Biden-Harris Administration: The Empire Strikes Back

Sputniknews. Guess he needs all the help he can get. I wonder who decided he needed all the help he could get? It's... almost funny somehow.

US Tech Giants Censored Biden Criticism Over 640 Times Since He Took Office, Report Says

Apr. 25, 2022

Since the latest presidential election, Republicans have been given ample reason to suggest that Silicon Valley works 'hand in glove' with Democrats and the current administration in the United States.

More than 640 cases of major tech companies censoring criticism of President Joe Biden since March 2020 have been detected by the Media Research Center (MRC), a media watchdog group.

MRC's CensorTrack database, which tracks censorship of prominent political voices by major social media platforms, analyzed data over a 24-month period from March 2020 to March 2022.

According to the report, tech giants such as Facebook and Twitter attempted to manipulate informational space 646 times in a two-year cycle to maintain a more positive image of President Biden.


According to the MRC, the cases of “censorship” included “bans, deleted content and other speech restrictions placed on those who criticized Biden on social media over the past two years.”

Meanwhile, the censorship was said to greatly affect those who “dared to speak about any subject related to the New York Post bombshell Hunter Biden story.” Of the 646 cases of censorship, 140 are related to the sensational Hunter Biden laptop story published in The New York Post at the end of 2020.

The newspaper that investigated the alleged corrupt ties of the president’s son and the Biden family with foreign businesses was suspended on Twitter for 17 days, and the platform restricted interactions with the posts that contained New York Post’s stories about Hunter Biden, banning retweets and replies.

In addition, Twitter placed a “warning label” on the House Judiciary Committee Republican account for linking to a newspaper article about Hunter Biden.

Big Tech's censorship of the story is believed to have helped sway the 2020 election in favor of Biden, according to an MRC poll
that reportedly showed that “a large number of respondents” would have voted differently in 2020 if they had been exposed to the censored Hunter Biden laptop investigation material.

Meanwhile, the most restricted content about Joe Biden appeared to be his “notoriously creepy, touchy-feely” habits, including sniffing and touching women.

“The 232 cases of comedic memes, videos, or generic posts about Biden’s conduct composed more than one-third of CensorTrack's total instances of users censored for criticizing the president,” the report says.

Twitter claimed in both cases that the video and images violated its child sexual exploitation policy, according to screenshots.

Nevertheless, the alleged bias of the biggest social networks was attributed by some to the fact that their employees actively espouse certain political views. According to an earlier report from Fox News, Twitter employees and some of their family members donated a significant amount of money to Joe Biden’s presidential campaign, almost 64 times more than for his challenger, former President Donald Trump. Biden was said to have received $193,443, while Trump received only $3,023.

Another analysis showed that employees of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, and Oracle donated nearly 20 times more money to Biden’s campaign than to Trump’s from the beginning of 2019 until the 2020 election.

In addition, numerous reports have previously stated that the current administration has hired many former Silicon Valley executives. According to The Washington Post, at least 13 aides on Biden’s team have previously worked for Google parent company Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Lyft, Microsoft, Twitter or Uber.
 
Didn’t know where else to post this, but here seemed to be most appropriate.

Strap in everyone. Summer of 2022 is about to get wild.

Been watching this off/on all day....After ' the leak,' barricades went up around the Supreme Court building, allegedly minutes after reports from Politico were leaked indicating SCOTUS has voted to overturn Roe v. Wade

News flashes, protesters outside SC bldg grow as do tensions....tik tock explodes with screaming posters.

Couple of the posts I made throughout the day:
--------------'

FROM @disclosetv
JUST IN - U.S. Supreme Court has voted to strike down the Roe vs. Wade ruling that legalized abortion nationwide, an initial draft majority opinion by Justice Alito shows.


👉How do such drafts of the SCOTUS get leaked to the media before a ruling is announced? This is criminal. It’s impossible to overstate the earthquake this will cause inside the Court, in terms of the destruction of trust among the Justices and staff👈
---------

Supreme Court spokesperson on leaked draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade: “The Court has no comment."

