Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

[Cosmos]

This latest news could be a significant one:

• 07:40 GMT
  Iran could withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) because further participation has become pointless after the attack by the US and Israel, MP Alaeddin Borujerdi, who sits on the parliament’s National Security Committee, has said.
  
  Tehran is “not seeking to develop a nuclear bomb, but we cannot simultaneously adhere to the rules of the game and be bombed,” he argued.
  
  “Ultimately, the time has come to withdraw from the NPT,” Borujerdi said.

It could be that so far legally speaking it would have been bad for Iran to declare that it has nukes and that it could use it because of this (and other treaties?)? So, if they withdraw from the treaty now that could give them the legal justification to relatively quickly declare that they have build nuclear bombs that they could use? It would give them also a cover from accusations that they already possessed them before the treaty was cancelled?

 

[Ca.]

Today marks the second month of the Israeli invasion of Iran, as the chaos and pandemonium spike, which seems to have included Trump's frame of mind as well

"Israel suspends a reserve battalion after the attack on a CNN journalist in the West Bank".
Today at 10:36 AM source

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

Mar 29, 2026#aljazeeraenglish #BreakingNews #aljazeeralivenews
Tensions in the Middle East are escalating rapidly as fears grow over a possible US ground invasion of Iran. Iran’s parliament speaker has warned that any American troops entering the country would face massive retaliation. Meanwhile, the United States continues deploying thousands of troops, including the USS Tripoli and elite rapid-response forces.

Truckers In France 3-29-26
French lorry drivers protest rising fuel prices with slowdown on A7 motorway

Oil jumps as Iran War enters fifth week | Insight with Haslinda Amin 03/30/2026
Mar 29, 2026

Insight with Haslinda Amin, a daily news program featuring in-depth, high-profile interviews and analysis to give viewers the complete picture on the stories that matter. The show features prominent leaders spanning the worlds of business, finance, politics and culture.

US does not oppose humanitarian oil supplies to Cuba, including from Russia — Trump

According to Donald Trump, these deliveries will not "have an impact" on efforts to overcome the energy crisis on the island

tass.com

US air forces expose F-35 jets to enemy fire by coming closer to Iran — analyst

According to Scott Ritter, the US has been "very successful in blowing up points on the ground" but it has not degraded the Iranian defense industry, which was relocated and hidden

tass.com

According to Scott Ritter, the US has been "very successful in blowing up points on the ground" but it has not degraded the Iranian defense industry, which was relocated and hidden
MOSCOW, March 29. /TASS/. US air forces are now compelled to come closer to Iran to drop bombs, exposing F-35 jets to enemy fire, former US Marine Corps intelligence officer and ex-UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter told TASS.

"The United States now has exhausted its supplies of long-range strike weapons so our military and our air forces are compelled to come closer to Iran to drop bombs. And we saw the other day, the Iranians are starting to engage our aircraft with surface air missile capabilities, and have even struck an F-35 for the first time in history," he pointed out.

According to Ritter, the US has been "very successful in blowing up points on the ground" but it has not degraded the Iranian defense industry, which was relocated and hidden. "Tragically, we are hitting targets that have nothing to do with the military capabilities of Iran. Striking this school in Minab and killing 175 children is an indication of that," the expert added.

"This is only going to get worse for the United States," he went on to say. According to the analyst, the Americans thought the Iran operation was going to be "a quick and easy victory," while Russia has demonstrated a more comprehensive understanding of combat operations in its special military operation in Ukraine.

"The Iranians have shown a level of professionalism and an ability to incorporate advanced military technologies that people should have been aware of if they had been following Iran. But it’s clear that we didn’t think they were capable of doing this," Ritter concluded.

 

[Cosmos]

This latest news could be a significant one:


It could be that so far legally speaking it would have been bad for Iran to declare that it has nukes and that it could use it because of this (and other treaties?)? So, if they withdraw from the treaty now that could give them the legal justification to relatively quickly declare that they have build nuclear bombs that they could use? It would give them also a cover from accusations that they already possessed them before the treaty was cancelled?

Interesting, Medvedev just said the following which isn’t a fake according to Grok:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2038498073710588130

[…]It shows [Medvedev] seated at a table, and the subtitles match his actual remarks from March 27, 2026:

• “In my opinion, following the assassination of the supreme leader, there is no doubt that Iran will continue pursuing nuclear testing in one form or another and will eventually acquire nuclear weapons.”
• “After what has happened, some form of nuclear confrontation between Israel and Iran now appears inevitable.”
• “As sad and unfortunate as it is to acknowledge this.”

