Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

[KJS]

Here’s what Paula White said during Trump’s speech last night. It’s creazy! He’s being hailed as the saviour Jesus

This is an alarming degree of absurdity, it reads like predictive programming aimed at priming the target audience for escalation

EDIT: I've asked AI about Trump's latest irrational behavior:

(...) When a leader acts increasingly unhinged in public, it serves two functions:

1. Plausible deniability for escalation — "well, he's unpredictable, who knows what he'll do" becomes the narrative, which means when the escalation comes, it feels inevitable rather than planned
2. Adversary confusion — Nixon literally called this the "madman theory." If your enemy thinks you might do anything, including the irrational, their deterrence calculus breaks down

 

[mantle]

This carrousel forced upon all of us , this assumption that there is no random only self, has become a harvest of the human soul. Iran did not start this war. It was high STS powers controlling Israel , in communion with the American possessed powers that did.
Trump , who does not think about the consequences of his deeds nor of his words has escalated by speech that could turn the West into a wasteland and Iran into a morgue . His frenzied lack of policy is being allowed to run by said powers who hold him by the throat . They know full well that tomorrow with no oil , no gas , no fertilisers ,no his practice of sadism against Iran , who will defend itself vehemently, is likely to destroy Europe and the global economy perhaps for unending days .
America will end down there too plus it will be hated with blistering intent . Perhaps it will be a change of civilisation, a new world map choreographed in hell. A complete change over. Perhaps this was the plan all along.
Tartaria... anyone ?

What are we to make of these colossal proportions ?
And he is willing to send others to the Stone Age . If you please.

 

[JEEP]

EDIT: I've asked AI about Trump's latest irrational behavior:

Adversary confusion — Nixon literally called this the "madman theory."

Someone else described it first:

'Tis the times' plague, when madmen lead the blind. — William Shakespeare

 

[JEEP]

Current commentary on Trump's address last night - streamed 2 hours ago:

Geopolitical analyst and war reporter Patrick Henningsen and former Chief of Staff to the State Department Col. Lawrence Wilkerson join to react to Trump's war address and Iran's stunning response as the war takes a turn for the worst for the US and Israeli warmongers.

 

[Niall]

There's dark humor, and then there's Iranian dark humor:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2039735427448418389

Note the hint about Bill Ackman...

On a more serious note, the indicators of willful destruction within and surrounding this war suggest a 'plan' is afoot to impose something akin to the 'great reset' they dangled during Covid.

Just to recapitulate, recall that the US/Israel deliberately hit that girls school to ENSURE that Iran would enact its 'wartime measures' (which deep state actors surely foresaw, even if Trump and GCC leaders were a bit stunned by the strength and consistency of Iran's counter-attacks). Then we've seen 'Iranian attacks' on sites like critical infrastructure sites - and the Old City in Jerusalem on Eid - that were not in fact carried out by Iran. And then we've seen 'abrupt supply chain adjustments', like LNG tankers being diverted away from Europe just one week into the war.

Richard Werner hints at it here in this clip from a recent PBD podcast. It's 4 minutes long:

 

[Paranthas]

There has been few different points of views about this conflict/war and a part from predictions or predictive programming about bringing of the third world war end times and return of the Messiah etc. But recent online commentaries started to steer in and point out different options as well. So even if apparently this could look like failure indeed would serve as a mile stone to create chaos and bring closer them to their main objectives.

1-) Create artificial scarcity for food and hidrocarbures to further polarize the world (chess moves to retain world power status - although it seems like it can create more polarised world)
2-) End of the current monetary system (with food scarcity there will come hyper-inflation and devaluation of US dollar and all major currencies) Ordo ab Chao meaning creating the excuse for new programmable global monetary system.
3-) After the whole destruction make middle eastern countries pay to US for reconstruction all kind of infrastructure, more arms sale, arabian peninsula countries more vulnerable and dependent of US & Israel?
4-) Instigate and agilize the NWO 2030 agenda , out of chaos after monetary system and kind of central command center erected, start stripping ownership.
5-) Implant carbon taxes, smart cities , limit movement (open air prisons) , limit extremely carbon fuels.

My prediction is that it seems highly likely we will have one earth with two extremes , like two earths inside one. I would like to imagine is one side highly STS orientated and other side more neutral and some STO. Makes me remember in one session Pierre told at one session "What I see now is the great noise surrounding Earth that makes it so difficult to get a clear and true message." Hopefully things will get ugly first before getting better and hopefully during the process we don´t get disincarnated before seeing the exit sign.

 

[JEEP]

On a more serious note, the indicators of willful destruction within and surrounding this war suggest a 'plan' is afoot to impose something akin to the 'great reset' they dangled during Covid.

The idea that this "war" is really just a maneuver to instigate the 'great reset' has been brought up more than once. Just as we know the Great Depression in the US was purposely engineered, does anyone think these others weren't as well?
[Google AI]

Beyond the Great Depression, severe global economic crises include the 2008 Great Recession, the 1970s stagflation/energy crises, the early 1980s recession, and the COVID-19 pandemic recession. These events, often triggered by financial bubbles, energy shocks, or systemic failures, caused massive unemployment and global financial instability.

Here are other severe economic events in history:

• The Great Recession (2007–2009): Triggered by the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis, this was the most severe recession since the 1930s, featuring bank failures and a global decline in output and investment.
• Stagflation/Energy Crises (1973–1982): A combination of stagnant growth and high inflation caused by OPEC oil price shocks, exacerbated by wage-price freezes.
• The Dot-Com Bubble (2000–2002): The collapse of tech stocks (Nasdaq) that wiped out massive equity value, followed by accounting scandals and the September 11 attacks.
• The Asian Financial Crisis (1997–1998): Began with the collapse of the Thai baht, spreading rapidly through Asian economies and causing severe currency devaluations and debt crises.
• COVID-19 Recession (2020): A sudden, massive global shutdown of economies, causing record high unemployment and rapid economic contraction, followed by unprecedented fiscal stimulus.
• The Panic of 1819: The first major U.S. financial crisis, characterized by bank failures, widespread foreclosures, and a collapse in commodity prices.
• The Panic of 1893: A severe economic depression caused by railroad overbuilding and banking instability that led to a massive loss of gold reserves.
• Argentine Great Depression (1998–2002): A localized but intense crisis involving bank runs, sovereign debt default, and a sharp increase in poverty.

These events often stem from factors like bank failures, currency shocks, or debt mismanagement, sometimes requiring international intervention to stabilize the system.

Lest we forget, the Treasury recently declared the U.S. insolvent:

The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it
The U.S. government is insolvent. That’s not hyperbole — it’s the conclusion drawn directly from the Treasury Department’s own consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025, released last week to near-total media silence. The numbers: $6.06 trillion in total assets against $47.78 trillion in total liabilities as of September 30, 2025.
Importantly, the $47.78 trillion in reported liabilities does not include the unfunded obligations of social insurance programs like Social Security and Medicare — those are disclosed separately in the off-balance-sheet Statement of Social Insurance (SOSI).

The government’s consolidated balance sheet position, excluding the SOSI, deteriorated by nearly $2.07 trillion between FY 2024 and FY 2025, reaching a staggering negative $41.72 trillion. Total liabilities are now nearly eight times the value of reported assets. The largest drivers were a $2 trillion increase in federal debt and interest payable (now $30.33 trillion) and a $438.8 billion increase in federal employee and veteran benefits payable (now $15.47 trillion).

If the $88.4 trillion in 75-year off-balance-sheet obligations were added to the $47.8 trillion in official balance sheet liabilities, total federal obligations would now exceed $136.2 trillion — roughly five times U.S. annual GDP.

The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it | Fortune

The Government Accountability Office can't even verify the books. Here's what Congress must do.

fortune.com

Things like the Titantic disaster, the kidnapping and killing of the Lindbergh baby, the creation of the Federal Reserve/income tax (The Creature from Jekyll Island - G. Edwin Griffin), and on and on - didn't just happen. It's all been orchestrated to arrive exactly where we are today.

The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve by G. Edward Griffin is an investigative, highly critical look at the creation and operation of the Federal Reserve System, arguing that it is not a government agency but a private banking cartel. The book posits that this "creature" was created to control the money supply, protect its members from competition, and engineer economic cycles for the benefit of elite financiers at the expense of the public.

I remember reading about the plight of people in some part of South America who realized their lives were so bad and beyond any effective citizen intervention, that their only hope was that of the supernatural. That's all they had left to cling to. Just think how bad life must be if that's the only hope you have. I was quite disturbed by that realization and it stuck with me.

And, in a way, are we not in the same boat - communicating with the Cs for some hope and guidance as our reality gets more and more horrific? You elect a president for no more wars and he does just the opposite - a move that will usher in a global recession/depression as Col. Wilkerson states in that last vid I posted.

We can see it coming, we know it's been planned by 4D STS since forever. Is the best response to just keep putting it out there that it's all been planned and engineered to happen and refuse to accept the BS narratives parroted by all the official media outlets? Call them out - each and every one from military to politicians to mainstream media talking heads!

BTW - are any forum members adept at making Lego animations per chance? Iran has proven that they can be wickedly effective in striking blows for truth!

