Alexander Davidis: Another "Puzzling" Psychopathy Expert?
- Thread starter jasstnhawk
- Start date
truth seeker
The Living Force
I've gone round and round with that question as well. Just my opinion based on personal experience so for what it's worth, but the word that has often come to mind is calculation. I think if he were truly oblivious, he would be in the thread posting even if what he wrote was insulting or just plain wrong.Gertrudes said:
The fact that he chooses when and what to post for the most part (with the possible exception being when he's too angry to not be able to control himself), tells me that he is cognizant of what he does and how he does it. Others may feel differently.
Azur said:
More than 2 years back, during one of casual chat( after EE class in NYC), he did mentioned to me that he discussed the subject of making some thing about psychopathy with one of his friend who is some senior executive in a big network. At that time he was not even involved in any pyschopathy movie making. I wondered why any network is interested in it,. which I even expressed to him too. what puzzled me at that time is he seems to have oblivious to my doubts of MSM acceptability. After that I forgot about it.
After wards how he lined up every body is clear NOW . I was hoping that he will say he dropped it. well, even in his latest post, he made it clear that “he is a film maker , so he can use it”. How much clearer things has to be to know what direction he is going.
name
Jedi Master
We are all judged by our actions AND by our associations. As somebody who does not know the person, I'd like to contribute some associations which I see.
That's what I told myself after I reading through this thread. why didn't he make the project with the SOTT people, at least in a consulting position?
The other videos I've seen coming from here are of perfectly good quality both in make and in information content, so why not go at it with a provenly successful team?
I would like to comment on the preview video about psychos linked from here and made by "John Galt Films" and a few other things which I miss in the discussion.
I followed the link to YouTube posted in this thread and looked at the video. What immediately put me off is that pattern of people popping up from right and left telling the viewer witty phrases about psychos. The icon of somebody presented as an "authority" in the matter, turned 45°, pops in from the right, tells the viewer some witty phrase about psychos, is followed by some other figure popping in from the left ... this goes on for the whole trailer. My impression is that this is manipulation, attempting to endear the viewer to these people presented as authorities. I wouldn't know why anybody would want to manipulate viewers in what is (supposed to be) a documentary about facts.
In the trailer there is a lady, one of the "experts", who works at the Penetanguishene psychiatric ward (link to Google Maps) north of Toronto on Lake Huron. Notice the jail conveniently located nearby in the map. Penetanguishene or "Penetang" was/is an institution for the criminally insane and appears to have been one of the "foreign locations"in which the CIA MK-series projects took place. I know of Penetang because of the story of a Canadian called Steve Smith aka "plasticsmith" - in short, as a teenager he was picked up by police in 1968 for some minor offenses and sent to Penetang because he swallowed some LSD he was carrying. See his full story here.
What they did to Smith and the drugs they gave him reads like they were trying to make psychos out of perfectly normal people with the help of drugs. A big red flag, and why I connect Penetang with the MK-series, is that other people who went through "treatment" there wound up dead in Angola and in israels wars - it would appear that they had some measure of success and loaned out their "products" - at least that is how I interpret some of the documents put out by Smith. There is (or was), BTW, a class action suite against Penetanguishene and the good doctor who treated Smith. See here.
My wonder is, even if the lady mentioned in the trailer is clean herself, why would anybody who knows what has been uncovered here at SOTT want to quote somebody
with such professional references?
Alex Davidis calls his film company "John Galt Films", what I took from the YouTube video entry. John Galt was/is the protagonist of writings of Ayn Rand. I have not read Ayn Rand, but by all what I have read about her and her writings, Lobaczewski would probably have mentioned her together with Marx and the other bearded crazies he alludes to, if he had known about her. Here is a choice quote about Ayn Rand and John Galt from Alternet, full article here.:
Why would anybody call his company after a literary figure which was inspired by a serial murderer? Not me at least, and nobody whom I know.
Somebody mentioned the neighborhood of AD. 10021 is a smallish part of NY, sized about 7x8 blocks or 1x1,5 Km. It is upper-middle class (overrated IMO), and it is home to 24 501(c)(3) "charities" which are involved in financing the israeli occupation and theft of Palestinian lands or generally funneling money to israel on the back of US taxpayers, count is per middle of 2011. Such zionist institutions sprout in zionist neighborhoods and nowhere else.
Truth Seeker said:
That's what I told myself after I reading through this thread. why didn't he make the project with the SOTT people, at least in a consulting position?
The other videos I've seen coming from here are of perfectly good quality both in make and in information content, so why not go at it with a provenly successful team?
I would like to comment on the preview video about psychos linked from here and made by "John Galt Films" and a few other things which I miss in the discussion.
I followed the link to YouTube posted in this thread and looked at the video. What immediately put me off is that pattern of people popping up from right and left telling the viewer witty phrases about psychos. The icon of somebody presented as an "authority" in the matter, turned 45°, pops in from the right, tells the viewer some witty phrase about psychos, is followed by some other figure popping in from the left ... this goes on for the whole trailer. My impression is that this is manipulation, attempting to endear the viewer to these people presented as authorities. I wouldn't know why anybody would want to manipulate viewers in what is (supposed to be) a documentary about facts.
In the trailer there is a lady, one of the "experts", who works at the Penetanguishene psychiatric ward (link to Google Maps) north of Toronto on Lake Huron. Notice the jail conveniently located nearby in the map. Penetanguishene or "Penetang" was/is an institution for the criminally insane and appears to have been one of the "foreign locations"in which the CIA MK-series projects took place. I know of Penetang because of the story of a Canadian called Steve Smith aka "plasticsmith" - in short, as a teenager he was picked up by police in 1968 for some minor offenses and sent to Penetang because he swallowed some LSD he was carrying. See his full story here.
