Africa's apocalyptic mood

Erna

The Living Force
http://www.mg.co.za/article/2010-01-01-africas-apocalyptic-mood

Africa's apocalyptic mood

The story is told of how two Ghanaian old ladies emerged from church one Sunday morning in June 1967. During the service, the minister had asked for prayers for the people of Israel, who were at war.

"Akosua", one lady turned to the other, "what are we going to do?"

"Do about what?" the other asked, perplexed.

"Didn't you hear the priest? Jerusalem is about to be destroyed!"

"Oh that ... "

"Yes. You and I have been paying our church dues regularly. We have been coming to morning service without fail. But now that we are approaching the time when we shall leave this place of suffering and go to Jerusalem, our heavenly home of eternal peace, they say that that place, too, is going to be destroyed."

"It's not fair!" the other old lady assented. "All our good deeds have been done in vain!"

This story illustrates a phenomenon very common indeed in Africa: many Christians on the continent take what the Bible says about almost anything quite literally.

It is therefore extremely worrying that climate change is already changing the Africa's environment irreversibly.

Indeed, very frightening pictures have been coming out of Kenya and other parts of East Africa in recent months.

Apart from the suffering of the people, and the dying of the cattle and other livestock by which they measure their economic wellbeing, disaster is also staring them in the face in the form of the loss of the wild animals that have made East Africa a tourist paradise. One of the most beautiful creatures in the world, the giraffe, for example, has suffered a crash in numbers. Estimates of the number lost in the Masai Mara are as high as 95%.

If things get worse -- as they undoubtedly will do -- it isn't only nature that will take its toll on the African people. The many "prophets" who have set up "charismatic" churches all across Africa, and which already prey financially on the poor and the rich alike, will redouble their psychological assault on the people. Already, they use the "tithes" of their poor church members to buy themselves jet planes and build huge mansions. They can use Biblical quotations to explain away their wealth without blinking, if challenged.

As climate change takes its toll, they will read passages to their congregations from the Bible, such as this one from Mark 13: 14-28: But when you see the abomination of desolation standing where it should not be, then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. And let him who is on the housetop not go down, or enter in, to get anything out of his house; and let him who is in the field not turn back to get his cloak. But woe to those who are with child and to those who nurse babes in those days! ... Those days will be a time of tribulation such as has not occurred since the beginning of creation which God created, until now, and never shall.

Of course, give a nebulous passage like this to a practised orator, and give him concrete evidence on the ground with which to illustrate his literal interpretation of "abomination of desolation", and you have a wolf and a flock of sheep which he can exploit at will.

One doesn't need to be a prophet oneself to imagine the kind of anxiety this will provoke. Some of the resulting hysteria could turn into violence, as scapegoats are sought against whom to seek vengeance for bringing disaster to the world with their "sins".

This is one of the reasons why the Copenhagen talks mattered so much to Africa. The countdown for Armageddon has begun not only in Africa but all over the world. In the past decade, any preacher can -- out of the top of his head -- reel off a series of major disasters, such as the tsunami in Asia, the Katrina floods in the US, and the earthquake in China, as disturbing warnings to humanity.

We would have brought it all on our own heads, the prophets will say -- with some justification. For if you live in somebody's house and you don't heed his warnings on how to behave, then where do you stand?
 
Sad truth that these zionists pseudo churches :evil: have taken a grip on Ghana and are striving to destroy the African souls (even in the most remote bush under the guise of US NGO).

They have also demonized the Muslim population for at least one decade, thus prompting tensions between Sahelian (mostly animist/Muslims) and Coastal population (Southern Ivory Coast, Guinée Bissau, Guninée, Bénin, Togo...) I said southern because in all these country, the nortern part is Sahelian and thus more Muslim oriented.

from my experience, it is not even worth discussing with the evangelists, their mindset is really turned toward their sick vision of armaggedon... Catholics on the other side are more prone to tolerance and to engage in civic initiative. They are far more open minded and if it wasn't with the invoolvment of the Vatican with corrupted elite, the catholic believers are much less prone to dogmatism.

From what I have understood after some research on my own, most evangelists are using traditional "religious knowhow' to attract people. :cool2:
 
Sankara said:
From what I have understood after some research on my own, most evangelists are using traditional "religious knowhow' to attract people.

