Being afraid: More and more people are seeing terror-threats everywhere

Gawan

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
It seems fear is spreading all over the globe. (Sorry many links are in German). Either people are seeing a gun instead of a microphone, making there minds up that hotel guests could be terrorists and that they heard something suspicious, or a woman stated that she was raped by one refugee (which was a total lie and nothing happened) or today a teacher in Paris claimed that he was attacked with a knife by a man and the culprit said "this is Daesh", which was also just made up and nothing happened.

To me it seems if something is boiling all over the world and it just needs another spark to blow everything up.
 
Gawan said:
It seems fear is spreading all over the globe. (Sorry many links are in German). Either people are seeing a gun instead of a microphone, making there minds up that hotel guests could be terrorists and that they heard something suspicious, or a woman stated that she was raped by one refugee (which was a total lie and nothing happened) or today a teacher in Paris claimed that he was attacked with a knife by a man and the culprit said "this is Daesh", which was also just made up and nothing happened.

To me it seems if something is boiling all over the world and it just needs another spark to blow everything up.

I've noticed in interactions with people that some are vocalising they are feeling more scared. Little reminders like train announcements to report suspicion add to the tension. I don't know think blow everything up would serve much purpose but more just increasing pressure to facilitate compliance and obediance as presented here on Transmarginal inhibition. Laura's description was written at the time of George Bush and development of a "GITMO for all" environment. As you've presented this Gawan, this war on the people shows no signs of abating.

She does end reassuringly:
So, ya'll hang in there and take some time off now and then to have some fun. And if you understand the tricks they are playing, it will make it a bit easier to cope.
 
Gawan said:
To me it seems if something is boiling all over the world and it just needs another spark to blow everything up.

Geeze, it seems like it's that way all the time! I can't remember when the world didn't seem on fire and ready to explode. Maybe before the Ukraine coup? Either way, I agree that the world is crazy. I hear the people at work talk about muslims and closing the borders, and I being to understand just what Sebastian Haffner was talking about in his book Defying Hitler. Seems like here in the US we're slowly moving toward a Nazi reality. You see it happening, you are powerless to stop it. All you can do is keep your own understanding to yourself so you don't get locked up. Nice world those reality-creators in Washington have made for us...
 
Theseus said:
I've noticed in interactions with people that some are vocalising they are feeling more scared. Little reminders like train announcements to report suspicion add to the tension. I don't know think blow everything up would serve much purpose but more just increasing pressure to facilitate compliance and obediance as presented here on Transmarginal inhibition. Laura's description was written at the time of George Bush and development of a "GITMO for all" environment.

Thanks for reminding me of that post. I think it's time to rework it into a sott article for wider readership.
 
Laura said:
Theseus said:
I've noticed in interactions with people that some are vocalising they are feeling more scared. Little reminders like train announcements to report suspicion add to the tension. I don't know think blow everything up would serve much purpose but more just increasing pressure to facilitate compliance and obediance as presented here on Transmarginal inhibition. Laura's description was written at the time of George Bush and development of a "GITMO for all" environment.

Thanks for reminding me of that post. I think it's time to rework it into a sott article for wider readership.

Excellent idea. This is crucial information for people to understand how they are being manipulated. Events create an atmosphere where public become less likely to protest: e.g.Today the UK parliament pushed through unwelcome Fracking relaxation laws "Fracking under national parks backed by MPs" _http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35107203

The scale of the global emotional control is staggering and facilitated by increasing global events from sporting events even popular TV shows e.g ‘Game of Thrones’ simulcast in 173 countries sets record _http://www.irishexaminer.com/world/game-of-thrones-simulcast-in-173-countries-sets-record-351376.html

Social media dances the same tune e.g How to remove French flag from Facebook:
Users complain there's no easy way to return profile pictures to normal: The site added a tool to put the filter over existing photos – though removing the red, white and blue colour isn’t as simple
_http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/how-to-remove-french-flag-from-facebook-users-complain-about-having-no-easy-way-to-turn-profile-a6744566.html

The scientific global conditioning tools being utilised is terrifying. :scared:

edit, by odd coincidence just having radio on in the background some good ideas how this will develop is being discussed on 'Free Thinking' _http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06rwvrc 45 mins long on
"Tonight, Philip Dodd and guests reflect on safe cities, past and present - on how literature, technology, law and social engineering imagine safety and its absence in cities - and whether safe cities are in the end an oxymoron.

Philip is joined by senior urban fellow at LSE Cities, Adam Greenfield, writer Beatrix Campbell, criminologist Peter Fussey, director of The Runnymede Trust Omar Khan, and historian of London Jerry White, who will be discussing Joseph Conrad's terrorist novel, The Secret Agent."

