Candace Owens: From TPUSA Conservative Activist to Powerful Voice for Truth

Candace's episode for Wednesday follows up on the one from yesterday:

Ep. 302
Epstein's text messages mention Emmanuel Macron's boyfriend, more inconsistencies appear in Erika's story, and we look more into the story of Gilgamesh and how it ties in with Epstein and the elites.
00:00 - Start.
00:58 - Gilgamesh, Epstein, and the elites.
21:10 - Erika's lies and misrepresentations.
26:54 - Tip on who Erika was with on the 10th.
31:48 - Macron in the Epstein files.
35:05 - Final thoughts and comments.
 
Candace's episode for Wednesday follows up on the one from yesterday
I wish she'd focus her Kirk-related investigation on Harpole and Flood rather than EK. Of course it doesn't help that EK has been caught lying and otherwise behaved strangely for a grieving widow. That seems to have taken Owens' focus away from the real conspirators. Hoping she circles back to those guys in the future.
 
I think she's particularly incensed at Erika because she was his wife. The person who was supposedly closest to him, the one who should be fired up and doing the job Candace is doing. Each lie, big and small, is to her another betrayal of Charlie and everything Candace believed about their relationship.
 
fwiw , worries me more that she is going through her " historical analysis " through a bible focused outlook
After decades of leery biblical education (just a gut feeling) I think that Candace will resonate with so many Americans in trying to tie Nimrod to these Satanic overlords. She's trying to get the US to waken up and is using everything they have all been schooled in to show what lies beneath.
She can only work with what she's got but trying to pull on many strings and get them to line up is a task very very few of us would be hard pushed to do in front of Millions.
Trying to get deeper and closer as she goes with her various leads may get her nearer to Harpole and Flood but as yet she's not got a connection that she can share. Maybe she never will but if she can get to a place where she can discredit TPUSA in the eyes of the population of the USA she will have done them a service.
Take away what the C's have told us over the years and could any of us do what she is doing?. I think not.
 
If there´s a significant overlap between the 70% humans that don´t take at face value " the narrative " of CK´s assassination and the current public image of the "merry widow" , imo safe to say that tpusa is all bought and paid for with dollars but nothing else for support , as somewhat of a confirmation ( again imo ) , even Alex jones came out with public ad hominem attacks on Mrs. Candace shortly after the Fort Huachaca meetings became public knowledge. Even King groyper schizo Nicko posted further mindless attacks on Mrs. Candace , guess those invisible hands have been pushing his buttons if that´s what is motivating him .
 
I think she's particularly incensed at Erika because she was his wife. The person who was supposedly closest to him, the one who should be fired up and doing the job Candace is doing. Each lie, big and small, is to her another betrayal of Charlie and everything Candace believed about their relationship.

Agree. To me, it is VERY sad that Charlie's wife didn't really love him. I suspect she is one of those women who is as deep as a thimble.
 
She can only work with what she's got but trying to pull on many strings and get them to line up is a task very very few of us would be hard pushed to do in front of Millions.

True, and one suspects she may have a lot given her associations, yet to come right out with them probably requires much more verifiable crosschecking, and things are kept in reserve. If only a fifth of the connections that she has brought to light are true, its very bad indeed, and now the scope grows exponentially, which comes with risk not to be discounted.

She has poked the hornets nest to be sure, and it is one thing to do what very much needs doing, and quite another to see who officially in our times will do nothing about it (that is what many people are seeing, the whole evil premeditate mess opening up).
 
In one of the last week's episode ( BAAL SO HARD ) She made some curious comment about these Israeli Satanists ( I related it as Ashkanazi Jews) orgins as Turkish pagan gypsies that converted to Judiasim (around 8th century around ) and created their own Khazaria.
session-24-june-2023
(seek10) The C’s mentioned gypsies are gene spliced with an alien race, humanoid and Atlantean drone workers. Did this happen in the Indus Valley civilization region and period?

A: No, it was much earlier. Refugees migrated there.

Q:
(seek10) If the Indus Valley civilization peoples are into genetic modification, is the current Indian tendency for rituals the remnant of it through the Dravidian lineage?

A: Yes, but see previous answer also.

When I asked the above question, I have a specific threads of thought.
  • C's confirmed that 540 AD (or 564 AD) event that burned the rome and triggered dark ages also impacted animals in India.
    • That is used by religous Brahmins of Hinduism used against Buddhists( due to the powerful Mauryan patronage). B.R. Ambedkar who was trying to make sense of linkage (he had been hearing from un touchabilities across the country) between untouchability and beef eating hypothesized that it is part of cunning and brutal religious ploy. For me, that is too far fetched. But,
      • This reminded me BBC Survivor's series we watched long back. In the first season, when plague hit, any body outside comes to a house or city, they were asked to live in a detached room/place for a few days, before they were allowed to enter the main house. What if this is what happened in India at that time and that short term measure became political untouchability ( after 540 AD) and they rewrote it as a Upper caste theology ( much twisted version of much older ManuSmriti). For my surprise, C's seems to agree with it. Naturally, people are not stupid and it is highly unlikely they followed those non-sensical rules for long. But these hierarchial social structure mixed in theology are from North India and naturally fizzle out, which it did. But, this is where South Indian Bhakthi movement ( freedom of worship of choice) came to rescue.
        • South Indian Bhakthi movement ( freedom of worship of choice) became popular all across India as a alternative to Brahminical theology. Interestingly this spread of Bhakthi movement is facilitated by Sankaracharya ( who only lived for 30 odd years, travelled all across India and installed his own centers) winning religious competitions over Buddhists.
        • Another effect is ( it is my hypothesis or thought process at that time), these Gysies ( very small group from North West Indian state of Rajastan and Punjab) fed up with this brahminical non-sense and migrated out of India in 2 phases one around 800 AD and another one around 1100 AD. they moved first to Iran and migrated to other Western regions after that. Given that Indus valley icons has some strange animals and it is created by lizards, I thought they are into Genetic experiments (as a 4D STS oursourcing - STS works through least effort path).
          • But, C's were saying that Gypsies were brought to Indus valley ( 4000 BCE - 1100 BCE) and this genetic mixing might have happened much before 4000 BCE. Cayce says Atlanteans are into weird genetic experiments. Probably these are Atlanteans or most probably Post YD phenomenon ( as only 19 million out of 6 billion survived).
Is there a connection between Ashkanazi jews and Gypsies as Candace mentioning? I am not sure of the source of her claim, but thought interesting. Here we are assuming all 'Gypsies' are same. Some times unrelated people also can also be labelled as Gypsies due to social dynamics ( aka "food fight" politics and war propaganda).

If this is true, We can know why Ashkanazi Jews ( as Gypsies - gypsies are gene spliced with an alien race, humanoid and Atlantean drone workers ) are "chosen" to be patsies under the portal of the middle east to control rest of the world.

If Gypsies were brought into Indus valley ( large area from Afghanistan to North West India) from outside ( i.e. from the Western side), these Gypsies must have existed else where too. If so, why genetic studies only showing Indian origin? May be genetic findings are only part of the story, not the whole story? Hard to know, but thought interesting.
 
Back
Top Bottom