They tend to mix their tribal religions a little with the monotheistic religions as well. All these religions are psychopathic, but as a woman I think the Islamic dominance in the North (which steadily creaps South) scares me the most. Sharia law is just insanity, I would definitely get myself stoned or whipped!

EDIT:

Found this:

Religion_distribution_Africa_crop.png
 
Erna, you've been subjected to the western propaganda :lol: :lol: :lol:

Islamic fundamentalism is really an epiphenomenon which grows on ignorance, extrem poverty and rejection of the abominations comminted by the western Empire...
Most Sahelians are by far animist Muslims and women are not stoned or whipped. I have been in a Sahelian community for 10 years and have never heard or witness about such things. I'll write more about that later on.

salam
 
Sankara, don't you find this a little psychopathic?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/people/features/ihavearightto/four_b/casestudy_art07.shtml

If a woman is raped, she runs a high risk of being charged with zina, particularly if she becomes pregnant. In order to prove an absence of consent, however, a woman is required to provide four witnesses to the rape, a near impossible task.

You don't think a religion in which women are inferior to men is psychopathic?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia

As for sexism, the common law long denied married women any property rights or indeed legal personality apart from their husbands. When the British applied their law to Muslims in place of Shariah, as they did in some colonies, the result was to strip married women of the property that Islamic law had always granted them — hardly progress toward equality of the sexes.

and this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia

In international media, practices by countries applying Islamic law have fallen under considerable criticism at times. This is particularly the case when the sentence carried out is seen to greatly tilt away from established standards of international human rights. This is true for the application of the death penalty for the crimes of adultery, blasphemy, apostasy and homosexuality, amputations for the crime of theft, and flogging for fornication or public intoxication.

It's beyond insanity! Christianity doesn't even come close!
 
The first thing I would say would be to be very careful when reading anything in the mainstream about Islam. We are right in the middle of a massive world-wide propaganda campaign to demonise Muslims and Arabs as part of a truly psychopathic effort to lock down the planet. I am sure you have also noticed that Muslims in several countries, including handcuffed children, are being slaughtered daily.

The second thing I would say is that Sharia law is not so much religious law, like Catholic Canon law, but more akin to British Common law.

From the wiki article

Sharia is an Arabic word meaning ‘way’ or ‘path’. In Arabic, the collocation ‘Šarīʿat Allāh’ (God’s Law) is traditionally used not only by Muslims, but also Christians and Jews [...]’ Sharia refers to the legal framework within which the public and private aspects of life are regulated for those living in a legal system based on Islamic principles of jurisprudence and for Muslims living outside the domain. Sharia deals with many aspects of day-to-day life, including politics, economics, banking, business, contracts, family, sexuality, hygiene, and social issues.

Islamic law is now the most widely used religious law, and one of the three most common legal systems of the world alongside common law and civil law. During the Islamic Golden Age, classical Islamic law may have influenced the development of common law

In fact, Sharia law is based on British common law, it is a remnant of the wonderful days of the British Empire.

This is evidenced in the excerpt you posted:
As for sexism, the common law long denied married women any property rights or indeed legal personality apart from their husbands. When the British applied their law to Muslims in place of Shariah, as they did in some colonies, the result was to strip married women of the property that Islamic law had always granted them — hardly progress toward equality of the sexes.

That is to say, it was BRITISH influence that robbed Muslim women of more equal rights, something they had before British influence. To me that suggests that the psychopathology was seeded into Sharia law by a pre-existing psychopathology in Western, and therefore Christian, doctrine.

It is also important to remember that Sharia law is interpreted by the local Muslim clerics or imams, etc. The interpretation varies greatly throughout the Muslim world. Over 1 Billion people, by the way. Think of the variations in extent of adherence to and intensity of belief Christianity in the Christian world. All the way from non-practicing to "Jesus camp".

Extreme forms of Islam that you hear about in the press are most often practiced in countries where Western governments, mainly the US, Britain (and Israel more covertly) have played a major role in establishing the ruling regime. Saudi Arabia is one of the strictest Muslim nations where women are marginalised and people regularly beheaded or stoned to death for theft. The Saudi rulers were helped into power and have been maintained there by the US. Same goes for the Taliban, who are nothing more than a bunch of tribal nut cases who were given guns and money by the USA. The methodology is:

place extremist crazies in power. wait a few years. denounce their extremist practices and launch an invasion that wipes out the local population who, invariably hated the crazies that you put in power.