With supporting article " The truth about smart cities: ‘In the end, they will destroy democracy'

The smart city is, to many urban thinkers, just a buzzphrase that has outlived its usefulness: ‘the wrong idea pitched in the wrong way to the wrong people’. So why did that happen – and what’s coming in its place?"
_http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/dec/17/truth-smart-city-destroy-democracy-urban-thinkers-buzzphrase

And Jeebus!: just realising that the plans for Global Gitmo are being implemented as we speak!

[Mod: deactivated link]
 
If I may say so, these hints produced ample fruits:

http://www.sott.net/article/308630-Knowledge-and-Freedom-Antidote-to-the-rising-fascism

Thanks Laura. :thup:
 
Thank you for this discussion, and to Laura for the article linked from above. This also serves as a reminder to keep doing the breathing exercises for stress relief, and following the diet.

Be careful out there, everyone! (Has anyone else noticed an increase of eratic drivers lately?)

I liked the comment below Laura's article about kindness too, and will certainly keep that in mind.
 
Palinurus said:
If I may say so, these hints produced ample fruits:

http://www.sott.net/article/308630-Knowledge-and-Freedom-Antidote-to-the-rising-fascism

Thanks Laura. :thup:

The following written of Laura can be a good complement to her article:
If you have read Secret History, you will know that I have tracked many of the core ideas back to a form of ancient shamanism of the Central Siberian kind though even that was a corruption of what had existed before. My concern was to find the "religion before the Fall" (assuming there was a "fall") and to understand what is was the was behind the obviously unified and stupendous society that created the megalithic culture.

I found traces of these ancient beliefs in Christianity but what we know about it has been so corrupted by Judaism that it takes some time and care to extract the elements.

The archaeological record shows that, once upon a time, human beings lived in peace and harmony. The megalithic cultures of the British Isles, Europe, and elsewhere, shared a common culture. The megalithic civilization lasted longer than the Anglo-Saxons, the Roman Empire, and the British Empire combined. Archaeologists have pointed out that for the megalithic people to have repeatedly been mobilized en masse to work on their incredibly vast construction projects, there must have been some central authority coordinating things. Yet, from the evidence left behind, there does not seem to be any principal city or citadel. There were only individual settlements of roughly equivalent size. These settlements didn’t even have the impressive monuments built within them. The largest and most impressive megalithic structures were well away from the communities where their builders lived.

The most remarkable aspect of the megalithic culture is that it repeatedly absorbed different ethnic groups peacefully century after century. The arrival of the different groups has led archaeologists to divide the megalithic culture into three sub-phases. Throughout these periods, the same lifestyle, monument building traditions and methods endured and were repeatedly invigorated peacefully.

Megalithic settlements remained constantly small, averaging between one hundred and three hundred people. This alone is strange considering the mammoth constructions these people executed! Even in the most densely populated areas, there were concentrations of small villages rather than big towns.

Dwellings were built of timber and/or stone and were often set in pits with only the roof above ground. This was excellent insulation against both heat and cold. The megalithic people raised sheep, cattle, pigs, had domesticated dogs, and grew wheat, barley, rye, oats and beans.

At least twice, the megalithic civilization in the British Isles which, itself, originally consisted of two different ethnic groups, absorbed a mass influx of more technologically advance peoples. This brought more sophistication to their lives, but the culture endured. The settlements continued to be small and the mode of living was adopted by the newcomers. Whatever belief system existed then, it must have been widespread and/or persuasive. More than that, it was peaceful. Throughout this two thousand year period, there is no evidence of war or conflict. The very fact that the megalithic people continued to live in small, undefended villages, rather than banding together for protection, is evidence that they did not live in fear.

Additionally, though some more elaborate tombs indicate that certain individuals had a higher status in their society, there is no evidence of kings or a central government of any kind. Whatever it was that bound the megalithic people together, it does not seem to have been politics. Of course, politics and military power are not the only things that can bind people together in harmony as modern day theorists propose. There is also religion. But we know that religion can be as divisive as politics and military force. Christianity dominated the Western world only through bloodshed and intolerance. The same is true regarding Islam and Judaism and the Hindu kingdoms of India.

So, if it wasn’t politics, the sword, or religion, what was it? What was it that cemented the fabric of megalithic society?

I propose that it was knowledge of reality and how to live in harmony with that reality. And that knowledge must have included a deep understanding of hyperdimensional realities and how to live in harmony with that as well.

Another question is: what brought this almost global peace to an end?

