I get what you are saying. However, where the UK Labour Government is concerned, every (Trump) cloud has a silver lining.
Trump has really singled out Sir Keir Starmer for special attack since he perceives the UK as having badly let him down. He has even had a go at the poor old Royal Navy, what is left of it, for not making its two (according to Trump "toy") aircraft carriers available for his attack on Iran even though he later pointed out that they were out of service so not available. These toys by the way weigh 68,000 tons and carry the extremely expensive VSTOL version of the US F-35 aircraft purchased from America. To put the record straight, one is undergoing maintenance at the moment, as all ship do every five years or so. The other has recently returned from a mission to the Artic where it acted as a NATO flagship in countering the Russian threat that had led Trump to threaten a US invasion of Greenland unless the NATO allies stepped up to the plate. You simply can't win with the Donald can you.
The funny things is that Trump's attacks on Starmer have actually improved his standing where the left wing of his Labour Party are concerned. Only a few weeks ago, he faced being toppled as leader by a backbench revolt orchestrated by his main leadership rivals. Now Starmer appears more secure, at least for the time being.
Another gift from Trump is that the looming economic crisis in the UK caused by Labour's disastrous fiscal policies, which will only get worse due to increasing inflation and other knock on effects of the War, can now be blamed on Trump rather than on the economic incompetence of the government and especially the economic illiteracy of our Chancellor of the Exchequer (finance minister) Rachel Reeves. Unlike most other western countries, she has failed so far to cut the level of government revenue or duties accruing from increasing fuel prices at the pumps (which in the UK accounts for the vast majority of the price per litre that motorists pay) in what for her is an unexpected tax bonanza, which is helping to offset her crass mismanagement and poor stewardship of the nation's finances.
Yet another gift for Starmer is the fact that the War has presented him with the excuse to bring the UK ever closer again to the economically distressed European Union. This represents a complete betrayal of the people's Brexit vote ten years ago, which he promised in his manifesto not to undo. To watch him beam like a sycophantic fan in the company of Empress Ursula von der Leyen is really too much for me to take, especially as every negotiation he undertakes with Europe leads to the UK paying over more money and surrendering more of our hard won sovereignty in return for nothing of substance (go speak to our British fishermen if you don't believe me).
The annoying things is that Trump is right about Starmer being a weak leader but because it is coming from Trump, his criticism is having exactly the reverse effect on his reputation, at least where the left are concerned.
The other ridiculous thing is that Trump has recently gone on record as saying that King Charles III, the UK's head of State, would agree with him over the War. This is complete BS since the King is above politics and cannot be seen to take a political stance on anything. The politics is left to his governments (as he is also King of Canada and Australia too). If you are not aware, King Charles is due to visit the USA later this month to take part in the 250th anniversary celebrations of the founding of the United States. Why a Hanoverian successor and descendant of King George III (the last King of America) should be celebrating the 250th anniversary of the secession of the American colonies from British rule escapes me

but then according to 'King Donald' he is coming to show solidarity as regards a war Charles approves of (and no doubt it will be good for British exports too).
What is true of Starmer is true of other European leaders too since Trump has recently had a go at President Marcon for denying US aircraft the use of French airspace during this conflict.
The moral of the story seems to be that personal criticism from the Donald is becoming increasingly a badge of honour.