The Martian Stonehenge
For those more familiar with my posts, they will appreciate that I have had a long-term interest in the planet Mars. Indeed, it was through a search I once did on the Monuments of Mars that I discovered Laura and the Cassiopaeans. The C’s confirmed my strong suspicions that the so called ‘Monuments of Mars’ had been built by an earlier pre-Flood Earth civilisation and this civilisation was that of the Atlanteans:
Session 19 November 1994:
Q: (T) Is there such a thing as "alternative three" the plan to take all the brains off the planet?
A: No.
Q: (T) Is that more disinformation?
A: Yes. So is Mars landing but not Mars monuments.
Q: (TL) Who made the monuments on Mars?
A: Atlanteans.
Q: (T) So, the Atlanteans had inter-planetary ability?
A: Yes. With ease. Atlantean technology makes yours look like the Neanderthal era.
Q: (T) Who created the structures on the moon that Richard Hoagland has discovered?
A: Atlanteans.
Q: (T) What did they use these structures for?
A: Energy transfer points for crystalline power/symbolism as in monuments or statuary.
Q: (T) What statuary are you referring to?
A: Example is face. [
MJF: the ‘Face on Mars’ – see image below]
Q: (T) What power did these crystals gather?
A: Sun.
Q: (T) Was it necessary for them to have power gathering stations on Mars and the Moon. Did this increase their power?
A: Not necessary but it is not necessary for you to have a million dollars either. Get the correlation? Atlanteans were power hungry the way your society is money hungry.
Over the years I have looked at a lot of photographs of the Martian surface in which there appears to be evidence of anomalies. Often these anomalies can still be seen even after there has been obvious tampering to obscure what is there. One can either take the view that these images of anomalies and strange artefacts on Mars are the product of clever ‘high tech’ computer aided imaging (sophisticated ‘photo shopping’) or, if they are real, that NASA, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) or the ESA when posting them on their websites are deliberately defying our credulity by putting them on public view without scientific comment or, when they do bother to comment, any explanation they provide is usually of an unconvincing nature. Perhaps the greatest example of this is the infamous Face on Mars photograph taken by the Viking I orbiter, which the C’s confirmed in the extract above as being a real man-made structure.
The original Face on Mars image taken by the
Viking 1 orbiter and released by
NASA/JPL on 25 July 1976
To this day NASA and mainstream scientific opinion still holds that the image showing what appears to be a face was just a trick of light and shadow. While accepting the "Face" as a subject for scientific study, famous American astronomer
Carl Sagan criticised much of the speculation concerning it in the chapter "
The Man in the Moon and the Face on Mars" in his 1995 book
The Demon-Haunted World. However, Carl Sagan had history here since early on in his career he had opined on the possibility that certain structures seen on images taken by NASA probes could be evidence of artificiality. He was taken to task for these claims and, as a result, he quickly stepped back into line adopting the orthodox approach of “nothing to see here” thereafter. However, he sometimes left an enigmatic question mark hanging over certain images without openly suggesting they were depicting artificial structures. One such example was a field of pyramids on Mars photographed by NASA’s Mariner 9 probe, the first to successfully obtain orbit around the planet.
In his 1980 book
Cosmos, Carl Sagan showed the picture above in the chapter
Blues for a Red Planet with the image caption "
The Pyramids of Elysium". In that paragraph he wrote about a large rover mission which would be of high public interest as live TV-picture would be sent to Earth when the rover visits these pyramids. In a footnote on that page, he wrote:
"The largest Mars Pyramids have a base width of 3km and a height of 1km, so they are much larger than the Pyramids of Sumer, Egypt and Mexico. With the ancient eroded shape, they could be small hills, sandblasted for centuries, but they need to be viewed from nearby."
The Elysium region was photographed again by the Viking orbiter in 1976, the results of which can be seen on the right-hand side of the composite image shown below.
I obtained this and other images taken by the Viking and the Mars Global Surveyor orbiter from an article by
Holger Isenberg which can be viewed at
The Sagan Pyramids - Mariner 9 #4205-78 & #4296-23 (mars-news.de).
In the above picture, the square-based pyramid on the right side is really more interesting than the “Sagan” ones. The Mariner 9 image forms the lower left part of this image up to the dark crack observed through the whole image in the centre.
The final image above is one taken of the same region by the Mars Global Surveyor in April and May 2001. As you can see in the images above and below, one picture was taken directly over one of the pyramids but, unfortunately, a transmission error happened causing the image to be lost (MJF: Hmmm … was it really lost due to a transmission error?). The other one was taken about 50km east and hit another pyramid very well on the border. The edges of that pyramid are way too sharp and rectangular to be made by random erosion.
Another strange object nearby
In the very same region, as can be seen by the context image below, there is a 500-meter large representation of the
Hebrew letter NUN! This is a really interesting connection, not only by the mythological meaning of the letter NUN, but also by the ancient
Egyptian goddess Nun who was the first entity, the "infinite water of chaos" or as we call it today, space.
These images of pyramids on Mars are not the only examples of such structures for one can think of the famous five-sided D&M Pyramid located in the Cydonia region where the Face is found:
By way of comparison, I show below an aerial image of the pyramid complex at Giza in Egypt:
We should keep in mind here that the C’s said that the Great Pyramid at Giza that is now a ruin was constructed 10,673 years ago from granite blocks and limestone. In contrast, the pyramids on Mars are probably more than 50,000 years old and are most likely crystalline structures like the one that lies on the bed of the Atlantic Ocean 380 miles off the eastern coast of Florida, which is responsible for the strange phenomena associated with the infamous Bermuda Triangle:
Q: (L) And the third and final destruction was caused by what?
A: Crystals
Q: (T) Are the crystals still active?
A: Bermuda triangle.
Q: (L) I thought that was a myth?
A: No.
[…]
Q: (L) What were the physical dimensions of these crystals and were they cut or naturally grown?
A: Varied. Were synthetic.
Q: (L) Were they faceted?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) In their faceting, what was the general configuration?
A: Pyramid.
Q: (L) Was that an absolute pyramid with the same proportions as say, the Great Pyramid at Gizeh?
A: Close.
Q: (L) How large was the largest from base to apex?
A: 5000 feet.
Q: (L) What was the average size?
A: 500 feet.
Q: (L) And was the one that was 5,000 feet tall, is that one still in existence?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Where is that one located?
A: 380 miles due East of you?
Q: (L) Some years ago a pilot reported seeing a pyramid near there in the water...
A: That is just the top sticking out of the ocean floor. It is 90 per cent buried.
[…]
Q: (T) Are the crystals on Mars why they want to get there so badly?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Because of the crystals or because of what is stored in the monuments?
A: Neither.
Q: (T) Why do they want to get to Mars?
A: Explore.
The C’s also told us that the Great Pyramid was built to capture cosmic energy:
Q: (L) Why was it built? What purpose was it used for?
A: Capture cosmic energy.
Q: (L) And what was this cosmic energy used for once it was captured?
A: Many things. Power, transport, healing, mind control, climate, et cetera.
In a similar way, the C’s said that the crystalline structures on Mars (e.g., the pyramids of Elysium) were built as energy transfer points for crystalline power.
Hence, it would seem that when building the Great Pyramid at Giza, the Atlantean descendants who built it were following the example of their ancestors who had built the huge Bermuda Triangle pyramid on Earth and the pyramids on Mars and the Moon (MJF: Yes, there are pyramid structures on the Moon too).
However, very early on Laura had noted that the survivors of the Flood or Deluge seemed to have split into two distinct camps, i.e., the pyramid builders and the circle builders. This split may in turn reflect the divide between the two main philosophical/religious groups that dominated Atlantis, the Sons of Belial and the Sons of the Law of One:
Q: Cayce talks about the division in Atlantis between the "Sons of One" and the "Sons of Belial." Was this a racial division or a philosophical/religious division?
A: It was the latter two, and before that, the former one.
I have displayed evidence above for there being ancient Atlantean pyramids on Mars but is there any evidence of ancient stone (or crystal) circles on Mars like Stonehenge in England? Up to a few days ago, I would have said no but watching a program on UFO secrets, which featured the ufologist Richard Dolan, I learned there may well be a Stonehenge on Mars. In the program, Dolan displayed a photograph taken by Viking 1 in 1976 of an anomalous circular feature on Mars, which for some unknown reason had not been released by NASA until forty (40) years after its capture. Dolan could find no official reason why NASA had delayed its release for so long.