We should always try to remember that we live in an entirely manufactured world. Very little of what goes on the political and religious arenas has anything to do with the truth.

As for Christianity, or more specifically catholicism; I've heard the stories of Muslim men taking "child brides", but not so many stories about the fact that in America, by the time they are 15 years old, 50% of girls are estimated to have been sexually abused by their fathers or other adult male members of their extended families/

Then of course, who can forget the sexual abuse of boys by catholic priests. The true extent of this scandal has by no means been revealed. Hundreds of thousands of mens' lives have been ruined by this particular type of "pastoral care", and the church leaders, right up to the Vatican, have been deliberately covering it up in order to PERPETUATE it for decades.

But did they lie about it? Of course not! priests and cardinals etc do not "lie", they simply employ "mental reservation"

Priests used idea of 'mental reservation' to hide scandal

4 December 2009

When is a lie not a lie? In addition to exposing how child abuse was concealed and perpetuated in the Dublin archdiocese, the report raises questions about Catholic moral teaching on the Eighth Commandment and "mental reservations".

The Dublin Report said a mental reservation permits a Church official knowingly to convey a misleading impression to another person without being guilty of lying. It gave the following example: "John calls [on] the parish priest to make a complaint about the behaviour of one of his curates. The parish priest sees him coming but does not want to see him because he considers John to be a troublemaker.

"He sends another of his curates to answer the door. John asks the curate if the parish priest is in. The curate replies that he is not. This is clearly untrue but in the Church's view it is not a lie, because, when the curate told John that the parish priest was not in, he mentally reserved to himself the words 'to you'," the report said.

Mr Madden was the first Irish clerical abuse victim to go public. In 1995 he said the Dublin archdiocese had paid him compensation for being abused by Fr Ivan Payne and that the priest was still in parish ministry and in contact with children.

The Murphy Report, as the commission's report has become known, said that during a meeting in 2003 Cardinal Connell apologised for his handling of the Fr Payne case.

"He was, however, at pains to point out to Mr Madden that he did not lie about the use of diocesan funds in meeting Fr Payne's settlement with Mr Madden," the report said.

The cardinal "explained that when he was asked by journalists about the use of diocesan funds for the compensation of complainants of child sexual abuse, he had responded that diocesan funds 'are' not used for such a purpose; that he had not said that diocesan funds 'were' not used for such a purpose. By using the present tense, he had not excluded the possibility that diocesan funds had been used for such purpose in the past. According to Mr Madden, Cardinal Connell considered that there was an enormous difference between the two."

So you see, when the cardinal and others made statements that covered up physical and sexual abuse of children by the clergy at all levels, which then condemned thousands more children to the same fate, they were not committing any sin or "lying", they were instead employing a technique that is laid out in CANONICAL LAW and they were therefore being "holy", I can only presume.

The "sharia law" that is being denounced (largely by Neocon-types) and portrayed as adhered to by ALL Muslims is, I suggest comparable to Dominionism. If the shoe were on the other foot, and the White House was in the Middle East, you can be sure that you would be sitting in the West, a nominal Christian, and reading stories in the press and articles on wikipedia about how "Christian terrorists" want to spread Dominionism across the planet. Of course, you'd only be reading such stories if you happened to be in a Western country that was allowed to develop to the extent that you had access to the internet. And if you happened to be in a Western country that had been one of the targets of the Middle Eastern White House's "war on christian terrorism", then there's a decent chance that you would be either living in a refugee camp in exile or dead.

p.s. for another look at the nature of Neocon, Frank Gaffney, from the second last link above, see this interview with Chris Matthews

p.p.s in reference to the Sudan trouser/lashes story; Sudan is an American client state that plays the CIAs "al-Qaeda" game and allows US multinationals to pillage Sudanese oil. The president since 1989, Omar al-Bashir, is the tin pot dictator who likes extreme (i.e. totally false) interpretations of Sharia law in order to control the population who would otherwise revolt and demand that US interests be kicked out. As the very brave woman in question, Lubna Ahmed al-Hussein, said herself in the article:

"My main objective is to get rid of Article 152, this article is against both the constitution and sharia

What all tin pot idiots like the Sudanse president don't realise is that they are making deals with the devil. At any time they can and will be the next adventure in the US/Israeli phony war on terror. Then again, being likely psychos themselves, they probably can't realise such things, because, as was recently stated, psychopaths are defined by an extreme lack of insight.
 
