There were two articles read on SOTT:
Here:
And here:
and they were both equally painful to read about what is going on in the UK (at least in England) under this State sanctioned theft of peoples children. Most all get the need to safeguard children against many forms of abuse, yet this is a function of the subjectivity of 'pre crime' with all the machinery of State that ensures this racket is in place and kept running - spreading out money that is not theirs. If nothing else, this leaves parents hollow and crushed - their children lost to their birth mothers and fathers (and their families).
It is reprehensible.
The first article is told through the eyes of Ian Josephs, and noted his website in the article that details many items. Noted he lists the corporations tied to the Fostering of many of these children once they are stolen. Of these corporations, many are owned by equity firm's - Josephs mentions Graphite Capital as example. You can read about this in a 2015 Guardian article 'Why do we let fostering agencies profit from caring for vulnerable children? Interestingly, from that article, it was noted that this is really big business - such as when even the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan owns one of the corporate agencies outright. Josephs gives a partial list of some of these firm's and who owns them.
Pension Funds - that is a big red flag that the shows that the State apitite to stop this 'legal' child theft racket unless funds/investors pull out. Sadly, many pension funds claim that their investments follow a charter of ethical funding; if the pensioners only knew.
The second article looks to Denise Robertson and the work she has done on behalf of mothers and families and cites some situations that are beyond words.
You know, people here have read a lot of horrible damn things over the years - it's nonstop and painful, yet something like this in what is supposed to be a beacon of civilization (well that was crossed out years ago) digs very deep indeed; a line that no one should ever cross is crossed right through the door into families homes in plain wide open view of society - with a circus of judges presiding over these child thefts.
Here:
British State Has Stolen Thousands of Children From Families it Deems 'Potential Risk' - Hundreds of Pregnant Women Fleeing UK Shores
Comment: This is completely outrageous. 'Punishing people for crime they have not committed is wrong', campaigner insists A British businessman who lives in France is one of several people who regularly help women to flee the UK to give birth...
www.sott.net
And here:
Bone-chilling national scandal: Thousands of babies are stolen from innocent parents by the UK state
The woman's face was pale and tear-stained; her eyes raw from crying. 'Please may I speak to Denise?' she begged my husband. Fired by desperation, she'd found my home and rung my doorbell one evening six years ago. I was her last hope, she said....
www.sott.net
and they were both equally painful to read about what is going on in the UK (at least in England) under this State sanctioned theft of peoples children. Most all get the need to safeguard children against many forms of abuse, yet this is a function of the subjectivity of 'pre crime' with all the machinery of State that ensures this racket is in place and kept running - spreading out money that is not theirs. If nothing else, this leaves parents hollow and crushed - their children lost to their birth mothers and fathers (and their families).
It is reprehensible.
The first article is told through the eyes of Ian Josephs, and noted his website in the article that details many items. Noted he lists the corporations tied to the Fostering of many of these children once they are stolen. Of these corporations, many are owned by equity firm's - Josephs mentions Graphite Capital as example. You can read about this in a 2015 Guardian article 'Why do we let fostering agencies profit from caring for vulnerable children? Interestingly, from that article, it was noted that this is really big business - such as when even the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan owns one of the corporate agencies outright. Josephs gives a partial list of some of these firm's and who owns them.
Pension Funds - that is a big red flag that the shows that the State apitite to stop this 'legal' child theft racket unless funds/investors pull out. Sadly, many pension funds claim that their investments follow a charter of ethical funding; if the pensioners only knew.
The second article looks to Denise Robertson and the work she has done on behalf of mothers and families and cites some situations that are beyond words.
You know, people here have read a lot of horrible damn things over the years - it's nonstop and painful, yet something like this in what is supposed to be a beacon of civilization (well that was crossed out years ago) digs very deep indeed; a line that no one should ever cross is crossed right through the door into families homes in plain wide open view of society - with a circus of judges presiding over these child thefts.