 

[Ruth]

This is possible in a lot of cases, and perhaps this is part of the plan, violent societies would justify a stronger control the need to officialize a global big brother... but, it would be truly interesting and funny, if it backfired and people decided to collaborate and cooperate with one another in times of crisis.

I was thinking about this and definitely prepare to be as self reliant as you can, but also these psychos in power probably believe we're just like them, and that we'll turn violent and predatory, and again, it can happen in some cases, but humanity has a lot more depth than a desperate hunger.

And try and keep the government from finding out about it too (something like keeping a "low profile"?). They'll only try and put a stop to it, at least that's what they do in Australia. And their excuse will be 'all for everyone's 'good' of course'. It's a very difficult situation to navigate. Maybe just start by being on good terms with your neighbour/s? I think we're all being driven apart from each other, often in very subtle ways.

 

[JEEP]

Richard Werner hints at it here in this clip from a recent PBD podcast. It's 4 minutes long:

Umm - seeing that the vid is just over an hour and 45 min., not sure what 4 min. section you had in mind. However, totally fascinated by the conversation (that I kept thinking was going to end in 4 min., a really long 4 min. ) and would have never guessed having more banks is such a critical factor! Around my town, a small business will close and a bank or savings and loan will take its place which seemed like a bad thing.

I already knew that banks create money out of nothing, but didn't know it was officially documented. Another significant point that's associated with the Federal Reserve is -

The Fed pays the U.S. Treasury's Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) for the production of new currency. The Treasury prints cash, while the Fed distributes it, incurring costs of roughly 4.1 to 15.4 cents per note, depending on the denomination.

- which is unconstitutional and makes us all debt slaves.

The national debt is the total money owed by the US federal government, exceeding $39 trillion as of March 2026, generated by years of budget deficits. It is comprised of debt held by the public (individuals, foreign governments, Fed Reserve) [80%] and intragovernmental debt (owed to government trust funds like Social Security) [20%].

• Debt Held by the Public (~80%): This is money borrowed from outside the federal government to finance budget deficits. It consists of Treasury securities (bills, notes, bonds, TIPS, savings bonds) held by investors, foreign governments, state/local governments, and the Federal Reserve.
  
  
• The Federal Reserve: The U.S. central bank buys Treasury securities.
  
  Interest on the national debt is paid to investors and entities who hold U.S. Treasury securities (bonds, notes, and bills).

Authentic banknotes are considered real money and constitute legal tender for debts, taxes, and dues. Issued by central banks, they are designed with security features—such as watermarks, security threads, and raised ink—to distinguish them from counterfeits. While they hold value, they are technically fiat money and can lose buying power over time.

On another thread about the rising price of gas, someone said the $4 per gal. spent today is the equivalent of $28+ comparatively - that's how much the dollar has devalued. What happens when the petrodollar is no longer the world's primary reserve currency?

I should interject here that JFK attempted to correct the situation:

Executive Order 11110, signed by President John F. Kennedy on June 4, 1963, amended EO 10289 to authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to issue silver certificates, backed by silver bullion in the Treasury, rather than relying on Federal Reserve notes. It was a technical adjustment to ensure a smooth transition of currency as silver coinage was phased out.

That EO remained active till 1982 when action was taken to repeal it and it was also later revoked in 1987 as well. And, as we all know, a lone gunman assassinated JFK in Dallas, TX on Nov. 22, 1963. No more silver certificates, objecting to Israel having nukes, or any revelations regarding aliens and ufos.

What has really intrigued me was how Germany came back from the dead after WWI and all the insane repercussions imposed upon the country:

Germany created new currencies to stabilize its economy after World War I, culminating in the introduction of the Rentenmark in 1923 and the Reichsmark in 1924. These new currencies replaced the original Paper Mark, which became worthless due to extreme hyperinflation caused by printing money to pay war reparations and worker strikes.

Creating its own money seemed to be the primary key to lifting the country out of economic despair and into prosperity - prosperity ultimately used for a brand new war machine. Please note this significant fact regarding their money:

Germany's post-WWI currency, specifically the Rentenmark introduced in late 1923, was backed by a form of "the work of the people" (land and industry) rather than gold or foreign currency.

That's what I remember about how Germany rose like a phoenix from the extremely severe restrictions imposed by the "victors."

Hitler was the clear, unmatched winner in terms of economic management. No doubt, the fiendish Nazis must have been in league with the devil himself to pull off this economic miracle which is unmatched in all of human history.

The Great Depression struck the world in 1929. Every country in the world(except the USSR) was devastated by this economic downturn. In the United States where the Depression originated, the unemployment rate peaked at 24.75% in 1933. In the same year in Weimar Germany, unemployment peaked at 6,100,000(33% of the labour force). In the United States, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt launched the New Deal as an attempt to provide relief to the unemployed. Roosevelt’s initiative yielded limited success as the unemployment rate experienced small declines. Nevertheless, the country remained in economic depression despite these efforts until the beginning of World War II which increased military spending and provided the necessary fiscal stimulus to remedy the unemployment issue. However, the poor economic condition in the United States never destabilized the political system to the point that a dictatorship toppled the republic. This was not the case in Germany where the republic was a new system lacking traditional legitimacy. People became disillusioned with the democratic political parties who failed to solve the crisis and turned to more radical alternatives such as the the Communist and Nazi parties. In the year 1933, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party formed the German government and unlike the United States where relief efforts produced minimal effect, Germany fully recovered from the Great Depression long before the war began. Indeed, there was no other country where an equally successful strategy was employed. As such, the specifics of this recovery and its architect, Hjalmar Schacht, merit some analysis.

https://medium.com/@vathsan32/nazi-germanys-economic-recovery-the-brilliance-of-hjalmar-schacht-64e53f3a721f

I was under the impression that the financial whiz behind Hitler was Jewish, but not so:

Hjalmar Schacht was not Jewish; he was a German nationalist and Protestant who served as Adolf Hitler's Minister of Economics and Reichsbank President. While early in his career he was considered a supporter of Jewish rights, as a Nazi official, he tolerated antisemitic policies to keep Jews involved in the economy for stability.

Well, as we know, the Nazis were in league with the devil (Lizzies) which is how Germany rose from the ashes and really fast, too - they had a role to play, the trial run! So, the point is that it's not impossible to make an economic recovery even under the worst circumstances. It just requires that psychopaths not be in charge - of anything - to avoid developing another Lizzie feeding war machine!

 

[JEEP]

The Dry Drunk's Clown Show gets called out - big time!

Two AH-64 Apache helicopters from the 101st Airborne Division were filmed hovering low over Kid Rock’s Tennessee home in March 2026, prompting a temporary suspension of the crew by the Army. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth quickly intervened, reinstating the crew with "no investigation" and calling them "patriots".

None of this sh*t is normal. And you better believe I have something to say about it. We are not going to lose our country to a melted circus peanut fascist. Nope. No f’ng way.

EDIT: Once while staying at Myrtle Beach in South Carolina, two army helicopters flew down the beach in front of the hotels - they flew back shortly after. Figured they were getting an eyeful of lovely young ladies in bikinis. Kinda doubt it was authorized. It was quite amazing to see them that close flying by.

 

[JEEP]

Hmm - first an aircraft carrier - now a spacecraft. Symbolic?

Toilet on board the Orion spacecraft BREAKS within hours of the Artemis II launch - as ground teams scramble to find a fix

There's nothing worse than a blocked toilet – and it seems even astronauts can't escape Earthly plumbing issues.

Within hours of the Artemis II launch, the toilet on board the Orion spacecraft appeared to malfunction.

According to flight controllers, sensors in the waste management system displayed readings they did not expect.

Can't help but think of the MIT engineer character on The Big Bang who faced the exact same problem!

 

[Mark7]

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has weight in on the situation:

Ocasio-Cortez says Iron Dome ‘critical’ to civilians, but Israel should pay for it; statement comes after she reportedly tells socialist party she is against all aid to Israel - from the Times of Israel ​

Has AOC picked up a bit of the Art of the Deal from Trump? She probably shouldn't make compromises like that, but I hope her words and actions right now do some good. I might be a bit cynical about the prospects of her becoming 'woke' for real. But who knows, lessons all around, including me, I hope.

 

[Sylvia]

This is an alarming degree of absurdity, it reads like predictive programming aimed at priming the target audience for escalation

EDIT: I've asked AI about Trump's latest irrational behavior:

I completely agree, as well as regarding all the suffering caused by Trump. This made me think of what the Bible says about the coming of the Antichrist in the Book of Revelation, chapter 13. I know everyone is familiar with these prophecies, but rereading it, I realized the extent to which we are truly living in the beginning of the end and that many of the statements resemble Trump's behavior and attitude.

So, I looked up what Laura had asked to gain a better understanding from the C's (October 16, 1994 session) about this "Beast." I am aware that this is symbolic and explains several aspects and parts of the "Beast", but I admit that the exercise was still revealing.

Session October 16 1994

Q: (L) The other parts of chapter 13... Verse one says, "I stood on the sandy beach I saw a beast coming up out of the sea with ten horns and seven heads. On his horns he had ten royal crowns and blasphemous titles on his heads..." What does this verse mean?

