Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

[Abats]

Maybe all this theater was somekind of a dress rehearsal ? Because I'm think that Israel will never stop until Iran regime is overthrown

 

[Ryan]

Because at this point, IMO not much on the ground has changed objectively - except maybe that Iran looks pretty strong and the US and Israel look pretty retarded to those 'in the know'.

There are a few important objective changes, osit, such as Iran now being able to legitimately exit from the IAEA and NPT which have been hamstringing them politically for decades; Iran now has a path to openly declaring themselves a nuclear power. Also, Iran has given a concrete demonstration to Russia and China that they can handle themselves in an unfair fight against the biggest nasties in the world without 'losing their cool', and thus have earned a place at a rather elect geopolitical table. Integration with BRICS will proceed rapidly now, and the Iranians are likely to have much more trust in Russia and China and their allies. I tend to agree with those who say that Iran has emerged the real victor out of this situation.

Of course, this is a death sentence for Netanyahu politically and we may see "regime change" happening in Israel as the inner circles of the Mossad reorganise themselves and seek a newer, more palatable, puppet frontman. 'Bibi''s nine lives appear to have at last expired. A dying animal can still be dangerous though, so the prospect of further dirty tricks before he disappears from the scene is very possible.

As for Trump, he's in the same category as Jordan Peterson for me, now. Still with a part to play, yet vanishingly credible to those geopolitical participants who are truly shaping the future. He should focus on draining the US swamp as much as possible if he really wants to improve the prospects of the average American in facing the coming changes, or so it seems to me. And he might want to mend bridges with Musk, who, for all his faults, seems capable of seeing certain things that Trump cannot.

The neocons and deep state have again suffered a setback, but still have cards left to play. I think the long-awaited confrontation of the US with China may prove to be the 'final battle' of the empire in the brightening dawn of the multipolar world Federation.

 

[seek10]

There are a few important objective changes, osit, such as Iran now being able to legitimately exit from the IAEA and NPT which have been hamstringing them politically for decades; Iran now has a path to openly declaring themselves a nuclear power. Also, Iran has given a concrete demonstration to Russia and China that they can handle themselves in an unfair fight against the biggest nasties in the world without 'losing their cool', and thus have earned a place at a rather elect geopolitical table. Integration with BRICS will proceed rapidly now, and the Iranians are likely to have much more trust in Russia and China and their allies. I tend to agree with those who say that Iran has emerged the real victor out of this situation.

Of course, this is a death sentence for Netanyahu politically and we may see "regime change" happening in Israel as the inner circles of the Mossad reorganise themselves and seek a newer, more palatable, puppet frontman. 'Bibi''s nine lives appear to have at last expired. A dying animal can still be dangerous though, so the prospect of further dirty tricks before he disappears from the scene is very possible.

As for Trump, he's in the same category as Jordan Peterson for me, now. Still with a part to play, yet vanishingly credible to those geopolitical participants who are truly shaping the future. He should focus on draining the US swamp as much as possible if he really wants to improve the prospects of the average American in facing the coming changes, or so it seems to me. And he might want to mend bridges with Musk, who, for all his faults, seems capable of seeing certain things that Trump cannot.

The neocons and deep state have again suffered a setback, but still have cards left to play. I think the long-awaited confrontation of the US with China may prove to be the 'final battle' of the empire in the brightening dawn of the multipolar world Federation.

The whole point of having weapon is "nuclear deterrence". Against whom? currently it is against Israel, which itself never declared its existence. If Iran declare having nuclear weapon, other Sunni countries like in the Saudi Arabia forced to get one. Easiest way is to get out of NPT and remove Western world from their back. i.e. Geo politics won't so simple as "Rule based", where some body else decides what those rules are.

 

[Don Cesar]

In their psychopathic logic and destructive madness, I feel Israel capable of using one of their atomic bomb to make an attack under false flags against themselves in Israel and accuse Iran or other.

 

[Ryan]

If Iran declare having nuclear weapon, other Sunni countries like in the Saudi Arabia forced to get one.