Thanks for your post Perceval. I see what you're saying.

Islam remains however a religion that give me the chills. I understand that they are demonized in the West, and that I have been subjected to that demonization, and that we should be discerning when exposed to that demonization.

But even their common practises (excluding the fundamentalism) troubles me also - the accepted dress code for women, the polygamy, the limited education for girls, the forced studying of the Qur'an.

The 'mental reservations' you speak of is indeed insane also, and the molestation is rife, but it is still largely confined to the church environment in Catholicism, and doesn't directly affect the secular or non-practising portion of the society, whereas Islamic Law seems to subject an entire nation to its laws.

But your post is very informative. I just always pity Islamic women when I see them in the street covered from head to toe in pitch black in temperatures ranging from early to mid-thirties. Islam just really scares me still. We have had business meetings with Muslims, and when they excuse themselves at 12 to go pray - in the middle of a meeting!, I mean it's just...you know? ...and the fasting, and the dietary requirements...it just freaks me out. But I'm totally secular, a choice I wouldn't have under Sharia Law.

But all religions bear foul fruit, as you rightly pointed out. The Christian West today is however much further along the road of women’s rights in particular than Islam.
 
E said:
But even their common practises (excluding the fundamentalism) troubles me also - the accepted dress code for women, the polygamy, the limited education for girls, the forced studying of the Qur'an. [..]

But all religions bear foul fruit, as you rightly pointed out. The Christian West today is however much further along the road of women’s rights in particular than Islam.

I have some of the same feelings, too. This whole discussion made me realize that I have strong emotional reactions to the issue of women's rights and safety. E.g., when I read in Perceval's message,

I've heard the stories of Muslim men taking "child brides", but not so many stories about the fact that in America, by the time they are 15 years old, 50% of girls are estimated to have been sexually abused by their fathers or other adult male members of their extended families/

The thought that sprang to my mind right away was, "not exactly -- CDC puts the US figures at 1 out of 4 girls and 1 out of 6 boys before age of 18, with 40% of abuse coming from family members and 50% from people the child knows or trust. And, there is very little statistics available in middle-eastern, eastern and african countries (although, what's coming out is scary -- India's rate is at a whopping 70+%), because the subject is a taboo and the girl risks being blamed and disposed of in honor killing if she were to say anything, so people keep quiet and resort to surgeries to restore virginity if they can afford it", etc, etc.

On the second thought though, that may be true but is not exactly the point. The point is that the image of Islam we have is skewed. Most of the terrible things we hear about are done by desperate people whose life is unstable and harsh. The poorer the people and the more unsafe their environment is, the more rabidly restrictive their religious rituals are going to be (\\\http://miller-mccune.com/culture_society/who-needs-god-when-we-ve-got-mammon-1626). Buddy brought an excellent analysis of why this is so, in this thread: http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=15301.msg124474#msg124474

But if you look at richer and more prominent folks, be it in Egypt, Turkey or in Saudi Arabia, they will be more secular and also more content to use the western "freedoms", or rather comforts. Religion is the opium for the masses, administered by the elites, there as well as here.

If we are talking about the muslims in the US, they are a very diverse group, and the Asian-American and Arab-American muslims are on average very highly educated and secular. The women in that community are some of the highest educated in the nation, and their earnings equal those of men, which is a better situation than that of any other group (\\\http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/02/us/02muslims.html). Yet they feel deeply alienated and are discriminated against, and are perceived by others as alien to the US culture (\\\http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=436). This comes from people's ignorance and believing in media's portrayal of an Arab Muslim extremist bogeyman.

