reading everyone's response made be think of balance.
a teachers job is to deliver information in such a way that most ill equipped student can pick up on the topic at hand. to do this,
the teacher would want to learn the students learning style and attempt to adjust accordingly so that the information can be processed. The teacher would not mind withholding internal emotional conflicts associated with teaching, because the ultimate goal is to make sure the receiver processed the information and can regurgitate it back out in a way it can help them and eventually help others. if the teacher sincerely has the intent to teach, they would reach a point where their emotions aren't even a second thought anymore.
the same goes for a student. (ie ME) my ultimate goal is to learn so i'm going to adjust accordingly, in order to absorb what i need in order to accomplish my goals. if my intent is sincerely to learn, i would ignore the emotional conflict within myself to learn the lesson. the student has to realize that everyone has a certain style of communication, so why take it personal. its something to learn in every interaction.
I'm sort of playing the devils advocate here as i always do but, this thought led me to ask what role does balance play in all of these lessons? i just read a thread on creation and began to ponder the concept of duality and the trinity. it seems that "all is one" which is a perception of duality, which made me realize how duality uses the ego to chose a side. the moment the nothing realized it had the power to look upon itself as something, it was faced with the choice to chose which view it wanted to take. you are either going to be sto or sts.. pick sides buddy! i guess there is some sigh of relief that both sides lead to successfulness in its own right, but we are repeatedly taught that the sts side does not promote the advancement into oneness that is "preceived as positive." (group/light or self/blackhole) but we also know that "success or postive" is all in the eye of the beholder.
so this lead me to think about the small space in the middle? is there a space in the middle? what happens in that space in the middle of sto and sts? is anything happening, or NO -thing is happing in the middle? is it selfish to not pick a side and just be neutral/sleep?
I thought about the bible threatening us to "not straddle the fence" when the rapture comes because thats like being the bad guy. it kind stresses that you have to make a choice. Then I thought about midnight on the movie constatine who was the neutral party between both worlds, the liason. he helps whomever comes to his door. he even helped keanu after he disrespected him. then i thought about how the c's frowned upon being in a sleep state. which spawned one of my first post about just ending creation itself, but then i realized how selfish that was. but is it selfish to be neutral in my own world? what happens when we get back to the union/perception of one ie level 7? do we recycle back into more lessons like our sts buddies? do we go into the neutral state at that point or do we stay at one and assist those who need assistance? i'm so confused now lol
am i stretching this too far? did the c's say anything in the transcripts about being neutral? im sure they did and i cant think of it because its like 6 am here, but how do we know the goal isn't to be neutral? is it because thats not making progress? or is neutral considered being like water and just going with the flow?!?!
but what if the water is treading into territory where is knows its going to evaporate, and its tired of being recycled back as rain to keep going through the process? then we are back at you having to make a choice. (now i get that part in the matrix where neo discovered the reason the first matrix failed (and why analomies happen)is because the problem is choice. then the architect countered and said we discovered that for the program to be accepted the choice only had to happen at a subconcious level (as the c's have repeated also which explains why were "fell from heaven). i guess at the end of the day no matter what you choose in this awareness program of duality, there is no right or wrong way to learn the lesson. as long as you learn the lesson, even if you have to take a break in the neutral zone to come back to the infinite amount of lessons there is to learn, you still would want to explore all that it is you are. it sounds so depressing but i guess if you look at it like they said look at it, as lessons, then you can incorporate learning in a fun way as don juan tried to also explain. you can easily overcome any emotional conflicts you have in learning when you realize the purpose of all of this.
soooo i guess i answered my own question again
i guess its better when you have to type things out.
a teachers job is to deliver information in such a way that most ill equipped student can pick up on the topic at hand. to do this,
the teacher would want to learn the students learning style and attempt to adjust accordingly so that the information can be processed. The teacher would not mind withholding internal emotional conflicts associated with teaching, because the ultimate goal is to make sure the receiver processed the information and can regurgitate it back out in a way it can help them and eventually help others. if the teacher sincerely has the intent to teach, they would reach a point where their emotions aren't even a second thought anymore.
the same goes for a student. (ie ME) my ultimate goal is to learn so i'm going to adjust accordingly, in order to absorb what i need in order to accomplish my goals. if my intent is sincerely to learn, i would ignore the emotional conflict within myself to learn the lesson. the student has to realize that everyone has a certain style of communication, so why take it personal. its something to learn in every interaction.
I'm sort of playing the devils advocate here as i always do but, this thought led me to ask what role does balance play in all of these lessons? i just read a thread on creation and began to ponder the concept of duality and the trinity. it seems that "all is one" which is a perception of duality, which made me realize how duality uses the ego to chose a side. the moment the nothing realized it had the power to look upon itself as something, it was faced with the choice to chose which view it wanted to take. you are either going to be sto or sts.. pick sides buddy! i guess there is some sigh of relief that both sides lead to successfulness in its own right, but we are repeatedly taught that the sts side does not promote the advancement into oneness that is "preceived as positive." (group/light or self/blackhole) but we also know that "success or postive" is all in the eye of the beholder.
so this lead me to think about the small space in the middle? is there a space in the middle? what happens in that space in the middle of sto and sts? is anything happening, or NO -thing is happing in the middle? is it selfish to not pick a side and just be neutral/sleep?
I thought about the bible threatening us to "not straddle the fence" when the rapture comes because thats like being the bad guy. it kind stresses that you have to make a choice. Then I thought about midnight on the movie constatine who was the neutral party between both worlds, the liason. he helps whomever comes to his door. he even helped keanu after he disrespected him. then i thought about how the c's frowned upon being in a sleep state. which spawned one of my first post about just ending creation itself, but then i realized how selfish that was. but is it selfish to be neutral in my own world? what happens when we get back to the union/perception of one ie level 7? do we recycle back into more lessons like our sts buddies? do we go into the neutral state at that point or do we stay at one and assist those who need assistance? i'm so confused now lol
am i stretching this too far? did the c's say anything in the transcripts about being neutral? im sure they did and i cant think of it because its like 6 am here, but how do we know the goal isn't to be neutral? is it because thats not making progress? or is neutral considered being like water and just going with the flow?!?!
but what if the water is treading into territory where is knows its going to evaporate, and its tired of being recycled back as rain to keep going through the process? then we are back at you having to make a choice. (now i get that part in the matrix where neo discovered the reason the first matrix failed (and why analomies happen)is because the problem is choice. then the architect countered and said we discovered that for the program to be accepted the choice only had to happen at a subconcious level (as the c's have repeated also which explains why were "fell from heaven). i guess at the end of the day no matter what you choose in this awareness program of duality, there is no right or wrong way to learn the lesson. as long as you learn the lesson, even if you have to take a break in the neutral zone to come back to the infinite amount of lessons there is to learn, you still would want to explore all that it is you are. it sounds so depressing but i guess if you look at it like they said look at it, as lessons, then you can incorporate learning in a fun way as don juan tried to also explain. you can easily overcome any emotional conflicts you have in learning when you realize the purpose of all of this.
soooo i guess i answered my own question again
i guess its better when you have to type things out.
