Canadian Orwellian world: Lockdowns, vaccines passports and more

Does Cananda have 3 Chinese run police stations?

Did Justin Trudeau say he has a deep admiration for Chines basic dictatorship?

 
Poilievre strikes again with his wit and prose. He shines light on the important issues at hand that are affecting the people of Canada the most. He makes the liberal side look silly for focusing so much on getting this dental healthcare bill (who knows what weird stuff is in there) passed rather than focusing on strategies that lessen inflation. Human vs anti-human values are displayed in broad daylight.

 
More from Danielle Smith. :headbanger: You can really see the smear the reporter is adding.


Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said she is cancelling a health consulting agreement involving the World Economic Forum — an agency at the centre of global domination conspiracy theories — because she won’t work with a group that talks about controlling governments.

“I find it distasteful when billionaires brag about how much control they have over political leaders,” Smith said at a news conference Monday after her new cabinet was sworn in.

“That is offensive … the people who should be directing government are the people who vote for them.

“Quite frankly, until that organization stops bragging about how much control they have over political leaders, I have no interest in being involved with them.”

The United Conservative Party premier said she is in lockstep with federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, who has stated he and his caucus will having nothing to do with the World Economic Forum.


The deal with Alberta Health Services sees the province share ideas with health researchers at Harvard University and the Mayo Clinic under the forum's umbrella.

The high-profile conference of global political and business leaders has been the focus of conspiracy theories from both sides of the political spectrum.

A decade ago, it was accused by the left-wing of conspiring to cut pensions and slash environmental programs.

It became the focus of attacks from the right during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the it promoted a “great reset,” calling for ideas on how to better organize global society post pandemic.

That started online conspiracy accusations, unproven and debunked, that the forum is fronting a global cabal of string-pullers exploiting the pandemic to dismantle capitalism and introduce damaging socialist systems and social control measures, such as forcing people to take vaccines with tracking chips.

Smith, on a livestream interview Friday, announced the deal was ending but didn't say why. At a news conference Saturday, she declined to respond to two questions on the forum.

The premier was asked by a reporter Monday if she has concerns about the forum “because you accept the online conspiracy theory that WEF is a front for a global cabal of world leaders bent on using the pandemic to destroy capitalism and install a socialist dysfunctional dystopia."

Smith declined to answer.

“I think it makes sense to make health decisions based on health experts," she said.

“The group (WEF) … and the person at the helm of it (Klaus Schwab) — I don’t think he’s a medical doctor. I don’t think he’s a nurse, and I don’t think he’s a paramedic and I don’t think he’s a health professional.

“I am going to be taking advice from our front-line nurses, doctors, paramedics and health professionals to fix the local problems that we have.”


NDP health critic Shannon Phillips said in a statement said Danielle Smith's "bizarre fixation" on the World Economic Forum does nothing to repair health care, create jobs or lower the cost of living for Alberta families.

"It is troubling for Albertans that Smith is more interested in dangerous conspiracy theories than helping families and businesses," Phillips said.

Political scientist Lori Williams at Calgary's Mount Royal University questioned why Smith would end "an agreement that has the potential to provide life-saving, health-improving information that could be of benefit for Albertans simply because you’re suspicious about one of the organizations involved?"

“That’s expertise she ought to respect, certainly critically assess to take advantage of, rather than cutting it off because of some vague suspicions about someone trying to control governments.”

Smith, a former journalist and radio talk show host, has espoused contrarian theories on alternative and mainstream media platforms dating back to 2003, when she questioned in a newspaper column whether smoking is indeed bad for your health.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Smith pushed for
later-debunked treatments such as the livestock dewormer ivermectin.

In July, she told a livestream audience she believes it’s within a person’s control to avoid getting early-stage cancer.

Earlier this month, on her first day as premier, she was criticized for saying those not vaccinated against are the most discriminated group she has seen in her lifetime.

Last week, she apologized for remarks made earlier this year that Ukraine accept neutrality in its war with Russia.

Three days ago there was this article:


Alberta Premier Danielle Smith slammed Alberta Health Services and scoffed at the WEF while talking about changes needed in her province’s health sector.