Because, at a certain point in time, the last of the megalithic monuments was built – construction abruptly ceased. Instead, stone walls began to be built around settlements throughout the British Isles. Settlements quickly became larger, defendable forts were built throughout the megalithic world and purpose made weapons were made. The long-standing custom of interring the dead in burial mounds was suddenly abandoned in favor of cremation. Thousands of years of peace were at an end and human beings suddenly entered an age of violence that has continued to this very day.


All of these things have been on my mind a lot lately as I have tediously combed through the archaeology and hints and clues left by the ancients in myth and religions. It is in this context that the Cs announced recently:

Citation de: Cs session 30 May 2009

Q: (L) What's next?

A: How about "Paleochristianity"?

Q: (laughter) (L) Well since you brought it up... (J) You should respond with, "Now that's an interesting question!" (laughter) (L) What do you mean by Paleochristianity? (laughter) (L) Would you define Paleochristianity for us?

A: The knowledge of realms that all men comprehended before the "fall".

Q: (L) Why is it called Christianity? Isn't Christianity strictly related to Christianity as we know it?

A: Oh no! The word was co-opted and everything you know of as Christianity is distorted. For example, the earliest "Christ" was a woman.

Q: (L) Okay. Were the Bogomils and the Cathars - as I have surmised - close to understanding this original reality?

A: They had some very close approximations, but they were still influenced by many of the distorted religious ideas of the time.

Q: (L) Okay, what is the importance of Paleochristianity?

A: The only hope for the survival of your realm and species.

Q: (L) In what sense do you mean that?

A: Unification of aim: survival and avoidance of the destruction hanging over your heads as a consequence of the machinations of psychopathy.


Citation de: Evolutionary1 le juin 25, 2009, 01:34:57 am

Not to mention, I too, have a tendency to "make things my own" by collecting and combining portions of various belief systems in response to the often conflicting religious and philosophical interpretations of how things are.
________

That's all fine and good and we are all about individuality. In fact, Gurdjieff's description of the Esoteric Circle emphasizes individuality. But there is something about objectivity that just is what it is. Our society has been so influenced by Post Modernism and "I create my own reality" that individuality has come to mean little more than "If I wanna believe it, that makes it so." Few people stop to really consider the pathology of such a position.

In the same session quoted, the Cs also made the following remark:

Citation de: Cs

Q: (L) In other words, there's no hope for our planet or our species if normal human beings do not come together and get over these varied pathological belief systems and religions and "your truth" and "my truth" and all that sort of thing?

A: Yes. All of that was created and spread by pathological types under the influence of their hyperdimensional masters for the purpose of turning this planet into a "hell on earth" with them as the masters. They have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. What is needed is for many people to begin to make direct connections with their higher centers. This has been done via the "work" up to now, but there are other methods to accelerate the process and obtain the needed assistance.


Some further considerations about "individuality" as a twist on reality were addressed in the thread about the May 30 session, but I'll include it here since it is appropriate (again) to the discussion.

Let me try to explain with a little help from psychologist John Schumaker who wrote a nifty little book entitled "Wings of Illusion" about the human tendency to hide from reality and make up beliefs in saviors and so on.

First, let's establish what reality is. Primary reality is reality as it would present itself if only information and data was available. This is raw data with no critical or analytical thinking. It is reality that is uncorrupted by analysis and thinking. It has not been modified, translated, or otherwise distorted.

Consider the squirrel. With no bias from higher order thinking, the reality of a squirrel is stable. Things are "as they are," so to say. An acorn is always something to eat or to stick in holes. The squirrel doesn't think about why it does that, but later in the winter, it turns out to be handy that all those acorns got stuck in holes.

In the absence of any rational, analytical mechanism to misinterpret acorns, squirrels never have acorn gods and never develop acorn phobias. When another squirrel dies, decomposes and disappears, the remaining squirrels have no ability to alter the empirical data ... the dead squirrel is gone. The reality of the squirrel does not permit a squirrel heaven or happy acorn ground of an afterlife. Because of its brain design, the squirrel is prevented from interpreting empirical data which is its only access to reality.

Human beings, on the other hand, possess something that can automatically banish them from reality. Human beings, in all cultures, construct realities for themselves that are not empirical. Under the influence of pathology, these realities are irrational and false. Socrates frequently began his speeches by imploring his listeners not to be angry with him if he tells them the truth. Socrates definitely knew that falsehoods and errors envelop the human mind.

What is shocking is the astonishing human capacity to tolerate beliefs that make fools of our brains. The surprising fact about human beings is that a belief does not have to be true in order to be believed. Most of the belief systems that generations of humans have lived by and died for are in fact patently false. Yet they were held with deep conviction and fervor. Fads and fallacies, delusions and fantasies, are so numerous in human history that they constitute the very fabric of our existence. Human culture is comprised of castles in the air that are products of our imagination and yearning in the face of a cold, cruel and forbidding reality.