----------------

Just thinking how another hornet's nest is being poked between US fractions of the population:

BIDEN ON ROE V. WADE: "If this decision holds, it's really quite a radical decision...I've not had a chance to thoroughly go into the report...Does this mean that in Florida they can decide they're going to pass a law saying that same sex marriage is not permissible?"
---------------

Ah, there's the rub,
FROM Someone called Big Moo:

We hold that Roe and Casey must be Overruled...”

With this finding, abortion goes back to being a matter of states rights. On the political warfare front, this is a chess move designed to undermine republicans in the purple districts during the midterms. The democrats had literally nothing to run on this November, since one was going to vote for the bitch who supported the mask mandates, identity politics and degenerate lifestyles. This gives them a brand new causus beli and a women’s rights platform to rally their wagons. It jeopardizes a conservative midterm win that could open an investigation on the entire government covid response.

On the subversion front, creating a state of collective hysteria and mobilizing protesters with a “leak”, normalizes the use of direct social pressure against the the judicial branch to influence a major decision. The long term goal is to create an arbitrary legal environment subject to the whims of angry mobs. As logic, facts, science, and measurable data do not matter anymore, this evolution is designed to break people’s remaining respect for the rule of law.

On the economic front, the Democrats are being mobilized because there is a commercial trade in aborted fetal parts that requires looser regulations and abortion laws. By removing the supreme court from the equation, states can be lobbied to pass and modify abortion laws directly and independently.


On the information warfare front further division has been achieved, the circus has a new act, and everyone gets distracted from the implosion of the debt bubble, growing inflation, the vaccine disaster and the coming food shortage. The only thing that matters is to keep the population polarized and firmly grounded in 2 different subjective and antagonistic realities to perpetuate a social conflict that keeps everybody busy so the powers that be can rule over them with impunity.
 
They might be shooting themselves in the foot by overtuning Roe v. Wade because there is another side to it. Apart from the right to choose, one of the things discussed in the case and which became part of the final opinion was the question of when life begins and the final conclusion was that life begins when a fetus can be viable outside the womb - although it was acknowlegded that different religions and cultures held that life begins at conception and some at quickening.

The reason why this is might be significant is that it formed part of the distinction, according to the case, between a legal abortion and murder under the criminal code. So, overtuning Roe v. Wade might open the gates for murder charges where vaccination has been the cause of early fetal death or miscarriage.
 
"You’d think she’d be more concerned with her crime riddled city but here she is gaslighting & inciting," wrote conservative pundit Rita Panahi, while pundit Matt Walsh wrote "Not satisfied with the murders just in her own city, Mayor Lightfoot calls for more violence across the country." (h/t Fox News)

"Call to arms? Are you declaring an insurrection? Civil war?

What is wrong with you?

Your city has the highest murder rate in the US with the strictest gun control laws.

Now you are making things up and calling for war?

Not a good idea."

 
"You’d think she’d be more concerned with her crime riddled city but here she is gaslighting & inciting," wrote conservative pundit Rita Panahi, while pundit Matt Walsh wrote "Not satisfied with the murders just in her own city, Mayor Lightfoot calls for more violence across the country." (h/t Fox News)

"Call to arms? Are you declaring an insurrection? Civil war?

What is wrong with you?

Your city has the highest murder rate in the US with the strictest gun control laws.

Now you are making things up and calling for war?

Not a good idea."


Well said.


They want to start a war they can't win.

It's the quickest way to solve this mess.
 
Holly Moley...what a soup sandwich!

 
Demonstration today in Tampa Florida. How the military will "rescue" a city official.

"international service members from 11 nations. The demonstration includes simulated explosions, simulated gunfire and low-flying aircraft. Helicopters, boats, all-terrain vehicles, scuba divers and ground forces will be used to "rescue" a city official from "hostile" forces."


Video and more information:

 
Looks like the Ministry of Truth is being shut down before it started, or as they say here "paused".

"On Monday, DHS decided to shut down the board,"

By Tuesday morning, Jankowicz had drafted a resignation letter in response to the board’s dissolution. -WaPo

 
Back
Top Bottom