The more modern image shown below of the same site was apparently captured by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter after the site had been detected in the distance by the Mars Curiosity Rover as it trundled along the Martian surface.
For more images see:
Marshenge – Stonehenge on Mars? - YouTube
The image above may not seem like much but when seen at a higher resolution, the comparison with Stonehenge becomes more readily apparent.
A close-up of the mysterious rock formation
The mysterious formation rests on a mound that rises from the ground and clearly seems to be surrounded by a ditch. I think readers can agree that it is very unlikely that what you are seeing is the result of Pareidolia (a trick of ‘light and shadow’ like they say of the Face on Mars). But could it be an ancient monument? The mysterious rock formation clearly has a passing resemblance to the ancient stone circle at Stonehenge in England (see image directly above) and is very unlikely to be the result of the work of mother nature. The rock formation is unique within the area it was photographed in since there is nothing nearby that resembles in any way the mysterious rocks formed into a circle.
Sceptics claim that stone circles like this can be formed as a result of natural processes that also take place on Earth. Thus, permafrost can cause sediments to rotate and separate which can make blocks of stone move and position themselves in circles or polygons resulting in formations like the one seen here.
Although I would not rule such an explanation out, NASA geologists also claimed that the Elysium Pyramids photographed by Mariner 9 (see above) were merely natural sand dunes formed by the Martian winds.
For more see:
Unraveling The Enigma Of Red Planet's Stonehenge | NASA's Unexpained Files | A peculiar rock formation on Mars echoes the symmetry of Earth's Stonehenge. Scientists grapple with theories ranging from seismic activity to... | By Love Space | Facebook
Researchers discover a 'Stonehenge' on Mars - The Ancient Code (ancient-code.com)
https://www.humix.com/video/ttZyVrBXsXf
94.704 Aufrufe · 1.523 Reaktionen | Is that Stonehenge on Mars?! 
Unravel the Martian enigma on #NASAsUnexplainedFiles, Saturday at 9/8c on TRVL! | Travel Channel | Travel Channel · Original-Audio
Given that the Atlanteans built pyramids on Mars, should we really be so surprised that they may have built stone circles on Mars too. One Mars anomaly researcher claimed that there is evidence of other stone circles on Mars but that this was by far the largest he had seen to date. So, if the Martian henge is real, what purpose was it built to serve? It might help here to look at what the C’s said about the purposes Stonehenge in England served:
Session 23 October 1994:
Q: (L) What was Stonehenge built to do or be used for?
A: Energy director.
Q: (L) What was this energy to be directed to do?
A: All things.
Q: (L) Was the energy to be directed outward or inward to the centre
A: Both.
Session 9 November 1994:
Q: (L) In many ancient ruins there are found certain symbols which interest me, specifically the coil or spiral which seems to be ubiquitous throughout the world. This is also very similar to one of the Reiki symbols. What is the origin and meaning of this symbol?
A: Energy collector translevel; Stonehenge was one. Stonehenge is a coil. The missing stones form a coil arrangement. People have been "zapped" at Stonehenge.
In some ways Marshenge does look like a coil arrangement. You will also note that the C’s say that this energy collecting function was a trans-level operation, suggesting that it involved an application of hyperdimensional physics. This is something that Richard Hoagland (before he sold out to the dark side) picked up on when he investigated the enigmatic ruined structures at Cydonia, including the Face and the D&M Pyramid. He wrote extensively about it in his book The Monuments of Mars and on his website. The C’s confirmed that the Druid builders of Stonehenge were also aware of this hyperdimensional physics too:
Session 29 March 1996:
Q: (L) Can you tell me anything else about it? The Clapham Wood incident back in the 70's?
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, that is not helping me.
A: It is, but not as you think. Stonehenge power. Vortex. Magnetic principles understood by you when you occupied other bodies, ask Hilliard, ole boy. [
MJF: Hilliard was the builder of Coral Castle for which he used anti-gravity, wave focusing techniques.]
Q: (L) There have been a number of hints that Hilliard has some knowledge that he may be withholding. Does he have knowledge that is important, and how can I persuade him to tell me?
A: Massive, and probe directly after promising absolute confidence... and don't break it!!!