The universality of the distortion of reality is a reaction against pathology. Finding order and meaning in life is a powerful human drive - the drive that can lead us to deep reality, to higher spheres. Reality, after pathology moved in and took it over, became so unpleasant, that this drive for order and meaning was subverted.

At the same time, the human being is quite capable of arriving at reliable knowledge. It is within our capabilities to process incoming information in order that our mental constructions correspond to reality.


Now, let's consider personal reality.

For the squirrel, the personal reality and the primary reality overlap exactly. This is because the squirrel doesn't have the ability to translate and then re-translate incoming information.

To a human being, on the other hand, acorns can be little bombs planted by aliens, or the source of powerful magic, or just an acorn. Many options are open to human beings that are not there for the squirrel. Why do humans avail themselves of these optional interpretations? All things being equal, it is done for purposes of social, psychological and physical survival.

The reality of human beings almost never overlaps completely with primary reality. It is "interpreted" for better or worse. This is true in normal as well as abnormal individuals. These interpretations can be delusional or they can be paths to DEEP reality. DEEP REALITY may, indeed, reveal that acorns are little bombs planted by aliens or the source of powerful magic (not probable, but all possibilities have to be kept open when assessing empirical observations). But one cannot GET TO that deep reality without first being able to face Primary Reality without flinching. One MUST have data and that data must not be skewed.

Human personal reality is FULL of errors when using primary reality, raw data, as the criterion.

The question is: why do humans do this?

The probable answer is that it is a response to emotionally terrifying facets of existence in this world.

The human brain has the ability to:

1) selectively perceive its environment,
2) selectively process information,
3) selectively store memories,
4) selectively disengage from already stored memories, and
5) selectively replace dissociated data with more "user-friendly " data.

These abilities empower human beings to regulate their reality. It's like a thermostat.

So, personal reality is defined by its deviation from primary reality even if it partially overlaps. Personal reality is Empirical reality + or - whatever empirically unjustified modifications have been made.

Ernest Rossi, an Ericksonian hypnotherapist, estimated that at least 80 percent of the information contained in the human mind is false. What makes this estimate remarkable is that Rossi was referring to the vast amount of error that is accumulated not as a result of any kind of hypnosis, but just during the normal waking life of the individual.

Remember, we are not talking about an animal with insufficient brain power to get things right. We are dealing with the creature with the most highly developed cerebral cortex known. Despite our cerebral talents, the mental world of the human being is most often at odds with the true nature of things. Not only that, but we will fight to preserve what is false. We are able to do this while, at the same time, apprehending SOME areas of our reality with astonishing precision!

Whatever the actual extent of our cognitive errors, we need to remember that the generation of these errors is a result of complex cerebral processes that work to safeguard the integrity of the entire nervous system. We aren't doing this "on purpose," so to say.

Next, there is the Cultural Reality. The reality of the individual is, to a great extent, the result of constructions that are fabricated and propagated by culture. Cultural reality is the constellation of externally delivered suggestions that are normalized on the basis of group endorsement.

One central function of any workable culture is to offer mental constructions of reality that are erroneous in relation to empirical reality. Culture is the central bank of cognitive distortion. Ernest Becker described culture as a "macro-lie".

Mental health is assessed by psychologists and psychiatrists as a person's ability to "perceive reality accurately." And, of course, they mean the socially accepted reality! In short, a considerable amount of insanity, in the sense of being out of touch with reality, is requisite to be diagnosed as mentally healthy! (This tells us a lot about the pathological state of psychology and psychiatry.)

Scholars throughout the ages have described empirical reality in terms so noxious that humans must somehow defend themselves from it. The average humans' distaste for the facts of life has been recorded since writing began.

Over the past decades, researchers have tested hypotheses that people do generate transformations or distortions of reality prophylactically. The results of these studies all point to the remarkably consistent tendencies of all human beings to self-deception, illusion and other biases about reality.

In short, it seems that reality is "too strong" for most humans to tolerate.

Several studies dealt with the "illusion of self-control". That is, the illusion that individuals possess environmental or situational control that they do not have in actuality. Several experiments have shown that the illusion of control is inversely related to depression. That is, depressed people are less adept than nondepressed people at generating such illusions. This particular category of illusion appears to insulate people from depression. One can reduce depression by imposing on reality "alterations" that are illusory.

