Re: BREAKING NEWS: Attack on queen beatrix on queens day.
latest news from: _http://www.depers.nl/binnenland/303913/Drama-Apeldoorn-eist-vijfde-dode.html
Five people dead. Thirteen are wounded, three of which are children. Five of the wounded are in critical condition, of which three are aformentioned children. The offender is supposed to have said his action was meant against the Dutch royal family, to the police man that spoke to him just after it happened. Supposedly he tried to hit their bus with his car. No explosives were found in his car.
The Dutch MSM are also touting the line that it was a deliberate assault on the Dutch royal family.
I haven't been following the news all day and started watching some news videos about this story online couple of hours ago. The first thing I noticed was this: A lot of innocent bystanders wounded or killed, live on television with millions watching, in an "attempt at attacking the royal family". A lot of planned festivities for Queens day (a national holiday with a lot of celebrating) canceled all over Holland. The msm all over it, a lot of emotionally laden news coverage on the tv, shocking images included. But what no one seems to realize is that the "attack" is just one of the worst planned attacks ever! I mean what's the point in driving a normal everyday car at high speed and aiming it at a big open bus with the Dutch royals sitting in it, when all of them are sitting one and a half meters above the ground? He didn't have any explosives in the car, so what damage could he have done to the Dutch royals when he would have hit their bus? As far as I can tell, not very much. Its like trying to drive into someone who's at the upper floor of a double-decker bus using a normal every day car. It's just not ever going to work, simply because your car is too low. You would need a ramp, or a bigger vehicle.
See the following pictures:
The perpetrator vehicle crashed into a statue. Notice that it's just a normal road car (more precisely, a Suzuki Swift):
The bus with royals after the "attack". Notice the height of the vehicle:
I mean it just doesn't make any sense.
Another thing I noticed was Dutch 'security expert' Ger van der Veen on RTL4 television who said the following:
Ger van der Veen said:
Ja, we hebben gezien dat er voor het eerst eigenlijk in deze vorm een aanslag is gepleegd op het koninklijk huis. Een aanslag die eigenlijk vrij snel duidelijk werd gezien alle informatie die binnen kwam, een aanslag die nog veel ernstiger had kunnen aflopen als waarschijnlijk de auto niet bij de eerste afzetting zodanig beschadigd is dat ie eigenlijk rechtuit op de naald is gereden. Maar als ie natuurlijk op, eh, de koers had kunnen vervolgen die hij had willen doen gezien alle informatie die we krijgen over draaiboeken enzovoort, ja dan hadden we een frontale botsing gezien met de bus van het koninklijk huis met alle gevolgen van dien.
(emphasis mine)
Knowing that the perpetrator is in critical condition in the hospital and cannot be interrogated by the police, I wonder what he meant by 'draaiboeken', which translates to 'scripts' in English. Using the word 'scenarios' would be far more appropriate, and he does use that word later on in the interview. Could this be a possible slip of the tongue? Was there a script?
The video with the interview can be viewed by opening this page: _http://www.rtl.nl/components/actueel/rtlnieuws/index_video.xml and then clicking on the link that says "Voor het eerst aanslag op 30-04-2009"
A quick search on 'security expert' Ger van der Veen resulted in quite an interesting article about him:
_http://www.volkskrant.nl/archief_gratis/article874750.ece/De_Rampenconsumentenman (sorry, again in Dutch)
It's perhaps telling that some people consider him an ordinary swindler.
To me there are more questions than answers at this point, but I surely smell a rat.
