Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

Iranian authorities blame Israel and the United States for organizing the protests. According to TASS sources from the Tasnim news agency, a group of armed protesters with videos of Israel were arrested with evidence that they had been trained in sabotage operations. They were planning to blow up critical infrastructure. Various types of weapons, state-owned equipment, and explosive devices were seized. There is talk of 2,000 people dead, but the figure may rise and be exaggerated.
According to The Times of Israel:

Help is on its way’: Trump urges Iranians to keep protesting, seize institutions.

Appearing to depart from the notion of negotiating with the Iranian government, US President Donald Trump told protesters in Iran on Tuesday that “help is on its way” and urged them to keep protesting and take control of the country’s institutions.
He added that those who have killed protesters would “pay a big price.”

Trump’s remarks, made in a social media post, came after Iranian authorities said some 2,000 people had been killed in the mass demonstrations, though the Mossad was reported to say that the true toll was more than twice as high.

“There is a lot of help on the way in different forms, including financial assistance from us,”



They can really make Trump think twice:



 
One of the ideas I had a while ago and now again:

Could it be that Trump actually wants to do the Iran thing quickly not only to keep the crazies at bay and avoid the worst but also in order to make Israel more vulnerable? I mean, if you push it to make it fast, and things are not quite in place to defend “allies“ in the region, this sort of gives Iran a better chance to take Israel out, since they obviously will be the main target besides maybe some US bases? Might just be wishful thinking on my part though. I would bet more on wishful thinking on my part there.
The Cs said 'they' would go too far, as always. Then there's the saying 'give them enough rope...', and 'evil always destroys itself'. Is Trump performing a 5D chess move by playing along with STS? Does he have much choice? As an optimist, I can hope he does the right thing at the right time. He's been a catalyst. Perhaps he will betray the betrayer in the end, or not.
 
Has been that way for a long time, IMO.

Don’t forget that Israel was ultimately a British creation long before the state of Israel even existed (Balfour declaration 1917). The British aim would have been then already to secure the Middle Eastern resources/ unruly natives under their control. The power of the British Empire has somewhat waned, but it should not be underestimated, as the City of London still is one of the biggest financial players in the world. And the old enmity between England and the US is still alive and well.
 
Could it be that Trump actually wants to do the Iran thing quickly not only to keep the crazies at bay and avoid the worst but also in order to make Israel more vulnerable?
I think the key to any future war between Israel and Iran is that Iran seems to have a lot more rockets than Israel has air defense rockets. Last time half a year ago Israel almost ran out of these after less than two weeks:

Anti-ballistic missile interceptors are very costly—generally millions of dollars per shot, while produced in small volumes annually. Lair points out in his blog that the 39 THAADS observably expended exceed the annual production rate (32) per year.

So, given enough time, Iranian missile attacks might have eventually exhausted Israel’s upper-layer interceptor stocks.
A report by the Wall Street Journal on June 18 hints such a shortage was looming, causing the U.S. to scramble to offer more resources.

Ultimately, hostilities ended before Israel’s supply of interceptor missiles dried out. However, the 12-day war highlighted several key realities of ballistic missile defense, insights already evident in Ukraine and prior Middle Eastern conflicts: It is very appealing to have ways of defeating ballistic missiles, but highly expensive to do so (even more so than the missiles being defended against). And there continues to be insufficient annual production of interceptor missiles, globally, relative to the offensive arsenals they may be pitted against.
 
Don’t forget that Israel was ultimately a British creation
I will second you and argue that UK's absence is striking

Never do we hear of "Britain", being even more or less close to the events. They simply don't appear on the big picture and it's all on "Israel" & Trump the Donald orange man. The Trump focus is ridiculous when we think of GLADIO and all the mess that Britain has been doing, especially as reported by the Grayzone, during the last four years

The idea is that Britain has always been, and that we don't know the extent of it. But I may be wrong of course!
 
The "unseen" ties between UK and US may be quite a bit more ... prevalent than public perception would have of it , remember years ago Mr. Timothy Good , author of book " Above Top Secret" ,stating in an interview on youtube ( sorry don´t have link atm this was years ago by now ) , that UKs nuclear arsenal was controlled by the US (military) so...
 
There's a lot I could say about this post by Trump's 'ambassador-at-large',* but it also kinda leaves me feeling speechless, so it's probably best that I say nuthin'!


* Grenell's formal government title is "Special Presidential Envoy for Special Missions." And 'twould certainly appear so. :lol:

On a more serious note, a reporter for Israel's Channel 14 has stated that "foreign actors are arming the protesters in Iran with live firearms," and that "everyone is free to guess who is behind it," so, Mossad.

 
1768429179343.png

🚨 BREAKING: Iran announces the closure of its airspace to civilian air traffic.

🔴 @DDGeopolitics

There are still several planes in Iran's airspace

Couple more diverted just now

1768429310302.png


1768429535232.png


I suppose it won't be long before it veers off course.

1768429705799.png
 
FWIW:

US attack on Iran imminent – Reuters

"A US military attack on Iran is “imminent,” and could come within mere hours, Reuters has claimed, citing anonymous sources."
"On Wednesday, Reuters quoted an unnamed Western military official as saying that “all the signals are that a US attack is imminent.”


&

“that is also how this administration behaves to keep everyone on their toes,” with unpredictability being “part of the strategy.”



 
Back
Top Bottom