So, now, combine the above with what was said earlier in the following posts and it looks increasingly likely to me that a (probably limited) nuclear exchange could be happening not too far in the future during this conflict:

Assuming that it is true that it is not going that well for the Epstein coalition (and/or not as well as expected), I don't think it would be that unlikely that they would go as far as trying to do something rather crazy "in desperation", including dropping at least one nuke (in one form or the other) on Iran.

In fact, that is what some people are speculating now including the ex elite insider Florian Homm, and interestingly, he considers the possibility that they will try to do it already in April (April Drop Dead date, anyone?):

If so, one wonders how much of what is happening now is at least partly a part of a broader plan to initiate something more globally? Recently he has come out and said that he won't be silent anymore. Which could mean that he in part is now revealing some of the things he knows and perhaps also information he is somewhat still in the loop in because of still existing high level contacts.

Just went ahead and watched a couple of minutes of live broadcast at RT international and IMO it was quite noticeable how the nuclear option and the unhinged nature of the empire was seemingly hinted at including by reminding people about what the US did with Nukes in Japan. IMO it smells a lot like something to that extent is in the air and/or known at some levels.

A russian work colleague told me yesterday (without me priming) that on the Russian side there is a lot of talk about nuclear escalation. Then I said to her that the following wouldn’t surprise me (and that it might be possible): that the US/Israel could drop one nuclear bomb on Iran. Then she said „that’s exactly what they (the russian side) is talking about now“. Now, I’m not sure what her sources are and if it is russian news per se and/or russian social media where that talk comes from? But as you see in the quotes above I have noticed something very similar on official Russian outlet RT.

So, I‘m continuing to wonder what is going on exactly. It almost sounds to me like the Russian population is being prepared/primed toward something nuclear happening (soon?). Also, one wonders, how much of what is going on is “scripted“ at some level and if those “in the know“ already know what will likely happen next through “backroom“ knowledge and/or talks?

 

[Aeneas]

JD Vance said the other day that the fact that Iran could use people with nuclear suicide vests killing thousands of people, was enough reason for the attack on Iran to be justified due to a National security threat.
Here is the clip:

The first thought apart from it being utter BS, was that he was perhaps "preparing" the grounds for a false flag event similar in magnitude to 9/11 in terms of trauma and hysterization.

It made me think about what the C's said about the 4D STS forces signalling ahead of time their intentions. I couldn't find the quote though it is not so long ago, but it seemed like a sort of rule that they had to signal it ahead of time. Someone might remember the exact quote.

What I did find was this quote about the Universe often signalling things ahead of time.

Q: (Niall) They've said in the past that a Batman movie that was released in 2012-ish, which had references to the Sandy Hook shooting in the movie, even though it came out beforehand, was an instance of the Cosmic Mind sending many clues ahead of time. With the Charlie Kirk shooting, there's a 1998 Hollywood movie called Snake Eyes that has loads of similarities with the Kirk assassination. Was this another instance of that?

A: Yes there are many such instances.

There was also chatter not long ago, about another 9/11 style event, though it might have just been triggered due to Larry Silverstein buying an iconic skyscraper in LA.

 

[loreta]

JD Vance said the other day that the fact that Iran could use people with nuclear suicide vests killing thousands of people, was enough reason for the attack on Iran to be justified due to a National security threat.
Here is the clip:

The first thought apart from it being utter BS, was that he was perhaps "preparing" the grounds for a false flag event similar in magnitude to 9/11 in terms of trauma and hysterization.

It made me think about what the C's said about the 4D STS forces signalling ahead of time their intentions. I couldn't find the quote though it is not so long ago, but it seemed like a sort of rule that they had to signal it ahead of time. Someone might remember the exact quote.

What I did find was this quote about the Universe often signalling things ahead of time.

There was also chatter not long ago, about another 9/11 style event, though it might have just been triggered due to Larry Silverstein buying an iconic skyscraper in LA.

You're absolutely right. And for 9/11, there was a film showing two towers collapsing, and other films with subtle messages. It's obvious, I think, that they're planning a big Hollywood-style attack. Most people living in the US watch TV fervently and films attentively, thus forgetting reality, surely also to forget reality. To avoid seeing the truth. So we're all waiting, and that's why the C's asked us to pray, for a major false flag attack is coming. And then the chaos, the final one I hope, will arrive like an unstoppable tide. A tsunami. A massacre.