Regarding the treatment of women, I think we might also keep in mind that there is some cultural relativity with which we view some of the practices. I mean specifically the dress code -- not the full body dress but the head scarf. E.g., when there was the big debate in France about head scarves in public schools, some government official (could have been Sarko himself) made a statement in the media that "these women are oppressed and should be freed from their bondage". To which a French muslim acquaintance said, "Oppressed? moi? I think it's the French women who feel that they have to dye their hair after 40, and can't get out of the house without a perfect coif, are oppressed by their societal programming. I am free to be as I am, and can get ready to go out in a jiffy, just by throwing on my scarf."

I think that in general people react negatively when others disapprove of their tradition that for them is a token of their heritage, and that should be respected. In contrast, nobody who is human is proud of truly abusive practices that their culture and religion enforces, and they definitely need to be discussed and worked against. But if we as a society can somehow separate the two in the discussion, that gives a better chance of success in improving people's lives.

osit
 
E said:
Thanks for your post Perceval. I see what you're saying.

Islam remains however a religion that give me the chills. I understand that they are demonized in the West, and that I have been subjected to that demonization, and that we should be discerning when exposed to that demonization.

But even their common practises (excluding the fundamentalism) troubles me also - the accepted dress code for women, the polygamy, the limited education for girls, the forced studying of the Qur'an.

Check out this article on dress code for women in Islam, and this follow up, for a different view from the one that pervades the mainstream press. After all, unless I am mistaken, most of your impressions of all things Muslim has been presented to you by the Western press. As for education, Iraq is a good example. Under Saddam, Iraq was a well developed nation with free third level education for all. Women held positions at all levels of society. The point I am making is that it is not possible to generalise about "Islam" because the way it is practiced varies greatly from country to country and within countries. You've probably heard about how evil Iran is also. Watch this BBC documentary for an inside view.

[quote author=E]The 'mental reservations' you speak of is indeed insane also, and the molestation is rife, but it is still largely confined to the church environment in Catholicism, and doesn't directly affect the secular or non-practising portion of the society, whereas Islamic Law seems to subject an entire nation to its laws.[/quote]

Again, I think that we are talking about individuals here, not "Islamic law". This is an important distinction, I think Islam in its own way, is as toxic to human beings as Christianity and Judaism, but we should be careful not to condemn our fellow normal human beings in condemning the religion that has been imposed on them by psychopaths. That is precisely what the psychopaths in power are attempting to achieve.

[quote author=E]But your post is very informative. I just always pity Islamic women when I see them in the street covered from head to toe in pitch black in temperatures ranging from early to mid-thirties. Islam just really scares me still. We have had business meetings with Muslims, and when they excuse themselves at 12 to go pray - in the middle of a meeting!, I mean it's just...you know? ...and the fasting, and the dietary requirements...it just freaks me out. But I'm totally secular, a choice I wouldn't have under Sharia Law.[/quote]

I understand your point, and I agree that the West is generally much more secular than most Muslim countries.

[quote author=E]But all religions bear foul fruit, as you rightly pointed out. The Christian West today is however much further along the road of women’s rights in particular than Islam.
[/quote]

Hmmm...that's a thorny issue IMO. I think Christianity and Western culture have done as much to harm women and equality as Islam has. Perhaps you have been spared a lot of the discrimination, or perhaps you are strong enough to have overcome it. IMO, discrimination against women is very pervasive and so entrenched that most people don't recognise it as such any more.
 
Hildegarda said:
The thought that sprang to my mind right away was, "not exactly -- CDC puts the US figures at 1 out of 4 girls and 1 out of 6 boys before age of 18, with 40% of abuse coming from family members and 50% from people the child knows or trust. And, there is very little statistics available in middle-eastern, eastern and african countries (although, what's coming out is scary -- India's rate is at a whopping 70+%), because the subject is a taboo and the girl risks being blamed and disposed of in honor killing if she were to say anything, so people keep quiet and resort to surgeries to restore virginity if they can afford it", etc, etc.

I thought I read somewhere that estimates were that up to 50% was likely, in real terms, because obviously it's difficult to know the exact figures.

This paper puts it at 38%
 
Hello,

Perceval, thank you for your insightful intervention :).

the subject of Islam deserve a very long study since it is a complexe matter and really I won't have time to even start getting in the subject. What I am therefore going to deal with brievly, is of a first hand experience with Islam, Islamic civilisation, it's different people (so many from Europe to China via Sénégal :)), it's different religious "sects", it's different spiritual school from remote Island in Indonesia to the Mourides of Sénégal via the Persians etc...

