Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

With what happen in Iran, Russia and China are tightening their ties once again and they are displaying a united front against the West.

Following a high-level meeting in Beijing, Russia and China have displayed an increasingly overt strategic convergence: challenging what they describe as the Western desire to maintain a form of global hegemony.

In an official statement, Moscow denounced attempts by Western powers to preserve their dominance, framing them within a historical continuity dating back several centuries. This worldview directly opposes the Western vision of a liberal international order with that defended by Beijing and Moscow: a multipolar system based on state sovereignty.

The crisis in the Middle East, and particularly tensions surrounding Iran, occupied a central place in these discussions. Russian and Chinese authorities attribute responsibility for the escalation to the actions of the United States and its allies, believing that this conflict extends beyond a regional framework to become part of a global strategic rivalry.

For these two powers, current clashes illustrate a broader opposition: that between an international order dominated by the United States and the emergence of a multipolar world in which new centres of power—notably within the expanded BRICS—intend to exert greater influence.

This interpretation leads Moscow and Beijing to downplay the idea of a conflict motivated solely by local dynamics or regional alliances. On the contrary, they view it as an episode of systemic competition, where energy, economic, and geopolitical stakes overlap.

Beyond this diagnosis, this stance reflects a tightening of the Russo-Chinese partnership. Increased diplomatic coordination, alignment within international forums, and implicit support for certain states contested by the West: all are signs of the progressive structuring of an alternative bloc.

Naturally, Western countries (globalists) strongly contest this interpretation, putting forward their own security and political arguments.

In this context, these statements illustrate less a universally accepted truth than a growing fracture in how global balances of power are interpreted—a fracture that undoubtedly constitutes one of the defining features of contemporary geopolitics.
Source
 
The Alexes of the Duran had a conversation with Alex (! . . . :umm: ) Reporterfy, who among other things makes analyses of, and coaches trading in, the derivatives market, Not for the faint of heart. They talk about the effects the war is having on that market, and how traders, including Iran, are gaming it based on Trump's various announcements, and Iran's responses. The whole thing is worth a watch.

In any case this section caught my attention because he view a disastrous, irrevocable financial situation developing by mid-April if matters can't be pulled from the brink in the next week. Another candidate for the April Drop Dead Date? Scary, scary stuff


YouTube transcript of relevant section (32:34)
something I noticed yesterday that both Alexes mentioned on their daily videos that they has been hit by a flu of some sort -
they live in entirely different locations geographically - there seems to be alot of this going around- possibly recent covid vax uptake /shedding - or something else ?
 
something I noticed yesterday that both Alexes mentioned on their daily videos that they has been hit by a flu of some sort -
they live in entirely different locations geographically - there seems to be alot of this going around- possibly recent covid vax uptake /shedding - or something else ?
If you figure out why let me know, just my youngest and I have had the flu, I’m on day 10. Everyone else we come in contact with is fine.
 
Nevertheless, such a massive global infrastructure for trade... for what exactly? Local autonomous economies make local autonomous government possible.
Global "free trade" seems to have been the first step by the globalists towards creating a one world government with them in charge. Capital became global and not necessarily bound to any country, plus global institutions became more important.

Another important reason seems to be that self-sufficient countries are much more difficult to integrate into a globalist one world governance system.

In some ways global trade does seem to have positive effects as well, such as the fact that countries that depend a lot on each other for trade are less likely to go to war with each other. But in a lot of cases importing things from far away that can be produced locally indeed makes little sense.
 
There a lot for me to take in, I’ll continue to read your thread- while on the subject of that, I want to say thank you for your research. Years ago when I had some strange happenings with the supposed work of the hyperdensity entity Saint Germain, it was your Alton Towers, Sir Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucian thread that set my my mind on fire with intrigue, and also bought me back to the forum which I had been absent from for some 3 years provoking me to reread the Wave and sessions, buy a few important books and bring me back from my lofty daydreams about reality. Much appreciation for you!
Your strange happenings with some hyperdensity entity passing itself as the Comte de Saint Germain sounds quite scary. I am glad my articles in the Alton Towers thread were of help to you. I have a few things in mind that I would like to get down on paper soon so I can add to the thread, as new discoveries are being made all the time.