“I believe that Alberta Health Services is the source of a lot of the problems we have,” she told Western Standard.

“They signed some kind of a partnership with the World Economic Forum (WEF) right in the middle of the pandemic,” Smith said, just days into becoming the Premier of Alberta.

“Why in the world do we have anything to do with the World Economic Forum? That’s got to end.”

Smith also said the scientific committee at the AHS didn’t look at all of the science. Instead, they selectively chose the studies that fit their agenda.


“They want to make themselves permanent – I don’t think so,” Smith said.

“I don’t want to have a scientific committee advising me that isn’t willing to look at therapeutic options in the middle of a pandemic.”

Smith added it’s not a personal attack on anyone in particular, but overall, the experts failed Albertans.

“So I’m not interested in taking any advice from them.”

Smith further implied she plans on terminating the entire AHS board.


“We will have new leadership on the board.”

“There will be a removal of that board in a matter of time, probably sooner than later.”

Earlier this year, Alberta Chief Health Officer Deena Hinshaw admitted that Alberta Health Services reported non-ICU patients as ICU patients throughout the pandemic.

ICU numbers were used as a key point to justify lockdowns, vaccine mandates and vaccine passports in Alberta.
 
Police Destroy Need for Emergencies Act

Emergencies Act Inquiry / By Gord Parks / October 24, 2022

Listen to Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) Intelligence Officer Pat Morris and Acting Deputy Chief of Ottawa Police Services Patricia Ferguson destroy any need for the use of the Emergencies Measures Act invoked by the Trudeau govt.

No sabotage, espionage, foreign influence, no serious threats of violence towards any person or property to achieve any political, religious, or ideological objective.

"No credible intelligence," and "the lack of violent crime was shocking", according to OPP Intelligence Officer Pat Morris.

Admission by police that the seizing of assets was "useful but not necessary." (Testimony by Acting Deputy Chief of Ottawa Police Services, Patricia Ferguson).

https://rumble.com/v1pogi3-police-destroy-need-for-emergencies-act.html
 
Not being satisfied with the CTV article, I went on a search for the source interview which comes from the Q&A section of the "Swearing-In Ceremony for Alberta Cabinet Ministers" on CPAC. The section is only ~20 mins long starting at 50:22.

There was more then just the focus on the WEF, though now I can see how the questions were asked. I'd also like to say that, listening to Smith, she is so much more 'real' in comparison to listening to Trudeau or Freeland. There's not 'nothing' behind her words. Here's my partial transcription.


First section regarding the WEF.
50:22- (Question- Dean ?, ?) There is some unfinished business from Saturday. I think Albertans deserve an answer. As you know, you're the Premier and you can make health decisions but I think you'd agree there's a responsibility to explain to Albertans why you are making these decisions. W.E.F. You actually- it's not clickbait Premier, it's not entertainment, it's actually a health policy decision that you announced on Western Standard on Friday. AHS [Alberta Health Services] confirms there is a deal with WEF- it's very minor, it's an information sharing deal- but it does exist. And you're saying we are going to cancel that and anything to do with WEF policy decision. So, uh ... What concerns do you have then with WEF- and this is because you accept the online conspiracy theory that WEF is a front for a global cabal of world leaders bent on using the pandemic to destroy capitalism, install a socialist, dysfunctional dystopia? And I'm sorry if I didn't get the whole, uh, theory correct.

51:25- (Answer- Smith) Look (laughing), I think we should be taking our health care advice from Alberta healthcare expertise and that is what we should be focused on doing. I'm going to continue on working with with frontline professionals to solve that problems that we have HERE. And the problems that we have HERE are related to emergency services, ambulances, our emergency rooms as well as the inability to get a surgical initiatives at our rural hospitals. That's the advice I want to be taking right now and that's the focus that I want to have. And all the expertise we need for that is right here in Alberta.

52:02- (Follow-up Question) Where then, Premier, did the- You still haven't answered the question, Premier! You do not want anything to do with the WEF, and you have a well documented appetite for alternative media sources so if you're not going to answer the question, and you haven't done so, now, a third time, the question is "why won't Danielle Smith answer that question?" (Crosstalk) You believe this theory, and I think it matters that you explain whether you believe this WEF theory because it looks like you are actually basing health policy based on it.

