Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

[Ellipse]

With what happen in Iran, Russia and China are tightening their ties once again and they are displaying a united front against the West.

Following a high-level meeting in Beijing, Russia and China have displayed an increasingly overt strategic convergence: challenging what they describe as the Western desire to maintain a form of global hegemony.

In an official statement, Moscow denounced attempts by Western powers to preserve their dominance, framing them within a historical continuity dating back several centuries. This worldview directly opposes the Western vision of a liberal international order with that defended by Beijing and Moscow: a multipolar system based on state sovereignty.

The crisis in the Middle East, and particularly tensions surrounding Iran, occupied a central place in these discussions. Russian and Chinese authorities attribute responsibility for the escalation to the actions of the United States and its allies, believing that this conflict extends beyond a regional framework to become part of a global strategic rivalry.

For these two powers, current clashes illustrate a broader opposition: that between an international order dominated by the United States and the emergence of a multipolar world in which new centres of power—notably within the expanded BRICS—intend to exert greater influence.

This interpretation leads Moscow and Beijing to downplay the idea of a conflict motivated solely by local dynamics or regional alliances. On the contrary, they view it as an episode of systemic competition, where energy, economic, and geopolitical stakes overlap.

Beyond this diagnosis, this stance reflects a tightening of the Russo-Chinese partnership. Increased diplomatic coordination, alignment within international forums, and implicit support for certain states contested by the West: all are signs of the progressive structuring of an alternative bloc.

Naturally, Western countries (globalists) strongly contest this interpretation, putting forward their own security and political arguments.

In this context, these statements illustrate less a universally accepted truth than a growing fracture in how global balances of power are interpreted—a fracture that undoubtedly constitutes one of the defining features of contemporary geopolitics.

Source

 

[EmeraldR]

The Alexes of the Duran had a conversation with Alex (! . . . ) Reporterfy, who among other things makes analyses of, and coaches trading in, the derivatives market, Not for the faint of heart. They talk about the effects the war is having on that market, and how traders, including Iran, are gaming it based on Trump's various announcements, and Iran's responses. The whole thing is worth a watch.

In any case this section caught my attention because he view a disastrous, irrevocable financial situation developing by mid-April if matters can't be pulled from the brink in the next week. Another candidate for the April Drop Dead Date? Scary, scary stuff

YouTube transcript of relevant section (32:34)

something I noticed yesterday that both Alexes mentioned on their daily videos that they has been hit by a flu of some sort -
they live in entirely different locations geographically - there seems to be alot of this going around- possibly recent covid vax uptake /shedding - or something else ?

 

[Fluffy]

something I noticed yesterday that both Alexes mentioned on their daily videos that they has been hit by a flu of some sort -
they live in entirely different locations geographically - there seems to be alot of this going around- possibly recent covid vax uptake /shedding - or something else ?

If you figure out why let me know, just my youngest and I have had the flu, I’m on day 10. Everyone else we come in contact with is fine.

 

[axj]

Nevertheless, such a massive global infrastructure for trade... for what exactly? Local autonomous economies make local autonomous government possible.

Global "free trade" seems to have been the first step by the globalists towards creating a one world government with them in charge. Capital became global and not necessarily bound to any country, plus global institutions became more important.

Another important reason seems to be that self-sufficient countries are much more difficult to integrate into a globalist one world governance system.

In some ways global trade does seem to have positive effects as well, such as the fact that countries that depend a lot on each other for trade are less likely to go to war with each other. But in a lot of cases importing things from far away that can be produced locally indeed makes little sense.

 

[MJF]

There a lot for me to take in, I’ll continue to read your thread- while on the subject of that, I want to say thank you for your research. Years ago when I had some strange happenings with the supposed work of the hyperdensity entity Saint Germain, it was your Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucian thread that set my my mind on fire with intrigue, and also bought me back to the forum which I had been absent from for some 3 years provoking me to reread the Wave and sessions, buy a few important books and bring me back from my lofty daydreams about reality. Much appreciation for you!

Your strange happenings with some hyperdensity entity passing itself as the Comte de Saint Germain sounds quite scary. I am glad my articles in the Alton Towers thread were of help to you. I have a few things in mind that I would like to get down on paper soon so I can add to the thread, as new discoveries are being made all the time.

In the meantime, I attach a link to quite a good short documentary on Saint Germain, which you may find of interest. Although he was certainly a charming and suave conman as Laura wrote about him, there is still a great mystery surrounding him since he seems to have been something of an agent who became involved both in the Jacobite struggle and the American independence movement, which suggests that he moved in circles that may have been linked to secret organisations such as the Freemasons (who were significant players in both the French and American Revolutions), the Illuminati and/or the Rosicrucians. Many Roscirucians were secret alchemists, including Sir Francis Bacon and Sir Isaac Newton, and the Count was himself an alchemist, as confirmed by the C's:
​

Q: (L) Comte St.Germaine claimed to be able to transmute lead into gold. Was this true?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) He also claimed to have discovered the secret of eternal youth, was this true?

A: No.

Q: (L) Did he die like everybody else at the regular age?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Is Elizabeth Clare Prophet channelling St. Germaine?

A: No.

Q: (L) Who does she channel?

A: Imposter.

So, it seems there are those in the ethereal realm who have been passing themselves off as the Count, so you were right to be wary.

Link: MSN​

 

[MJF]

The layer of national and international trade mostly benefits the big players, the corporations. It may be the current reality on this planet, but I see little need for that level when people can get most everything they need on a regional and even local level in many instances. There are a lot of goods being traded on a global level that can easily be made or produced on a local level. Nevertheless, such a massive global infrastructure for trade... for what exactly? Local autonomous economies make local autonomous government possible. Nit-picky regulations keep everybody playing the same game.

You have just described the European Union in one sentence.