question and answer session with the paleo-father after he has come back from hunting.
A silly question... But I am trying to bring up as to whether or not the transformation from animal to food is brought up or will we just leave that in the background? On the one hand, it seems to me delicate how to broach killing an animal to a child, and on the other, spending time in the past would seem to lack something if hunting were not mentioned.
Maybe seeing the father go out to hunt and then a conversation with him when he comes back in?
It seems clear from extant cultures with hunting/gathering ancestors that reverence was given to the animal hunted and that the gravity of death was not removed from the process. Perhaps this sense of reverence/respect can be transmitted in the book as the father explains what he has to do to hunt. There are modern people who learn primitive survival skills who say that the process of stalking animals with use of nature-made bows and spears causes one to have to know the animal intimately in order to hunt it at least partly because of the reduced proximity to the animal when the kill is made, and this necessarily precludes the distancing from death that we have in our food production today.
Think about it... Imagine all of the cute animal moments that we see on youtube. Some of these get posted to this forum. And don't get me wrong, I like them, too. Now imagine the hunter who spends days stalking a herd of deer to understand their daily lives and to choose one of them to kill. The hunter is seeing these moments himself as they happen. After he sees the ways these animals can have traits that humans can identify with, he still has to bring supper home.
We could even extrapolate that hunters thinking about the widest ramifications of life would select the kill to augment the quality of the herd. This would only benefit all in the future. Modern people studying survival skills have noticed that gathering herbs in reasonable amounts actually causes the amount of an herb in its natural habitat to increase. The plants become hardier and more numerous through some culling. Ancient hunter/gatherers could not have failed to make the same observations.
Bottom line: If the transition from the animal to our plate is explained at all, then I think respect for life should be transmitted in the story. This could be done by some kind of question and answer session with the paleo-father after he has come back from hunting.