Q: We would like to know if there is any significance to the fact that Mother Theresa and Princess Diana both died within a week
of each other?
A: Vague.
Q: Why didn't you tell us that Princess Diana was going to get killed in an auto accident? That's pretty big news!
A: You would not have benefited, and, besides, it was not predetermined. Just one possible future.
Q: Why was this particular future the one that manifested?
A: Because it was chosen.
Q: Why?
A: No escape any other way.
Q: For who?
A: Diana.
Q: Escape from what or who?
A: Judgment.
Q: Judgment by whom?
A: You pick. She was damned if she did and damned if she did not.
Q: (T) Let me ask: is she dead?
A: Yes.
Q: Was there any factor involved in her death that could be connected to any secret groups on the planet that wish to bring down
the monarchy?
A: No.
Q: So, this wasn't part of a plot to bring down the monarchy?
A: Soul mates.
Q: She and Dodi were soul mates?
A: Yes.
Q: And they decided to leave together...
A: Yes, at another level.
Q: Is there any special significance to the fact that they were soul mates?
A: No, only way out, and valuable lessons learned by everyone else.
Q: So, this was a gift?
A: And STO. And the same with Mother Theresa who waited for the proper timing, so that others would notice what you did.
Q: (T) Well, things usually happen in threes... who is next?
A: Usually threes is an old wives tale.
Q: So, from one perspective, the death of the Princess is nothing more than a tragic accident?
A: We did not say that.
Q: So, she chose this because it was the only way out... (T) Was she helped along? Was there more to it than choosing the time
and the way?
A: There always is.
Q: Can you list some of the other factors involved?
A: Lessons, that is all there is!!
Q: (T) Was she murdered?
A: Would murderer agree to be crushed to death?? What future is there in that line of work?
Q: Well, there are some Middle Easterners who think there is a LOT of future in that line of work... suicide bombers and so forth
as well as persons programmed to do that sort of thing... Was anybody or any other thing behind this?
A: No.
Q: Was the driver drunk?
A: Yes.
Q: (AH) Would she like to tell us something?
A: Statement as such would not benefit this work.
Q: Did Dodi give Diana the purported ring as an engagement ring?
A: Yes, but that is incidental to the "bigger picture."
Q: What IS the bigger picture?
A: STO.
Q: You are saying that this was an STO act? (T) That's what they said...
A: No.
Q: That's not what they said. They said that this act would make others realize what we did and would start thinking about STO.
A: Yes.
Q: Are you saying that this was done by Diana as a service to others?
A: Part.
Q: I get the feeling that there is something we are not getting here...
A: Maybe we are waiting for you to figure it out on your own!
Q: When I read the article by Rupert Cornwell and there was a paragraph that was identical to what I had written on the original
web-page, and then he made the remark about the circle of daggers surrounding Prince Charles, that he was in the center of a
circle of sharp daggers... that struck me as a rather bizarre thing to say. With all the theories going around about the various
families and bloodlines killing each other off from time to time... and this is connected with all this other underground business,
CIA, KGB, God knows what else... Is the way the press plays the event a capitalizing on a circumstance on behalf of such
conspiratorial groups?
A: If so, that is nothing new.
Q: Was this Cornwell saying in this article that the "dagger men" are gathered around Charles and that they are going to use this
event to bring him down?
A: No.
Q: (T) Were the deaths, in addition to generating feelings of STO, also to speed up the process of the changing of the systems, the
entering the new realms...
A: Close.
Q: There is still something we are not getting. And, they are waiting for me to figure it out - okay. But, give me a clue!
A: You will do so when it is appropriate.
Q: Okay, there is an issue here and it is just not the appropriate time to address it. JR asked about the significance of the circle of
daggers...
A: Circles are always significant.
Q: (T) Well, the only way out of a circle of daggers is through the center... (L) Or up... (T) The daggers may not be pointed at him
to take him out but to limit him... or to move him to the center... (L) Once before you told...
A: Seven.
Q: Seven what?
A: Ask your question.
Q: Well, I was going to ask... once before you told us that the monarchy in England was going to come to a halt and that Charles
would never be king... what are the probabilities that one of the sons will?
A: Are you trying to coerce a response?
Q: No, I'm just trying to be sneaky!
A: Well, forget it!!!
Q: (T) Does this have to do with getting Charles... is this whole thing designed to get Charles to take charge the way he is
supposed to... to get his center back...
A: You are making a mountain where the universe sees a molehill.
Q: Okay, change gears: I read the other day that the word "Iscariot" means "from Sikarios," and this connects the Jesus story
directly to my Paran Sikarios... the Percys, piercing, PS, etc. Could you comment on the fact that Judas Iscariot was "from
Sikarios." Was he a member of the Paran Sikarios, the Assassini, a dagger man?
A: You are not to be told some things yet, because of your tendency to share before realizing the ramifications it can bring to your
doorstep.
Q: Anything else for tonight?
A: No, Goodbye.