Maybe that would be better than a "Non Proliferation Treaty" that does nothing to stop bad actors like Israel getting nukes in the first place? I'm reminded of the many treaties that Russia signed, to their disadvantage, because the US simply ignored them.

 

[SOTTREADER]

I woke up this morning to the "news" that: Iran declares victory, Israel declares victory, USA declares victory.

There are no winners or losers, everyone gets a participation medal

A participation medal is a type of award given to individuals who take part in a competition or event, regardless of their ranking or placement.

 

[SOTTREADER]

 

[loreta]

There are no winners or losers, everyone gets a participation medal

I propose to Mr. Nobel a Peace Nobel Prize for all of them.

 

[Ricardo]

(...)
As for Trump, he's in the same category as Jordan Peterson for me, now. Still with a part to play, yet vanishingly credible to those geopolitical participants who are truly shaping the future. He should focus on draining the US swamp as much as possible if he really wants to improve the prospects of the average American in facing the coming changes, or so it seems to me. And he might want to mend bridges with Musk, who, for all his faults, seems capable of seeing certain things that Trump cannot.
(...)

Way i see it , the problem is " the technocrats " , and Mr. Musk is certainly one of them , are still going for their Panopticon ,seemingly undeterred, even as is said in the transcripts that such will fail , ie it has been stated ( Ian Carrol @ Candace Owens ) that "Trumps" big beautifull bill has within provision(s) barring legislation , state wide / sate side , on legislatively restricting AI uses. ( which incidentally seems inconstitucional per Us. law ) fwiiw / blah .

 

[ApotheosisMMC.]

There are no winners or losers, everyone gets a participation medal

Yes, it's a bit pointless, although as they said, Iran was the one that gained the most despite what the media says. It adopted a long-term war of attrition posture that a country as small as Israel, which saw its supplies exhausted and its economy destroyed by damage to its refineries and ports, cannot sustain.

(The fact that they banned filming of Iranian impacts speaks volumes.) So, since the US didn't drag this out, it was a good idea for them to slip out the back door and join the cessation of hostilities, even though it wasn't their ideal scenario in their fantasies.

Iran didn't suffer as much weapons damage, so its capabilities remain intact, and now it has the opportunity to learn from what happened and improve its weaknesses. Its nuclear facilities suffered little damage and are relatively easy to put back online. In fact, in Ishafan, where the Tomahawks fell, the US was careful not to damage any of the three nuclear reactors. This is another example of the behind-the-scenes agreements and the care taken to avoid a nuclear catastrophe.

The same should apply to the other nuclear facilities that were attacked.

The Iranian Parliament passes a bill to suspend cooperation with International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA).The Members of Parliament then gather to chant their old favorite chant:“DEATH TO AMERICA”“DEATH TO ISRAEL”

https://twitter.com/x/status/1937846706445406301

 

[Happy Poo]

What about baby Bibi?

 

[sToRmR1dR]

Brussels wants Israel to be the only nuclear power in the Middle East.

 

[Nević Nenad]

Brussels wants Israel to be the only nuclear power in the Middle East.

Brussels also wants brussels sprout to be of the same size and diameter, but it doesn't works that way . . .

 

[Tristan]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1937768572551401717

 

[axj]

She says things are not so great between Russia and Turkey / China / North Korea. Russia is pissed that China is in the process of building a pipeline that BYPASSES Russia through Turkey to Europe. Not sure where those hydrocarbons would be sourced from. Central asia? Qatar? Saudi Arabia? Iran?

China is building a pipeline from Turkmenistan to China, which Russia is not happy about. But it does not involve Turkey, which has a gas pipeline from Azerbaijan to Europe, where China is not involved.

She basically says that Russia will eventually turn on China the way Russia turned on Hitler (well it helped Hitler invaded his ass...although I know historians debate as to who was planning to betray who first - both were making plans) in WWII

If she actually said that, it is a big red flag that she is twisting history and geopolitics. How can Hitler's surprise attack on the USSR be "Russia turning on Hitler"? It is just insane.