Studies of self-consciousness, or self-insight and self-awareness show that people who rate high in these aspects are less inclined to resort to denial and self-deception. As it turns out, this self-consciousness correlates with negative emotional states. Increasing the apprehension of reality, both internal and external, can precipitate negative emotional responses.

The problem with reality is that it makes no sense. Terror is the normal emotional state for someone in full view and bearing the full psychic brunt of reality.

So, obviously, the ability to create and believe in illusions can make a person more functional.

But, here's the problem. When psychopaths use the human tendency - ability to dissociate to make them believe in illusions that are beneficial to the psychopaths - it always and inevitably is to the detriment of the person engaged in the illusion.

We are unquestionably creatures of genius, but we are engaged in actions, as a society, of such stupidity that our own survival is in jeopardy.

The question is, can we wake up in time?

Can we figure out what really works and the scientific basis of that practice? Can we marry science to mysticism?

That is the perspective of the Cs: PRIMARY REALITY combined with DEEP REALITY.

It takes some getting used to.

Citation de: Evolutionary1 le juin 25, 2009, 01:34:57 am

I suppose it is a belief that if I do not "reinterpret" something into my own language, I have not done the work necessary to "get it." I still think this is a useful approach to integrating knowledge, but I see how this belief has often led me to do things the hard, long way--re-doing what's already done well--when it was not necessary and I certainly want to conserve my energy!
____

It can also be an effect of pathological Post Modernist thinking. Two very useful books on this topic are Ernest Gellner's "The Psychotherapeutic Movement" and "Postemodernism, Reason and Religion." On the topic of how pathology has spearheaded the ideas that we all create our own reality, have a look at Psychopath Humanoids - Beyond Insanity.

Citation de: Evolutionary1 le juin 25, 2009, 01:34:57 am

Though I do my best to eliminate wishful thinking, having others shed light on one of my oldest patterns and beliefs has given me a lot to think about (as usual) and for that I am very grateful. Thank you for taking the time, all of you, to respond.
____

As the Cs said, again from the May 30 session:

Citation de: Cs Session

(L) Okay. What is the most essential thing for us to know about Paleochristianity, about what people need to know?

A: People need to know about pathology as you call it. In former times it was often referred to as demonic possession. In some cases, they were right.

Q: (L) But clearly not in all cases, and that needs to made absolutely clear because there are some people who are just sick.

A: Yes. Hyperdimensional influences are often the cause of pathology. This can be due to influences at this level of reality including dietary and nurture.

Q: (L) Okay, what else?

A: Just as detoxing the body can lead to abundant health, so can detoxing the mind and environment lead to abundant life and happiness for all. But as was the "fall", it must be a group decision and the differences and pathological blocks to objective understanding must be removed.

Q: (L) In other words, there's no hope for our planet or our species if normal human beings do not come together and get over these varied pathological belief systems and religions and "your truth" and "my truth" and all that sort of thing?

A: Yes. All of that was created and spread by pathological types under the influence of their hyperdimensional masters for the purpose of turning this planet into a "hell on earth" with them as the masters. They have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.


I already mentioned John Keel's book "Operation Trojan Horse" - a useful read at this point for everyone. Just remember that STS/entropic forces are the source of division and confusion. Remember the Biblical story of the Tower of Babel... it wasn't a "good" god that created that confusion despite the perspective of Judaism which is a distillation of patrism which is anti-female and advocates the torture of children. Those are also core characteristics of psychopathology.

We need to identify all the threads and tendrils of pathology that wind their way through our thinking, strangling and twisting and distorting our vision and our emotions. It's difficult because it's been a part of our Western culture for over 2000 years. We cut our teeth on those ideas and it's hard to get outside of them. But it can be done. We can open our eyes and see, open our ears and hear, and have our hearts cleansed so that we can truly love and BE individuals who all see the same Truth.
Also
It is true that I have, as the Cs described it, " literally turned the world upside down in search of the greatest truths for all of humanity, much to her potential peril" but I also STILL rely on my network for feedback. I am pretty convinced that, even if I act as a sort of "Big Sister" and "trail blazer," I don't have the whole banana without help. Any person who gets to the point that they think they have it all sussed out and don't need honest mirroring from others to prevent falling into the pit of hubris will, most definitely, fall into that pit!

Human beings were only able to evolve because of social ties. Trusting others seems to be an evolutionary strategy that served us well for a long time. In that evolutionary struggle, man was opposed to a "natural enemy," the environment and all it contained. All he had was his bigger brain to compensate for his smaller strength and speed; and, of course, his network.