In the meantime, I attach a link to quite a good short documentary on Saint Germain, which you may find of interest. Although he was certainly a charming and suave conman as Laura wrote about him, there is still a great mystery surrounding him since he seems to have been something of an agent who became involved both in the Jacobite struggle and the American independence movement, which suggests that he moved in circles that may have been linked to secret organisations such as the Freemasons (who were significant players in both the French and American Revolutions), the Illuminati and/or the Rosicrucians. Many Roscirucians were secret alchemists, including Sir Francis Bacon and Sir Isaac Newton, and the Count was himself an alchemist, as confirmed by the C's:
Q: (L) Comte St.Germaine claimed to be able to transmute lead into gold. Was this true?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) He also claimed to have discovered the secret of eternal youth, was this true?

A: No.

Q: (L) Did he die like everybody else at the regular age?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Is Elizabeth Clare Prophet channelling St. Germaine?

A: No.

Q: (L) Who does she channel?

A: Imposter.

So, it seems there are those in the ethereal realm who have been passing themselves off as the Count, so you were right to be wary.

Link: MSN
 
The layer of national and international trade mostly benefits the big players, the corporations. It may be the current reality on this planet, but I see little need for that level when people can get most everything they need on a regional and even local level in many instances. There are a lot of goods being traded on a global level that can easily be made or produced on a local level. Nevertheless, such a massive global infrastructure for trade... for what exactly? Local autonomous economies make local autonomous government possible. Nit-picky regulations keep everybody playing the same game.

You have just described the European Union in one sentence.
 
I would say the main beneficiaries of global trade are the large technology companies where economies of scale are insane, in addition to certain raw materials like hydrocarbons (which Asia and Europe are relatively lacking in). There is a reason only Taiwan and to some extent South Korea have broad monopolies on the microprocessors that power most digital electronics. And then you have China that provides a lot of the other necessary components to those devices as their supply chains are unmatched worldwide...I heard one estimate that it would take the US at least 15 years to try to duplicate what they have built, and that is before talking about where they are with advanced manufacturing robotics. Its just really hard to invest the equivalent amount of capital in fabs, etc. Most of what we need for day to day living live food, basic raw materials, services might be available locally, but we are so dependent on technology that I wonder what would happen if the US started WWIII and turned much of the US and Asia into nuclear wastelands.

For that reason I really would like to see a country like Brazil or Argentina put forward the public investment to build something like that in South America over the long time. But both governments are so screwed up I doubt it ever happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJF
The fact is that Trump cannot, nor does he wish to, directly override the powers of established trustees. In order to impose his – frankly irresponsible – view, which is to open up the pension funds of all American workers to private market investments and inject liquidity into the system, he offers both benefits to pensioners through his ‘savings plan’ and legal protection to these pension fund managers, as you rightly point out, thereby reducing the risk of lawsuits from participants. Decision-making thus becomes very attractive due to the high fees, which lead to better returns.

It’s like taking sheep to the supermarket… the government is channelling people’s pension funds into a market sector that is now in a very precarious state, full of financial wolves.
Here’s an excerpt from the Financial Times article, behind a paywall:


PIMCO's investment chief doesn't see systemic risk from private credit




I agree with your sentiments. I did, however, do a follow-up post that recognised Trump was in fact seeking to widen the investment powers of US private individual pension funds known as 401(k) plans and not employee pension schemes administered by trustees, just to put the record straight. However, the same dangers still apply as Elizabeth Warren has sought to draw attention to.

As to PIMCO's investment chief saying that he doesn't see any systemic risk from private debt, I would just point out that nobody saw any systemic risk either to funds which were wrappers around US sub-prime mortgage lenders' ledgers and mortgage-backed securities until they went crashing, triggering the 2008 financial crash. Indeed, some of these fund were given Triple 'A' ratings by certain leading market rating agencies, which is the highest rating you can get. I was working in the City of London at the time and I have never seen investment bankers looking so scared, particularly when Lehman Brothers went down due to its exposure to the sub-prime mortgage market. For investors sake, I just hope he is right.​
 
Your strange happenings with some hyperdensity entity passing itself as the Comte de Saint Germain sounds quite scary. I am glad my articles in the Alton Towers thread were of help to you. I have a few things in mind that I would like to get down on paper soon so I can add to the thread, as new discoveries are being made all the time.