...

I grew up in a neighborood where our right and left and front neighboors were Catholic Spanish, the back neighboors were Algerian Muslims. For years my parent's house was 100 meters away from a Synagogue, the Rabbi's son was our good friend and we have all never discriminate since we learned more or less consciously that the good friends, the trustworthy one, could not be recognized by his religious background and the crazy guys were not specificaly Arabo/berbère Muslims ;). If the Spanish and the Algerians usually gave us cookies for some Catholic feast or the end of Ramadan, never has the Rabbi. But his son was a good football player and a very good fellow :D...

What about Islam,Muslims?

I have been practicing the fifth pillars of that religion for 8 years and studying it and even join a Sufi Brotherhood for a while. I have learned much (especially with Ismaelians) and it has been a blessing to have had Ibn Arabis poetry around the period when I have had an experience with light such as described by Jacques Vallée and John Keel because otherwise nobody around could have helped me with what I have been living around that period. Not that I could understand how tremendous this was dealing with at 24, but because it led me to stop drinking, introduce the regularity of finding one self to bend on the ground because of life. the fasting of food, carnal attraction during the hardship of Ramadan,have led me to understand what that means to observe oneself. It helped me to consider my previous education and widened the scope of understandings and multiplied the point of view.

Once I have been in a Mosque, it had been the last time. It was great somehow, because in a foreign land in Asia and it was moving to see people of all complexion, all social background, Indonesians, Bangladeshis, pakistanese, Chinese, Ivorians, Sudanese... and even French since three of them were converted in that big Asian City, altogether. The religious leaders just repulsed me. Ever since that time I have never wanted to join the Mosque prayers except in remote villages in Marocco or with an old friend, an old cigarette smoking egyptologist, devoted truth seeker and converted (like many french freed Muslims, he still have little wine and nobody blame him because is is considered a respectful elder).

Religion is corrupted.

Like the great Jamaïcan poet Mutabaruka used to say "religion have been designed by insecure men to oppress women". But from my experience, and this is while Wikipedia is totaly irrelevant, most Muslim women are highly respected in their society and much happyer than many Westerners. Some of them are not for sure :(, like the afghani Pastuns, but this has nothing to do with Islam, (in Mayotte the inheritance goes to the women)it depends on the ethnical background. and this relevant for the whole Christian mediterranean era. In Egypt, the Copts practice excision...

In the village I have roots in, I have heard about beaten women twice in ten years. The first time, all the women in the village (and they know one another perfectly since they spend much time altogether) blame it on...the woman. And they really explained why. The second time was two years ago. This time, the whole village defended the woman against the man. The father went in the couple's house, took his daughter's stuff and swear (backed by the villagers) that his daughter would never come back because of his behaviour.

I am French, and I know that more women are beaten right here, in French families than in Mali, in Algeria. If you really doubt what I say, I could figure out the official figures in France, Spain, Italy...

In many Muslim countries, the woman is a mother, she is sacred to her children and I have witnessed this high respect and love for mothers in Arabic tribes, highly religious Berbere Mozabites( non Sunna, nether Shi'a), black African Muslims. The Mozabites city of Ghardaïa keeps the reminder of a woman who refused to 'pray' and who would answer the religious leaders of that very pecular society (worth a search) that only God was her judge and so none of them could judge her. She was such a good person that her life was recorded with respect.

Erna, please check how many woman are in university in Iran, look at the role they play in the 'Hezbollah society', as teachers, professors, journalists. The Al Azhar University (founded by the Ismaelians) has declared a moratory on stoning and whipping because they had to be reconsidered in this era, but no western media seem to have notice this important move. This may remotely have something to do with the fact that many French women convert.

Anything can be said of Muhammad, but surely he did help his wife for their daily duties.

Three years ago, in Mali, in a Bambara village (Mutwa talks about them),arrived a new young cultivated Imam (locally called a Marabu) arrived. he informed the population of the prophet's habits (which according to the Sunna Islam must be copied in behaviour) and told the men to do the same. The Bamako's newpaper who ran that story, finished the article saying that all the males chased him out of the village. It is highly probable that peasant in Haute Loire would have done the same with a Curé telling them the same thing a couple of decades ago (no risk he would have say such an heresy anyway :lol: :lol:)

We should be careful with the mainstream presentation of Islamic civilisations, indeed...

