Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

@MJF, the topic you're addressing is fascinating and helps me better understand what's happening in the Middle East, drawing parallels with the ancestry of the Iranian people. I also observe that the markers that have had the greatest impact on genetic changes are cataclysms and wars.

And I've rediscovered the scientific research concerning the tallest people."Mapping the Mountains of Giants: Anthropometric data from the Westerne Balkans reveal a nucleus of extraordinary physical stature in Europe" and I quote this passage:
This article summarizes all the key socio-economic, nutritional, and genetic data, and offers possible explanations for this anthropological phenomenon. Since the remarkable height of the Dinaric populations cannot be connected with any commonly known environmental factor, the most probable hypothesis is genetic and links these physical characteristics with the local founder effect of Y haplogroup I-M170. Furthermore, given that both the level of socio-economic development and dietary protein quality are still sub-optimal, the local upward trend in body height has the potential to continue in the future.
So, this "haplogroup I-M170" gene, according to the AI, refers to a very old paternal genetic lineage, passed down from father to son, identified through the Y chromosome. It is a group sharing the same common ancient ancestor and which dates back to around 20,000 to 25,000 years ago.
 

You may well be right but the reality is that there was a cataclysm in Western Europe in antiquity that saw massive movements of people around the continent, with many of them heading eastwards to the Eastern Mediterranean and the Adriatic and others crossing over to North Africa and the Levant (e.g., the mysterious Sea Peoples). Parts of Northern Europe would seem to have become a dead zone, which suggests cometary showers may have been widespread there. As the C's pointed out, the story of the Trojan War as presented in the Iliad was really about cataclysms:​



I appreciate that people in what was the old Yugoslavian Federation are on average taller than their Mediterranean neighbours but then the Slavs were originally Eastern Europeans:



The ancient Celts were also tall people and dwarfed the Romans for example. They migrated all over Western and Southern Europe, even at one stage invading Greece, with one group eventually landing up in Asia Minor:



So, if you encounter people today in the Balkans who are tall and have red hair, they are likely to have some Celtic ancestry.

BTW: my understanding is that the Dutch or Netherlanders are today the tallest people on average in the world:

In that case only about half of Yugoslavs came from the east. Yugoslavs are actually not overly Slavic. They just speak Slavic language. According to the study of David Reich, as the most recent one, Yugoslavs are at the top only about 50% Slavic. The rest is a "proto Balkan" mixture of Thracians, Dacians and Celts (not exact numbers, I'm writing "from the head"} That is also obvious in physical appearance where the difference between Yugoslavs and other Slavs are very distinctive. The closest Slavs to Yugoslavs in the appearance are Poles and Ukrainians, and the biggest difference is with Russians. Russians being too blond, too small and strange looking, Yugoslavs are in all shades of hazel (very much with reddish tint) some dark blondes, and with hazel to green eyes, in small percentage blue. They could look a bit darker, but the Sun over Adriatic is "a bit more" stronger than over Moscow or Berlin :-)


And this is, I believe, what is called "having a great advertising" ;-D Personally, I didn't saw those tall men in Holland, and they tend to be skinny. I'm 184 and in Croatia and Serbia I'm of average height, but in Bosnia and Montenegro they call me shorty ;-D (of course, I'm exaggerating a bit in order to have a bit of laugh in this of topic)
 
I don’t think the messaging from the media is working anymore, they have entirely discredited themselves. I’m hearing people say that they don’t know what to believe anymore. The media can try to construct a specific narrative but the people are going rogue. It’s like a modern secessio plebia.
As the C's said in the 28 February 2026 session: "This is a conflict that will reveal and teach many." This suggests that many people will finally wake up to reality and not the reality the media has created or spun.
 
The 'Greek empire' Alexander founded, was founded on the Achaemenid Empire. Did Alexander's conquest Hellenize Persia, or did Persia absorb and modify 'Hellenization'?

