Canadian Orwellian world: Lockdowns, vaccines passports and more

Influencer Lauren Southern claims CSIS, Canadian intelligence, is pressuring her to work for them
Good for her for recording it. Here's her full tweet:

Intelligence agents showed up at my door late last year. I told them to leave.

They proceeded to call me from anonymous numbers repeatedly. Contacted my gym. Told me they wouldn’t go away unless I “built a relationship with them” as an asset. “Your audience will never know”

Returned to speak with me multiple times claiming they were giving me “last chances” before they threw me to the wolves. They told me that the courts wouldn’t care if I was actually guilty or not. That essentially someone had to take the fall and I could ensure it wasn’t me. It was repeatedly implied to me that: “You’re smart you know it’s not what’s true that matters it’s the perception”

I was made to believe there was a potential arrest coming. Made to believe I could never travel to the US again without being arrested by the FBI. Made to believe I might not be around to see my child grow up. None of these things were true. I can enter the US without issue. I was never arrested. I did nothing wrong.

I was psychologically manipulated for months in an attempt to turn me into a government asset. We have one party consent in Canada, and I believe it is in the public interest for people to understand how this works, as I know I’m not the only one. I have nothing against the agent. He was just given instructions and a job. But I have no doubt if his job were to destroy my life and try to jail me based on “perception” not “truth” he would do it. I’m just doing my job as well by publishing this. These are just a few excerpts cut from hours of conversations to give people an idea of our conversations:
 
This weekly newsletter

led me to this topic:


Baxter Dmitry October 27, 2025
According to a recent publication in the Journal of Death and Dying, Health Canada has unveiled a plan for “savings” that is as brutal as it is unprecedented. As detailed by Kelsi Sheren, the analysis reveals that from 2027 to 2047, the government is projected to save a staggering $1.273 trillion—not through innovation or improved healthcare—but through death.

More than 14 million Canadians, according to the data, will be culled by Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) instead of receiving palliative or mental health care. (Current Canada population: +- 39-41 million)

Over nine million are expected to be the elderly—our parents, grandparents, the generation that built the country. Another four million are projected to be those struggling with mental illness or suicidal thoughts—people who should be receiving compassion and treatment, not a government-funded lethal injection. Three hundred thousand are forecast to be Indigenous, continuing a centuries-long cycle of state-sanctioned extermination masked as “care.” The remainder are the forgotten—the addicts, the poor, the homeless. Those who once fell through the cracks are now being deliberately pushed through them.

What we’re witnessing is not compassion—it’s a depopulation agenda dressed up as healthcare reform. For years, the elites have spoken in euphemisms about “sustainability,” “resource allocation,” and “reducing human impact.”
But behind the sterile language lies the same philosophy that drove eugenics programs in the last century: that some lives are no longer worth the cost of keeping alive. This is the new face of population control—clean, clinical, and taxpayer-funded.

This is what Bill Gates spoke about years ago when he calmly explained that “death panels” will be necessary to keep healthcare systems “sustainable.” The idea was dismissed as a dystopian conspiracy at the time.

But today, we’re seeing those exact mechanisms quietly installed—committees, guidelines, and cost-benefit analyses that decide who lives and who dies in the name of fiscal efficiency. The architects of this system call it mercy. In truth, it is the economic rationalization of death.

And it’s not stopping with Canada. Similar conversations are happening across the West, from the UK’s National Health Service to U.S. think tanks advocating for “end-of-life cost optimization.” The narrative is spreading—one that frames euthanasia as empowerment, while burying the fact that the system itself created the despair in the first place. When people are crushed by inflation, isolation, and mental collapse, the state arrives not with help, but with a syringe.


Link to the journal: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00302228251323299



Same topic on X
 
Back
Top Bottom