Lone herbal witch
Jedi Master
Yes, he was always a bit violent. Even with journalists, he was always on the defensive and reacted to anyone who did not agree with him. A really strange man. He had a too high opinion of himself.
Canadian Orwellian world: Lockdowns, vaccines passports and more
- Thread starter Debra
- Start date
rognaill
Jedi
This is so interesting to read this, it is appreciated your candor from where you sit.
I think in many disciplines from Martial Arts to Yoga and perhaps even inner work type of groups/systems, it is the teacher and/or peer that whom "rubs us the wrong way" even at a foundational level, that makes the strongest impression on us. And certainly such people we would not typically find congruence with, which affords 'that' opportunity to self reflect and observe our own reactions that arise automatically.
I think it is well covered in these unknowable pages of research that just about all the earth's 'problem' lays in how we interpret cycles. Some see longer and grander cycles, others seem to focus on the shorter ones.
The blip of the tiger that has been caught by the tail that seems to be connected with cosmic level acuity, affords the biggest opportunity in our life times to see things different and perhaps a tad more objectively.
Benjamin
The Living Force
One effect that I thought of when I started hearing Trump talk about the '51st state' was of Canadians becoming more nationalistic, more patriotic for their country because the comment can be seen as a threat. I wondered if this was some kind of tactic. It could also be some kind of 'hurry-up' warning to get the border security situation strengthened (which I had forgotten about), the plan for which came out on Dec. 17. It's still being implemented.
If Trump is going to take over Canada, then what's the point of upgrading border security? Is it just a huge diversion plan and colossal waste of money? I don't think so. And what about Mexico? If he takes over Canada, he'll have to take over Mexico to solve the illegal immigrant problem.
Canada becoming several states (I don't think it would become just one big state) is not a new idea. Over maybe 20 years, I've heard positive feedback from several people who relished the idea of becoming American. Certainly I would save on shipping costs. My god are they expensive! There are other positives, but I do have many apprehensions as well. No doubt, the Texas of the North, Alberta, would become the gun capital of Canada, and I don't particularly want to be 'an American'. On the other hand, PP's legacy list as assembled by Timótheos is not a great outlook for Canada. Still, there's too much up-in-the-air.
Russian and Chinese ships totally surrounding us as if only Canada is under siege?
Geez, Trump. Give it a rest.
If Canada's annexation by the US comes with a "comet discount", I'm all for it. 
unkl brws
Dagobah Resident
I wonder if Trump will promote the North American Union? This issue floats to the surface from time to time and doesn't seem to completely go away. This is an article from SOTT.net on the DNA;
Biden signs onto 'Declaration of North America (DNA)' with Canada and Mexico: Is the planned North American Union making a comeback?
Joe Biden met last week in Mexico City with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador for the 10th North American Leaders' Summit. The three leaders signed onto a document that appears to be a...
www.sott.net
Okay, seems he's getting more serious. He said he doesn't care what Poilievre says about Canada's sovereignty - he would use economic force (not military) to acquire Canada. It's all hypothetical at this point, but it looks like it's turning from joking to not joking.
There is a precedent for annexing or integrating territories recently - Crimea, and the four former Ukrainian territories integrated into Russia. This was done via referendum and massive popular support. If Trump tries to do this by 'economic force' alone, then we can actually start calling him a dictator.
That said, Emperors and dictators aren't all bad per se. There's Caesar, of course. Also, Napoleon in may ways liberated Europe. I think Europe could use another Napoleon right about now, to clear out all the psychopaths, pedophiles, rape gangs, and illegal immigrants. That's maybe a bit of a simplistic dream, and Napoleon's campaign was, like everything in 3D, a mix of dark and light - but it's arguable that his institutions and policies based on the new Idea liberte, egalite, fraternite were better than the stagnation of the entrenched rule of the royals and church.
Anyways, we're sure as hell in need of a new Idea here in Canuckistan due to our own entrenched rulers! Under Trump, that new Idea would be MAGA - stop the woke agenda, make drugs illegal again and get tough on crime, stop the green agenda and invest in manufacturing and resource extraction, cut taxes and gov't fat, and take the immigration bull by the horns, etc. All of which would stabilize the domestic social structure, in preparation to more directly confront BRICS+ via trade war. These policies could also be good for the military-industrial complex as the PTB tries to maintain global hegemony also by ramping up the war economy.
I can see the faces of CDN patriots now - torn between their love of Canada as they knew it, and their love of Trump as King of the Populist Right...
There is a precedent for annexing or integrating territories recently - Crimea, and the four former Ukrainian territories integrated into Russia. This was done via referendum and massive popular support. If Trump tries to do this by 'economic force' alone, then we can actually start calling him a dictator.
That said, Emperors and dictators aren't all bad per se. There's Caesar, of course. Also, Napoleon in may ways liberated Europe. I think Europe could use another Napoleon right about now, to clear out all the psychopaths, pedophiles, rape gangs, and illegal immigrants. That's maybe a bit of a simplistic dream, and Napoleon's campaign was, like everything in 3D, a mix of dark and light - but it's arguable that his institutions and policies based on the new Idea liberte, egalite, fraternite were better than the stagnation of the entrenched rule of the royals and church.
Anyways, we're sure as hell in need of a new Idea here in Canuckistan due to our own entrenched rulers! Under Trump, that new Idea would be MAGA - stop the woke agenda, make drugs illegal again and get tough on crime, stop the green agenda and invest in manufacturing and resource extraction, cut taxes and gov't fat, and take the immigration bull by the horns, etc. All of which would stabilize the domestic social structure, in preparation to more directly confront BRICS+ via trade war. These policies could also be good for the military-industrial complex as the PTB tries to maintain global hegemony also by ramping up the war economy.
I can see the faces of CDN patriots now - torn between their love of Canada as they knew it, and their love of Trump as King of the Populist Right...
Time for the Amero? The Great (American) Reset?
North American monetary union - Wikipedia
Here's my thoughts on the situation, without the insight of a crystal ball. It's all a contrived political situation.
All a sudden Freeland, suddenly stabs Trudeau in the back on Twitter...Really! One of his most loyal sycophants, who has no financial acumen, she is just a mouthpiece. it has recently been disclosed that Mark Carney was the mastermind of Trudeau's financial policies. All three are connected to the WEF.
Whatever one thinks or believes about Pierre Pollivieve, he is the only viable option for the electorate to quote "Hope and Change"...Sounds like a well worn mantra in political circles, from the start of the 21st century and beyond...
Trudeau has stated he will resign. I think I heard this, and this is anecdotal, that in the so called liberal manifesto. He cannot be replaced unless there is a leadership race to replace him...Hm, interesting.
In all the Canadian polls regarding the next government after election, it will almost certainly be a
Conservative majority government (possibly, who knows at the end of the day).
Cureently, the Block (French Canada is polling as opposition, seem strange to me considering that Quebec only has one interest to keep the oligarchs in power and keep the tansfer payments comming from the federal government). Lots of poverty in the rural areas of Quebec...One wonders where all the transfer payments end up.
So now we are entering the juggling and clown performances in the media, who will be the leader of the liberal party of Canada. Freeland in the lead, then comes Carney, and not so new kid on the block a resurrected blast from the past in BC Christie Clark, with her disastrous policies for BC, opening up the way for Jack Layton...well respected, again offering hope and promise...His unfortunate demise opened up the final nail in the coffin for BC with abysmal leadership of the NDP in BC.
So by my recooking, it is a race between Freeland and Carney...I suspect Freeland will win. She will lead the party after a loss to the Conservative party win. In six monthes of liberal party leadership she comes under the leadership party review (given her past performances, could be troublesome) they copuld give her another six months, who knows. All the while Carney is waiting in the wings, to grab the prize Prime minister of Canada...a Full blown WEF country...Is it fantasy, who knows. As the C's say wait and see.
I suspect that when Pollievere becomes Prime Minister of Canada in the next election, all the hounds of hell will be on his back, a simliar situation to Trump
Just my 2 cents
All a sudden Freeland, suddenly stabs Trudeau in the back on Twitter...Really! One of his most loyal sycophants, who has no financial acumen, she is just a mouthpiece. it has recently been disclosed that Mark Carney was the mastermind of Trudeau's financial policies. All three are connected to the WEF.
Whatever one thinks or believes about Pierre Pollivieve, he is the only viable option for the electorate to quote "Hope and Change"...Sounds like a well worn mantra in political circles, from the start of the 21st century and beyond...
Trudeau has stated he will resign. I think I heard this, and this is anecdotal, that in the so called liberal manifesto. He cannot be replaced unless there is a leadership race to replace him...Hm, interesting.
In all the Canadian polls regarding the next government after election, it will almost certainly be a
Conservative majority government (possibly, who knows at the end of the day).
Cureently, the Block (French Canada is polling as opposition, seem strange to me considering that Quebec only has one interest to keep the oligarchs in power and keep the tansfer payments comming from the federal government). Lots of poverty in the rural areas of Quebec...One wonders where all the transfer payments end up.
So now we are entering the juggling and clown performances in the media, who will be the leader of the liberal party of Canada. Freeland in the lead, then comes Carney, and not so new kid on the block a resurrected blast from the past in BC Christie Clark, with her disastrous policies for BC, opening up the way for Jack Layton...well respected, again offering hope and promise...His unfortunate demise opened up the final nail in the coffin for BC with abysmal leadership of the NDP in BC.
So by my recooking, it is a race between Freeland and Carney...I suspect Freeland will win. She will lead the party after a loss to the Conservative party win. In six monthes of liberal party leadership she comes under the leadership party review (given her past performances, could be troublesome) they copuld give her another six months, who knows. All the while Carney is waiting in the wings, to grab the prize Prime minister of Canada...a Full blown WEF country...Is it fantasy, who knows. As the C's say wait and see.
I suspect that when Pollievere becomes Prime Minister of Canada in the next election, all the hounds of hell will be on his back, a simliar situation to Trump
Just my 2 cents
Forgot to mention the nickname for NDP leader Sell out Jagmeet Singh, who has now secured his 2.7 (at last count) million government pension, is now in the race as the official opposition party against the conservatives. What a wonderful reality show for the population that are aware of the reality of the Canadian shit show politics has become, it's a real primer and instruction into the world of political ponerology and psychopathology.
Freeland strikes me as a very ambitious woman, not accepting being sidelined and demoted by Trudeau and the face loss that would have entailed, and instead opting out of the executive branch altogether in a very public denouncement of the liberal leadership.
I think she has better political instincts than to take the reins of the party just to charge into a guaranteed defeat at the ballot box, especially one she’s in part responsible for. I see it as more likely she will try for the leadership once the conservatives are already in power, and just let someone else fall on the landmine in the next election. Similar to how finance minister Paul Martin stepped into the PM role just for Stephen Harper to kick the liberals out. We’ll see though.
Hmm! Forgot to add the interaction of the cosmos? March 22nd could this have some influence. Who knows, but bears some consideration...Numbers and symbology rule the dark occult world. Coincidence, this so called resignation is dated January 6th. Now another conspiracy theory started.
Have to say, I'm waiting for John Carter to scribe a few Ottawa post prorogation thoughts, yet one can read The Prussia of North America from back in November - it was fun:
barsoom.substack.com
Snip
You have the right of that, and she likes the controlled spot light. Noticed even Pollivieve, in that 2 hr. scrum with Peterson - I had a hard time with that, that 'here is what I'm going to do' scrum, with plenty of axe the tax slogans (the guy can talk). Had also a hard time with Peterson not asking the right questions, and where Pollivieve, more or less, avoided referring to Freeland at all, yet was fierce on the Goldman Sachs boy, Carney - and rightly so (IMO).
Justin is done, good riddance, yet as his half-brother Kemper said, Justin had many Wormtongues in his ear (which appealed to his reflection in the pond), and those tongues will still be exactly were they are behind the scenes.
So, with Freeland sidelined, albeit with her victimhood speech of withdrawal, perhaps she will do the unexpected and simply cross the floor into the open arms of the liberals in blue suites, and would that not be grand for some. Christina Alexandra Freeland (CAF) is simply protected class. After all, the taxpayer cash to the Ukies in Kyiv must go on, and the clappers sit on both sides of the house.
Whatever happens with CAF, she is far from exiting stage. She will have the usual complexes to support, including staying in her constituents good graces (not to mention that the British and American alphabets agencies might well be pleased if she stayed).
Hunka was not in Parliament for nothing.
Yes, admittedly, I'm being a little jaded, so one must look province to province to see the cracks and alignments - see people and their provinces rich histories, their astounding environs as well as their hard struggles. I'm all for Canadians to truly start talking with each other again, as there is a lot of character amongst the fickleness. It will take some time, if ever, for each coming out from such a ponerised society, but needs must and wish Canadians good luck.
Last words to John:
The Prussia of North America
For the Canadian nation to save itself from euthanization by liberal multiculturalism, it needs to see itself for what it really is - reactionary, traditionalist, illiberal, and martial.
barsoom.substack.com
Snip
A nation culturally paralyzed by an intractable identity crisis is a godsend to a revolutionary party. If a people don’t know who they are anymore, all you need to do is swoop in and tell them. Erasing the old symbols that remind them of who they used to be meets with little resistance, and you can easily replace them with new symbols that represent what you want them to be, instead. It’s no accident that, as the national identity crisis was at its most consciously acute, Canada adopted a new flag in 1965, at the initiative of a Liberal government. The old Red Ensign displayed both the Union Jack and the Canadian coat of arms, tribal heraldry that served as a reminder of the British, English, Scottish, Irish, and French origins of the Canadian nation; the well-known maple leaf erased all of that.
The national anthem4 wasn’t adopted until 1980, around the same time that the liberal principles of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (which does not include a right to bear arms) was enacted (1982), which was the same year that July 1st, Dominion Day, commemorating Canada’s birth in 1867 as a Dominion of the British Empire, was renamed as the nondescript and historically mute Canada Day. All of those innovations in the 1980s happened under Liberal prime minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, the (alleged) father of the current prime minister.
The invariant vector of these changes has been to progressively deracinate Canadians, concealing them from their past, leaving them adrift in an eternal present in which their only guiding principles are whatever the revolutionary liberals say they are.
You even see this at the municipal level. Toronto’s old motto was “Industry, Integrity, Intelligence”. These virtues were exchanged in 1999 for “Diversity Our Strength”. The jokes write themselves on that one.
In the wake of the newest addition to Canada’s ersatz national antimyth, the supposed schoolocaust of First Nations children in the residential schools (not a single body has yet been produced, by the way), the iconoclastic imperative has expanded to include the arson of over a hundred churches (some of the schools, near which no bodies have been found, were run by the church, you see) and defacement and removal of statues of Canada’s first prime minister, Sir John A. MacDonald (he was, you understand, a racist).
You have the right of that, and she likes the controlled spot light. Noticed even Pollivieve, in that 2 hr. scrum with Peterson - I had a hard time with that, that 'here is what I'm going to do' scrum, with plenty of axe the tax slogans (the guy can talk). Had also a hard time with Peterson not asking the right questions, and where Pollivieve, more or less, avoided referring to Freeland at all, yet was fierce on the Goldman Sachs boy, Carney - and rightly so (IMO).
Justin is done, good riddance, yet as his half-brother Kemper said, Justin had many Wormtongues in his ear (which appealed to his reflection in the pond), and those tongues will still be exactly were they are behind the scenes.
So, with Freeland sidelined, albeit with her victimhood speech of withdrawal, perhaps she will do the unexpected and simply cross the floor into the open arms of the liberals in blue suites, and would that not be grand for some. Christina Alexandra Freeland (CAF) is simply protected class. After all, the taxpayer cash to the Ukies in Kyiv must go on, and the clappers sit on both sides of the house.
Whatever happens with CAF, she is far from exiting stage. She will have the usual complexes to support, including staying in her constituents good graces (not to mention that the British and American alphabets agencies might well be pleased if she stayed).
Hunka was not in Parliament for nothing.
Yes, admittedly, I'm being a little jaded, so one must look province to province to see the cracks and alignments - see people and their provinces rich histories, their astounding environs as well as their hard struggles. I'm all for Canadians to truly start talking with each other again, as there is a lot of character amongst the fickleness. It will take some time, if ever, for each coming out from such a ponerised society, but needs must and wish Canadians good luck.
Last words to John:
David Krayden gives his take on Trudeau resigning. He's concerned Parliment has been dismissed so nothing will get done and Justin will be around for another 4 months. Is the Biden affect coming to Canada, heard someone say that awhile back. I like hearing Davids take on things.