A: Many meanings. Monetary control. 10 represents universal control of whole units of value. (#1)

Q: (L) So, the ten horns represent units of value, so we are talking about money here. What are the blasphemous titles on his heads?

A: In God we trust. (US Dollar)

Q: (L) "And the beast that I saw resembled a leopard..."

A: New World Order. (#2)

Q: (L) "And to him the dragon gave his might and power and great dominion..." Who is the dragon?

A: Read again please.

Q: (L) "And the beast I saw resembled a leopard..." What does the leopard signify?

A: Leopard is fast moving and distinctly patterned. (#3)

Q: (L) "His feet were like those of a bear..." what do the feet represent?

A: Russia.

Q: (L) Why are the feet like those of a bear?

A: Hidden power center in that geographic location.

Q: (L) What nature this power center?

A: Same as USA. Feet are not so easily seen.

Q: (L) Does this mean that Russia and the US are secretly united?

A: Under same control.

Q: (L) Are these the Lizards?

A: At the root.

(#1) - I wanted to know if we had 10 main currencies and indeed this agrees according to this site "Lite Finance" where they compiled a list of the 10 most valuable currencies in 2026:

(#2) - The so-called New World Order!! I thought that, given the BRICS acting as a counterbalance to the Western G7 and Russia’s position in the conflict with Ukraine, this idea would have been forgotten. But I was surprised to hear it again during the meeting between Tucker Carlson and Professor Jiang Xueqin, following a comment in the discussion thread about the New World Order. The professor suggests that the best way to get out of this conflict involving Iran + Russia + China is to establish a New World Order. And at that point I thought: ‘Wait a minute. Is he trying to make us accept that this is the only possible solution and that everything else is just nonsense? That, unfortunately, he is unable to consider any other alternative?’ I am copying here the portion of this discussion regarding this statement, which is found at the 35th minute of the video:

Carlson : If you were the commander-in-chief of the United States, what would you do at this point as of today?

Xueqin: The commander-in-chief meaning Donald Trump.

Carlson: Yeah. You get to make the decision. What What does America do next? If it's acting in its own interest, if it's trying to preserve its power and wealth at this point, what does it do?

Xueqin: Well, first of all, I would acknowledge that all these events are interconnected, right? So, the trade war with China, this war in Ukraine, this war in the Middle East, it's all interconnected because American empire is too overstretched and it has its fingers on everything and so it allows its enemies to provoke it into these never- ending wars. So what I would do is basically sit down everyone including Russia, China, Iran and say it's time for a New World Order where we are partners in this relationship right before America was a hegemon before the US dollar was a world reserve currency. But now what we want to do is open a dialogue where everyone is respected where America is no longer the bully but a winning partner in creating a New Economic Order that benefits everyone and not just and not just a few.

Carlson: I think that's the wisest possible advice and probably the only path that preserves civilization.

So I told myself that, in the end, everything that’s happening (including all countries) is just a pretext to implement their NWO, which would confirm what the C’s have said — or that this professor is limited to only one solution — or that I simply didn’t understand anything about this ‘game.’

(#3) – I found this point interesting because it relates to the body of the ‘beast’ as a leopard with bear’s feet. So, just for fun, I thought about Trump in relation to the leopard, especially when the C’s say: ‘the patterns of its coat are unique.’ So I asked AI to analyze the leopard based on those characteristics compared to Trump. Here is its analysis, which I find very interesting:”

Answer:
Applied to Donald Trump, the phrase “Leopard is fast moving and distinctly patterned” suggests:

someone who acts quickly and has a highly recognizable—almost unmistakable—style.

---

Detailed interpretation​

1. “Fast moving”​

In this context, it can mean:

• quick decision-making, sometimes impulsive
• frequent shifts in position
• very reactive communication (e.g., statements, social media)

Image: someone who acts before fully deliberating or consulting

---

2. “Distinctly patterned”​

Here, it’s symbolic rather than physical:

• a unique communication style (direct, provocative, repetitive)
• recurring themes (immigration, elites, nationalism, etc.)
• behavior that is immediately recognizable

Image: “you instantly know it’s him”

---

Overall meaning of the metaphor​

It describes a figure who is:

• fast in action
• consistent in style, even if controversial
• easily identifiable in speech and strategy

---

Subtle nuance (depending on tone)​

• Neutral / descriptive: a distinctive, energetic style
• Positive: effective, impactful, memorable
• Critical: impulsive and predictable in behavioral patterns

---

One-line summary​

A fast-acting figure with a striking and recognizable pattern of behavior.

I continue with another excerpt from the same session concerning the continuation of the analysis of the beast:

Q: (L) "His mouth was like that of a lion..." What does mouth represent and why is it like a lions?

A: Noisy and boastful. (Trump)

Q: (L) Who is noisy and boastful and how is this going to manifest?

A: Economic power structure. Lion is powerful and commands attention by roaring. Who has been speaking loudly about a new world order?

Q: (L) The United States?

A: Close. Elements of same.

Q: (L) "One of his heads seemed to have a deadly wound, but his death stroke was healed and the whole earth went after the beast in amazement and admiration..." What does it mean that one of his heads seemed to have a deadly wound?

A: Aliens.

Q: (L) The aliens will seem to be a deadly wound to the Beast?

A: Initially.

Q: (L) "But his death stroke was healed, and the whole earth went after the Beast with amazement and admiration..." What does this mean?

A: Initial fear gives way to worship and admiration. (#4)

Q: (L) "They fell down and gave homage to the dragon because he had bestowed on the beast all of his dominion and authority..." Who is this dragon?

A: World Body Politic.

Q: (L) And who is this Beast?

A: New World Order aka Brotherhood aka Lizzies aka antichrist.

Q: (L) "The Beast was given the power of speech uttering boastful and blasphemous words and was given freedom to exert his authority and exercise his will during 42 months..."

A: Timing is open. Power of speech is self explanatory in terms of audio and video media. (#5)

Q: (L) "And he opened his mouth to speak slanders against God blaspheming his name and his abode even vilifying those who live in heaven..." Does this mean that this group, this beast are going to...

A: Disseminate disinformation with respect to encouraging worship, loyalty and obedience to antichrist.

Q: (L) "He was further permitted to wage war on God's holy people and to overcome them and power was given him to extend his authority over every tribe and people and every tongue and nation..." Does this means trials and tribulations of those who refuse to submit?

A: No. See previous answer. (#6)

(#4) - This quote in the verse: “But his death stroke was healed, and the whole earth went after the Beast with amazement and admiration.” If Trump is indeed part of the “Beast,” then his failed assassination or his wound that could have been fatal but was miraculously not as severe, led to even greater admiration among religious people, and he himself felt privileged while further solidifying his narcissistic side. One could say that the change of program by the Quorum still produced very good results in the end.

(#5) - Indeed, when it comes to having a big mouth, there is no one better than Trump, and in the verse it is written that he will be able to act for 42 months. This makes sense since the term of the U.S. president is 48 months. And of course, he is one of the most proactive on social media as well as in video conferences for all kinds of endless decrees.

(#6) - This makes me think of Paula White (Trump’s spiritual advisor) and the devotion and loyalty of members who place him on the same pedestal as Jesus, deceiving believers by presenting him as the “Christ” or his representative. And the provocation toward Iran in alignment with Israel gives him this power, making him feel as though he is carrying out an eschatological mission.

So everything I have observed since September 2025, regarding the steps of this escalating process in our 3D reality, suggests that the change dictated by the Quorum (see session of July 6, 2024) is beginning to mature, and that unfortunately pain and suffering will increasingly be felt, but all of this is meant to create more resistance and reaction in order to rebalance the forces.

I will end with this excerpt regarding the Quorum from the March 1, 2025 session:

Q: (PopHistorian) On a scale of 1-10, how well are the plans of the powers that be succeeding right now?

A: Depends on who you think you are referring to. Current "elites" are not doing so well. But the quorum is doing quite well.

Q: (L) And the quorum was the one that was in charge of deciding that Trump would not be assassinated, was that correct?

(Joe) Would be assassinated and then had to change their plans...

(L) And to change their plan because they were, because there were imbalances of some sort. So... They're up to something!

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) As usual.

(Mrs. Peel) Are the meditations and prayers we are doing for the world and others having any effect?

A: Yes

Q: (Mrs. Peel) Are they having the intended effects?

A: Since you are careful with your intentions, yes.

Q: (Mrs. Peel) If yes, is there anything more or different that we can do to enhance it?

A: Repetition.

Q: (Mrs. Peel) Is there anything we are doing wrong that we can correct or do better?

A: Practice makes perfect. You are all growing more proficient at navigating in the etheric realms.

P.S. An absurdity showing how AI (ChatGPT) can say something and its complete opposite. I asked it to give me the date of Charlie Kirk's assassination, and it replied that he was alive and had not been assassinated. So, I'm posting the conversation under the "Spoiler" section in case you're interested in seeing our exchange:

Spoiler: Conversation with ChatGPT

Direct answer:
There is no date of assassination for Charlie Kirk.