Nowadays, we are no longer opposed to the natural world out there as the sparring partner, we are opposed to a culture that has been slowly infiltrated and taken over by pathologicals. At the same time, this outer world that has been shaped by pathology, also represents a certain pathological state within normal humans - their lack of ability to see pathology in individuals that look like themselves - an intra-species predator. Humanity's failure to perceive this, to adapt, means that our inner world, taken into us from the outside by means of identification, has become an "independent power" which, in its turn, by means of projection, is our own creation. After all, it is normal humans, not pathologicals, who have the real power to "create reality" as a group. Pathologicals only influence us - mostly women - to believe certain things are the norm, and we then act as they pull our strings.

This outer reality which has such a powerful influence on the formation of our character and the focusing of our creativity, has become a power itself and we are being challenged to become "new beings" that can evolutionarily adapt to this changing situation. Either we become fully pathological, in which case there will be no stress (the STS route), or we return to our roots taking with us the knowledge of the new "opponent" that will enable us to rebuild our social bonds and structures and survive through the massive changes that are ahead of us.

Because, realistically, even if no cataclysmic scenario of any external kind manifests, anybody with two neurons firing can see that we are most definitely heading straight into a "clash of civilizations" though it is not at all what is being touted. It is a clash of normal humans with pathologicals and right now, they have all the assets (which they have by trickery, cunning, cheating). Even the mildest scenario of the future is not pleasant to contemplate: Climate Change and its effects on humanity. It's not a pretty picture.

This principle that the inner world is taken in from the outside by means of identification, and then, in its turn, by way of projection, alters the external world so that it corresponds to the inner world even more closely, requires some serious thought. Basically, we have to bootstrap ourselves out of here by reverseing the process: we must create an inner world in the face of the opposition of the outer world, that then becomes strong enough, EN MASSE, to change the outer world.

The creative individual must be able to create and develop his standards beyond the identifications of the external pathological world. This means, in the simplest of terms, connecting with the higher self so that this part consciously guides and rules the creative will even in terms of the personality. The important factor here is that groups of individuals must get from here to there - here being the false personality created in us by the pathological external world, there being the merging with the higher self - by consciously choosing those factors that he will identify with.

This must be a group effort.

But, as we have seen in this thread - and elsewhere - language is all-important to that process. (Keeping in mind also that language is used to "create" the reality and control us.)

Language is another evolutionary thing; you need language to network so we might think that this ability has been wired into us as a consequence of evolutionary pressures and using language in some ways (like telling the truth) was evolutionarily adaptive in our history. But now, language is being used in ways it was not evolved to be used: to conceal truth and to create false images. This is one of the reasons that human beings are so stressed.

As I explained in the audio recording I made over the last couple of days to introduce the teaching of breathing techniques, stress is a worldwide epidemic. The number one disease of adults in the world is depression. Depression is the most extreme form of stress in your nervous system.

But here's the rub: stress response is vital for survival in times of danger. The problem comes when it is turned on too strong, too often.

The very fact that our stress response is doing this tells us that our bodies are telling us something about our world! There is DANGER out there, only it is hiding amongst us in the form of pathologicals! We are constantly in a state of stress because we are in a state of cognitive dissonance. We sense the danger, but we cannot SEE it because we have been programmed NOT to see it by lies and false reality constructs.

Getting back to the language problem: language can shape perception in ways that people are not aware of. Barbara Oakley, in her book "Evil Genes", points out that people who grow up speaking Chinese process mathematics in different areas of the brain than those who grow up speaking English. Both groups use the inferior parietal cortex, but Chinese speakers also use a visual processing areas, while English speakers use a language processing area.

This is important to know because it tells us something about the pathways in the brain that underlie some of the differences between Asians and Westerners in thought patterns. Different languages can cause anatomical differences in our brains. People who speak different languages literally see the world differently from one another.

That is larger scale effect between different languages.

There is a more subtle effect between individuals who speak the same language cause by different understandings of words and meanings. We've seen some examples of this in this very thread.

Language and culture act to structure the neurologically based lens that people use to perceive reality. Within a single language group, differences between people arise from family upbringing, religion, political persuasion, educatioal background, work experience, and so on. These all create different frames of reference.

James Surowiecki's book, The Wisdom of Crowds, suggests that multiple viewpoints from individuals with a wide range of backgrounds, rather than the restricted viewpoints of experts or specialists, are crucial in reaching informed decisions on complex topics. Oakley comments that getting input from a broad variety of people is like getting input from a wide variety of devices such as microscopes, telescopes, litmus paper, tensile testors, ultrasound devices, scales, and so on.

Here, of course, we are not talking about getting a lot of EMOTIONAL viewpoints, but rather perceptions and assessments of the shared, Primary Reality - what is REAL "out there". Even if we are agreeing that there is a real reality and it is what it is, no one of us has the all-encompassing way of perceiving that would give us the understanding of EVERY ASPECT of what is out there.