I said somewhere in a comment about the Zionists that I have no pity for them. But I hope that when they find themselves in Hell, they suffer the same suffering they made others suffer, one by one, and if they made a million people suffer, that they suffer a million times over, and that there they see the consequences of their actions, and the possibility of allowing their souls to evolve and find enlightenment. I speak for them, but it's for all of us. To confront our actions and learn.

 

[T.C.]

On the topic of Iran nuke, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson recently had a private phone conversation with weapons expert Theodore Postol.

Postol told him that even based on ‘official’ estimates of how much enriched unranium Iran has, it’s highly likely that given their capability to work underground, they’re probably now developing a deliverable nuclear weapon.

Postol is not an anti-Iranian propagandist. He’s a scientist who is working with real data.

Iran would have to demonstrate their capability to the world, so a nuclear weapons test by them may be on the cards in the not-too-distant future. How the US/Israel respond to that is anyone’s guess.

 

[ra888]

Iran has started hitting the water facilities now. Even though they are resisting the Epstein class, the humanitarian crisis in the gulf will be devastating. It might turn into a case of winning the (military) battles and losing the (humanitarian) war.





I am wondering why is twitter/X letting the other side speak out at all. They were quite happy to profit off of a 1 million bounty on the Iranian professor - Mohammad Marandi. The paid promotion was not taken down for about 10 days, and it was even cleared by the approval team after massive reports.

It gives credibility to the idea that it is all a massive distraction from the upcoming global energy lockdown. If I have to guess it would be april 1 in India.

Also, Russian oil refineries are being hit by Ukraine almost every day. And they have stopped all gasoline exports from April 1st.

Iran denies it was them, says it was a false flag by Israel and Co. Gives hope they have still have a cool head amongst all the rampant destruction.

️ Iranian Armed Forces DENIES Kuwait desalination plant strike, accuses Israel of false flag

A statement by the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters reads:

“The brutal aggression by the Zionist regime against the desalination facility in Kuwait, carried out in recent hours under the pretext of accusing the Islamic Republic of Iran, is a sign of the vileness and depravity of the Zionist occupiers.

We declare that US bases, personnel, and their interests in the region, as well as the military, security, and economic infrastructure of the Zionist regime in the occupied Palestinian territories, remain powerful targets for us.

Countries of West Asia must remain vigilant against the sedition of the US–Zionist axis aimed at destabilizing and destroying the region, and must put an end to the presence of the criminal US army and occupying Zionists in the region.”

The Cradle

⭕️ Iranian Armed Forces DENIES Kuwait desalination plant strike, accuses Israel of false flag A statement by the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters reads: “The brutal aggression by the Zionist regime against the desalination facility in Kuwait, carried out in recent hours under the pretext...

t.me

 

[Aeneas]

In the interview which Tucker Carlson did with Ted Cruz some months ago, it became clear that Ted had no ideas about Iran. He is most likely not alone, so when ideas are floated about taking Kharg Island, a lot will probably just bubble their head in a "yeah let's do it" motion.
In the real world, it helps to know a few things about Iran, the Strait of Hormuz and the Persion Gulf which is where the Kharg Island is situated. So here are a few facts from wikipedia.

• Size of Iran: 1,648,195 km2 (636,372 sq mi) Israel in comparison is: 22,072 or 20,770 km2 (8,522 or 8,019 sq mi)
• Population of Iran: 92,417,681 In comparison Israel: 10,147,200.
• Length of the Persian Gulf: 989 km (615 mi)
• Size of the Persian Gulf: 251,000 km2 (97,000 sq mi) with Iran having the greatest Economic Exclusive zone of 97,860
• Kharg Island: The island is 25 kilometres (16 mi) off the coast of Iran and 660 kilometres (410 mi) northwest of the Strait of Hormuz.
• The size of Kharg Island is 20 km2 (7.7 sq mi) which is like 4km x 5km. In hektares it amounts to 2000 ha or 4942 acres (for the farmers here )

Here is a screenshot with a measuring stick in the top left corner. The red dot is Kharg Island:

What is important to note is that the Kharg Island is 660km from the strait of Hormuz. So even if a landing force (unless it is a parashooting force), makes it through the Strait of Hormuz unscathed, it still has 660 km of water to traverse in hostile waters. Regardless of whether a force comes by land or sea, if they manage to make it, it will be difficult in the extreme to keep supplies to them. A logistics horror.

So perhaps the real aim is not Kharg Island but one or two of the other islands which are closer but without any strategic signifcance, in the hope of making a shortlived PR stunt similar to what we have seen in Ukraine countless of times. Good luck with that.