Broadcaster says serious news at risk

[Fifth Way]

"Television is the most perfect democracy," Brown said. "You sit there with your remote control and vote." The remotes click to another channel when serious news airs, but when the media covers the scandals surrounding Laci Peterson, the Runaway Bride or Michael Jackson, "there are no clicks then," the journalist said.

If there would be a special investigating how an remote controlled drone plain could have shot a mini nuke into the pentagon, there would be no clicks.

If there would be a reportage on Larry Silverstein ordering the demolition of WTC7 there would be no clicks.

If there would be an special new report on Bush's bin Laden and Hitler ties, no click!

You get the idea.

Many Americans on the left and the right aren't interested in the truth, but simply want news that confirms their viewpoints, he said. "You'd think that it's no more complex than good vs. evil," he said.

That makes it kind of easy: Since the majority of the American people already believe the Bush gang is evolved in 911 there is a vast selection of potential news which would guaranty ratings.

It's not enough to say you want serious news. You have to watch it.

Well, if there would in fact be serious news I could watch them and didn't need to want them and if I want them it means there are in fact not there so I cannot watch them.

It isn't enough to say you want serious debate. You have to engage in it.

Good to know we here, are ahead of the pack.

 

[avrilcory]

Thank you so much for sharing the broadcaster news. Which is related context of politics and media. I wish to share the news we are running an online site of world news where you can able to find any types of news and broadcaster says serious news at risk. Its easy to use. For more you can browse us.


__________


link removed