What if the Greeks didn't bring great learnings to the East, but rather learned great things from the East?
Hang on, I thought the Greeks learned all their "Greek Voodoo" from the Celts? Alexander The Great wasn't actually Greek btw, he was Macedonean (he conquered the Greeks - or rather solidified what his father had done previously - then went off to do some more conquering). Potentially some compeditiveness there?

Anyway, when I look at a map of the Achaemenid Empire, I see a map of "The Greater Israel Project". Weird.
 
Kharag Island now seems to be a kind of consensus on my various news feeds, where the US will put its boots on.

It could be a psyop, and they are planning to hit somewhere else, but something is brewing... :nuts:
Yes, they are preparing to be held hostage or slaughtered. No wonder this "war" is so unpopular.
 
. . . in keeping with their ancient past into current times, a people (subhuman animals) chosen for the ultimate blood sacrifice. They are the Red Heifer and the Temple will be nothing but ash. Their gods (Yahweh/Baal/Moloch) will not be denied. By deception, they shalt do death.
Good Lord! It's just the psychopaths whining because they are destroying themselves. No responsibility taken at all! Amazing.
 
Esoteric and conspirator ideas are that this node 10 is being suppressed by the placement of the Ark, considered a planetary battery, which is considered a convergence point for all other 11 points.
I think this is confusion, that the Ark doesn’t in fact do anything until it’s activated and it’s placement if it’s activated has ripple effect across all other nodes (just my theory)
If STS is in charge of this planet and they know where the Ark is, why haven't they picked it up already? Surely it belongs to them anyway? (And also why they were looking for it in the first place?).
 
@MJF, the topic you're addressing is fascinating and helps me better understand what's happening in the Middle East, drawing parallels with the ancestry of the Iranian people. I also observe that the markers that have had the greatest impact on genetic changes are cataclysms and wars.

And I've rediscovered the scientific research concerning the tallest people."Mapping the Mountains of Giants: Anthropometric data from the Westerne Balkans reveal a nucleus of extraordinary physical stature in Europe" and I quote this passage:

So, this "haplogroup I-M170" gene, according to the AI, refers to a very old paternal genetic lineage, passed down from father to son, identified through the Y chromosome. It is a group sharing the same common ancient ancestor and which dates back to around 20,000 to 25,000 years ago.
Yes, it is a fascinating topic, albeit a complex one. Genetic studies are revealing so much these days about our racial origins. We should also keep in mind though that there has been a 4D STS influence at play too where human genetics is concerned. These beings treat different human groups as prize cattle at times, making genetic tweaks here and there as they please.

Many tribal groupings in Europe have roamed far and wide over time and one such people are the Finnish who were once the same racial stock as the Hungarians. Even then the true origins of the Finns/Hungarians seems to have been the Carpathian mountains in present day Romania according to the C's:​
Q: (L) Next question: This was something that was bugging me, and somebody sent an e-mail asking the same question, so I thought I would toss it in here. What is the origin of the Finns. They are quite different from their neighbours, and something of a puzzle.

A: Tribal split in transit.

Q: (L) What tribe?

A: In other words, "you take the high road and I'll take the low road..."

Q: (L) Are they split off from the Hungarians? Were the Hungarians and the Finns originally the same tribe?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And what is the origin of the Hungarians and Finns before they split?

A:
Carpathian zone.

Q: (L) Now, you have them in a locator, what is the origin of their genotype since they sort of stand out alone?

A: What do you propose?

Q: (L) I guess that they were another experimental creation. A genetic "tweak," so to speak.

A: Works for us. [Laughter.]

So, we may need to take 4D STS genetic tinkering into account too including the survival of Nephilim genetics, which will account for some cases of great height:
Q: (L) I was reading some of the transcripts earlier today. One of the things I read was about the Nephilim and their interactions with human beings and about other planets and molecularization, etc. Then, I was reading about the planet Kantek. Are there any human beings, on Earth, at the present time, who carry in them the Nephilim genes?