So, in this sense, the network itself is the Teacher.

But in order for a network to go anywhere and not just fall into entropy, there must be a direction and in that sense there must be a vanguard.


Vanguard: Etymology: Middle English vauntgard, from Anglo-French vantgarde, avantgarde, 1 : the troops moving at the head of an army 2 : the forefront of an action or movement.

It is also reflective of true evolutionary social activities that there are some who are trailblazers and others who support and "watch the back" of the trailblazers. Once the trail is blazed, and the destination is reached, the others not only benefit from the struggles of the trailblazer, they also set about organizing the details of the new environment and stabilizing it. So, everyone plays a role and if the network is tight, they all arrive pretty much together.

The bottom line is this: we are all in this mess together and we sink together, or we get our boat to harbor, but somebody's got to be the one who coordinates or we'll just go endlessly in circles, nobody will be bailing, paddling, or evaluating currents and signs to determine direction. I haven't been doing too bad at it, but I can't do it without data and help and there is no way I could gather all the data by myself, so the network is crucial in that respect also!

As I said, we evolved to trust one another - but that was a world where others were trustworthy. We live in a different world now. The cheaters in our world have evolved ways to induce us to trust them, but we can tell by our stress that we are going in the wrong direction, we are in mortal peril. But still, to get anything done at all, we MUST TRUST. And to figure out who to trust, we need to rely, again, on the network of observations from many observers. Again, we are not talking about getting a lot of EMOTIONAL viewpoints, but rather perceptions and assessments of the shared, Primary Reality - what is REAL "out there" and what really seems to work, to explain things, and has internal consistency over time.

Those who are able to accomplish this task of rebuilding social connections based on the new evolutionary standard of accounting for pathology in the equations, will evolve. Those who do not evolve will perish.

That's what I see from where I sit right now. United we stand, divided we fall. All for One and One for All.
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,12737.200.html

There's no freedom if we don't wake up before.
 
Thank you, zak, for compiling and sharing these additional excerpts. :cool2:

They explain once more why the human experiential cycle is inextricably interwoven with the cosmic plane and the hyper-dimensional realities, and how important therefore searching for the whole truth really is to enhance the chances of our survival.
 
Palinurus said:
Thank you, zak, for compiling and sharing these additional excerpts. :cool2:

They explain once more why the human experiential cycle is inextricably interwoven with the cosmic plane and the hyper-dimensional realities, and how important therefore searching for the whole truth really is to enhance the chances of our survival.

Yes, indeed. The excerpts are a great reminder. Thanks Zak :)
 
Even the Pope is voicing dramatic changes and chaos.

The Pope Says This Christmas Is A ‘Charade’ And That For Some People ‘It May Be Their Last’ (By Michael Snyder)
http://investmentwatchblog.com/the-pope-says-this-christmas-is-a-charade-and-that-for-some-people-it-may-be-their-last/

Pope Francis sure does say a lot of strange things. I don’t think that any other Pope throughout history has ever called Christmas a “charade” or has suggested that for many people this Christmas “may be their last”. What in the world would cause Pope Francis to adopt such an ominous tone? Without a doubt, the leader of the largest religious organization in the entire world would be privy to information that would not be available to ordinary people like you and I. Could it be possible that he is aware of something that is coming that is going to dramatically change life on this planet? What we do know is that our world is becoming increasingly unstable. World War III threatens to erupt in the Middle East at any time, the number of terror attacks around the globe continues to increase, earthquake activity continues to rise, giant cracks are opening up in the ground all over the world, and we are rapidly plunging into a brand new global financial crisis. There is certainly a lot to be concerned about, but what would make the Pope so glum that he would actually call Christmas a “charade”?

One of the primary reasons why the Pope is so down is all of the war that is going on all over the planet right now. It was in the context of talking about war that he made this recent statement about Christmas being “a charade”…

Pope Francis has declared in a sermon that Christmas this year will be a “charade” because “the whole world is at war”.

The pontiff’s speech at the Vatican came after terrorist attacks in France claimed the lives of 129 people; a Russian plane was bombed and dozens of people were killed in a double suicide attack in Lebanon.

Speaking during Mass at the Casa Santa Maria, he said: “We are close to Christmas. There will be lights, there will be parties, bright trees, even Nativity scenes – all decked out – while the world continues to wage war.”

“It’s all a charade. The world has not understood the way of peace. The whole world is at war.”

And what he has said is actually true. War and civil conflict are breaking out all over the planet, and all of this violence threatens to spiral out of control as we head into 2016.

[...]

If life is so great and everything is under control, then why are world leaders like Elon Musk and Pope Francis so seemingly obsessed with apocalyptic scenarios?

Could it be possible that everything is not really “under control”?

The truth, of course, is that most of us have a gut feeling that big trouble is on the horizon. Many of us may not know exactly what that trouble will consist of, and we may not be able to put our feelings into words, but deep inside most of us understand that the future is not bright.

So what should we do?

Is there anything that can be done?

Is it inevitable that humanity is facing a future of chaos and war?
 
Palinurus said:
If I may say so, these hints produced ample fruits:

http://www.sott.net/article/308630-Knowledge-and-Freedom-Antidote-to-the-rising-fascism

Thanks Laura. :thup:
An other good addition of Laura's article:
Everything is rotten in the state of Denmark...
But the "alienated person" is one who does not succumb to the system, the terrorists, the Matrix. To be alienated, in the terms of the SETI study, is to be FREE of Stockholm Syndrome. And this, of course, poses its own set of problems.

There can be no doubt that the alienated person, when they actively pursue the "lights" of alienation, do become exceptional and even eccentric. Most people follow rules that are made for them by others, communicated to them by traditions, shaped into fixed forms by imitation, and continued by force of habit. The alienated person does nothing of the kind.

For the alienated person, the perception of the world is not according to the rules of the Control System. And there is indeed something singularly "feverish" about such individuals that can be perceived as "nervous instability." They are generally geniuses and are often commemorated - posthumously, I should add - even though they generally have led discordant lives; and most likely they have suffered melancholy at some point in their career.

As a result of their struggles against the "system," driven by their inner light of resistance against external controls that they assess - most often objectively - as hostile, alienated people often suffer a great deal and in many ways. This suffering, instead of breaking them, builds in them a single pointed focus that would be viewed by the people who have sold out as obsessions and fixed ideas. This suffering may induce chemical changes in their physiology; they can fall into trances, hear voices, see visions, and manifest all kinds of peculiarities that are commonly classed as "pathological."

We cannot ignore these so-called pathological aspects. We must describe and name them. Even if the psyche recoils from such a laying bare of the causes from which a thing originates, we must still consider our passions and their properties.
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,2594.msg15772.html#top
 
Happening everywhere, although they have to work a lot harder in the antipodes to try to generate and maintain the fear level. What is happening is that there are quite a few people who are starting to question what is happening and smelling the abundant loads of horse poo that is being flung out. On the other hand, it has also made many people close their minds like a steel trap and reject anything other than the standard government generated illusion.

In this part of the world (New Zealand in particular) there is a healthy skepticism of politicians and their motives, which is helpful and is quite a barrier to the imposition of harsh totalitarian conditions. However that just means that the government is much more stealthy and low key in how they handle things. I recall recently when the government was rushing through legislation to allow government eavesdropping on citizens, which they had been doing illegally. One of the current affairs programs focused on this issue and were drumming up support for more open discussion and debate around the imposition of Big Brother controls. The PM when questioned about the unseemly haste to rush the legislation through, remarked that the average New Zealand er was much more interested in the size of the annual personal fish quota (which was also being debated at the same time, as a distraction), than in worrying about conspiracy theories, and that they were happy to leave these things to the government. That did upset a lot of people but in the end the legislation was rammed through anyway.

So, from my perspective, the attempt to generate and maintain high fear levels is opening doors for discussions on objective reality that were not possible 12 months ago.
 
Gawan said:
It seems fear is spreading all over the globe. (Sorry many links are in German). Either people are seeing a gun instead of a microphone, making there minds up that hotel guests could be terrorists and that they heard something suspicious, or a woman stated that she was raped by one refugee (which was a total lie and nothing happened) or today a teacher in Paris claimed that he was attacked with a knife by a man and the culprit said "this is Daesh", which was also just made up and nothing happened.

I don't know what prompts outright lies like the rape situation mentioned, but fear combined with pre-framed expectations does seem a powerful combination indeed!

I remember reading about situations staged in High School or University psychology classrooms to test the students' powers of observation under stress. The particular experiment in question concerned a fight and stabbing between two people. I don't recall whether the students were told anything about the experiments in advance, but after the staged event, students were requested to describe the assailants. Researchers were surprised to discover so many varied descriptions of exactly who had the knife and what it looked like. Thing is, the 'knife' was really a banana.

I can only imagine what's going on in the minds of those converting microphone stands into rifles and such, but as Flashgordonv suggests, maybe some of it can be turned into fruitful discussions in various places.
 
Back
Top Bottom