Batman US cinema shooting: Fourteen dead in Denver

Eboard10 said:
herrnimrod said:
This is some very bad acting. Looks like another fake psyop.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbNlm7lEmEE
Click to expand...

Oh my! If you watch the video at minute 1:56 it looks like someone is holding a board for the "witness" to see. I doubt it was done to cover his face from the sun!
Click to expand...
Could have been a bounce card, used to illuminate the subject by bouncing light (as explained at: _http://www.cybercollege.com/tvp034.htm). I'm not saying either way, just trying to point out alternative explanations.

Regarding the "just for the record" statement, this could certainly be a clue of a staged event. But it could also be someone who was incensed at hearing someone earlier saying there were more than one shooter when his experience dictated otherwise. I'd be pretty frustrated and would want to set the record straight if I heard people saying things that completely contradicted my experience.

Throwing in $0.02, fwiw,
Gonzo
 
Gonzo said:
Could have been a bounce card, used to illuminate the subject by bouncing light (as explained at: _http://www.cybercollege.com/tvp034.htm). I'm not saying either way, just trying to point out alternative explanations.

Regarding the "just for the record" statement, this could certainly be a clue of a staged event. But it could also be someone who was incensed at hearing someone earlier saying there were more than one shooter when his experience dictated otherwise. I'd be pretty frustrated and would want to set the record straight if I heard people saying things that completely contradicted my experience.

Throwing in $0.02, fwiw,
Gonzo
Click to expand...

Having looked at the video again, I think it might have actually been used to cover the witness from the sunlight :/ If you look carefully at the interviewee, it seems that the board is acting as a cover as sunlight passes below it. My bad.

On the lone gunman issue, I just find it hard to believe that he would come out with that statement with such certainty. IMO, the way someone communicates a message should be given as much importance as the actual message being conveyed, especially in this kind of situation.
 
Eboard10 said:
Gonzo said:
Could have been a bounce card, used to illuminate the subject by bouncing light (as explained at: _http://www.cybercollege.com/tvp034.htm). I'm not saying either way, just trying to point out alternative explanations.

Regarding the "just for the record" statement, this could certainly be a clue of a staged event. But it could also be someone who was incensed at hearing someone earlier saying there were more than one shooter when his experience dictated otherwise. I'd be pretty frustrated and would want to set the record straight if I heard people saying things that completely contradicted my experience.

Throwing in $0.02, fwiw,
Gonzo
Click to expand...

Having looked at the video again, I think it might have actually been used to cover the witness from the sunlight :/ If you look carefully at the interviewee, it seems that the board is acting as a cover as sunlight passes below it. My bad.

On the lone gunman issue, I just find it hard to believe that he would come out with that statement with such certainty. IMO, the way someone communicates a message should be given as much importance as the actual message being conveyed, especially in this kind of situation.
Click to expand...

Yep, 'specially when you want to convince everyone of the spin.

Imagine a conversation with someone and they look at you with disgust and outrage for even thinking that he was acting, Just because of the nature of the event. That is Exactly the type of manipulation that TPB plays on the human psyche. It's sickening.

I'd be more than be happy to eat my hat however. I do not know enough about the effects of traumatized individuals, but the emotions on show just came across as very unconvincing.
 
Don't know what to make of these 3 links but just thought I should share the info I have come across. Don't want to speculate, have no clue if this stuff is true or false

http://www.wkyc.com/news/article/252995/22/Witness-thinks-someone-let-gunman-inside-Colorado-movie-theater-

http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/252061.html

http://66.90.101.64/DHS-FBI-Bulletin-Terrorist-attack-theaters.pdf
 
Regarding the person who thought someone let the shooter in through a side door, there might be another explanation for what they saw. In one news story, we were told the shooter purchased a ticket for the show and went into the theatre. He then went out the side door, propped it open, and returned shortly after with his protective gear and weapons. Source: http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/12-dead-58-injured-in-colorado-theatre-massacre-1.886248

So, that witness may have actually seen the actual shooter leave to gather his armaments, not an accomplice. Of course, this story could also be a plant.

Gonzo
 
I think it would be interesting to see what the C's say about this.
 
anart said:
There was a report very early on that his mom told the police that they had the right person. http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/news/national/colorado-shooters-mother-says-shes-not-surprised-WPTV1342795383692
Click to expand...

Strangely, the article does not give us a reason WHY she said this.
 
Posting the relevant bit from the latest session

(L) Well… Ugh... Okay, what about this crazy shooting? Now the weird thing about this shooting is that it happened in Aurora, Colorado. It was at a movie about Batman, and part of the title of the movie was the word "Knight". It was committed by somebody getting their PhD in neuroscience. So four of those items have direct relations to things that are close to our work. So, it got our attention. Perhaps it was just to get our attention to get a question about it, but it just really is totally and completely weird.

A: We believe we have already mentioned "Greenbaum programming"? Yes? {Which is, essentially MKUltra.}
Click to expand...
 
Laura said:
anart said:
There was a report very early on that his mom told the police that they had the right person. http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/news/national/colorado-shooters-mother-says-shes-not-surprised-WPTV1342795383692
Click to expand...

Strangely, the article does not give us a reason WHY she said this.
Click to expand...
The mother is claiming her words were twisted:
Mother of Colorado shooting suspect James Holmes says her words were twisted
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9422146/Mother-of-Colorado-shooting-suspect-James-Holmes-says-her-words-were-twisted.html

Gonzo
 
Gonzo said:
The mother is claiming her words were twisted:
Mother of Colorado shooting suspect James Holmes says her words were twisted
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9422146/Mother-of-Colorado-shooting-suspect-James-Holmes-says-her-words-were-twisted.html
Click to expand...

That actually makes sense.
 
Or possibly if he was mind controlled - maybe the self destructive alter was triggered, and now its integrated with his more sane concious. He actually looks partially reflective to me. Especially looking at the response to being told he was a murderer - watch his eyes. The vibe im getting is "WTF have i done" , but x 1000000000000000000000000000.

Edited - Added 1 line.
 
melatonin said:
Or possibly if he was mind controlled - maybe the self destructive alter was triggered, and now its integrated with his more sane concious. He actually looks partially reflective to me. The vibe im getting is "WTF have i done" , but x 1000000000000000000000000000.
Click to expand...

When you say that the self destructive alter was triggered, do you mean it was done consciously as part of a plan or was it accidental? IMO, I would rule out the latter as the whole event seems to have been planned for some time given all the weapons that he possessed as well as the possibility that more than one person was involved as described by several witnesses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom