Brigitte Macron is a man?

I fell for it. Perhaps safer to look at most everything as probable AI entertainment these days.

Don't worry, and yes! See what I posted about it here. It wasn't easy for non-French speakers to tell, so it happens, but it was actually funny once you knew. In any case, we have to be super critical, yes. Sometimes it's easy to tell it was done with AI, sometimes it's not even AI, but some details that give it away.
 
Candace is back from a break and has updates on her dig into the Stanford Prisoner Experiment:


It is curious that the one SPE participant she's unable to identify is the one that's a Trogneux lookalike, but I don't think Owens is going to 'strike gold' and discover that it was 'Brigitte'. And she's stretching that quote from Madame Macron ("I was in the US for the moon landing!") to make it sound like she was directly involved with NASA. Most likely, Macron simply meant that she was living in the USA when it happened. Which is itself damning, because it means, if she really is who she says she is, that she was a minor in the USA in the summer of '69.

Her discovery that the whole SPE was 'fake and gay' is interesting in its own right. She's kinda onto something here in a similar way to Tom O'Neill exposing Vincent Bugliosi, the Manson Family prosecutor, as a fraud. It does now look like Philip Zimbardo's Stanford experiment was contrived to produce results that 'confirmed' his activist/leftist beliefs: that no one is born evil or criminally-minded, so nurture and society always determine an individual's behavior, thus you ought to let us activists 'fix' society.

We've been living with the results of such social justice activism disguised as academic research for the last half-century, and it's directly responsible for psychopaths and other character-disturbed types literally getting away with murder and taking over civilization.
 
Last edited:
🍿 Ready


Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte, are planning to present photographic and scientific evidence to a US court to prove Mrs Macron is a woman.

Their lawyer says the French president and Mrs Macron will present the documentation in a defamation suit they have taken against the right-wing influencer Candace Owens after she promoted her belief that Brigitte Macron was born male.
Mr Clare said there would be "expert testimony that will come out that will be scientific in nature" and while he would not reveal, at this stage, its exact nature, he said the couple were prepared to demonstrate fully "both generically and specifically" that the allegations are false.

What photographic or scientific evidence are they going to present, aware of the scrutiny it will be under and also the attention it might attract to the case? The fact that the BBC is covering this is already far from the Macrons' ideal scenario. Filing the lawsuit was probably a mistake and now they have to double down.
 
That should be interesting! My guess is probably a fake cert and fake pictures, but who knows what they can concoct... And who knows whether whatever they show will be accepted by the US Courts?
 
Call me a sceptic but at this stage pants down or it’s a dude. With their connections and proximity to the root of evil they probably can produce any certificate they want. I’m kind of surprised ‘Mrs Doubtfire’ hasn’t presented some fake evidence already. It’s enough to forge genetic test results. Instead of bribing lab employees it would be enough to temporarily put a mole there as a lab worker and get them to produce whatever the Macrons want. Make the mole female and instead of Brigitte she could test herself. That’s what I would do in this case as it’s easier to maintain the cover if no PhotoShop is involved and there is no trail of results changing.
 
Back
Top Bottom