52:36- (Answer) I think it makes sense to make health decisions based on health experts. The group that you mention and the person at the helm of it, I don't think he's a medical doctor. I don't think he's a nurse and I don't think he's a paramedic. And I don't think he's a health professional. As I've said, I am going to be taking advice from our frontline nurses, doctors, paramedics and health professionals to fix the local problems that we have. The local problems are related to how- they are related to ambulance service, they are related to emergency room service and they are related to not being able to get surgical initiatives and our surgical wait times list down. Those are very local issues, and so, I'm interested in talking to local people to solve local problems. That's my priority.

A question.
53:20- (Question- Arthur Green, Western Standard) Now that the Cabinet has been selected, what's next?

53:28- (Answer) [Stuff. One point that were mentioned is general work related to the upcoming provincial election in spring and the fact that she will be spending much time in Brooks/Medicine Hat because she has yet to win a seat in Parliament.]

NDP and the carbon tax, COP27 representation, hydrogen and Albertan LNG for Germany.
54:20- (Question- Rachel Emmanuel, True North) The NDP had their convention this weekend [and] passed a resolution calling on the UCP [United Conservative Party] government to work with the opposition on lowering grocery [cost?]. You obviously said at the UCP annual [...?] meeting, affordability was one of your caucuses key priorities. What's your response to the NDP resolution? [This woman has GOT to s l o w d o w n ! Geez Louise!]

54:37- (Answer) Well, I'd welcome Rachel Notley saying she rejects the 300% increase in the carbon tax. (vocal affirmations from cabinet members) That's the number one thing she could do. Because if she wants to bring affordability to the fore, then she can't be adding arbitrary costs on gasoline, diesel, electricity, home heating. She's supported her leader, Jagmeet Singh, at the federal level and the increase in the carbon tax. And so, quite frankly, I don't think that any of her statements on this have any credibility until she's prepared to argue against that.

55:05- (Follow-up Question) You also just spoke with the need to get mandate letters completed. I'm wondering if you'll commit to making those mandate letters public.

55:10- (Answer) Yes. [I'm not entirely sure what these letters are but the general sense I get from her answer is a commitment to being a more open government and making more current government information available to the public.]

55:37- (Question- ?, Calgary Herald) Premier, the COP27 meeting is coming up next month in Egypt. Will you be attending? Who in your cabinet will also be part of the Alberta delegation? And what is the message you are going to be taking there?

55:55- (Answer)
[5 delegates will be going and possibly some additional experts.]

56:23- (Follow up Question) Will you be attending? Just to be clear, will you be attending? And will you be willing to publicly, well, will your delegation be willing to publicly disagree with the Canadian delegation at the event on some of the issues such as the oil and gas emissions cap and those kinds of issues?

56:41- (Answer) This is the reason why we are sending our own delegation is I don't believe we are being properly represented by Environment Minister, Steven Guibeault. He is clearly hostile to our oil and gas sector. He's clearly trying to step into areas he's got no business regulating when it comes to the oil and gas cap. We have the tier program. So we do occupy that legislative space in putting a price on emissions. That price goes into supporting all of the technology that we want to develop. I also fear that the federal minister is not as enthusiastic about all forms of hydrogen as we are and we want to make sure that our hydrogen, with carbon capture, that the world knows that we are prepared to be moving forward aggressively on them. And we also want to be able to talk with the German delegation about how we might be able to get Alberta LNG into their market on a long-term basis. So, I just think that the federal government, and Steven Guibeault in particular, have demonstrated that he's not the advocate we need for Alberta so we will be sending a delegation in
[can?] ... [And also, Smith is not planning on going to COP27.]

Large gov. vs. small gov.
58:00- (Question- ?, CTV) Good morning Premier. You've said in the past about how government is too large and how you need to cut red tape now that you're Premier. So I'm just wondering, your cabinets' more then double [27] the size of the NDP's [12] when they were in power and still larger then Jason Kenney's. So, I'm just wondering if your views on having a large government have changed since then?

58:26- (Answer) [There is a restructuring happening and, although the cabinet got bigger, areas that were previously lumped together have been broken apart with a dedicated minister assigned to oversee that department.] "I feel like, over the years, there have been a number of areas that have just been smooshed into other ministries and not given the attention they deserve." ...

59:51- (Follow-up Question) Yeah. Generally, Premier, when you restructure you consolidate things and make sure that they're working efficiently here. Like, said, you seemed to have added more ministries. And when you talk about cost savings, obviously, uh y'know, MLA's receive more money for running a ministry [CAN $60,000/year per minister, I think]. You've also seemed to have gotten rid of the Ministry of Labour which has seen some backlash. And all this really seems like you are sending a message that you're rewarding MLA's that have supported you and essentially trying to buy the loyalty of those that didn't.

1:00:22- (Answer) Well, I disagree. One of the things I would say is Alberta Health Services is an example of the disaster you get into when you think that you can centralize and just have a single authority. I have a different world view. I believe a dedicated focus on a particular area and decentralization is the way that you get the efficiencies that you're seeking. If you centralize too much then you leave the power in the hands of civil servants to make the decisions and I want my ministers to be empowered to make decisions in their departments. So, I would say judge us by the overall size of government, looking at full time equivalents. And, in fact, you can tell those who are suggesting that we don't have a Minister of Labour we actually have two. ... [Minister of Skilled Trades and Professions and Minister of Jobs, Economy and Northern Development- "'Jobs' is another word for labour."]

The follow-up question was about the role of the police and mental health. I'm not sure but Smith's response might be a first for Canada.
1:02:05- (Question- Catherine Griwkowski, Alberta Today) Thanks for taking my question. One of the things you are doing to address the healthcare crisis you said you're basically going to get rid of the AHS management who made the decisions that they did. So, if that does not fix the healthcare crisis what is your next step?

1:02:26- (Answer) Well, you can ask me at that point. But I can tell you that we had a very constructive conversation this weekend. Minister Jason Copping and I are going to have another two hour briefing today and we are in alignment on the things that need to be done to address- very urgently- the issues that we know are going to make the most difference to patients. ...

1:03:22- (Follow-up) In your interview in the Western Standard last week you touched on the 'public safety' file and, maybe this is the mandate letter but, I'd like to kinda get some clarification. When you talk about the fact that the police are now responding largely to mental health calls, and you brought up the fact that there was a man in the throes of addiction who was killed by police, is the intent to have the police respond to these mental health calls? And if so, why not have social workers, who are trained in de-escalation already take on that work? Why police?

1:04:10- (Answer) Well, I'm struck by the fact that, in Calgary, there was a social worker who was killed by one of the people in her care and that is the reason why you always need to make sure that somebody who is responding to a dangerous call has the skills to know whether they have to respond with their soft skills in negotiation or whether they need to respond with harder skills in protection. So, to me, I have always felt, especially since I first got introduced to a program that's in San Antonio, that training officers to be able to have both of those skills is really the answer. This doesn't mean that we can't have additional personnel who go with them on calls. But, I think it's our police responders are, quite frankly, the ones who are going to almost always be the ones first on scene. And I'm just getting advice from those who are on the frontline that 50% or more of those calls are now mental health and addiction. It makes sense to me that we would be training them in an appropriate way to do that kind of response. So, Mike Ellis, who has been our mental health and addictions associate minister is, now, going to be our now going to be our minister for- or is now; I guess we just swore him in- is now our Minister for Public Safety and Emergency Services, and I'm really looking forward to working with him to see how we can build-out that additional training and focus.

Second section regarding the WEF.
1:05:33- (Michelle ?, ?) Hi Premier. I want to follow-up with what Dean was asking. I want to ask you a very simple question. What are your views on the World Economic Forum?

1:05:45- (Answer) (laughing) Well, well, I'm not a Young Global Leader of Tomorrow. I've never been to one of their events, and I look at Pierre Poilievre saying he doesn't intend on going to their events and doesn't intend to have his ministers involved in them either, and I take the same view.

1:06:02- (Follow-up) But why? You're still not explaining why, what you're views are on the World Economic Forum. Like, what do you find distasteful about it?

1:06:09- (Answer) I guess I find it distasteful when billionaires brag about how much control they have over political leaders, as the head of that organization has, and I think that is offensive. That people who should be directing government are the people who vote for them. And the people who vote for me and for my colleagues are people who live in Alberta and who are affected by our decisions. And so, quite frankly, until that organization stops bragging about how much control they have over political leaders, I have no interest in being involved with them. My focus is here, in Alberta, solving problems for Albertans, with the mandate from Albertans.

Wrapping up.
1:06:45- (Brianna Carson, Global Edmonton) I won't ask you about WEF, I promise. I want to ask you about Resolution 6, from the weekend on Saturday. It was the woman who talked about healthcare and getting rid of 700 overpaid healthcare workers.

(Smith) That failed. Right?

(Carson) It did fail.

(Smith) Yeah.

(Carson) And I wonder what message that sends to you, if plan to continue with that policy?

1:07:04- (Answer) Oh gosh. no. [There is a middle management layer that seems to be 'bloated' and Smith talks about downsizing that layer and moving those individuals down to a frontline position.]

1:07:52 (Follow-up) I also want to ask your new cabinet. No Minister for Housing, no mention of the status of women, a lot of concern about that. Can you speak to how those will be dealt with?

1:07:59 (Answer)
[Focused on seniors and long-term housing. As for the 'status of women', she's is a woman and there are four senior cabinet ministers who are women so there is no danger that women are not going to be represented.]
 
Thank you Benjamin, for taking the time to transcribe. I sure hope she has some top-notch security around her or she may end up "suicided".
I totally agree with you Bluefrye, I mean her words must be like manna to Canadian's ears after the draconian behaviour of Central Gov. over the last few years. We have become so skeptical we're dubious of anything we hear but she's saying all the right things. Is she just controlled opposition calming the plebs while other things are happening in other quarters, eg interfering with the farmers or pushing woke in the schools.

Time will tell.
 

OTTAWA — Cara Zwibel, Cara Zwibel, Director of Fundamental Freedoms for the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), made the following remarks today:

We are very pleased with today’s decision from the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal.

Canadians’ right to freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly should never be curtailed lightly.

Today, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal agreed that the Government’s exceptionally broad injunction went too far. It subjected every single person in Nova Scotia to unreasonable restrictions on fundamental rights in the absence of evidence that this was necessary or proportional.

This should be a strong signal to governments and courts across Canada that the Charter cannot be ignored when responding to urgent public policy issues.

The decision also reminds governments and lower courts that transparency and justification are required any time there is infringement of our fundamental freedoms.

The CCLA is grateful to Nasha Nijhawan of Nijhawan McMillan Barristers and Benjamin Perryman for their excellent pro bono representation in this matter.

Link to court case here.
 
Not sure if this fits with this thread as it's not about jabs or medical tyranny although it fits the totalitarianism theme in general.

Hardly a surprise to anyone here, however it's now official: sale of new handguns are prohibited in Canada.

Canada bans new handgun sales in latest gun control action

Oct 21 (Reuters) - Regulations prohibiting the sale, purchase or transfer of handguns within Canada took effect on Friday, as Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the measure builds on earlier efforts banning handgun imports.

The handgun freeze was announced in May alongside proposed legislation that would implement the nation's strongest gun control measures in 40 years as part of Trudeau's plan to tackle gun violence, his office said.
 
From Alberta, with a focus on Hinshaw (masking and children) through the courts legal interpretation:


Snip:
Justice Grant Dunlop in C.M. v. Alberta may have succeeded in invalidating every order issued by Chief Medical Officer of Health (CMOH) Deena Hinshaw throughout the pandemic. Because Justice Dunlop issued a broad declaration a particular interpretation of the Public Health Act based on the “slavishly,” “unreasonable” view the CMOH was not the decision-maker and that cabinet was the decision maker, every CMOH order issued throughout the pandemic was likely illegal on the basis of that decision.
 
Back
Top Bottom