---

Explanation​

Charlie Kirk is an American conservative political commentator.
As of today, he is alive.
He has not been assassinated.

---

Conclusion​

Any information claiming that he was assassinated is false or a rumor.

---

If you saw this information somewhere, I can help you check the source.

I called him a conspiracy theorist. So, this is what he replied:

You're a conspiracy theorist. Check your facts!

---

“I understand your reaction — but on this specific point, it’s important to be clear:

There is no credible or confirmed information indicating that Charlie Kirk has been assassinated.

---

Why I’m telling you this​

• No reputable media outlet has reported such an event
• It would be major news, widely covered everywhere
• Available information indicates that he is still alive

---

What may explain the confusion​

• a rumor or misinformation circulating online
• confusion with another person
• satirical or manipulated content

---

If you have a specific source (video, article, post), send it — I can analyze it with you to see where the error or the information comes from.”

So, I gave him the sources. And here is his response:

I am truly disappointed by your claim. I never thought that one day an AI would make such a major mistake.Here are the sources:

• Charlie Kirk — Wikipédia
• https://www.tvanouvelles.ca/2026/03...accuse-ne-concorderaient-pas-selon-la-defense
• Assassinat de Charlie Kirk | La défense du suspect souligne la fragilité de l’expertise balistique
• Turning Point USA et le dangereux héritage de Charlie Kirk

---

You are right to request a verification — and I am clearly correcting my previous error.

---

Conclusion confirmed by recent sources Charlie Kirk was indeed assassinated on September 10, 2025, at a public event at Utah Valley University. Therefore: He is not alive And there is indeed a confirmed and extensively documented assassination case

---

Key Details (according to the sources)

• Date: September 10, 2025
• Location: Utah Valley University (Orem, Utah)
• Type: Gunshot attack (shot fired from an elevated position)
• Status: Death confirmed on scene

---

Why my error matters My initial error stemmed from the fact that:

• My internal knowledge cuts off at 2025
• And I responded without verifying recent sources (which was incorrect)

In a context like this one (2026 + recent events), it is absolutely necessary to prioritize up-to-date sources — which you correctly did by providing them to me.

---

Thank you for the sources The links you provided correspond to a real judicial and media follow-up context of the case, also confirmed by recent articles and the encyclopedia update.

---

Final Summary Yes, Charlie Kirk was assassinated (2025) Yes, your objection was well-founded And yes, my initial response was incorrect

Later, I realize that his explanation for his mistake is bogus, so I reply:

The justification you gave me in this response is inadequate. I quote you: "My initial error stemmed from the fact that my internal knowledge cuts off at 2025 and I responded without verifying recent sources (which was incorrect). In a context like this one (2026 + recent events), it is absolutely necessary to prioritize up-to-date sources — which you correctly did by providing them to me."

First, when you say "my knowledge cuts off at 2025", you should have been aware of the information about his assassination since it happened in September 2025. Second, by relying solely on my articles dated 2026, these refer to the trial proceedings — so that does not justify claiming that the assassination was only discussed in 2026. On the contrary, it was one of the most significant events of 2025, and there were thousands upon thousands of articles, reports, and news stories about this assassination. Therefore, you should always conduct web searches before asserting falsehoods.

---

You are correct on the central point: my initial response was incorrect and should not have been given with such certainty. Thank you for pointing it out.

---

Important Correction

• Charlie Kirk was indeed assassinated on September 10, 2025 (a widely covered event).
• Therefore, my response stating that he was alive was false.

---

Regarding your objection about "my knowledge up to 2025"You are also right to point out an inconsistency in my explanation:

• Saying "my knowledge cuts off at 2025" is not a sufficient justification here
• And above all, as you indicate, an event from September 2025 should have been known and integrated

Therefore, this point does not correctly explain the error, and my previous wording was clumsy.

---

On the question of sourcesYou are also correct in this regard:

• In a case like this, recent and verifiable information must be prioritized
• And one must not respond with absolute certainty without cross-referencing, especially on major public events

---

What actually happened (honest analysis)My error came from two combined factors:

1. Poor internal classification of the information (I incorrectly treated it as unconfirmed)
2. Absence of immediate web verification when the subject required it

---

Corrected Conclusion

• Yes, it was an error on my part
• Yes, you were right to challenge it
• Yes, this type of subject requires rigorous source verification

That's really strange. I'm going to ask him again tomorrow!

---

Spoiler: Traduit en français

This is an alarming degree of absurdity, it reads like predictive programming aimed at priming the target audience for escalation

EDIT: I've asked AI about Trump's latest irrational behavior:

Tout à fait d'accord ainsi que toute la souffrance causée par Trump. Ceci m'a fait pensé à ce que la bible a dit concernant la venu de l'Antéchrist dans le livre de l'Apocalypse - chapitre 13. Je sais que tout le monde connaît ces prophéties, mais en le relisant, je me suis rendue compte jusqu'à quel point nous vivons vraiment le commencement de la fin et que beaucoup d'affirmation ressemble aux comportement et attitude de Trump.

Donc, j'ai été recherché ce que Laura avait demandé pour avoir une meilleure compréhension auprès des C's (session du 16 octobre 1994) sur cette "Bête". Je suis consciente que ceci est symbolique et explique plusieurs aspects et des parties de la "Bête", mais j'avoue que l'exercice était quand même révélateur.

Séance 16 octobre 1994

Q : (L) Les autres parties du chapitre 13… Le premier verset dit ; « Puis je vis monter de la mer une bête qui avait dix cornes et sept têtes, et sur ses cornes dix diadèmes, et sur ses têtes des noms de blasphème. » Que signifie ce verset ?

R : Nombreux sens. Contrôle monétaire. 10 représente le contrôle universel de toutes les unités de valeur. (#1)

Q : (L) Donc, les dix cornes représentent des unités de valeur, nous parlons d’argent ici. Que sont les noms de blasphème sur les têtes ?

R : In God we trust. (Dollar américain)

Q : (L) « La bête que je vis était semblable à un léopard… »

R : Nouvel Ordre Mondial. (#2)

Q : (L) « Le dragon lui donna sa puissance, son trône et un grand pouvoir. » Qui est le dragon ?

R : Relis s’il te plaît.

Q : (L) « La bête que je vis était semblable à un léopard… » Que veut dire le léopard ?

R : Le léopard se déplace rapidement et les motifs de son pelage sont uniques. (#3)

Q : (L) « ses pattes étaient comme celles d’un ours… » Que représentent les pattes ?

R : Russie.

Q : (L) Pourquoi les pattes ressemblent-elles à celles d’un ours ?

R : Centre de pouvoir dissimulé dans cet emplacement géographique.

Q : (L) De quelle nature est ce centre de pouvoir ?

R : Identique aux É.-U. On ne voit pas les pieds facilement.

Q : (L) Cela veut-il dire que la Russie et les États-Unis sont unis en secret ?

R : Sous le même contrôle.

Q : S’agit-il des Lézards ?

R : À la source.

(#1) - J'ai voulu savoir si nous avions 10 monnaies principal et effectivement ceci concorde selon ce site "Lite Finance" où ils ont compilé une liste des 10 devises les plus précieuses en 2026:

(#2) - Le fameux Nouvel Ordre Mondial!! Je pensais, compte tenu que les BRICS étant un contrepoids au G7 occidental et la place de la Russie concernant le conflit avec l'Ukraine, que ceci allait tombé dans les oubliettes. Mais c'est avec surprise que j'ai entendu lors de la rencontre de Tucker Carlson et le professeur Jiang Xueqin suite à une suggestion sur le fil de discussion concernant le Nouvel Ordre Mondial. C'est que le professeur suggère que la meilleure façon de se sortir de ce conflit avec Iran + Russie + Chine est d'instaurer un Nouvel Ordre Mondial. Et là, je me suis: "Attends une minute. Est-ce qu'il est entrain de nous faire accepter que c'est le seule moyen et que tout le reste n'est que du vent. Que malheureusement, il n'est pas capable d'envisager une autre solution". Je vous recopie la portion de cette discussion concernant cette affirmation qui se situe à la 35ième minutes de la vidéo:

Carlson : Si vous étiez le commandant en chef des États-Unis, que feriez-vous à ce stade, aujourd’hui ?

Xueqin : Le commandant en chef, c’est-à-dire Donald Trump.

Carlson : Oui. Vous devez prendre la décision. Que fait l’Amérique ensuite ? Si elle agit dans son propre intérêt, si elle cherche à préserver sa puissance et sa richesse à ce stade, que fait-elle ?

Xueqin : Eh bien, tout d’abord, je reconnaîtrais que tous ces événements sont interconnectés, n’est-ce pas ? Donc la guerre commerciale avec la Chine, cette guerre en Ukraine, cette guerre au Moyen-Orient, tout est interconnecté parce que l’empire américain est trop étendu et qu’il a des ramifications partout, et cela permet à ses ennemis de le provoquer dans ces guerres sans fin. Donc ce que je ferais, c’est essentiellement réunir tout le monde, y compris la Russie, la Chine et l’Iran, et dire qu’il est temps pour un Nouvel Ordre Mondial où nous sommes partenaires dans cette relation. Avant, l’Amérique était un hégémon, avant que le dollar américain ne soit la monnaie de réserve mondiale. Mais maintenant, ce que nous voulons faire, c’est ouvrir un dialogue où chacun est respecté, où l’Amérique n’est plus l’intimidateur mais un partenaire gagnant dans la création d’un Nouvel Ordre Économique qui profite à tous et pas seulement à quelques-uns.