A:
Yes.

Q:
(L) MM has a six foot tall daughter. I have a kid who is pretty tall. Could this be a manifestation of Nephilim genes?

A: Maybe, maybe not.

Q: (L) Is there any way one can tell?

A: Would you want to?

Q: (L) Yes.

A: No you wouldn't!

Q: (L) Would these Nephilim genetics be passed down in the natural way, or would they be the result of genetic manipulation by genetically altering a fetus and then putting it back?

A: No to latter. One clue: double Y chromosomes. [N.B. Sylvia said above: "So, this "haplogroup I-M170" gene, according to the AI, refers to a very old paternal genetic lineage, passed down from father to son, identified through the Y chromosome."]

Q: (W) That's male...

A: Nephalim were.

Q: (L) They, were male. Women are a double X, men are XY.

A: Prisons are filled with double Y's with monstrous personality disorders, almost always Caucasian and over- sized. Also, "bikers" often carry the gene. We suggest you not share this in a general way on the net!!!

Q: (L) On TV they interviewed a serial killer. He was HUGE! He described killing. The shrink who was analyzing said he did it because he wanted to get caught. I did NOT get that feeling. I think he did it just because it was what he did. Bikers often carry the gene... and this is why they form 'gangs.' Nephalim. Bikers. Big. Caucasian. My, my, my. Is there any other clue you can give?

A: Nephalim are not currently on your world, just trace residuals.

I myself am predominately a Milesian Gael, although with Nordic ancestry too through the Normans or Norsemen. In some ways the British Isles reflects a similar tribal divergence to the Finns and the Hungarians since there are two distinct strands of Celt within these islands with quite different Celtic languages (that are still spoken today). You have the Brythonic Celts in Wales, Cornwall and other parts of Britain such as Northumbria and Cumbria whilst you have Gaelic Celts in Ireland and in Scotland, especially the Western Isles and the Highlands. As Celts, they were once Indo-Europeans who continued to migrate westwards until they stopped at the British Isles (although the former British Empire has since scattered them far and wide throughout the world).

If you go further back in time still, it seems the Celts had common ancestors with the Russians:
(Ryan) At the time of the cosmic catastrophes related to the "fall of Atlantis", what happened to the population of "Athens" – i.e. Russia - who were acting as Atlantis' opponent?

A: Suffered cataclysms like everyone else but with more survivors.

Q: (Ryan) What relationship, if any, did they have with the Celtic peoples of the British/Irish isles who constructed the megaliths?

A: Ancestors were the same.

Q: (L) So the ancestors of the Russians and the Celtic peoples were the same?

A:
Yes

I don't know how far back in time you need to go to determine when the original ancestral group split to become the distinctive racial entities of Celts and Russians but one answer may lie in Gobekli Tepe where we now know that Atlantean survivors of the Deluge regrouped some 12,800 years ago and subsequently fanned out from there over time. Indeed, I read only recently that geneticists have been able to prove that the people who built Stonehenge in England in 8,000 BC originated from Anatolia where Gobekli Tepe just happens to be found.

But then the C's also said that the term "Celt" was just a modern-day moniker and they were ultimately Kantekkians who seem to have been giants themselves originally and were likely the giant sons of Anak mentioned in the Bible:
Q: That explains a LOT. I was just thinking about it the other day. If these people in India are related to the Celts, as philologists would have us believe due to language roots, there is no way I can understand this because they are simply NOTHING like them in any way. … Okay, I think that you said that this nuclear war happened something like 50,000 years ago. We have taken care of a couple of points; we have 3 races on Atlantis, Celts all over the place... did the Celts conquer the Atlanteans?

A: No.

Q: Did they just move in and hang out?

A: They took over the Northern section.

Q: At the same time, there were Celts in the Caucasus, along the Baltic, in Ireland, England and Europe...

