Canadian Orwellian world: Lockdowns, vaccines passports and more

Influencer Lauren Southern claims CSIS, Canadian intelligence, is pressuring her to work for them
Good for her for recording it. Here's her full tweet:

Intelligence agents showed up at my door late last year. I told them to leave.

They proceeded to call me from anonymous numbers repeatedly. Contacted my gym. Told me they wouldn’t go away unless I “built a relationship with them” as an asset. “Your audience will never know”

Returned to speak with me multiple times claiming they were giving me “last chances” before they threw me to the wolves. They told me that the courts wouldn’t care if I was actually guilty or not. That essentially someone had to take the fall and I could ensure it wasn’t me. It was repeatedly implied to me that: “You’re smart you know it’s not what’s true that matters it’s the perception”

I was made to believe there was a potential arrest coming. Made to believe I could never travel to the US again without being arrested by the FBI. Made to believe I might not be around to see my child grow up. None of these things were true. I can enter the US without issue. I was never arrested. I did nothing wrong.

I was psychologically manipulated for months in an attempt to turn me into a government asset. We have one party consent in Canada, and I believe it is in the public interest for people to understand how this works, as I know I’m not the only one. I have nothing against the agent. He was just given instructions and a job. But I have no doubt if his job were to destroy my life and try to jail me based on “perception” not “truth” he would do it. I’m just doing my job as well by publishing this. These are just a few excerpts cut from hours of conversations to give people an idea of our conversations:
 
This weekly newsletter

led me to this topic:


Baxter Dmitry October 27, 2025
According to a recent publication in the Journal of Death and Dying, Health Canada has unveiled a plan for “savings” that is as brutal as it is unprecedented. As detailed by Kelsi Sheren, the analysis reveals that from 2027 to 2047, the government is projected to save a staggering $1.273 trillion—not through innovation or improved healthcare—but through death.

More than 14 million Canadians, according to the data, will be culled by Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) instead of receiving palliative or mental health care. (Current Canada population: +- 39-41 million)

Over nine million are expected to be the elderly—our parents, grandparents, the generation that built the country. Another four million are projected to be those struggling with mental illness or suicidal thoughts—people who should be receiving compassion and treatment, not a government-funded lethal injection. Three hundred thousand are forecast to be Indigenous, continuing a centuries-long cycle of state-sanctioned extermination masked as “care.” The remainder are the forgotten—the addicts, the poor, the homeless. Those who once fell through the cracks are now being deliberately pushed through them.

What we’re witnessing is not compassion—it’s a depopulation agenda dressed up as healthcare reform. For years, the elites have spoken in euphemisms about “sustainability,” “resource allocation,” and “reducing human impact.”
But behind the sterile language lies the same philosophy that drove eugenics programs in the last century: that some lives are no longer worth the cost of keeping alive. This is the new face of population control—clean, clinical, and taxpayer-funded.

This is what Bill Gates spoke about years ago when he calmly explained that “death panels” will be necessary to keep healthcare systems “sustainable.” The idea was dismissed as a dystopian conspiracy at the time.

But today, we’re seeing those exact mechanisms quietly installed—committees, guidelines, and cost-benefit analyses that decide who lives and who dies in the name of fiscal efficiency. The architects of this system call it mercy. In truth, it is the economic rationalization of death.

And it’s not stopping with Canada. Similar conversations are happening across the West, from the UK’s National Health Service to U.S. think tanks advocating for “end-of-life cost optimization.” The narrative is spreading—one that frames euthanasia as empowerment, while burying the fact that the system itself created the despair in the first place. When people are crushed by inflation, isolation, and mental collapse, the state arrives not with help, but with a syringe.


Link to the journal: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00302228251323299



Same topic on X
 
Baxter Dmitry October 27, 2025
According to a recent publication in the Journal of Death and Dying, Health Canada has unveiled a plan for “savings” that is as brutal as it is unprecedented. As detailed by Kelsi Sheren, the analysis reveals that from 2027 to 2047, the government is projected to save a staggering $1.273 trillion—not through innovation or improved healthcare—but through death.

Had read a report from the Can-gov (think from their procurements site), who had commissioned a study of all this. Thought I had lost sight of it, yet it may be this one you have shown in the article - the one being cited.

These are report sections that immediatly tell one, all they need to know on their economic/technocratic thinking:

Conventional Per-Person Cost of Administering MAiD​

Attempted Suicides

Mentally ill

Homeless (will quote this one)

...In non-voluntary scenarios, it is assumed that all individuals from the specified groups would opt for MAiD. In voluntary scenarios, based on a study by Eynan et al. (2002) (Eynan et al., 2002), 34% of homeless individuals have attempted suicide, and this proportion is used to estimate those who would voluntarily choose MAiD
Just from memory, this was all factored into age groups, comorbidities, mental health (a big one) and the savings that could be realized.

They are using numbers such as 225,000 Homeless, or soon to be. Further down come the calculations:

The annual budget allocated for homelessness programs at Infrastructure Canada is CAD $561 million (Chomeless,total = CAD $561 million) (Segel-Brown, 2024) so...

Retired Elderly

Indigenous Population

In the non-voluntary scenario, given that the poverty rate for indigenous individuals was 11.8% as of 2020 (Fpoverty,ind = 11.8%) (S. C. Government of Canada, 2022), it is estimated that this percentage of the total indigenous population may be affected by MAiD.

Looking at this further, like the homeless, the capital output is much higher - so despite what the gov. propaganda says, they don't want to pay it - MAiD to the rescue (not that it does not have a place if careful guardrails are placed around it):

The Government of Canada has forecasted to spend CAD$32 billion per year on indigenous people in Canada for year 2024-25 (D. of F. Canada, 2024, p. 6). The cost incurred by the Canadian Government on indigenous population per capita is given by:

(25)
The potential savings from MAiD can be calculated from the following equations...
It should be noted that this is a conservative estimate because it only considers the extra costs for indigenous citizens, not the costs for all other citizens that the indigenous citizens could use as well.
1762929996286.png


And there it is, their cost/benefit analysis. That is how these groups think of Canadians.
 
My parents are getting older and will eventually lose autonomy and need help... What will I do then? Placing them in a CHSLD (government sponsored retired housing) = mistreatment and a death sentence. They both know it and hope to die before reaching that stage...
Yes, the desperate situation for us all at this time. I hear you:shock:
I hope your parents will have another solution brought to them when it is their time. Not all seniors are bound for the "retirement living" of our generous government programs....It is those who have restricted mobility we should be worrying about....
My husband had a stroke 2 months ago. In a wheelchair now and cannot walk. He now requires a pacemaker as he had developed AFib while under treatment. I'm truly worried about the cost of "nursing home" for him as we are on a tight budget and whatever he may need in the future would be my cost. So yeah, I hear you! I hope he won't be subjected to any disparaging behavior or even suggestions about killing him off if he gets in a dire situation.
They rob us as much as they can our lifetime and then they demand solutions that are unhumanitarian while robbing us even more! What a conundrum situation we live in! I will pray for your parents! I sincerely hope your parents won't live through this at all.
All the best to you, Meadow-Wind.:hug2:
 
Indeed, it's no fun getting old in this country anymore, especially when you're alone and have no family. I live in senior housing now. Saskatchewan seems to be one of the better provinces. The town I'm in has a lot of retirees. I've met several people in the building who also came here from Ontario (you know, the centre of the known universe - or is that the Great Toronto?!?!). With a 4-8 year wait for senior housing in Ontario, this was my best option. So the government takes 50% (if you'r lucky) of your income in taxes when you're working and then when you're no longer of any use, just put us down. FWIW
 
Back
Top Bottom