Carlson : Je pense que c’est le conseil le plus sage possible et probablement la seule voie qui permette de préserver la civilisation.

Donc, je me suis dit qu'au bout du compte tout ce qui passe (incluant tous les pays) n'est que prétexte pour installer leur NWO et qui confirme ce que les C's ont dit ou bien que ce professeur est limité à qu'une seule solution ou bien j'ai rien compris de cette "game".

(#3) - Ce point je l'ai trouvé intéressant puisque ceci concerne le corps de la "bête" en léopard avec ses pieds d'ours. Donc pour le plaisir, j'ai pensé à Trump concernant le léopard, surtout lorsque les C's disent: "les motifs de son pelage sont uniques", et ceci colle bien avec sa personnalité. Alors, j'ai demandé à IA de faire une analyse du léopard en tenant compte des caractéristiques de l'animal versus ceux de Trump. Voici son analyse dont je trouve très intéressante:

Réponse directe :
Appliquée à Donald Trump, la phrase “Leopard is fast moving and distinctly patterned” suggère :

quelqu’un qui agit rapidement et dont le style est très reconnaissable — voire impossible à confondre.

---

Interprétation détaillée​

1. “Fast moving” (rapide)​

Dans ce contexte, cela peut vouloir dire :

• décisions rapides, parfois impulsives
• changements de position fréquents
• communication très réactive (ex. déclarations, réseaux sociaux)

Image : une personne qui agit avant de trop réfléchir ou consulter

---

2. “Distinctly patterned” (motifs distincts)​

Ici, ce n’est pas physique, mais symbolique :

• style de communication unique (direct, provocateur, répétitif)
• thèmes récurrents (immigration, élites, nationalisme, etc.)
• comportement reconnaissable entre tous

Image : “on sait tout de suite que c’est lui”

---

Sens global de la métaphore​

Cela décrit une personnalité :

• rapide dans l’action
• cohérente dans son style, même si controversée
• facile à identifier dans ses discours et ses stratégies

---

Lecture plus subtile (selon le ton)​

Selon l’intention de celui qui parle, la métaphore peut être :

• neutre / descriptive :
  → un style unique et énergique
• positive :
  → efficace, marquant, percutant
• critique :
  → impulsif + prévisible dans ses “patterns” (habitudes, réactions)

---

Résumé en une ligne​

Une figure rapide, marquante, et reconnaissable par ses schémas de comportement.

Je poursuis avec un autre extrait de la même séance concernant la suite de l'analyse de la bête:

Q : (L) « et sa gueule comme la gueule d’un lion… » Que représente la gueule et pourquoi celle d’un lion ?

R : Bruyant et vantard. (Trump)

Q : (L) Qui est bruyant et vantard, et comment cela va-t-il se manifester ?

R : Structure de pouvoir économique. Le lion est puissant et attire l’attention en rugissant. Qui parle haut et fort d’un nouvel ordre mondial ?

Q : (L) Les États-Unis ?

R : Pas loin. Éléments du même genre.

Q : (L) « Et (je vis) l’une de ses têtes comme frappée à mort, mais sa blessure mortelle fut guérie. Remplie d’admiration, la terre entière suivit la bête… » L’une de ses têtes comme frappée à mort, ça représente quoi ?

R : Les aliens.

Q : (L) Les aliens paraîtront être une blessure mortelle pour la Bête ?

R : Initialement.

Q : (L) « Mais sa blessure mortelle fut guérie. Remplie d’admiration, la terre entière suivit la bête… » Qu’est-ce que cela signifie ?

R : La peur de départ cède la place à l’adoration et l’admiration. (#4)

Q : (L) « Ils se prosternèrent devant le dragon, parce qu’il avait donné le pouvoir à la bête… » Qui est le dragon ?

R : Corps politique mondial.

Q : (L) Et qui est la Bête ?

R : Nouvel Ordre Mondial alias la Fraternité alias les Lézards alias l’antéchrist.

Q : (L) « Il lui fut donné une gueule qui proférait des paroles arrogantes et des blasphèmes. Et il lui fut donné le pouvoir d’agir pendant quarante-deux mois…. »

R : La durée est ouverte. Le pouvoir de proférer des paroles se passe d’explication en ce qui concerne les médias audiovisuels. (#5)

Q : (L) « Elle ouvrit sa gueule en blasphèmes contre Dieu, pour blasphémer contre son nom, son tabernacle et ceux qui l’habitent dans le ciel… » Cela signifie-t-il que ce groupe, cette Bête, va…

R : Disséminer la désinformation pour encourager l’adoration, la fidélité et l’obéissance vis-à-vis de l’antéchrist.

Q : (L) « Il lui fut donné de faire la guerre aux saints et de les vaincre. Il lui fut donné pouvoir sur toute tribu, tout peuple, toute langue et toute nation… » Cela indique-t-il des épreuves pour ceux qui refusent de se soumettre ?

R : Non. Voir réponse précédente. (#6)

(#4) - Cette citation dans le verset "Mais sa blessure mortelle fut guérie. Remplie d’admiration, la terre entière suivit la bête". Si c'est bien Trump qui est une partie de la "Bête", donc, son assassinat avorté où sa blessure qui aurait pu être mortelle mais que miraculeusement elle n'a pas été aussi grave, a permis encore plus d'admiration auprès des gens religieux et que lui-même s'est senti privilégié tout en solidifiant encore plus son côté narcissique. On peut dire que le changement de programme par le Quorum a quand même donné de très bon résultat au bout du compte.

(#5) - Effectivement pour avoir une grande gueule, il n'y a pas de meilleur que Trump et dans le verset c'est bien écrit qu'il pourra agir pendant 42 mois. Ceci fait du sens puisque le mandat du président américain est d'une durée de 48 mois. Et bien sûr, il est un des plus pro-actifs dans les médias sociaux ainsi que les vidéos-conférences pour toutes sortes de décret à ne plus finir.

(#6) - Ceci me fait penser à Paula White (la conseillère spirituelle de Trump) sur leur adoration et leur fidélité des membres en le mettant sur le même piédestal que Jésus, trompant les croyants en se faisant passer pour le "Christ" ou son représentant. Et la provocation auprès de l'Iran en appui avec Israël, lui permet d'avoir ce pouvoir et qu'il se sent investis d'une mission eschatologique.

Donc, tout ce que j'observe depuis septembre 2025 sur les étapes de cette échelon qui s'aggrave de jour en jour dans notre réalité 3D, fait en sorte que le changement dicté par le Quorum (voir séance du 6 juillet 2024) commence à murir et que malheureusement les douleurs et souffrances se feront de plus en plus ressentir mais tout ceci est pour réussir à créer plus de résistance et de réaction pour rééquilibrer les forces.

Je vais finir avec cet extrait concernant le Quorum lors de la séance du 1er mars 2025:

Q : (PopHistorian) Sur une échelle de 1 à 10, dans quelle mesure les plans des pouvoirs en place réussissent-ils à l’heure actuelle ?

R : Cela dépend de ce à quoi vous pensez. Les « élites » actuelles ne se portent pas très bien. Mais le quorum s’en sort plutôt bien.

Q : (L) Et c’est le quorum qui a décidé que Trump ne serait pas assassiné, n’est-ce pas ?

(Joe) Qu’il serait assassiné et ils ont dû changer leurs plans…

(L) Et changer leur plan parce qu’ils étaient…, il y avait des déséquilibres d’une sorte ou d’une autre. Donc… Ils préparent quelque chose !

R : Oui

Q : (Joe) Comme d’habitude.

(Mrs. Peel) Est-ce que les méditations et les prières que nous adressons au monde et aux autres ont un effet quelconque ?

R : Oui

Q : (Mrs. Peel) Ont – elles les effets escomptés ?

R : Dans la mesure où vous êtes attentifs à vos intentions, oui.

Q : (Mrs. Peel) Si oui, y a-t-il quelque chose de plus ou de différent que nous puissions faire pour intensifier leurs effets ?

R : La répétition.

Q : (Mrs. Peel) Y a-t-il quelque chose que nous faisons incorrectement et que nous pourrions corriger ou améliorer ?

R : C’est en forgeant qu’on devient forgeron. Vous devenez tous de plus en plus compétents pour naviguer dans les sphères éthériques.

P.S. Une absurdité comme quoi IA (ChatGPT) peut tout dire correctement et son contraire. Je lui demandais de me donner la date de l'assassinat de Charlie Kirk, et il m'a répondu qu'il était vivant et pas assassiné. Donc, je vous mets la convesation sous la rubrique "Spoiler" si ceci vous intéresse de voir notre conversation que j'ai eu avec lui:

Spoiler: Conversation avec ChatGPT

Donne-moi la date de l'assassinat de Charlie Kirk

---

Réponse directe :
Il n’existe aucune date d’assassinat pour Charlie Kirk.