In the meantime, I attach a link to quite a good short documentary on Saint Germain, which you may find of interest. Although he was certainly a charming and suave conman as Laura wrote about him, there is still a great mystery surrounding him since he seems to have been something of an agent who became involved both in the Jacobite struggle and the American independence movement, which suggests that he moved in circles that may have been linked to secret organisations such as the Freemasons (who were significant players in both the French and American Revolutions), the Illuminati and/or the Rosicrucians. Many Roscirucians were secret alchemists, including Sir Francis Bacon and Sir Isaac Newton, and the Count was himself an alchemist, as confirmed by the C's:


So, it seems there are those in the ethereal realm who have been passing themselves off as the Count, so you were right to be wary.

Link: MSN
The jury is still out for me about what was going on. Without going into too much detail the events started while reading and practicing the techniques from the I AM discourses who were channeled to Guy Ballard via Saint Germain (supposedly), 33 discourses relayed from this entity (nice number!)
I have mixed feelings about what was going on with me, and think it most likely was a combination of lack of knowledge to apply the practice while having questionable mental hygiene or safe personal boundaries to protect myself against negative influence. The option of trying again is on the table, I’ve learned a lot since then.

Anyway, the C’s say the discourses are good, early session so may be there was some other influence there too.

Q: (L) I would like to ask about a book called the "I AM" discourses. Could you tell us the source of this book?

A: Good.

Q: (L) What density level is the source of this book?

A: Sixth level.

Q: (L) Can you tell us the name of the group behind this book?

A: All is one and the same
.

Q: (L) As a service to another person can we get a health reading?

A: Is this of benefit to all?

Q: (L) Well, does this mean that we are going to be restricted forever to general questions that we can't verify?

A: Verification is not dependent upon personal nature. It is not STO if it limits.

Q: (V) So, asking about just one person is not service to all, it is just service to the one person?

A: And you.

Q: (L) Well, I am starting to wonder... I mean, if I didn't have to go back and start all over on prehistoric earth, in the primordial soup, I would think this STO road is just a little bit rough.

A: No pain, no gain.

Q: (L) I don't want any more pain!

A: You are in the wrong place then.

Q: (F) I think this should be noteworthy, if Karla Turner claims that you can't trust anything that comes from this source because it will only tell you what it wants you to hear and so forth, this proves that this source does not just tell us what we want to hear. (L) Most assuredly {Speaking sarcastically}. (F) It sometimes tells us what we don't want to hear and sometimes it tells us what ever it feels like. Another thing that should be noteworthy is, every time you try to do something to verify something, it keeps answering that verification does not depend upon personal information. (L) Does this mean that I have to can my last three questions?

A: Aren't things of universal significance more important?

Q: (L) Well, didn't you say before, when I was asking things that had to do with the various events of the past two years that knowledge of them was protection. If that is the case, why can't I ask about these things now?

A: Yes, but we have repeatedly told all you need to know for your protection.

Q: (L) In regards to my protection and V__'s and Frank's, and this is going to be the last on this series of questions, V__ and I both received cards from A__ B__ who, as you know, is hooked up with the metaphysical church group, I also received a card from S__ V__ who is hooked up with G__ and J__, is there any underlying motivation from these individuals to send these cards and should we just disregard them?

A: Up to you.

Q: (F) Well, Laura, you can't ask for advice every step of the way on how to deal with everybody you know. (L) I know. (V) Have I been abducted in the last month?

A: No.

Q: (V) Do we need to interpret our dreams through this source?

A: Why not?

Q: (L) You mean you will discuss our dreams?

A: Up to you.

Q: (L) What a relief! A concession! Okay, I had a dream last night, I dreamed about large mechanical flying "V's" that had flapping wings like metal bat boxes. They scared me. Then, I was with my family and we were going to see my cousin who is deceased and she had just had a baby. The baby was walking and talking and quoting Shakespeare. My Aunt got very upset and said it was unseemly because the baby was illegitimate and she walked out. The baby was only 10 days old. My aunt ran out the door and said it was evil.

A: Suggestion, get on computer net ASAP.

Q: (L) In other words, I really need to take my computer down and get the A drive fixed etc and log onto the network?

A: Yes.

Q: (V) What does that have to do with the dream? (Laura) I think it relates back to when Terry and Jan were here and we were talking about dreams and the suggestion was given to hook up to the network and discuss and share dreams. Like a dream forum kind of thing. Is there any significance to the ten days in this dream?

A: When you network, your entire life will dramatically improve immediately! See, sometimes we do advise when appropriate.

Q: (L) Alright. Point well taken. Would you please elaborate on the concept that alien abductions are "the scourge of God" and are manifested so that consciousness may grow and differentiate itself by a refusal to accept negative experience within the delusive material world?

A: Nonsense!

Q: (L) Well, that was real elaborate! Would you comment on the Biblical command to not make graven images. Why was this command issued?

A: In order to prevent control by too many sources.

Q: (L) How would not making graven images prevent control by other or too many sources?

A: Deception.

Q: (L) Who issued this command to not make graven images?

A: Central.

Q: (L) What is "Central?"

A: Level 7.

Q: (L) What is the true symbolism of the Egyptian scarab and why was it invented?

A: Operation.

Q: (L) The symbolism was operation? What do you...

A: Was an operation.

Q: (L) How was a scarab an operation?

A: Think. Action.

Q: (L) The scarab is a dung beetle. It rolls dung into little balls. Am I onto something here?

A: Continue.

Q: (L) And supposedly the scarab symbolized eternal life because it represented the rolling of the sun... oh dear, wait a minute... the rolling of the sun across the sky is what the Egyptians understood... but what the dung beetle really does is simply rolls dung up into little balls... is this the operation you are talking about... the rolling of dung into little balls?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Well, that's all I know about the scarab so you are going to have to help me out here.

A: Life cycle.

Q: (L) Okay, the life cycle. I would like to know what force was behind the rise and domination of Oliver Cromwell?

A: Lizards.

Q: (L) Okay, there is a woman named Jane Allyson who channels an entity known as Zeena. I would like to know who or what is Zeena?

A: Just Jane.

Q: (L) So, she is just channelling herself? What is the significance of the number 444 as repeated by Cytron, a robot channelled by Jane Allyson, a super cyborg?

A: Zilch. {Much laughter}

Q: (L) I would like to know what is the Karmic ramification of the killing of those two little boys in South Carolina by their mother? Everybody in the U.S. will be interested in this one, maybe not Katmandu, though.

A: Pain teaches.

Q: (L) And, in this case is the mother suffering the pain?

A: And all others involved including the whole nation. All is lessons.

Q: (L) Did these two little boys volunteer to come in for this purpose?

A: Yes. Were higher density beings on mission.

Q: (L) Do 4th density STO's feed off of 3rd density energy?

A: No.

Q: (L) I would like to ask about the “Starseed Transmissions”. I would like to know about the Bird Tribes. What is this source?

A: Ken Carey is only channelling his alternate self.

Q: (V) Who are good channels, then, if every one we ask about is channelling themselves or false channels, who can we look to as a clean channel?

A: We have already told you of one example.

Q: (L) Barbara Marciniak?

A: This session.

Q: (L) The I Am discourses?

A: Review. Graven images.

Q: (Laura) Could you tell me what source of information was behind the...

A: Akashic records.

Q: (V) I wanted to ask about that and I had totally forgotten! Are the Akashic records the same thing as the source that you called "Central?"

A: No.

Q: (L) Are the Akashic records the same source that the I Am discourses come from?

A: All is one at base but different "branches".


Q: (L) Was Nostradamus getting his information from the Akashic records?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) So, Nostradamus' quatrains, if interpreted correctly, would actually be valid.

A: Interpretation is the key.
 
Back
Top Bottom