But Stonehenge was not just built to be an energy collector and director judging from what the C’s said here:
Session 8 December 1996:
Q: (L) Well, we talked about Stonehenge before, that it was an energy transducer, so to speak. So, was Stonehenge put there because of the location, or did Stonehenge create... (T) Why don't you just ask what it is about Stonehenge? (L) Okay, what is it about Stonehenge?
A: Location attracted those spirit types on the proper frequency, who in turn, placed stones in proper location to receive the coded communications in code telepathically, in order not to have to chase around the countryside reading encoded pictographs. [MJF: the C’s subsequently described these “spirit types” in another session as being like Wiccans entubed on the information superhighway.]
Q: (L) What was the technique used within the circle to receive the information telepathically? [Planchette spiralled in and spiralled out.]
A: Transcendent focused thought wave separation.
Q: (L) OK, so that you're saying that moving in a spiral...
A: The spiral serves to translate message by slowing down the wave and focusing thought wave transference energy. Utilizes /transduces electromagnetic waves, the conduit, by breaking down signal from universal language of intent into language of phonetic profile. This is for multiple user necessity.
Q: (L) Multiple user necessity implies that a number of people must do the spiral. Is that correct?
A: No. Must hear and feel and understand precisely the same thing. The molecular structure of the rock, when properly sculpted sing to you.
The C’s would subsequently elaborate on this idea of the stones singing to you and the way in which this was used to impart wisdom from higher realms:
Session 19 February 2000:
Q: Is it the case that some of them [
northern peoples or hyperboreans]
communicated with higher density beings via Stonehenge, and that these communications they received...
A: Stonehenge used to resonate with tonal rill, teaching the otherwise unteachable with wisdoms entered psychically through crown chakra transceiving system.
[Note: the word "rill" is new to me. Webster defines it as a small stream or a little brook; to flow in or like a rill.]
Can we assume here that the transmitters of such wisdom were 6th density beings such as the C’s?
It would appear that Stonehenge and the Great Pyramid at Giza were modern (and inferior) recreations of an older Atlantean technology, but according to the C’s these structures seemed to have worked in different ways:
Session 22 August 1998:
Q: Then you talked about the pyramid as a focuser of energy to do ‘all things’ or many things. Later we asked about Stonehenge and you said that Stonehenge was built 6,000 BC by Druids, an early Aryan group, as an energy director to do ‘all things.’ This seems to be that both structures had similar design functions. Is that correct?
A: No. Stonehenge is a vector of energy derived from Solar and Cosmic rays. Pyramids focus electromagnetic energy from the atmosphere ambiently. Stonehenge was built 8,000 BC, by the way.
Perhaps we can assume a similar difference in operation and function for the pyramids and stone circles of Mars.
Coming back to Laura’s distinction between the circle builders and the pyramid builders again, it is interesting to note that ancient pyramids were built mainly in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Central America and Peru. These were all lands where there was an alien (Orion) influence upon the peoples who lived there. This is certainly true of the Sumerians, the ancient Egyptians, the Mayans, the Azteks and the Inca all of whom the C’s said were Atlantean legacy cultures. It is also true of other pyramid cultures too such as China, Cambodia (Angkor Wat) and India but these cultures were not the creation of Atlantean survivors. In contrast, stone circles predominate more in Northern Europe (especially Britain, Spain and Portugal), the Urals in Russia and parts of the Middle East such as Saudi Arabia and modern Israel or Palestine where Celts, Aryans or Semites predominated. It is possible that the Aryans or Celts were affected less by alien influence than the other cultures created by Atlantean survivors that I mentioned above, and they may at times have actively resisted them. This may be especially true of the Hyperboreans. Is there any evidence to support this claim? Well yes there is. The first case concerns the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah in what today is Israel but was formerly Canaan:
Q: (L) How were Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed and the other cities of the plain? And by whom?
A: Nuclear; EM pulse. Who else?
Q: (L) The lizzies?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Why?
A: To implant fear and obedience.
The second case is Stonehenge in England where the C’s said some of the missing stones were smashed by EM weapons:
Q: Was Stonehenge built in stages as this author suggests? Did it start out as a circular ditch, at the time of the so-called Aubrey holes?
A: No.
Q: Was it built all at once, complete?
A: Yes.