Spiritual Islam, is a treasure and it is a pity I can't advise you to have a look at Eva de Vitray Meyerovitch's book since I don't think it has been translated. Maybe you could try to find Amadou Hampatê Ba's book. In my life I have met so many people of so many different places having links in one way or another with Islam who were just the best guests we would have for damned good conversations. I have so many trustworthy friends in my heart that it is always rather painful to realize how people are ignorants about Islamic civilisation and demonize it. The descriptions of Lobaczewski are relevant in most Muslim society and they are a lot of normal people. I consider and pondered that what the C's have said about 30% of the Bible being of worth and having to be discovered thru meditation can be applied to Kuran.

In many couties Muslim are now educated and there is no doubt that you could easily sympathized with them. Recently I had a look on Muslim websites about UFO's and was amazed how they took it seriously.

When I started this post I knew I wouldn't be able to write for long since I have a flight tomorrow... Frustrating somehow. This is why I choose this style, forgive me. I hope you have understood the point.

The Empire has encouraged the most stupid and fundamentalist Wahabism to achive their aim of destroying this civilisation from within, this is an historical fact.

I will end this post with a love song from the area where I have deep roots with, the Peulh-Songhaï of the Niger borders between Gao and Niamey. Witness how the child "Mariama" had from a precedent wedding is accepted by the lover in front of the community.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THAqP7ANYQ0

You can also watch our sister's dance in the Sahelo-sahara area, wonderful.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61Ucw830fDU

respect
 
Perceval, thank you for the links to the Naomi Wolff articles, especially for the follow-up that I have not yet seen.

This quote in particular stood out:

There is nothing further to be said in response this sort of nonsense — I am just sorry that much of it is being spewed by organizations underwritten by the Israel lobby, who should abide by the core Jewish values of telling the truth, and promoting peace and mutual understanding, and instead are stooping to telling falsehoods and demonizing the “other” instead of seeking real dialogue.

I think she is absolutely right. The efforts to marginalize Muslims even includes questioning their percentage in the US population in favor of smaller numbers:

\\\http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_islam_usa.html
 
Perceval said:
Check out this article on dress code for women in Islam, and this follow up, for a different view from the one that pervades the mainstream press.

These articles are quite educational. Thanks. :)

Perceval said:
After all, unless I am mistaken, most of your impressions of all things Muslim have been presented to you by the Western press.

That is true. I do try and balance it out though with watching Al Jazeera regularly.

Perceval said:
The point I am making is that it is not possible to generalise about "Islam" because the way it is practiced varies greatly from country to country and within countries.

Yes, no I had a conversation with a friend of a friend one night who taught English in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for years who gave me a bit of an insiders account (he was male – which I think is relevant). Riyadh is of course what I consider on the one extreme, and some of the stories he relayed did leave a feeling of dread with me. That definitely shaped my view to some extend.

Perceval said:
You've probably heard about how evil Iran is also.

Indeed, but SOTT balanced that out fortunately.

Perceval said:
Watch this BBC documentary for an inside view.

I don’t think I’m seeing the documentary you intended for me to watch. The one I’m seeing is called The Last Duel.

Perceval said:
Again, I think that we are talking about individuals here, not "Islamic law". This is an important distinction, I think Islam in its own way, is as toxic to human beings as Christianity and Judaism, but we should be careful not to condemn our fellow normal human beings in condemning the religion that has been imposed on them by psychopaths. That is precisely what the psychopaths in power are attempting to achieve.

I’m with you.

Perceval said:
Hmmm...that's a thorny issue IMO. I think Christianity and Western culture have done as much to harm women and equality as Islam has. Perhaps you have been spared a lot of the discrimination, or perhaps you are strong enough to have overcome it.

No I’m not blind to the Western flavour of discrimination, and I have certainly not been spared from it. I guess it’s maybe a case with me of rather the devil that you know, than the one you don’t.

Perceval said:
IMO, discrimination against women is very pervasive and so entrenched that most people don't recognise it as such any more.

True.
 
Back
Top Bottom