What they did to Smith and the drugs they gave him reads like they were trying to make psychos out of perfectly normal people with the help of drugs. A big red flag, and why I connect Penetang with the MK-series, is that other people who went through "treatment" there wound up dead in Angola and in israels wars - it would appear that they had some measure of success and loaned out their "products" - at least that is how I interpret some of the documents put out by Smith. There is (or was), BTW, a class action suite against Penetanguishene and the good doctor who treated Smith. See here.
My wonder is, even if the lady mentioned in the trailer is clean herself, why would anybody who knows what has been uncovered here at SOTT want to quote somebody
with such professional references?
Alex Davidis calls his film company "John Galt Films", what I took from the YouTube video entry. John Galt was/is the protagonist of writings of Ayn Rand. I have not read Ayn Rand, but by all what I have read about her and her writings, Lobaczewski would probably have mentioned her together with Marx and the other bearded crazies he alludes to, if he had known about her. Here is a choice quote about Ayn Rand and John Galt from Alternet, full article here.:
Alternet said:
Why would anybody call his company after a literary figure which was inspired by a serial murderer? Not me at least, and nobody whom I know.
Somebody mentioned the neighborhood of AD. 10021 is a smallish part of NY, sized about 7x8 blocks or 1x1,5 Km. It is upper-middle class (overrated IMO), and it is home to 24 501(c)(3) "charities" which are involved in financing the israeli occupation and theft of Palestinian lands or generally funneling money to israel on the back of US taxpayers, count is per middle of 2011. Such zionist institutions sprout in zionist neighborhoods and nowhere else.
Well, "name", since you have collected those things together all in one post, if we put them together with some other things that have emerged in this thread, it really does look more and more like Alexander Davidis and his company, John Galt Films, could very well be a psy-op. At the very least, it could be signifying real pathology which is attracted to other pathological types and the end result is the same as a planned psy-op.
truth seeker
The Living Force
One thing that I've wondered about is the statement made here referencing the type of visa A has. Most people coming in from other countries get themselves a regular work visa and work their way up like everyone else. This seems to be one of the few visas that indicate a special status and seems to take quite some doing to obtain.
In addition to that, according to Wki:
So perhaps one reason this particular visa was obtained was so A wouldn't have to provide proof of a specific residence outside the country?
That neighborhood, like many in NY are vastly overrated. NYC has a very good public relations machine. Unfortunately many people view it as the 'real' NY and would never dream of moving to the outer boroughs. In reality, it's the everyday people from Harlem (upper Manhattan), the outer boroughs and cities/states who travel into New York City daily that are the real backbone of the city itself.
In addition to that, according to Wki:
So perhaps one reason this particular visa was obtained was so A wouldn't have to provide proof of a specific residence outside the country?
Interesting. Based on what I was told, A lives there because it's close to his children. I suppose he's never realized that many divorced people in general but men in particular try to live as close to their kids as possible, but not necessarily in the neighborhood they 'like'. Many don't have the luxury of being able to walk to visit their kids but rather take public transportation out of necessity. Somehow I can't envision A schlepping over to Manhattan from Brooklyn or Queens.
That neighborhood, like many in NY are vastly overrated. NYC has a very good public relations machine. Unfortunately many people view it as the 'real' NY and would never dream of moving to the outer boroughs. In reality, it's the everyday people from Harlem (upper Manhattan), the outer boroughs and cities/states who travel into New York City daily that are the real backbone of the city itself.
H
Hildegarda
Guest
truth seeker said:
In my experience with visa issues, the work visas of H type require an employer to sponsor you. To "work your way up", you have to again be sponsored by your employer for green card, or obtain green card through marriage. A refugee status is another way to legalization.
If somebody is essentially self-employed or owns a business in the US, it's a conundrum because you can hire and sponsor other people, but you can't sponsor yourself for visa status in the US. To get around that, one might apply for the O-visa status instead.
truth seeker
The Living Force
Ah, thanks for the clarification.Hildegarda said:
ana
The Living Force
Azur said:
Really?
Azur, one wonders how can someone who's been here for six years have so many difficulties to get it? Then, it's not so difficult to behave decently and with care for others instead of showing a total lack of concern unless one is well confortable serving the self.
Why are you here Azur?
anart said:
Yes I am a little bit stumped by that one, then again my jaw has dropped a number of times by Azur´s attitude and comments in this thread.
oneperson
The Force is Strong With This One
Laura said:
A side note regarding character assassination....
I previously wrote in one of my blog entries back in November, 2011:
As I pondered character assassination the other week wondering if I had engaged in such by bringing forth part of my story regarding my ex-therapist, it dawned on me that in order to assassinate a person's character, that person has to have the character to assassinate.
If one speaks the truth, with facts to corroborate that truth, it's not character assassination; it's character exposure.
Alexanders latest post on Facebook:
and here is the Trailer:
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4o-P3lGobo
the website:
_UprisingFilm.com
the twitter channel:
_twitter.com/UprisingFilm
the Facebook page:
_facebook.com/UprisingDocumentary
the youtube channel:
_http://www.youtube.com/user/UprisingDocumentary
and here is the Trailer:
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4o-P3lGobo
the website:
_UprisingFilm.com
the twitter channel:
_twitter.com/UprisingFilm
the Facebook page:
_facebook.com/UprisingDocumentary
the youtube channel:
_http://www.youtube.com/user/UprisingDocumentary
jasstnhawk
Jedi
Here's the description below the "Uprising" trailer on AD's aka John Galt Films, Inc. Vimeo page located @ _http://vimeo.com/39169431#