[…]
Q: I mean, there are stones just plain missing! Who could haul off such big pieces of rock?! . (A) You asked about these missing stones, and the answer was the multiple shocks registered. (L) Right. What about these multiple shocks. What, in particular?
A: Some were earthquakes; mini-cataclysmic in nature. Some were EM generated smashes, when terran forces clashed with outside "forces".
Q: Are you suggesting that some of these rocks were vaporized, as it were, by some sort of particle beam weaponry?
A: EM activity.
Finally, a third possible case relates to Aryans who once occupied Isle Royale in North America who appeared to be mining copper to create weapons to use in 4th density or against 4th density beings:
Q: What group mined the copper in northern Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan, like in Isle Royale?
A: Aryans.
Q: What did they want the copper for?
A: Weapons.
Q: Wouldn't iron make better weapons?
A: Not in 4th density.
Q: I'm getting the feeling that there have been bleed-in, bleed-out situations with 4th density on this planet a lot more often than we suspect.
A: Yes.
Now it is interesting to observe here that the C’s said that Stonehenge was built by Druids who the C’s described as being an early Aryan group:
Q: (L) Who built Stonehenge?
A: Druids.
Q: (L) Who were the Druids?
A: Early Aryan group.
Since the C’s said that Stonehenge was built in 8,000 BC, this suggests that the Druid priesthood had a much older pedigree than mainstream historians believe. The C’s also told Laura that the terms "Celts, Druids, etc..." were merely latter-day designations for Atlanteans. Does this suggest that the Druids, who are inextricably associated with the Celts, may have had antecedents in Atlantis who may have been a scientific and philosophical priesthood such as the Sons of Belial? If so, did they have a presence on Mars as well?
Given that the Druids of Stonehenge chose to build a stone circle for energy collection rather than a pyramid, does this suggest they had a different philosophical backcloth to the pyramid builders of Egypt for example? If so, was it their Atlantean ancestors who were responsible for building Marshenge and the other stone circles still visible on Mars? We also know from the C’s that the Celts were engaged in a nuclear war with the Paranthas (fellow Atlanteans) that took place on the Indian sub-continent around 50,000 years ago as recalled in Vedic literature. However, this time period also ties in with the Atlantean colonisation of Mars and the building of the Monuments of Mars. As I have mentioned before, Dr John Brandenberg, a former NASA scientist, has produced evidence to show that there was atomic warfare on Mars at one time. Could the war between the Atlantean Celts and the Paranthas on Earth have spread to Mars? If so, it might make sense of the cartoonist artist
Jack Kirby’s imagining of a war on Mars in his comic strip story
The Face on Mars (see my recent post:
Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucians) that saw the former Martian civilisation which constructed the Face on Mars destroyed save that in reality it was not a fight between hostile aliens and giant-sized Martians as he depicted but a conflict between Atlantean Celts and Paranthas. It is interesting to note here that the C’s confirmed in the latest session (21 September 2024) that the Atlanteans stood on average 7ft tall, which by modern standards would make them virtually giants. Indeed, those born on Mars with its lower gravity may well have been taller still.
So, was Marshenge and other stone circles constructed on Mars the work of the Atlantean ancestors of the Celts? If so, were the people responsible for these structures the predecessors of the Druid priesthood? Whatever, the case may be, there is no doubt that there is a whole chapter of our history waiting to be discovered by the first humans who set foot on Mars, which hopefully is an event that will take place in the near future.
When I was a young boy, I well remember the excitement generated by the Americans landing on the Moon. Indeed, I recall looking up at the Moon one night and saying to my rocket engineer father how incredible it was to think that there were humans standing on the Moon at that same moment. Sadly, the exploration impetus that had taken mankind to the Moon fizzled out in the early 1970’s and the advent of near-Earth space stations and the American shuttle orbiter flights never really captured the imagination in the same way. If time permits, and World War III or cometary oblivion does not destroy us in the meantime, it would be wonderful to see Elon Musk succeed in sending the first manned mission to Mars. And if Musk’s first Martian explorers do make it, I hope they include an archaeologist among their ranks for they will have their work cut out for them.
Here is a flavour of what they may find there:
). It may also interest you to know that I live in a horseshoe valley at the end of which once stood a Neolithic stone circle, now almost completely vanished as the stones got in the way of the farmers and were thus removed or repositioned over time.