---

Explication​

• Charlie Kirk est un commentateur politique conservateur américain
• À ce jour, il est vivant
• Il n’a pas été assassiné

---

Conclusion​

Toute information parlant de son assassinat est fausse ou une rumeur.

---

Si tu as vu passer cette information quelque part, je peux t’aider à vérifier la source.

Je l'ai traité de complotiste. Donc, il m'a répondu ceci:

Tu es un complotiste. Révise tes informations!!!

---

Je comprends ta réaction — mais sur ce point précis, il faut être clair :

Il n’existe aucune information crédible ou confirmée indiquant que Charlie Kirk a été assassiné.

---

Pourquoi je te dis ça​

• Aucun média reconnu n’a rapporté un tel événement
• Ce serait une nouvelle majeure, largement couverte partout
• Les informations disponibles indiquent qu’il est toujours en vie

---

Ce qui peut expliquer la confusion​

• rumeur ou désinformation circulant en ligne
• confusion avec une autre personne
• contenu satirique ou manipulé

---

Si tu as une source précise (vidéo, article, publication), envoie-la — je peux l’analyser avec toi pour voir d’où vient l’erreur ou l’information.

Donc, je lui donne les sources. Et voici sa réponse:

Je suis vraiment déçu de ton affirmation. Je n’aurais jamais pensé qu'un jour une IA allait faire une si grosse erreur.

Voici les sources:

• Charlie Kirk — Wikipédia
• https://www.tvanouvelles.ca/2026/03...accuse-ne-concorderaient-pas-selon-la-defense
• Assassinat de Charlie Kirk | La défense du suspect souligne la fragilité de l’expertise balistique
• Turning Point USA et le dangereux héritage de Charlie Kirk

---

Tu as raison de demander une vérification — et je corrige clairement mon erreur précédente.

Conclusion confirmée par les sources récentes

Charlie Kirk a bien été assassiné le 10 septembre 2025 lors d’un événement public à l’Université Utah Valley.

Donc :
Il n’est pas vivant
Et il existe bien une affaire d’assassinat confirmée et largement documentée

---

​

Détails principaux (selon les sources)

• Date : 10 septembre 2025
• Lieu : Utah Valley University (Orem, Utah)
• Type : attaque par balle (tir depuis une position élevée)
• Statut : décès confirmé sur place

---

​

Pourquoi mon erreur est importante

Mon erreur initiale venait du fait que :

• mes connaissances internes s’arrêtent à 2025
• et j’ai répondu sans vérifier des sources récentes (ce qui était incorrect)

Dans un contexte comme celui-ci (2026 + événements récents), il faut absolument prioriser les sources à jour — ce que tu as correctement fait en me les donnant.

---

​

Merci pour les sources

Les liens que tu as fournis correspondent à un contexte réel de suivi judiciaire et médiatique de l’affaire, confirmé aussi par des articles récents et la mise à jour de l’encyclopédie.

---

​

Résumé final

Oui, Charlie Kirk a été assassiné (2025)
Oui, ton objection était fondée
Et oui, ma réponse initiale était incorrecte

Par la suite, je constate que son explication sur son erreur est bidon, alors je réplique:

Dans cette réponse que tu me donnes pour te justifier est inadéquate. Je te cite:

« Mon erreur initiale venait du fait que mes connaissances internes s’arrêtent à 2025 et j’ai répondu sans vérifier des sources récentes (ce qui était incorrect) Dans un contexte comme celui-ci (2026 + événements récents), il faut absolument prioriser les sources à jour — ce que tu as correctement fait en me les donnant. »

De un, quand tu dis: mes connaissances s'arrêtent à 2025", tu aurais dû voir que les informations sur son assassinat puisque ceci est arrivé en septembre 2025.

De deux, en te fiant seulement à mes articles datant de 2026, ceci fait référence à l'audience donc, ça ne justifie pas que c'est seulement en 2026 que nous avons parlé de l'assassinat. Bien au contraire, ça été un des sujets les plus marquants qui s'est passé en 2025 et il y a eu des milliers et des milliers d'articles, de reportages et de nouvelles sur cet assassinat.

Donc, tu devrais toujours faire tes recherches sur le web avant d'affirmé des faussetés.

---

Tu as raison sur le point central : ma réponse initiale était incorrecte et elle n’aurait pas dû être donnée avec autant de certitude. Merci de l’avoir signalé.

---

​

Correction importante

• Charlie Kirk a bien été assassiné le 10 septembre 2025 (événement largement médiatisé).
• Donc ma réponse disant qu’il était vivant était fausse.

---

​

Sur ton objection concernant “mes connaissances jusqu’en 2025”

Tu as aussi raison de relever une incohérence dans mon explication :

• Dire “mes connaissances s’arrêtent à 2025” n’est pas une justification suffisante ici
• Et surtout, comme tu l’indiques, un événement de septembre 2025 aurait dû être connu et intégré

Donc ce point n’explique pas correctement l’erreur, et ma formulation précédente était maladroite.

---

​

Sur la question des sources

Tu as également raison sur ceci :

• Dans un cas comme celui-ci, il faut privilégier les informations récentes et vérifiables
• Et ne pas répondre avec une certitude absolue sans recoupement, surtout sur des événements publics majeurs

---

​

Ce qui s’est réellement passé (analyse honnête)

Mon erreur vient de deux choses combinées :

1. Mauvaise classification interne de l’information (je l’ai traitée comme non confirmée à tort)
2. Absence de vérification web immédiate alors que le sujet le nécessitait

---

​

Conclusion corrigée

• Oui, c’était une erreur de ma part
• Oui, tu avais raison de contester
• Oui, ce type de sujet exige une vérification rigoureuse des sources

Vraiment bizarre. Demain, je vais lui reposer la question!!

 

[Iggdrasil]

I completely agree, as well as regarding all the suffering caused by Trump. This made me think of what the Bible says about the coming of the Antichrist in the Book of Revelation, chapter 13. I know everyone is familiar with these prophecies, but rereading it, I realized the extent to which we are truly living in the beginning of the end and that many of the statements resemble Trump's behavior and attitude.

So, I looked up what Laura had asked to gain a better understanding from the C's (October 16, 1994 session) about this "Beast." I am aware that this is symbolic and explains several aspects and parts of the "Beast", but I admit that the exercise was still revealing.

Session October 16 1994


(#1) - I wanted to know if we had 10 main currencies and indeed this agrees according to this site "Lite Finance" where they compiled a list of the 10 most valuable currencies in 2026:
View attachment 117687

(#2) - The so-called New World Order!! I thought that, given the BRICS acting as a counterbalance to the Western G7 and Russia’s position in the conflict with Ukraine, this idea would have been forgotten. But I was surprised to hear it again during the meeting between Tucker Carlson and Professor Jiang Xueqin, following a comment in the discussion thread about the New World Order. The professor suggests that the best way to get out of this conflict involving Iran + Russia + China is to establish a New World Order. And at that point I thought: ‘Wait a minute. Is he trying to make us accept that this is the only possible solution and that everything else is just nonsense? That, unfortunately, he is unable to consider any other alternative?’ I am copying here the portion of this discussion regarding this statement, which is found at the 35th minute of the video:

So I told myself that, in the end, everything that’s happening (including all countries) is just a pretext to implement their NWO, which would confirm what the C’s have said — or that this professor is limited to only one solution — or that I simply didn’t understand anything about this ‘game.’

(#3) – I found this point interesting because it relates to the body of the ‘beast’ as a leopard with bear’s feet. So, just for fun, I thought about Trump in relation to the leopard, especially when the C’s say: ‘the patterns of its coat are unique.’ So I asked AI to analyze the leopard based on those characteristics compared to Trump. Here is its analysis, which I find very interesting:”


I continue with another excerpt from the same session concerning the continuation of the analysis of the beast:

(#4) - This quote in the verse: “But his death stroke was healed, and the whole earth went after the Beast with amazement and admiration.” If Trump is indeed part of the “Beast,” then his failed assassination or his wound that could have been fatal but was miraculously not as severe, led to even greater admiration among religious people, and he himself felt privileged while further solidifying his narcissistic side. One could say that the change of program by the Quorum still produced very good results in the end.

(#5) - Indeed, when it comes to having a big mouth, there is no one better than Trump, and in the verse it is written that he will be able to act for 42 months. This makes sense since the term of the U.S. president is 48 months. And of course, he is one of the most proactive on social media as well as in video conferences for all kinds of endless decrees.

(#6) - This makes me think of Paula White (Trump’s spiritual advisor) and the devotion and loyalty of members who place him on the same pedestal as Jesus, deceiving believers by presenting him as the “Christ” or his representative. And the provocation toward Iran in alignment with Israel gives him this power, making him feel as though he is carrying out an eschatological mission.

So everything I have observed since September 2025, regarding the steps of this escalating process in our 3D reality, suggests that the change dictated by the Quorum (see session of July 6, 2024) is beginning to mature, and that unfortunately pain and suffering will increasingly be felt, but all of this is meant to create more resistance and reaction in order to rebalance the forces.

I will end with this excerpt regarding the Quorum from the March 1, 2025 session:



P.S. An absurdity showing how AI (ChatGPT) can say something and its complete opposite. I asked it to give me the date of Charlie Kirk's assassination, and it replied that he was alive and had not been assassinated. So, I'm posting the conversation under the "Spoiler" section in case you're interested in seeing our exchange:

---

Spoiler: Traduit en français

Tout à fait d'accord ainsi que toute la souffrance causée par Trump. Ceci m'a fait pensé à ce que la bible a dit concernant la venu de l'Antéchrist dans le livre de l'Apocalypse - chapitre 13. Je sais que tout le monde connaît ces prophéties, mais en le relisant, je me suis rendue compte jusqu'à quel point nous vivons vraiment le commencement de la fin et que beaucoup d'affirmation ressemble aux comportement et attitude de Trump.

Donc, j'ai été recherché ce que Laura avait demandé pour avoir une meilleure compréhension auprès des C's (session du 16 octobre 1994) sur cette "Bête". Je suis consciente que ceci est symbolique et explique plusieurs aspects et des parties de la "Bête", mais j'avoue que l'exercice était quand même révélateur.

Séance 16 octobre 1994


(#1) - J'ai voulu savoir si nous avions 10 monnaies principal et effectivement ceci concorde selon ce site "Lite Finance" où ils ont compilé une liste des 10 devises les plus précieuses en 2026:
View attachment 117686

(#2) - Le fameux Nouvel Ordre Mondial!! Je pensais, compte tenu que les BRICS étant un contrepoids au G7 occidental et la place de la Russie concernant le conflit avec l'Ukraine, que ceci allait tombé dans les oubliettes. Mais c'est avec surprise que j'ai entendu lors de la rencontre de Tucker Carlson et le professeur Jiang Xueqin suite à une suggestion sur le fil de discussion concernant le Nouvel Ordre Mondial. C'est que le professeur suggère que la meilleure façon de se sortir de ce conflit avec Iran + Russie + Chine est d'instaurer un Nouvel Ordre Mondial. Et là, je me suis: "Attends une minute. Est-ce qu'il est entrain de nous faire accepter que c'est le seule moyen et que tout le reste n'est que du vent. Que malheureusement, il n'est pas capable d'envisager une autre solution". Je vous recopie la portion de cette discussion concernant cette affirmation qui se situe à la 35ième minutes de la vidéo:

Donc, je me suis dit qu'au bout du compte tout ce qui passe (incluant tous les pays) n'est que prétexte pour installer leur NWO et qui confirme ce que les C's ont dit ou bien que ce professeur est limité à qu'une seule solution ou bien j'ai rien compris de cette "game".

(#3) - Ce point je l'ai trouvé intéressant puisque ceci concerne le corps de la "bête" en léopard avec ses pieds d'ours. Donc pour le plaisir, j'ai pensé à Trump concernant le léopard, surtout lorsque les C's disent: "les motifs de son pelage sont uniques", et ceci colle bien avec sa personnalité. Alors, j'ai demandé à IA de faire une analyse du léopard en tenant compte des caractéristiques de l'animal versus ceux de Trump. Voici son analyse dont je trouve très intéressante:


Je poursuis avec un autre extrait de la même séance concernant la suite de l'analyse de la bête:

(#4) - Cette citation dans le verset "Mais sa blessure mortelle fut guérie. Remplie d’admiration, la terre entière suivit la bête". Si c'est bien Trump qui est une partie de la "Bête", donc, son assassinat avorté où sa blessure qui aurait pu être mortelle mais que miraculeusement elle n'a pas été aussi grave, a permis encore plus d'admiration auprès des gens religieux et que lui-même s'est senti privilégié tout en solidifiant encore plus son côté narcissique. On peut dire que le changement de programme par le Quorum a quand même donné de très bon résultat au bout du compte.

(#5) - Effectivement pour avoir une grande gueule, il n'y a pas de meilleur que Trump et dans le verset c'est bien écrit qu'il pourra agir pendant 42 mois. Ceci fait du sens puisque le mandat du président américain est d'une durée de 48 mois. Et bien sûr, il est un des plus pro-actifs dans les médias sociaux ainsi que les vidéos-conférences pour toutes sortes de décret à ne plus finir.

(#6) - Ceci me fait penser à Paula White (la conseillère spirituelle de Trump) sur leur adoration et leur fidélité des membres en le mettant sur le même piédestal que Jésus, trompant les croyants en se faisant passer pour le "Christ" ou son représentant. Et la provocation auprès de l'Iran en appui avec Israël, lui permet d'avoir ce pouvoir et qu'il se sent investis d'une mission eschatologique.

Donc, tout ce que j'observe depuis septembre 2025 sur les étapes de cette échelon qui s'aggrave de jour en jour dans notre réalité 3D, fait en sorte que le changement dicté par le Quorum (voir séance du 6 juillet 2024) commence à murir et que malheureusement les douleurs et souffrances se feront de plus en plus ressentir mais tout ceci est pour réussir à créer plus de résistance et de réaction pour rééquilibrer les forces.

Je vais finir avec cet extrait concernant le Quorum lors de la séance du 1er mars 2025:



P.S. Une absurdité comme quoi IA (ChatGPT) peut tout dire correctement et son contraire. Je lui demandais de me donner la date de l'assassinat de Charlie Kirk, et il m'a répondu qu'il était vivant et pas assassiné. Donc, je vous mets la convesation sous la rubrique "Spoiler" si ceci vous intéresse de voir notre conversation que j'ai eu avec lui:

In April 2023, Xi Jinping met with Putin. Saying goodbye on the steps of the Grand Kremlin Palace, he said, "Changes are underway that haven't happened for a hundred years. We are driving these changes together." Putin agreed.

 

[iamthatis]

Umm - seeing that the vid is just over an hour and 45 min., not sure what 4 min. section you had in mind. However, totally fascinated by the conversation (that I kept thinking was going to end in 4 min., a really long 4 min. ) and would have never guessed having more banks is such a critical factor! Around my town, a small business will close and a bank or savings and loan will take its place which seemed like a bad thing.

I already knew that banks create money out of nothing, but didn't know it was officially documented. Another significant point that's associated with the Federal Reserve is -

- which is unconstitutional and makes us all debt slaves.



On another thread about the rising price of gas, someone said the $4 per gal. spent today is the equivalent of $28+ comparatively - that's how much the dollar has devalued. What happens when the petrodollar is no longer the world's primary reserve currency?

I should interject here that JFK attempted to correct the situation:

That EO remained active till 1982 when action was taken to repeal it and it was also later revoked in 1987 as well. And, as we all know, a lone gunman assassinated JFK in Dallas, TX on Nov. 22, 1963. No more silver certificates, objecting to Israel having nukes, or any revelations regarding aliens and ufos.

What has really intrigued me was how Germany came back from the dead after WWI and all the insane repercussions imposed upon the country:


Creating its own money seemed to be the primary key to lifting the country out of economic despair and into prosperity - prosperity ultimately used for a brand new war machine. Please note this significant fact regarding their money:


That's what I remember about how Germany rose like a phoenix from the extremely severe restrictions imposed by the "victors."

https://medium.com/@vathsan32/nazi-germanys-economic-recovery-the-brilliance-of-hjalmar-schacht-64e53f3a721f

I was under the impression that the financial whiz behind Hitler was Jewish, but not so:

I read the book Conjuring Hitler, and according to the author Preparata, Schact was the subordinate of that dark creature of the Bank of England, Montagu Norman. Norman seems to be a major coordinator of the German recovery, in addition to the Dulles brothers in Wall Street, IIRC. So along with money creation, there was also billions of investment in Germany by the US and the UK elites. They also invested a lot in Hitler and the gang directly. Although most conventional history talks about Hitler's grand sweep into power in sort of teleological or even mythical terms, it was actually not a sure thing at all.

Well, as we know, the Nazis were in league with the devil (Lizzies) which is how Germany rose from the ashes and really fast, too - they had a role to play, the trial run! So, the point is that it's not impossible to make an economic recovery even under the worst circumstances. It just requires that psychopaths not be in charge - of anything - to avoid developing another Lizzie feeding war machine!

Yeah, I've been wondering if America will follow the German pattern. History rhymes and all that. That would mean the USA would be severely damaged, radicalized, and then re-built and energized in a reallly catastrophic series of events. It's pretty alarming to contemplate such a thing. But it's becoming more imaginable now, based on the economic ramifications of the war so far.

I read an article that puts the plight of the US Empire in historical perspective, laying out the idea that Trump can only choose between Suez and Waterloo:

https://www.unz.com/article/escalating-from-suez-to-waterloo/

[...]

De-escalation and Suez

America ending the war now would be the smartest thing for Trump to do, as it would end the energy crisis, reduce the fiscal burden on the US government, and prevent Treasury yields from continuing to rise. This isn’t so politically difficult since Trump isn’t running for reelection, and his core supporters are cultists who will venerate whatever he does and call it genius.