A: Ireland, England, etc. was later.

Q: But there were in the Norse lands, as Sweden, Norway and Denmark, they were along the Baltic, and they were in the Caucasus?

A: Some above mentioned areas were ice covered.

Q: When the philologists track the language roots, they arrive at the Kurgan region, north and west of the Caucasus. Is that where the Celts went when Atlantis was destroyed?

A: Close. [MJF: I think it is more likely that they went to Goblekli Tepe in Anatolia, which is not a million miles from the Caucasus and is just to the north of Sumeria/Mesopotamia in modern-day Iraq.]

Q: Were the Celts the tall blonds known as the 'Sons of Anak,' who ruled over the Sumerians as described by Sitchen?

A: "Celts" are what remains of the original prototype.

Q:
Okay. Kantekkians. When did...

A: Gravity differences account for the height difference.

And whenever we do get to see the Aryan undergrounders/ultraterrestrials posing as Martians, I think we will find that they are giants too.​
 
I’ve been having a long chat with AI about stargate 10, AKA the Persian stargate. As not to totally dump here what AI (I’ll put AI content in quotes) had to say I’ll try my best to summarise some of it myself. It’s pretty interesting and gives a new slant on the decades of Middle East conflict.

The CIA unclassified documents on their remote viewing sessions clearly suggest they were looking for a specific target and once that target was discovered they abandoned the project saying they couldn’t find any validity in continuing (in other words, they found what they were looking for)
You can view the original handwritten sketches and session notes in the CIA FOIA Reading Room under document CIA-RDP96-00789R001300180002-7.

The exact coordinates of the supposed Ark of the Covenant that they found are 26°34'N 51°43'E - the Persian Gulf off the southern coast of Iran. They were intentionally looking at Statgate 10 (node 10) though showing interest in other
nodes.



Esoteric and conspirator ideas are that this node 10 is being suppressed by the placement of the Ark, considered a planetary battery, which is considered a convergence point for all other 11 points.
I think this is confusion, that the Ark doesn’t in fact do anything until it’s activated and it’s placement if it’s activated has ripple effect across all other nodes (just my theory)




Has Israel the need to control the Middle East because they know what it means if this technology falls into the ‘wrong hands’
(I call BS on the weapons nuclear narrative, and consider it used as guise to cover the real reasons for wanting greater Israel, is it to be in total control of the Ark?)



Who are the people behind the so called special access programs? What do they want with this Ark, is everything we see in the Middle East about gaining control of territories to keep humanity suppressed indefinitely?


From the C’s
Session November 7 1994

Session October 21 1995

(What is alternative 3? WW3?)


Session August 23 2001


Session February 26 2002

The above correlates with a remote view session described here

From AI



And finally from the C’s

Session Feb 2 2003l



Session December 9 2017

You will also need to take into account what the C's said here about the Ark of the Covenant:

Session dated 31 May 1997:

Q:
(L) One aspect of the variation on the story was that Jacob gave his brother, Esau, the 'blessing' and some 'gift.' Does this reflect an accurate part of the story that Moses, in his form as Jacob, passed something on to someone else’s - something that was important?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Was it Moses/Abraham who was doing this?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Who did he pass it on to?

A: It was finally understood by "Moses" that the danger of the object was greater than the ability of descendants to resist corruption. He handed it over to those who had created it.

Q:
(Galahad) Was it STS or STO forces that created it?

A: STS.

Q: (Galahad) So, the Ark was an object created by STS. Did this amount to some sort of realization on Moses' part? Did he start to wake up?

A: Yes. The story of the "contending with the angel" was the significant turning point as well as the moment of return.

Where the STS forces then took the Ark (meaning perhaps just the power cell) is unknown. There are those who think it is on Oak Island in Nova Scotia and it was taken there by the Knights Templar who found it when excavating under the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. However, I would not rule out that it is still hidden somewhere in the Middle East, yet to be found.​
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom