Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

Can we depend on our gut to alert us that something is really off?

As Laura’s always taught, it’s about calibrating our reading instrument, through knowledge input, networking, meditation and thinking, prayer.

Gut instinct’s a part of our reading instrument and will be improved by the above. I guess if we want to be able to rely on it, it has build up a track record.

Do you think the C's had Netanyahu and Trump in mind when they said this :-)?

It’s a long list. But whoever wants first place will have to fight Pete Hegseth for it.
 
Isn’t it interesting that USA, UK and Australian leaders all decide to do a national address on April 1st… April fools anyone?
I sat down for a measly few minutes (I’m sure Trump’s address will go for ages talking about himself and what a great job he’s doing) while Anthony Albanese gaslit the public with his hot air and pussyfooting about the fuel shortage saying bullshite like the next ‘few months might be difficult’ so be stingy with fuel, only use what you need (what a retarded thing to say…, but still go on your holidays, just don’t fill up your tank all the way:umm:) that measures have been taken to reduce prices at the pump for 3 months (how I heard that was ‘lull the country into a feeling of security that this will all be over in 3 months) not once mentioning the downstream effects of fuel shortage or urging anyone to prepare for the potential for prolonged disruptions to all supply chains… then goes on to wish a a safe and happy Easter break… :whistle: I smell so many dead rats, the biggest one being is that they (ptb) don’t want to ignite panic until the very last bell and then watch the chaos erupt like crazy, like the toilet paper thing with covid but 100 x worse, so they can sit back and laugh and then bring in their digital ID for the controlling of the public.

May be I’m exaggerating or jumping the gun but I can’t help but think this is just a monumental joke on us.


I get what you are saying. However, where the UK Labour Government is concerned, every (Trump) cloud has a silver lining.

Trump has really singled out Sir Keir Starmer for special attack since he perceives the UK as having badly let him down. He has even had a go at the poor old Royal Navy, what is left of it, for not making its two (according to Trump "toy") aircraft carriers available for his attack on Iran even though he later pointed out that they were out of service so not available. These toys by the way weigh 68,000 tons and carry the extremely expensive VSTOL version of the US F-35 aircraft purchased from America. To put the record straight, one is undergoing maintenance at the moment, as all ship do every five years or so. The other has recently returned from a mission to the Artic where it acted as a NATO flagship in countering the Russian threat that had led Trump to threaten a US invasion of Greenland unless the NATO allies stepped up to the plate. You simply can't win with the Donald can you.

The funny things is that Trump's attacks on Starmer have actually improved his standing where the left wing of his Labour Party are concerned. Only a few weeks ago, he faced being toppled as leader by a backbench revolt orchestrated by his main leadership rivals. Now Starmer appears more secure, at least for the time being.

Another gift from Trump is that the looming economic crisis in the UK caused by Labour's disastrous fiscal policies, which will only get worse due to increasing inflation and other knock on effects of the War, can now be blamed on Trump rather than on the economic incompetence of the government and especially the economic illiteracy of our Chancellor of the Exchequer (finance minister) Rachel Reeves. Unlike most other western countries, she has failed so far to cut the level of government revenue or duties accruing from increasing fuel prices at the pumps (which in the UK accounts for the vast majority of the price per litre that motorists pay) in what for her is an unexpected tax bonanza, which is helping to offset her crass mismanagement and poor stewardship of the nation's finances.

Yet another gift for Starmer is the fact that the War has presented him with the excuse to bring the UK ever closer again to the economically distressed European Union. This represents a complete betrayal of the people's Brexit vote ten years ago, which he promised in his manifesto not to undo. To watch him beam like a sycophantic fan in the company of Empress Ursula von der Leyen is really too much for me to take, especially as every negotiation he undertakes with Europe leads to the UK paying over more money and surrendering more of our hard won sovereignty in return for nothing of substance (go speak to our British fishermen if you don't believe me).

The annoying things is that Trump is right about Starmer being a weak leader but because it is coming from Trump, his criticism is having exactly the reverse effect on his reputation, at least where the left are concerned.

The other ridiculous thing is that Trump has recently gone on record as saying that King Charles III, the UK's head of State, would agree with him over the War. This is complete BS since the King is above politics and cannot be seen to take a political stance on anything. The politics is left to his governments (as he is also King of Canada and Australia too). If you are not aware, King Charles is due to visit the USA later this month to take part in the 250th anniversary celebrations of the founding of the United States. Why a Hanoverian successor and descendant of King George III (the last King of America) should be celebrating the 250th anniversary of the secession of the American colonies from British rule escapes me :-D but then according to 'King Donald' he is coming to show solidarity as regards a war Charles approves of (and no doubt it will be good for British exports too).

What is true of Starmer is true of other European leaders too since Trump has recently had a go at President Marcon for denying US aircraft the use of French airspace during this conflict.

The moral of the story seems to be that personal criticism from the Donald is becoming increasingly a badge of honour.
 
The idea that this "war" is really just a maneuver to instigate the 'great reset' has been brought up more than once. Just as we know the Great Depression in the US was purposely engineered, does anyone think these others weren't as well?
[Google AI]


Lest we forget, the Treasury recently declared the U.S. insolvent:

Yes, but this has not stopped Trump from seeking an increase in the US defence budget to $1.5 trillion dollars.
 
I read the book Conjuring Hitler, and according to the author Preparata, Schact was the subordinate of that dark creature of the Bank of England, Montagu Norman. Norman seems to be a major coordinator of the German recovery, in addition to the Dulles brothers in Wall Street, IIRC. So along with money creation, there was also billions of investment in Germany by the US and the UK elites. They also invested a lot in Hitler and the gang directly. Although most conventional history talks about Hitler's grand sweep into power in sort of teleological or even mythical terms, it was actually not a sure thing at all.
Great analysis.

Let's not forget though the role of Prescott Bush, the father and grandfather respectively of two future US presidents, who assisted in financing the Nazi Party and Hitler's rise to power:​

Bush was a founder and one of seven directors (including W. Averell Harriman) of the Union Banking Corporation (holding a single share out of 4,000 as a director), an investment bank that operated as a clearing house for many assets and enterprises held by German steel magnate Fritz Thyssen, an early supporter of Adolf Hitler and financier of the Nazi Party. In July 1942, the bank was suspected of holding gold on behalf of Nazi leaders. A subsequent government investigation disproved those allegations but confirmed the Thyssens' control, and in October 1942 the United States seized the bank under the Trading with the Enemy Act and held the assets for the duration of World War II.<

Journalist Duncan Campbell pointed out documents showing that Prescott Bush was a director and shareholder of a number of companies involved with Thyssen. Bush was the director of the Union Banking Corporation that "represented Thyssen's US interests", continuing to work for the bank after America's entry into the war.
You might also want to read Professor Antony C. Sutton's book Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler. Quoting from Wikipedia:

Sutton's next three published books (Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and FDR and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler) argued that Wall Street's involvement in the Bolshevik Revolution to destroy Russia as an economic competitor and turn it into “a captive market and a technical colony to be exploited by a few high-powered American financiers and the corporations under their control” as well as its decisive contributions to the rise of Adolf Hitler and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whose policies he assessed as being essentially the same “corporate socialism,” planned by the big corporations.

Sutton concluded that it was all part of the economic power elites' “long-range program of nurturing collectivism” and fostering “corporate socialism” in order to ensure “monopoly acquisition of wealth” because it "would fade away if it were exposed to the activity of a free market."

See: Antony C. Sutton - Wikipedia

For the "power elites" read the 'New World Order' and the Illuminati Brotherhood otherwise known as the Antichrist according to the C's.

Curiously, one figure involved in this Nazi funding operation (acting as a "bag man") was Max Warburg who came from the wealthy Jewish Warburg banking dynasty primarily based in Germany:​

Max Warburg selected by Prescott Bush to be the American Ship & Commerce Line official representative on the board of the Hamburg- Amerika Line. Warburg was a long time advisor of Hjalmar Schacht, the Nazi’s Economic Minister and an executive in the Reichsbank. Warburg was also a close friend with Montagu Collet Norman.

An agreement to coordinate all trade between Germany & America was reached in Berlin after negotiations between Hitler’s Economics Minister, Hjalmar Schacht & John Foster Dulles. As a result Oliver Harriman, Averell’s cousin formed a syndicate of 150 firms to conduct all business between Germany and the United States.

North German Lloyd Co. merged with Hamburg-Amerika Line in Hamburg. Christian Beck a long time Harriman executive was placed as manager of ‘freight & operations’ in North America for this newly merged company. Emil Helfferich, an ardent Nazi was appointed chairman of this new company called Hapag-Lloyd. Nazi security guards were now on all ships of the company.

William S. Farish was appointed chairman of Standard Oil by John D. Rockefeller. Farish was close friends with Hermann Schmitz, chairman of I.G. Farben. Farish hired Ivy Lee, to write pro-I.G. Farben and pro-Nazi propaganda and get it into the U.S. press. He hired Nazi German crews for Standard Oil tankers. In addition, he hired "Emil Helfferich," chairman of the Hamburg-Amerika Line, as chairman also of the Standard Oil Company subsidiary in Germany. Karl Lindemann, board member of Hamburg-Amerika, also became a top Farish-Standard executive in Germany. The interlock placed Farish and Prescott Bush in a small group of Hitler supporters. Both Emil Helfferich and Karl Lindemann were authorized to write checks to Heinrich Himmler, chief of the Nazi SS, on a special Standard Oil account. This account was managed by the German-British-American banker, Kurt von Schroeder. According to U.S. intelligence documents reviewed by author Anthony Sutton, Helfferich continued his payments to the SS into 1944, when the SS was supervising the mass murder at the Standard-I.G. Farben.​

See: Timeline of Treason: The Bush Family Connections To The Nazis @ Timeline of Treason: The Bush Family Connections To The Nazis - UK Indymedia

Max Warburg later became the head of M.M. Warburg but was forced in 1938 to sell the family bank under Nazi “Aryanization” laws. Despite these pressures, they successfully relocated much of the family fortune abroad, establishing strong positions in the U.S. and UK.
 
Speaking of Pete Hegseth... [WARNING: strong language!]


🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
He has just sacked the US Army Chief of Staff. Great timing eh!

Pete Hegseth, the Defense Secretary, has dismissed Army Chief of Staff General Randy George, effective immediately. This decision comes amid a series of high-profile firings under Hegseth's leadership, including the removal of other senior military officers. The Pentagon has confirmed the firing, but no specific reasons have been provided. General George, who has served in various capacities, including as a senior military aide to former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, is expected to retire from his position. The Pentagon expressed gratitude for his decades of service to the nation.

Bizarrely, he has also sacked the US Army's chief chaplain too:

The dismissal of Army Chief of Chaplains, Major General William Green, by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth marks a significant event in the U.S. Army's leadership. Green, who had served in the position since 2023, was removed amid a broader reshuffle of top Army brass under Hegseth's administration. The decision to remove Green was not publicly explained, and his dismissal is part of a pattern of firings and changes in leadership roles within the Army. Hegseth's administration has been noted for its focus on reshaping military leadership to align with his vision, which has included targeting Black and female officers and promoting white men to leadership positions.

Perhaps he didn't buy into Pete's messianic vision and Armageddon script?
 
I use for taking information about Iran war in real-time from Telegram channel in Russian:


There is nearly in English, but it seems it has less information, maybe because it has 36 subscribers only:

 
Perhaps he didn't buy into Pete's messianic vision and Armageddon script?
Very likely. Dunno how the 'Armageddonists' are going to rationalise their ideological delusions with increasingly hard materiel limits:

1775280581380.png


🇺🇸🇮🇷 The war with Iran has shown how much the US military machine depends on tungsten, — FP

- This critically important metal is indispensable in the military industry, yet the US has not been mining it on an industrial scale for over ten years.

- Tungsten reserves are rapidly depleting, and prices have risen by more than 500%.

- The situation is exacerbated by China's dominance in supply chains and its export restrictions.

- The problems with tungsten reflect the overall dependence of the US military-industrial complex on critical minerals controlled by China.

- "We're getting a very clear picture that there simply isn't enough tungsten in the supply chain right now, and no one really knows how this deficit will be filled in the near future," say American investors.

- Even with all efforts, creating a tungsten supply chain independent of China will take from three to ten years. It's impossible to replenish current reserves anytime soon.
 
A point of view of the situation.

A Contested War and a Tense Narrative​

This neo-con/Zionist war against Iran is a strategic failure for the United States. The American administration, embodied by Donald Trump, has progressively scaled back its objectives, moving from broad ambitions to more limited goals as it encountered difficulties on the ground.

In this context, American statements are shifting and inconsistent, illustrating an attempt to adapt official discourse to a military reality deemed unfavorable. Notably, the abandonment of certain initial objectives, such as control of the Strait of Hormuz, is a clear sign of strategic retreat.

Parallelly, Iran appears resilient. Despite the strikes it has suffered, its military and economic capabilities are not as weakened as announced. The country continues to retaliate, targeting infrastructure in the region in particular, and visibly retains room for maneuver, including through potential external support.

We also note an escalation in the strikes, now targeting energy and civilian infrastructure on both sides, fueling a cycle of reprisals. This dynamic reinforces regional instability and the concerns of neighboring countries.

Finally, time is working in Iran’s favor,
while the United States faces growing political, economic, and military constraints. From this perspective, the war is less a success than a quagmire, whose outcome remains highly uncertain. One can only fear an act of madness from people who are not rational but under the influence of the forces of Darkness, who lie relentlessly like the Prince of this world they openly serve. This war highlights proof that American politicians and their Western vassals certainly do not serve the peoples they lead, but execute an agenda dictated by occult societies working to build a dark and sparsely populated world. The measures taken only move in the direction of chaos. The same is happening in several European countries.
source
 
Very likely. Dunno how the 'Armageddonists' are going to rationalise their ideological delusions with increasingly hard materiel limits:

One thing that I learned from recent wars in Ukraine and ME is that the participants may run out of interceptors but they never run out of attack missiles. Tungsten or no tungsten.
 
Back
Top Bottom