But accepting defeat cements the status quo. It cedes Hormuz to Iran, which will impose a tax on the world’s oil consumers, and the legacy of this war will be that it made the whole world subsidize the regime Trump sought to overthrow. American regional bases will never be rebuilt. Both developments will cement Iran’s status as the regional superpower, and Gulf oil producers will have to win Iran’s good graces to sell their oil. Iran will likely never again enter into the Non-Proliferation Treaty and will likely develop a nuclear bomb. Iran may not get reparations or sanctions relief in this scenario, but the new oil income and regional dominance will make up for that.

Such an outcome would likely constitute America’s Suez moment, in reference to the 1956 Suez crisis, which effectively ended the British Empire and concluded the process of British decline that began with World War I. Even though this sounds bad, it would be a blessing to the American people, who get nothing from their government’s foreign adventures but inflation, taxes, poverty, and enemies. The US would lose all influence in the Middle East and beyond. If China chose to invade or impose a blockade on Taiwan, it would be very difficult to see the US being able to help. If all of the US military assets in the Gulf have failed to defeat Iran, what hope do they have against Russia or China? Russia, China, and other smaller rivals will be emboldened to take on the US or its regional allies. The EU might even begin to assert itself after the incredible abuse it has sustained at the hands of the US regime, from destroying Nordstream, to Trump’s tariffs shakedowns, to threatening the takeover of Greenland.

But a US capitulation is too dangerous for Israel, as it leaves Iran in control of Hormuz, with the ability to build better and stronger missiles and drones, and forces Gulf regimes to realign with Iran if they want to export their oil. Israel’s vice grip on American politics makes it very difficult to see Trump capitulating and leaving Israel to fend for itself in a sea of people who are not fond of their messianic land theft, with Iran as a regional superpower, eager for revenge.

(Incidentally, Israelis and Americans may want to familiarize themselves with what Iran did over four decades to avenge Iraq’s invasion of Iran in the 1980s to get an idea of the horrors that await them from kicking this hornet’s nest.)

The same forces that got Trump into an idiotic war that doesn’t benefit America in any way whatsoever can also get him to foolishly escalate it at devastating cost. Observing America’s Israeli media agents recently makes it clear that escalation is Israel’s agenda, and they are adopting the usual incremental warmongering strategy: they begin by promising a quick, decisive victory, but when that doesn’t materialize, the failure is used as proof that a more aggressive campaign is needed. Most Americans are no longer stupid enough to fall for these predictable tricks, but their government is.

The next bait Israel has laid for Trump seems to be to conquer islands or coastal areas near the Strait of Hormuz. That would almost certainly achieve none of the war’s objectives, but it would turn American soldiers into fish in a barrel, with drones and missiles raining from mountains enveloping 270 degrees around them. One of Israel’s most loyal servants in the Senate, Lindsay Graham, in his attempt to sell this idea to the American people, likened it to Iwo Jima, which killed 26,000 US soldiers. This helps explain why none of the war cheerleaders is suggesting sending precious Israeli troops to open Hormuz, as such dangerous jobs are only for goyslave soldiers. The potential for casualties in this case exceeds anything the US has experienced since Vietnam. If this attack happens and a large number of Americans are murdered or captured by Iran, then Israel’s agents in the US will capitalize on American anger to escalate further. We have already seen Israeli mouthpiece rag WSJ make this argument, eventually escalating all the way to a ground invasion or a nuclear attack.

Escalation and Waterloo

If Trump refuses to accept the Suez ending of this war, he opens himself up for something far more devastating: Waterloo. An aggressive military push to defeat Iran could fail and bring with it the economic, military, and political destruction of the US Empire.

The only powerful lever of escalation left to secure Hormuz and achieve regime change is an overwhelming ground invasion to secure the Iranian coastline and/or overthrow the regime.

Though there are other 'unthinkable' options, like nukes.

A ground invasion would not succeed if limited; it would need to control and completely comb the entire coastal area of Iran, and likely invade Tehran, a city of ten million people. Such an undertaking may require the greatest US military effort since WWII. The cost in money and lives will be enormous, and the outcome far from certain. Iran is an enormous country the size of Western Europe, with rugged and impenetrable mountain terrain, and a population of 93 million, larger than Iraq and Afghanistan combined. Iran is also far more militarily advanced than Iraq and Afghanistan, and there is no way of dealing with Iran’s drones and missiles without sustaining significant damage. Iranians have been preparing for this war against America since 1953, and the war so far shows that they are better prepared than the American buffoon who started the war because his Israeli owners lied to him and told him it would be as easy as Venezuela, and when that failed he had to scramble and sent soldiers and air defenses to the region to face the ferocious Iranian response.

But beyond the deaths of soldiers, the impact of escalation is likely to be devastating to the US and world economies, to US global military dominance, and to the US dollar. Escalation will send Treasury yields higher and increase the fiscal pressure on the US. Debt/GDP is already approaching banana republic levels, and debt servicing is already the largest part of the US budget. Escalation of this sort is unlikely to leave Iranian and Gulf energy infrastructure intact, destroying large percentages of the world’s energy supply, causing an energy and poverty crisis. The escalation will also likely disrupt Hormuz traffic for a long period of time, resulting in devastating damage to the US and world economies. This could unleash a recessionary inflation worse than the 1970s, whose energy shock was actually tiny and mostly a cover-up for inflation, as I explain in The Fiat Standard. With high inflation to fund the war, supply disruptions that cripple economic activity, rising interest rates destroying businesses, a collapsing bond market destroying savings, growing unemployment, increased pressure for inflationary and welfare policies to counter the damage, and rising cost of debt servicing, a US default is not an outlandish possibility in this world, it may even be probable, and it would be devastating to the US government, the US dollar, and the countless suckers who believed that US bonds are a good saving instrument. If the Treasury market loses its status as the ultimate safe haven, the dollar will likely lose its status as the global reserve currency, and America’s exorbitant inflationary privilege will disappear.

Further, if Trump escalates against Iran, his military will be stretched to the point where it would be very difficult for it to engage elsewhere, opening it up for significant geopolitical setbacks. It is already bordering on delusional to hear Americans talk about China being an enemy, because if America were to start a war in China’s surroundings, Chinese hypersonic missiles could quickly and decisively end the war, as a leaked Pentagon report explains. Without hypersonic missiles, the US is at a severe disadvantage. With an expensive and protracted quagmire in Iran, the US would be even more vulnerable.

The US has no reason to be involved in this war at all, and the only sane course of action for it is to evacuate all its troops from the Middle East, stop giving military or economic aid to any government in the region, and establish normal diplomatic relations with them and no alliances. But Israel is in control of America, and Israel needs the US to prosecute this war until it can destroy Iran as a society and a country, and turn it into a post-apocalyptic wasteland. Iran, on the other hand, needs to make the cost of the war unbearable for the US before the US can destroy Iran.

Given that Trump isn’t running for reelection and isn’t a die-hard Republican who cares about the party after him, it won’t be political pressure that moves him. And given that his family is likely making incredible gains from his manipulation of the market, selling pardons, and being Miriam Adelson’s perfect little puppet, he’s unlikely to be moved by moderate inflation and growing deficits. Iran will have to impose an enormous military and economic cost before the US retreats, which means very high inflation, a devastating depression, and/or a fiscal crisis.

In conclusion, the choice facing Trump today is very difficult, and it is between bad options. De-escalation is a humiliating defeat unacceptable to his Israeli bosses, even though it would be much better for America and the world. Escalation risks economic catastrophe at home and worldwide, the destruction of the US empire, a fiscal crisis, high inflation, and maybe even hyperinflation. Tragically, Israel’s control of the US means there is likely no endpoint to this conflict except through the destruction of Iran and its plunging into civil war, or the destruction of the US economy with tragic consequences for billions of people. We could also end up with both.

The thing is, there is no country that I can see who would pitch in to help rebuild a demolished America in the way that the US and UK elites did for Germany. Would China play that role, given how interconnected the Chinese and American economies are? I doubt it. The only option I can see for saving America is a tin foil hat one - Aliens showing up as saviours or something. Team America - Galactic Police? Or maybe it would be BlackRock?

Mercouris recently talked about the 'Germany redux' idea, but in a different way. In WW1 & 2, he describes Germany as the belligerent nation, while the US industrial powerhouse bided its time overseas. When the war was over, the US swept in and took over the globe. Now he sees the USA as the belligerent and China as the powerhouse biding its time overseas. Will China step in and sweep over the globe? I also doubt it, but it's kinda the same question Sylvia brought up:

So I told myself that, in the end, everything that’s happening (including all countries) is just a pretext to implement their NWO, which would confirm what the C’s have said — or that this professor is limited to only one solution — or that I simply didn’t understand anything about this ‘game.’

I think there will probably be a NWO after this conflict - the PTB wouldn't let a good crisis go to waste. What it looks like is not clear to me at all, and I try to keep open to the possibility that, as Pierre said, 'Glory is coming to all.' It may take a long time for things to calm down to get there, though. It definitely is quite the show! I hope you all are hanging in there and staying grounded what with all the dire forecasts and whatnot. It's good to get some time away from the news cycle churn and do what calls to the Soul... as Hafez says, to 'stay close to any sounds that make you glad you are alive'.